11/06/2024 | Press release | Distributed by Public on 11/06/2024 19:20
In September, California Governor Gavin Newsom signed SB 707, the Responsible Textile Recovery Act of 2024, establishing a statewide extended producer responsibility (EPR) program for textiles. Under the new legislation, producers (i.e., manufacturers, brand owners, and distributors) of apparel and textile articles sold in California are required to form and join a producer responsibility organization (PRO) and create a plan for collecting, repairing, sorting, and recycling these products.
As the first EPR textile program in the nation, SB 707 aims to minimize the generation of waste, greenhouse gases, and environmental and public health impacts and to promote upcycling and recycling. Although this legislation is new for the U.S. textiles industry, EPR laws have already been enacted for other industries, such as plastic packaging, electronics, and pharmaceuticals, as well as for textiles in other countries, like the Netherlands.
Under the new law, producers of apparel and textile articles must join a PRO approved by the Department of Resources Recycling and Recovery (CalRecycle). To be considered for approval, the PRO is required to submit an application to CalRecycle that must include provisions for free and convenient collection, sorting, repair, and recycling of covered products, as well as education and outreach to consumers.
Other critical provisions of the bill include:
The Responsible Textile Recovery Act of 2024 could significantly impact apparel and textile producers by introducing steep financial and operational obligations without ensuring adequate support for complex recycling needs. To comply, companies will need to navigate technical inefficiencies like sorting, processing, and assessing the performance of recycled materials, which may require specialized guidance to effectively evaluate material contaminants and mechanical properties.
To meet other regulatory requirements, assessing recycled materials for emerging chemicals of concern, like per- and polyfluoroalkyl substances (PFAS) and bisphenol-S, could require costly testing supported by specific expertise to interpret results. The law also includes provisions for developing new technologies and materials to reduce microplastic emissions, which requires further in-depth knowledge of a rapidly developing field with non-standardized analytical methodologies.