Pregnant People Might Not Be Getting the Nutrients They Need, According to New Research from Stevens

New research from Stevens Institute of Technology reveals startling shortfalls in dietary nutrition during pregnancy

Hoboken, N.J., November 19, 2024 - It's generally estimated that around 10% of pregnant people struggle to meet their nutritional needs-but the real number could be far higher, according to new research from Stevens Institute of Technology.

According to a recent study published in The Journal of Nutrition, over 90% of pregnant individuals are potentially failing to get enough iron, vitamin D, or vitamin E from the food they eat, while over one-third could be short of calcium, vitamin C, and vitamin A. Troublingly, almost two-thirds of pregnant people were also found to be getting insufficient dietary folate-a critical nutrient that helps prevent birth defects in the baby's brain and spine.

"It's important to remember that many pregnant people take prenatal vitamin supplements, which might help prevent nutritional deficiencies," says Dr. Samantha Kleinberg, the study's lead author and a professor at the Charles V. Schaefer, Jr. School of Engineering and Science at Stevens. "Nonetheless, this is a startling finding that suggests we need to be looking much more closely at whether pregnant individuals are getting the nutrients they need."

Where most previous studies of nutrition during pregnancy relied on a few days of food diaries, or on simply asking people what they remembered eating, the Stevens team asked pregnant people to take before-and-after photos of everything they ate over two 14-day periods. Experts then reviewed the photos to assess the amount of food actually eaten and determine the nutrients consumed during each meal.

That's a far more accurate approach, because people are notoriously bad at estimating portion size or accurately reporting what they've eaten, Dr. Kleinberg explains. A photo-based approach is also much less laborious for pregnant people, making it easy to collect data over a period of weeks instead of just a few days.

"Most surveys only track diet over a day or two-but if you feel off one day and don't eat much, or have a big celebratory meal over the weekend, that can skew the data," Dr. Kleinberg says. "By looking at a longer time period, and using photos to track diet and nutrition, we're able to get a much richer and more precise picture of what people actually ate."

The study, which was co-authored with Dr. Andrea Deierlein, director of public health nutrition at New York University, found significant dietary variations between individuals, but also among the same individuals from one day to the next, suggesting that shorter studies and population-based reports might be failing to spot important nutritional deficits. "Some people eat really well, and others don't-so if you just take an average, it looks like everything's fine," Dr. Kleinberg explains. "This study suggests that in reality, an alarming number of pregnant people may not be getting the nutrients they need from their food."

Using food photos also allowed the Stevens team to accurately track the exact timing of meals and snacks, and to explore the way that patterns of eating behavior correlated with total energy and nutrient intake. When pregnant people ate later in the day, the data shows, they were likely to consume significantly more total calories-potentially an important finding as researchers explore connections between eating behaviors and health problems such as gestational diabetes.

The current research didn't directly study health outcomes, so it's too early to say whether insufficient nutrition or excessive energy consumption is adversely impacting pregnant individuals or their babies. "We'll be digging into that in future studies, and looking at possible connections with eating patterns and changes in glucose tolerance," Dr. Kleinberg says.

The team also hopes to automate the process of assessing nutritional content based on food photos, and is developing large language models capable of automatically asking follow-up questions to obtain more accurate information. "For this study, we often had to reach out to participants to ask what kind of meat they'd put in their sandwich, or whether their coffee had sugar in it," Dr. Kleinberg explains. "If we can streamline that process, then we'll be able to capture data more easily-and help shed new light on how pregnant people actually eat."

About Stevens Institute of Technology
Stevens Institute of Technology is a premier, private research university situated in Hoboken, New Jersey. Since our founding in 1870, technological innovation has been the hallmark of Stevens' education and research. Within the university's three schools, nearly 9,000 undergraduate and graduate students collaborate closely with faculty in an interdisciplinary, student-centric, entrepreneurial environment. Academic and research programs spanning business, computing, engineering, the arts and other disciplines actively advance the frontiers of science and leverage technology to confront our most pressing global challenges. The university continues to be consistently ranked among the nation's leaders in career services, post-graduation salaries of alumni and return on tuition investment.

Stevens Media Contact
Kara Panzer
Director of Public Relations
Division of University Relations
845-475-4594
[email protected]