Innovator ETFs Trust
11/22/2024 | Press release | Distributed by Public on 11/22/2024 13:28
Post Effective Amendment to Registration Statement by Investment Company Form 485APOS
As filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on November 22, 2024
No. 333-146827
No. 811-22135
UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
WASHINGTON, D.C. 20549
_____________________________
FORM N-1A
| REGISTRATION STATEMENT UNDER THE SECURITIES ACT OF 1933 | ☐ |
| Pre-Effective Amendment No. | ☐ |
| Post-Effective Amendment No. 1356 | ☒ |
| and/or | |
| REGISTRATION STATEMENT UNDER THE INVESTMENT COMPANY ACT OF 1940 | ☐ |
| Amendment No. 1357 | ☒ |
Innovator ETFs® Trust
(Exact Name of Registrant as Specified in Charter)
200 W. Front Street
Wheaton, Illinois 60187
(Address of Principal Executive Office)
Registrant's Telephone Number, including Area Code: (800) 208-5212
Corporation Service Company
2711 Centerville Road, Suite 400
Wilmington, New Castle County, Delaware 19808
(Name and Address of Agent for Service)
Copy to:
Morrison C. Warren, Esq.
Chapman and Cutler LLP
320 South Canal Street
Chicago, Illinois 60606
It is proposed that this filing will become effective (check appropriate box):
| ☐ | Immediately upon filing pursuant to paragraph (b) of Rule 485. |
| ☐ | On (date) pursuant to paragraph (b) of Rule 485. |
| ☐ | 60 days after filing pursuant to paragraph (a) of Rule 485. |
| ☐ | On (date) pursuant to paragraph (a) of Rule 485. |
| ☒ | 75 days after filing pursuant to paragraph (a)(2) of Rule 485. |
| ☐ | On (date) pursuant to paragraph (a)(2) of Rule 485. |
If appropriate, check the following box:
| ☐ | This post-effective amendment designates a new effective date for a previously filed post-effective amendment. |
Contents of Post-Effective Amendment No. 1356
| This Registration Statement comprises the following papers and contents: |
| The Facing Sheet |
| Part A - Prospectus for Innovator 2x Bitcoin Daily ETF |
| Part B - Statement of Additional Information for Innovator 2x Bitcoin Daily ETF |
| Part C - Other Information |
| Signatures |
The information in this Prospectus is not complete and may be changed. We may not sell these securities until the registration statement filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission is effective. This Prospectus is not an offer to sell these securities and it is not soliciting an offer to buy these securities in any state where the offer of sale is not permitted.
Subject to Completion
November 22, 2024
Prospectus
Innovator 2x Bitcoin Daily ETF
([______] - [____])
[___________], 2025
Innovator 2x Bitcoin Daily ETF (the "Fund") is a series of Innovator ETFs® Trust (the "Trust") and an exchange-traded fund ("ETF"). The Fund lists and principally trades its shares on [______] (the "Exchange"). Market prices may differ to some degree from the net asset value of shares of the Fund ("Shares"). Unlike mutual funds, the Fund issues and redeems Shares at net asset value only in large blocks of Shares called "Creation Units." The Fund is a series of the Trust and is an actively managed exchange-traded fund organized as a separate series of a registered management investment company.
The U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission ("SEC") has not approved or disapproved these securities or passed upon the accuracy or adequacy of this prospectus. Any representation to the contrary is a criminal offense.
Table of Contents
| Summary Information | 1 |
| Additional Information About the Fund's Principal Investment Strategies | 27 |
| Fund Investments | 28 |
| Additional Risks of Investing in the Fund | 30 |
| Management of the Fund | 49 |
| How to Buy and Sell Shares | 51 |
| Dividends, Distributions and Taxes | 53 |
| Distributor | 58 |
| Net Asset Value | 58 |
| Fund Service Providers | 60 |
| Premium/Discount Information | 60 |
| Other Investment Companies | 61 |
| Financial Highlights | 61 |
ii
Innovator 2x Bitcoin Daily ETF
Important Information About the Fund
The Fund seeks daily investment results, before fees and expenses, that correspond to two times (200%) the daily price performance of bitcoin (i.e., "spot" bitcoin prices), as represented by the price of one or more Bitcoin ETPs referenced by the Bitcoin Instruments (as defined below) (the "Bitcoin Price"). The Fund expects to achieve its exposure to the Bitcoin Price through instruments that reference one or more exchange-traded products that hold bitcoin directly ("Bitcoin ETPs"). Such instruments are expected to consist of FLexible EXchange® Options ("FLEX Options") that reference the one or more Bitcoin ETPs (the "Bitcoin ETP Options") and/or swap agreements that reference one or more Bitcoin ETPs ("Bitcoin ETP Swaps" and collectively with Bitcoin ETP Options, the "Bitcoin Instruments"). The Fund seeks to achieve its investment performance for a single day, not for any other period. A "single day" is measured from the time the Fund calculates its net asset value ("NAV") to the time of the Fund's next NAV calculation. The return of the Fund for periods longer than a single day will be the result of its return for each day compounded over the period. The Fund's returns for periods longer than a single day will very likely differ in amount, and possibly even direction, from the Fund's stated multiple (200%) times the return of the daily changes of the Bitcoin Price for the same period. For periods longer than a single day, the Fund will lose money if the Bitcoin Price's performance is flat, and it is possible that the Fund will lose money even if the value of the Bitcoin Price increases. Longer holding periods, higher bitcoin volatility, and greater leveraged exposure each exacerbate the impact of compounding on an investor's returns. During periods of higher bitcoin volatility, the volatility of the bitcoin may affect the Fund's return as much as or more than the returns of bitcoin.
While the Fund has a daily investment objective, you may hold Shares for longer than one day if you believe doing so is consistent with your goals and risk tolerance. If you hold Shares for any period other than a day, it is important for you to understand that over your holding period:
| · | Your return may be higher or lower than that sought in the investment objective, and this difference may be significant. |
| · | Factors that contribute to returns that are worse than the return sought in the investment objective include smaller gains or losses in the price of bitcoin and higher bitcoin volatility, as well as longer holding periods when these factors apply. |
| · | Factors that contribute to returns that are better than the return sought in the investment objective include larger gains or losses in the price of bitcoin and lower bitcoin volatility, as well as longer holding periods when these factors apply. |
| · | The more extreme these factors are, and the more they occur together, the more your return will tend to deviate from the return sought in the investment objective. |
1
The Fund expects to gain two times exposure to the Bitcoin Price by investing a portion of its assets in a wholly-owned subsidiary of the Fund organized under the laws of the Cayman Islands (the "Subsidiary"). In order to qualify as a regulated investment company ("RIC") for purposes of federal income tax treatment under the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 (the "Code"), the Fund will have to reduce its exposure to its Subsidiary on or around the end of each of the Fund's fiscal quarter ends. The Fund expects to reduce its exposure to its Subsidiary during these periods by investing in certain other investments as described below. During these periods, the Fund may not achieve its investment objective, and may return substantially less than two times (200%) the Bitcoin Price.
Investment Objective
The Innovator 2x Bitcoin Daily ETF seeks daily investment results, before fees and expenses, that correspond to two times (200%) the daily performance of bitcoin.
Fees and Expenses of the Fund
This table describes the fees and expenses that you may pay if you buy, hold, and sell shares of the Fund ("Shares"). You may pay other fees, such as brokerage commissions and other fees to financial intermediaries, which are not reflected in the table and example below.
Annual Fund Operating Expenses (expenses that you pay each year as a percentage of the value of your investment)
| Management Fees | [__] | % | ||
| Distribution and Service (12b-1) Fees | 0.00 | % | ||
| Other Expenses(1) | [__] | % | ||
| Total Annual Fund Operating Expenses | [__] | % |
(1) "Other Expenses" are estimates based on the expenses the Fund expects to incur for the current fiscal year.
Example
This example is intended to help you compare the cost of investing in the Fund with the cost of investing in other funds. This example assumes that you invest $10,000 in the Fund for the time periods indicated and then sell all of your Shares at the end of those periods. The example also assumes that your investment has a 5% return each year and that the Fund's operating expenses remain at current levels. This example does not include the brokerage commissions that investors may pay to buy and sell Shares.
| 1 Year | 3 Years | |||||||
| Although your actual costs may be higher or lower, your costs, based on these assumptions, would be: | $[___] | $[___] |
Portfolio Turnover
The Fund pays transaction costs, such as commissions, when it purchases and sells securities (or "turns over" its portfolio). A higher portfolio turnover will cause the Fund to incur additional transaction costs and may result in higher taxes when Shares are held in a taxable account. These costs, which are not reflected in Total Annual Fund Operating Expenses or in the example, may affect the Fund's performance. Because the Fund has not yet commenced operations, portfolio turnover information is unavailable at this time.
2
Principal Investment Strategies
The Fund is an actively-managed ETF that seeks to achieve its investment objective primarily through investments in Bitcoin Instruments providing exposure to the Bitcoin Price. The Fund will also invest in cash, cash-like instruments or other high-quality securities that serve as collateral to the Bitcoin Instruments ("Collateral Investments"). In this manner, the Fund seeks to provide investment results that correspond to twice the performance of the Bitcoin Price for a single day. The Fund does not invest directly in bitcoin. Instead the Fund seeks to benefit from increases in the price of bitcoin for a single day. The return of the Fund for periods longer than a single day will be the result of its return for each day compounded over the period. The Fund's returns for periods longer than a single day will very likely differ in amount, and possibly even direction, from the Fund's stated multiple (200%) times the return of the daily changes of the Bitcoin Price for the same period. See "Investment Risk-Compounding Risk" for additional information.
In addition to the Bitcoin Instruments, the Fund may also invest in: (i) reverse repurchase agreement transactions; (ii) exchange traded option contracts that reference one or more Bitcoin ETPs; and/or (iii) shares of Bitcoin ETPs.
The investment adviser to the Fund and the Subsidiary is Innovator Capital Management, LLC ("Innovator" or the "Adviser"). The investment sub-adviser to the Fund and the Subsidiary is Milliman Financial Risk Management LLC ("Milliman" or the "Sub-Adviser"). The Adviser oversees the Fund and the Sub-Adviser. The Sub-Adviser has day-to-day portfolio management responsibilities for the Fund. In serving as Sub-Adviser to the Fund, the Sub-Adviser does not conduct conventional investment research or analysis or forecast market movement or trends.
The Fund is classified as a "non-diversified company" under the Investment Company Act of 1940, as amended (the "1940 Act"). The Fund will not concentrate its investments in securities of issuers in any industry or group of industries, as the term "concentrate" is used in the 1940 Act, except that the Fund may invest more than 25% of its total assets in investments that provide exposure to the Bitcoin Price.
Bitcoin
Bitcoin is a digital asset that can be transferred among participants on the bitcoin peer-to-peer network (the "Bitcoin Network") on a peer-to-peer basis via the Internet. Bitcoin can be transferred without the use of a central administrator or clearing agency, unlike other means of electronic payments. Because a central party is not necessary to administer bitcoin transactions or maintain the bitcoin ledger, the term decentralized is often used in descriptions of bitcoin.
Bitcoin is based on the decentralized, open-source protocol of a peer-to-peer electronic network. No single entity owns or operates the Bitcoin Network. Bitcoin is not issued by governments, banks or any other centralized authority. The infrastructure of the Bitcoin Network is collectively maintained on a distributed basis by the network's participants, consisting of "miners", who run special software to validate transactions, developers, who maintain and contribute updates to the bitcoin network's source code, and users, who download and maintain on their individual computer a full or partial copy of the Bitcoin Blockchain (defined below) and related software. Anyone can be a user, developer, or miner. The Bitcoin Network is accessed through software, and software governs the creation, movement, and ownership of bitcoin. The source code for the Bitcoin Network and related software protocol is open-source, and anyone can contribute to its development. The value of bitcoin is in part determined by the supply of, and demand for, bitcoin in the global markets for the trading of bitcoin, market expectations for the adoption of bitcoin as a decentralized store of value, the number of merchants and/or institutions that accept bitcoin as a form of payment, and the volume of peer-to-peer transactions, among other factors.
3
Bitcoin transaction and ownership records are reflected on the blockchain ledger for bitcoin (the "Bitcoin Blockchain"). Miners authenticate and bundle bitcoin transactions sequentially into files called "blocks", which requires performing computational work to solve a cryptographic puzzle set by the Bitcoin Network's software protocol. Because each solved block contains a reference to the previous block, they form a chronological "chain" back to the first bitcoin transaction. Copies of the Bitcoin Blockchain are stored in a decentralized manner on the computers of each individual Bitcoin Network full node, i.e., any user who chooses to maintain on their computer a full copy of the Bitcoin Blockchain as well as related software. Each bitcoin is associated with a set of unique cryptographic "keys", in the form of a string of numbers and letters, which allow whoever is in possession of the private key to assign that bitcoin in a transfer that the Bitcoin network will recognize.
Two Times Daily Exposure to Bitcoin
In order to obtain two times daily exposure to the Bitcoin Price, the Fund intends to invest in Bitcoin Instruments, which consist of cash-settled FLEX Options, and/or enter into cash-settled swap agreements. In general, an option contract is an agreement between a buyer and seller that gives the purchaser of the option the right to buy or sell a particular asset at or before a specified future date at an agreed upon price. A call option contract gives the buyer of the call option contract the right (but not the obligation) to buy, and the seller of the call option contract (i.e., the "writer") the obligation to sell, a specified amount of an underlying reference asset at a pre-determined price. A put option contract gives the buyer of the put option contract the right (but not the obligation) to sell, and the writer of the put option contract the obligation to buy (if the option is exercised), a specified amount of an underlying reference asset at a pre-determined price. FLEX Options are exchange-traded option contracts with uniquely customizable terms. Although guaranteed for settlement by the Options Clearing Corporation (the "OCC"), FLEX Options are still subject to counterparty risk with the OCC and may be less liquid than more traditional exchange-traded option contracts. Swap agreements are transactions entered into primarily with major global financial institutions for a specified period ranging from a day to more than one year. In a swap transaction, the Fund and a counterparty will agree to exchange or "swap" payments based on the change in value of an underlying asset or benchmark. For example, the two parties may agree to exchange the return (or differentials in rates of returns) earned or realized on a particular investment or instrument.
The Fund invests in the Bitcoin Instruments indirectly via the Subsidiary. The Subsidiary and the Fund will have the same investment adviser, investment sub-adviser and investment objective. The Subsidiary will also follow the same general investment policies and restrictions as the Fund. Except as noted herein, for purposes of this Prospectus, references to the Fund's investment strategies and risks include those of the Subsidiary. The Fund complies with the provisions of the 1940 Act governing investment policies and capital structure and leverage on an aggregate basis with the Subsidiary. Furthermore, the Adviser, as the investment adviser to the Subsidiary, complies with the provisions of the 1940 Act relating to investment advisory contracts as it relates to its advisory agreement with the Subsidiary. The Subsidiary also complies with the provisions of the 1940 Act relating to affiliated transactions and custody. Because the Fund intends to qualify for treatment as a RIC under the Code, the size of the Fund's investment in the Subsidiary will not exceed 25% of the Fund's total assets at or around each quarter end of the Fund's fiscal year. At other times of the year, the Fund's investments in the Subsidiary may significantly exceed 25% of the Fund's total assets. The Subsidiary's custodian is [________]
4
If circumstances occur where market prices for the Fund's Bitcoin ETP Options were not readily available, the Fund would fair value its Bitcoin ETP Options in accordance with its pricing and valuation policy and procedures for fair value determinations. The Adviser would document its proposed pricing and methodology, detailing the factors that entered into the valuation.
Collateral Investments
The Fund will invest assets in Collateral Investments. The Collateral Investments may consist of high-quality securities, which include: (1) U.S. Government securities, such as bills, notes and bonds issued by the U.S. Treasury; (2) money market funds; and/or (3) corporate debt securities, such as commercial paper and other short-term unsecured promissory notes issued by businesses that are rated investment grade or determined by the Sub-Adviser to be of comparable quality. For these purposes, "investment grade" is defined as investments with a rating at the time of purchase in one of the four highest categories of at least one nationally recognized statistical rating organizations (e.g., BBB- or higher from S&P Global Ratings or Baa3 or higher from Moody's Investors Service, Inc.).
The Collateral Investments are designed to provide liquidity, serve as margin, or otherwise collateralize the Subsidiary's investments. The Fund expects that it will primarily invest its assets, and that the Subsidiary will primarily invest its assets, in Collateral Investments that are "securities," as such term is defined under the 1940 Act.
Other Investments
In order to help the Fund meet its daily investment objective by maintaining the daily desired level of leveraged exposure to the Bitcoin Price, maintain its tax status as a regulated investment company at and around each quarter-end, help the Fund maintain its desired exposure to the Bitcoin Price when it is approaching or has exceeded position limits or accountability levels, or because of liquidity or other constraints, the Fund may invest in the following:
Reverse Repurchase Agreements
The Fund may invest in reverse repurchase agreements which are a form of borrowing in which the Fund sells portfolio securities to financial institutions and agrees to repurchase them at a mutually agreed-upon date and price that is higher than the original sale price, and use the proceeds for investment purchases.
As a result of the Fund repurchasing the securities at a higher price, the Fund will lose money by engaging in reverse repurchase agreement transactions.
5
As noted above, because the Fund intends to qualify for treatment as a RIC under the Code, the size of the Fund's investment in the Subsidiary will not exceed 25% of the Fund's total assets at or around each quarter end of the Fund's fiscal year (the "Asset Diversification Test"). At other times of the year, the Fund's investments in the Subsidiary will significantly exceed 25% of the Fund's total (or gross) assets.
When the Fund seeks to reduce its total assets exposure to the Subsidiary, it may use the short-term Treasury Bills it owns (and purchase additional Treasury Bills as needed) to transact in reverse repurchase agreement transactions, which are ostensibly loans to the Fund. Those loans will increase the gross assets of the Fund, which the Adviser expects will allow the Fund to meet the Asset Diversification Test. When the Fund enters into a reverse repurchase agreement, it will either (i) be consistent with Section 18 of the 1940 Act and maintain asset coverage of at least 300% of the value of the reverse repurchase agreement; or (ii) treat the reverse repurchase agreement transactions as derivative transactions for purposes of Rule 18f-4 under the 1940 Act ("Rule 18f-4"), including as applicable, the value-at-risk based limit on leverage risk.
Bitcoin ETPs
The Fund may invest in shares of Bitcoin ETPs, which are exchange-traded investment products not registered under the 1940 Act that seek to generally match the performance of the price of bitcoin, and trade intra-day on a national securities exchange. Bitcoin ETPs are passively managed and do not pursue active management investment strategies, and their sponsors do not actively manage the exposure to bitcoin held by the Bitcoin ETP. This means that the sponsor of the Bitcoin ETP does not sell bitcoin at times when its price is high or acquire bitcoin at low prices in the expectation of future price increases. Bitcoin ETPs seek to track the price of bitcoin as determined by a specific index which typically examine multiple digital trading platforms to determine a prevailing bitcoin price, however, such index may not accurately track the global price of bitcoin. See "Principal Risks-Bitcoin ETPs" below for additional information.
Principal Risks
Daily rebalancing and the compounding of each day's return over time means that the return of the Fund for a period longer than a single day will be the result of each day's returns compounded over the period. This will very likely differ in amount, and possibly even direction, from twice the return of the Bitcoin Price for the same period. The Fund will lose money if the performance of the Bitcoin Price is flat over time. The Fund can lose money regardless of the performance of bitcoin, as a result of daily rebalancing, bitcoin's volatility, compounding of each day's return and other factors.
As with all investments, there are certain risks of investing in the Fund. Shares will change in value, and you could lose money by investing in the Fund. An investment in the Fund does not represent a complete investment program. An investment in the Fund is not a bank deposit and it is not insured or guaranteed by the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation or any other government agency, the Adviser or any of their affiliates. You should consider carefully the following risks before investing in the Fund. As a leveraged ETF, the unique and substantial risks associated with bitcoin, and the historic price volatility of bitcoin, are exacerbated.
6
Each risk noted below is considered a principal risk of investing in the Fund, regardless of the order in which it appears. The significance of each risk factor below may change over time and you should review each risk factor carefully.
Aggressive Investment Risk. Bitcoin is subject to unique and substantial risks. The value of an investment in the Fund could decline significantly and without warning, including to zero. You may lose the full value of your investment within a single day. If you are not prepared to accept significant and unexpected changes in the value of the Fund and the possibility that you could lose your entire investment in the Fund you should not invest in the Fund. The value of an investment in the Fund could decline significantly and without warning, including to zero. You should be prepared to lose your entire investment. Shares will change in value, and you could lose money by investing in the Fund. The Fund may not achieve its investment objective.
Compounding Risk. The Fund has a single day investment objective, and the Fund's performance for any other period is the result of its return for each day compounded over the period. The performance of the Fund for periods longer than a single day will very likely differ in amount, and possibly even direction, from twice (200%) of the daily return of the Bitcoin Price for the same period, before accounting for fees and expenses. Compounding affects all investments, but has a more significant impact on a leveraged fund and a fund that rebalances daily. This effect becomes more pronounced as bitcoin volatility and holding periods increase.
This effect becomes more pronounced as bitcoin volatility and holding periods increase. Fund performance for a period longer than a single day can be estimated given any set of assumptions for the following factors: (a) bitcoin volatility; (b) bitcoin performance; (c) period of time; (d) financing rates associated with leveraged exposure; and (e) other Fund expenses. The chart below illustrates the impact of two principal factors - bitcoin volatility and bitcoin performance - on Fund performance. The chart shows estimated Fund returns for a number of combinations of bitcoin volatility and bitcoin performance over a one-year period. Actual volatility, bitcoin, and Fund performance may differ significantly from the chart below. Performance shown in the chart assumes: (a) no dividends paid; (b) no Fund expenses; and (c) borrowing/lending rates (to obtain leveraged exposure) of zero percent. If Fund expenses and/or actual borrowing/lending rates were reflected, the Fund's performance would be different than shown.
Estimated Fund Returns
| Performance | One Year Volatility Rate | |||||
| One Year Bitcoin |
Two Times (200%) the One Year Bitcoin |
10% | 25% | 50% | 75% | 100% |
| -60% | -120% | -84.2% | -85.0% | -87.5% | -90.9% | -94.1% |
| -50% | -100% | -75.2% | -76.5% | -80.5% | -85.8% | -90.8% |
| -40% | -80% | -64.4% | -66.2% | -72.0% | -79.5% | -86.8% |
| -30% | -60% | -51.5% | -54.0% | -61.8% | -72.1% | -82.0% |
| -20% | -40% | -36.6% | -39.9% | -50.2% | -63.5% | -76.5% |
| -10% | -20% | -19.8% | -23.9% | -36.9% | -53.8% | -70.2% |
| 0% | 0% | -1.0% | -6.1% | -22.1% | -43.0% | -63.2% |
| 10% | 20% | 19.8% | 13.7% | -5.8% | -31.1% | -55.5% |
| 20% | 40% | 42.6% | 35.3% | 12.1% | -18.0% | -47.0% |
| 30% | 60% | 67.3% | 58.8% | 31.6% | -3.7% | -37.8% |
| 40% | 80% | 94.0% | 84.1% | 52.6% | 11.7% | -27.9% |
| 50% | 100% | 122.8% | 111.4% | 75.2% | 28.2% | -17.2% |
| 60% | 120% | 153.5% | 140.5% | 99.4% | 45.9% | -5.8% |
7
Bitcoin's annualized historical volatility rate for the five-year year period ended _____ was ____%. Bitcoin's highest __ to __ volatility rate during the five-year period was ___% (____). Bitcoin's annualized total return performance for the five-year period ended ____ was ____%. Historical bitcoin volatility and performance do not predict future bitcoin volatility and performance.
Leveraged Correlation Risk. A number of factors may affect the Fund's ability to achieve a high degree of leveraged (200%) correlation with the Bitcoin Price, and there is no guarantee that the Fund will achieve a high degree of correlation. Failure to achieve a high degree of correlation may prevent the Fund from achieving its daily investment objective, and the percentage change of the Fund's NAV each day may differ, perhaps significantly in amount, and possibly even direction, from twice the daily changes in the Bitcoin Price on a given day.
A number of other factors may adversely affect the Fund's sought-after two times correlation, including fees, expenses, transaction costs, financing costs associated with the use of derivatives, income items, valuation methodology, accounting standards and disruptions or illiquidity in the Bitcoin Instruments. The Fund may take or refrain from taking positions in order to improve tax efficiency, comply with regulatory restrictions, or for other reasons, each of which may negatively affect the Fund's correlation with daily changes in the Bitcoin Price. The Fund may also be subject to large movements of assets into and out of the Fund, potentially resulting in the Fund being under- or over-exposed to bitcoin. Any of these factors could decrease correlation between the performance of the Fund and daily changes in the Bitcoin Price and may hinder the Fund's ability to meet its daily investment objective.
Target Exposure and Rebalancing Risks. The Fund normally will seek to maintain notional exposure to the Bitcoin Price at 200%. However, in order to comply with certain tax qualification tests at the end of each tax quarter, the Fund may reduce its exposure to its Bitcoin Instruments on or about such date. If the value of bitcoin rises during such periods when the Fund has reduced its futures exposure to bitcoin, without gaining a similar increased exposure through Other Investments, the performance of the Fund may be less than it would have been had the Fund maintained its exposure through such period.
In addition, significant and unpredictable increases in margin rates with respect to the Bitcoin Instruments relative to prevailing futures prices could result in the Fund not achieving its target two times exposure and as such would cause the Fund to experience greater risk of failing to meet its target exposure of two times (200%) the daily performance of the Bitcoin Price, before fees and expenses.
Rebalancing Risk. If for any reason the Fund is unable to rebalance all or a portion of its portfolio, or if all or a portion of the portfolio is rebalanced incorrectly, the Fund's investment exposure may not be consistent with the Fund's daily investment objective. In these instances, the Fund may not successfully track the performance of daily changes in the Bitcoin Price and may not achieve its investment objective. Additionally, the rebalancing of Bitcoin Instruments may impact the trading in such FLEC Options and may adversely affect the value of the Fund. The trading activity associated with such transactions will contribute to the existing trading volume on the underlying Bitcoin ETP Options and may adversely affect the market price of such options.
8
Position Limits Risk. The options exchanges have established limits on the maximum number of puts and calls covering the same underlying security that may be held or written by a single investor or group of investors acting in concert or under common control (regardless of whether the options are purchased or written on the same or different exchanges or are held or written in one or more accounts or through one or more brokers). These are referred to as "position limits." The position limit applicable to a particular option class is determined by the options exchange based on the number of shares outstanding and trading volume of the security underlying the option. The rules of the options markets generally limit the maximum number of options on the same side of the market (i.e., calls held plus puts written, or puts held plus calls written) with respect to a single underlying interest that may be carried in the accounts of a single investor or group of investors acting in concert. An options market may require that positions in certain Bitcoin ETP Options be aggregated with positions in certain other options for purposes of calculating position limits.
The clearing members that clear the Fund's listed option positions are required to monitor and report the Fund's positions to the options exchanges and may be required to liquidate positions in excess of these limits. Failure to comply with position limits may result in the imposition of fines and other sanctions by the options exchanges.
To the extent the Fund needs to modify its holdings in Bitcoin ETP Options, such modification may adversely affect the profitability of the Fund and prevent the Fund from achieving its investment objective. A violation of position limits could also lead to regulatory action materially adverse to a Fund's investment strategy.
Management Risk. The Fund is subject to management risk because it is an actively managed portfolio. The Sub-Adviser, subject to the oversight of the Adviser, will apply investment techniques and risk analyses in making investment decisions for the Fund, but there can be no guarantee that the Fund will meet its investment objective.
Bitcoin Investing Risk. The Fund is indirectly exposed to the risks of investing in bitcoin through its investments in Bitcoin Instruments. Bitcoin is a new and highly speculative investment. The risks associated with bitcoin include the following:
| ● | Bitcoin is a new technological innovation with a limited history. There is no assurance that usage of bitcoin will continue to grow. A contraction in use of bitcoin may result in increased volatility or a reduction in the price of bitcoin, which could adversely impact the value of the Fund. The Bitcoin Network was launched in January 2009, platform trading in bitcoin began in 2010, and Bitcoin Futures trading began in 2017, each of which limits a potential shareholder's ability to evaluate an investment in the Fund. |
| ● | The Fund's investments are exposed to risks associated with the price of bitcoin, which is subject to numerous factors and risks. The price of bitcoin is impacted by numerous factors, including: |
| ○ | The total and available supply of bitcoin, including the possibility that a small group of early bitcoin adopters hold a significant proportion of the bitcoin that has thus far been created and that sales of bitcoin by such large holders may impact the price of bitcoin; |
9
| ○ | Global bitcoin demand, which is influenced by the growth of retail merchants' and commercial businesses' acceptance of bitcoin as payment for goods and services, the security of online digital asset trading platforms and public bitcoin addresses that hold bitcoin, the perception that the use and holding of bitcoin is safe and secure, the lack of regulatory restrictions on their use, and the reputation regarding the use of bitcoin for illicit purposes; |
| ○ | The fact that bitcoin is not presently widely accepted as a medium of exchange, which may be due to a number of common impediments and/or disadvantages to adopting the Bitcoin Network as a payment network, including the slowness of transaction processing and finality, variability of transaction fees, and volatility of the price of bitcoin; |
| ○ | Global bitcoin supply, which is influenced by similar factors as global bitcoin demand, in addition to fiat currency (i.e., government currency not backed by an asset such as gold) needs by miners and taxpayers who may liquidate bitcoin holdings to meet tax obligations; |
| ○ | Investors' expectations with respect to the rate of inflation of fiat currencies and deflation of bitcoin; |
| ○ | Foreign exchange rates between fiat currencies and digital assets such as bitcoin; |
| ○ | Interest rates; |
| ○ | The continued operation of digital asset trading platforms in the United States and foreign jurisdictions, including their regulatory status, trading and custody policies, and cyber security; |
| ○ | Investment and trading activities of large investors, including private and registered funds, that may directly or indirectly invest in bitcoin; ○ Regulatory measures, if any, that restrict the use of bitcoin as a form of payment or the purchase or sale of bitcoin, including measures that restrict the direct or indirect participation in the bitcoin market by financial institutions or the introduction of bitcoin instruments; |
| ○ | The maintenance and development of the open-source software protocol of the Bitcoin Network; |
| ○ | Increased competition from other digital assets, including forks of the Bitcoin Network; |
| ○ | Developments in the information technology sector; |
| ○ | Global or regional political, economic or financial events and situations; |
| ○ | Investor or Bitcoin Network participant sentiments on the value or utility of bitcoin; and |
| ○ | The dedication of mining power to the Bitcoin Network and the willingness of bitcoin miners to clear bitcoin transactions for relatively low fees. |
10
Negative developments in any of these factors could adversely impact an investment in the Fund.
| ● | A decline in the adoption of bitcoin could negatively impact the performance of the Fund. As a new asset and technological innovation, the bitcoin industry is subject to a high degree of uncertainty. The adoption of bitcoin will require growth in its usage for various applications that include retail and commercial payments, cross-border and remittance transactions, speculative investment and technical applications. Adoption of bitcoin will also require an accommodating regulatory environment. A lack of expansion in usage of bitcoin could adversely affect the instruments providing exposure to the price of bitcoin in which the Fund invests. In addition, there is no assurance that bitcoin will maintain its value over the long-term. The value of bitcoin is subject to risks related to its usage. Even if growth in bitcoin adoption occurs in the near or medium-term, there is no assurance that bitcoin usage will continue to grow over the long-term. A contraction in use of bitcoin may result in increased volatility or a reduction in the price of bitcoin, which would adversely impact the value of the Fund's shares. Recently, bitcoin has come under scrutiny for its environmental impact, specifically the amount of energy consumed by bitcoin miners. Some companies have indicated they will cease accepting bitcoin for certain kinds of purchases due to such environmental concerns. To the extent such concerns persist, the demand for bitcoin and the speed of its adoption could be suppressed. |
| ● | Bitcoin trading prices are volatile, and shareholders could lose all or substantially all of their investment in the Fund. Speculators and investors who seek to profit from trading and holding bitcoin generate a significant portion of bitcoin demand. Bitcoin speculation regarding future appreciation in the value of bitcoin may inflate and make more volatile the price of a bitcoin. As a result, bitcoin may be more likely to fluctuate in value due to changing investor confidence in future appreciation in the price of bitcoin. |
| ● | Regulation of participants in the bitcoin ecosystem continues to evolve in both the U.S. and foreign jurisdictions, which may restrict the use of bitcoin or otherwise impact the demand for bitcoin. As a technology, the Bitcoin Network is governed by its internal protocols and source code; however, the use by individuals or businesses of the Bitcoin Network and bitcoin may be subject to government regulation. Both domestic and foreign regulators and governments have increased focus on the use of the Bitcoin Network and bitcoin since 2013. Many digital asset platforms are unlicensed, unregulated, operate without extensive supervision by governmental authorities, and do not provide the public with significant information regarding their ownership structure, management team, corporate practices, cybersecurity, and regulatory compliance. In particular, those located outside the United States may be subject to significantly less stringent regulatory and compliance requirements in their local jurisdictions, and may take the position that they are not subject to laws and regulations that would apply to a national securities exchange or designated contract market in the United States, or may, as a practical matter, be beyond the ambit of U.S. regulators. As a result, trading activity on or reported by these digital asset platforms is generally significantly less regulated than trading in regulated U.S. securities and commodities markets, and may reflect behavior that would be prohibited in regulated U.S. trading venues. In the U.S., federal and certain state authorities have exercised jurisdiction over specific uses of the Bitcoin Network and bitcoin, typically in the context of money service business regulation. Some foreign regulators and governments have exercised similar regulatory oversight; however, other jurisdictions have determined that regulatory action was premature or that the use of the Bitcoin Network should be prohibited or limited for reasons such as incompatibility with capital controls or financial system risks. Bitcoin market disruptions and resulting governmental interventions are unpredictable, and may make bitcoin illegal altogether. Future foreign regulations and directives may conflict with those in the U.S., and such regulatory actions may restrict or make bitcoin illegal in foreign jurisdictions. Future regulations and directives may impact the demand for bitcoin, and may also affect the ability of digital asset trading platforms to operate and for other market participants to enter into bitcoin transactions. Currently, there is either a fragmentation of regulatory efforts or a general lack of regulation in U.S. and foreign markets. As a result of fragmented regulatory efforts or lack of regulation, individuals or groups may engage in fraud of market manipulation. Further, the bitcoin market globally and in the United States is not subject to comparable regulatory guardrails as exist in regulated securities markets. Many bitcoin trading venues lack certain safeguards put in place by exchanges for more traditional assets to enhance the stability of trading on the exchanges and prevent "flash crashes," such as limit-down circuit breakers. As a result, the prices of bitcoin on trading venues may be subject to larger and/or more frequent sudden declines than assets traded on more traditional exchanges. Tools to detect and deter fraudulent or manipulative trading activities such as market manipulation, front-running of trades, and wash-trading may not be available to or employed by digital asset platforms, or may not exist at all. Over the past several years, some digital asset platforms have been closed due to fraud and manipulative activity, business failure or security breaches. In many of these instances, the customers of such digital asset platforms were not compensated or made whole for the partial or complete losses of their account balances in such digital asset platforms. The closure or temporary shutdown of a digital asset platform used in calculating the value of the bitcoin could adversely affect the value of the Fund. |
11
To the extent that future regulatory actions or policies limit or restrict bitcoin usage, bitcoin trading or the ability to convert bitcoin to fiat currencies, the demand for bitcoin may be reduced, which may adversely affect investment in the Fund's shares. Regulation of bitcoin continues to evolve, the ultimate impact of which remains unclear and may adversely affect, among other things, the availability, value or performance of bitcoin and, thus, the instruments in which the Fund invests. Moreover, in addition to exposing the Fund to potential new costs and expenses, additional regulation or changes to existing regulation may also require changes to the Fund's investment strategies. Although there continues to be uncertainty about the full impact of these and other regulatory changes, it is the case that the Fund may be subject to a more complex regulatory framework, and incur additional costs to comply with new requirements as well as to monitor for compliance with any new requirements going forward.
| ● | Sales of newly mined bitcoin may cause the price of bitcoin to decline, which could negatively affect an investment in the Fund. Approximately 900 newly mined bitcoin are created each day. If the parties engaged in bitcoin mining choose not to hold the newly mined bitcoin, and, instead, make them available for sale, there can be downward pressure on the price of bitcoin. A bitcoin mining operation may be more likely to sell a higher percentage of its newly created bitcoin, and more rapidly so, if it is operating at a low profit margin, thus reducing the price of bitcoin. Lower bitcoin prices may result in further tightening of profit margins for miners and worsening profitability, thereby potentially causing even further selling pressure. Decreasing profit margins and increasing sales of newly mined bitcoin could result in a reduction in the price of bitcoin, which could adversely impact an investment in the Fund. |
| ● | Disruptions at digital asset trading platforms and potential consequences of a digital asset trading platform's failure could adversely affect an investment in the Fund. Digital asset trading platforms operate websites on which users can trade bitcoin for U.S. dollars, other government currencies or other digital assets. Trades on digital asset trading platforms are unrelated to transfers of bitcoin between users via the Bitcoin Network. Bitcoin trades on digital asset trading platforms are recorded on the digital asset trading platform's internal ledger only, and each internal ledger entry for a trade will correspond to an entry for an offsetting trade in U.S. dollars, other government currency or other digital asset. Digital asset trading platforms have a limited history, and during this limited history, bitcoin prices on the digital asset markets generally, and on digital asset platforms individually, have been volatile and subject to influence by many factors, including operational interruptions. Unlike exchanges for more traditional assets, such as equity securities and futures contracts, bitcoin and digital asset trading venues are largely unregulated, may be operating out of compliance with regulation and are highly fragmented. As a result, individuals or groups may engage in fraud or market manipulation. Since 2009, several digital asset trading platforms have been closed or experienced disruptions due to fraud, failure, security breaches or distributed denial of service attacks a/k/a "DDoS Attacks." A DDoS attack is a malicious attempt to disrupt the normal traffic of network by overwhelming the target or its infrastructure with a flood of internet traffic. In many of these instances, the customers of such exchanges were not compensated or made whole for the partial or complete losses of their funds held at the exchanges. In 2014, the largest digital asset trading platform at the time, Mt. Gox, filed for bankruptcy in Japan amid reports the exchange lost up to 850,000 bitcoin, then valued then at over $450 million. Digital asset trading platforms are also appealing targets for hackers and malware. In August 2016, Bitfinex, a digital asset trading platform located in Hong Kong, reported a security breach that resulted in the theft of approximately 120,000 bitcoin valued at the time at approximately $65 million, a loss which was socialized and allocated to all Bitfinex account holders, regardless of whether the account holder held bitcoin or cash in their account. In November 2022, FTX Trading Ltd. ("FTX"), a major digital asset trading platform, filed for bankruptcy following a halt in customer withdrawals. The potential for instability of digital asset trading platforms and the closure or temporary shutdown of exchanges due to fraud, business failure, hackers, DDoS or malware, or government-mandated regulation may reduce confidence in bitcoin, which may result in greater volatility in bitcoin. |
12
| ● | Demand for bitcoin is driven, in part, by its status as the most prominent and secure digital asset. It is possible that a digital assets other than bitcoin (often referred to as "Altcoins") could have features that make it more desirable to a material portion of the digital asset user base, resulting in a reduction in demand for bitcoin, which could have a negative impact on the price of bitcoin and adversely affect the instruments in which the Fund invests. The Bitcoin Network and bitcoin, as an asset, hold a "first-to-market" advantage over other digital assets. This first-to-market advantage is driven in large part by having the largest user base and, more importantly, the largest combined mining power in use to secure the Blockchain and transaction verification system. Having a large mining network results in greater user confidence regarding the security and long-term stability of a digital asset's network and its blockchain; as a result, the advantage of more users and miners makes a digital asset more secure, which makes it more attractive to new users and miners, resulting in a network effect that strengthens the first-to-market advantage. Bitcoin also enjoys significantly greater acceptance and usage than other digital asset networks in the retail and commercial marketplace, due in large part to the relatively well-funded efforts of payment processing companies. However, it is possible that other blockchains will emerge that are similarly designed to serve as an alternative payment system, such as those focused on privacy through the use of zero-knowledge cryptography. These alternative blockchains have in the past and may in the future seek to compete with the Bitcoin Network by offering networks that improve the speed of transaction processing, address issues in the finality and variability of transaction fees in the Bitcoin Networks, and with lesser volatility in the digital asset's price than bitcoin. In addition, it is also possible that other digital assets and trading systems could become more widely accepted and used than bitcoin. The market demand for these alternative blockchains may reduce the market demand for bitcoin which would adversely impact the price of bitcoin. Despite the marked first-mover advantage of the Bitcoin Network over other digital assets, it is possible that an Altcoin could become materially popular due to either a perceived or exposed shortcoming of the Bitcoin Network protocol that is not immediately addressed by the bitcoin developers or a perceived advantage of an altcoin that includes features not incorporated into bitcoin. For example, the development of digital self-executing contracts (also known as "smart contracts" or "DeFi") on the Ethereum network has permitted the value of its native unit (ether) to rival bitcoin for periods of time. If an Altcoin obtains significant market share (either in market capitalization, mining power or use as a payment technology), this could reduce bitcoin's market share and have a negative impact on the demand for, and price of, bitcoin. Finally, the continued adoption of bitcoin may require growth in its usage as a means of payment. The slowness of transaction processing and the variability of transaction fees are significant impediments to the widespread adoption of bitcoin. To address these issues, participants have created secondary networks that layer on top of the blockchain to facilitate small, low-cost transactions (e.g., Lightning Network). These secondary networks may be more vulnerable to fraud and malicious attacks and may experience greater price volatility. In addition, participants have been slow to adopt these secondary networks. If the adoption and use of bitcoin slows or contracts, bitcoin may become less liquid, and the price of bitcoin may experience greater volatility. |
| ● | Miners may cease expanding processing power to create blocks and verify transactions if they are not adequately compensated. Miners generate revenue from both newly created bitcoin (known as the "block reward") and from fees taken upon verification of transactions. If the aggregate revenue from transaction fees and the block reward is below a miner's cost, the miner may cease operations. An acute cessation of mining operations would reduce the collective processing power on the Blockchain, which would adversely affect the transaction verification process by temporarily decreasing the speed at which blocks are added to the Blockchain and make the Blockchain more vulnerable to a malicious actor obtaining control in excess of 50 percent of the processing power on the Blockchain. Reductions in processing power could result in material, though temporary, delays in transaction confirmation time. Any reduction in confidence in the transaction verification process or mining processing power may adversely impact the price of bitcoin. Furthermore, the block reward will decrease over time. In the summer of 2020, the block reward was reduced from 12.5 to 6.25 bitcoin, and it will further reduce to 3.125 bitcoin in 2024. As the block reward continues to decrease over time, the mining incentive structure will transition to a higher reliance on transaction verification fees in order to incentivize miners to continue to dedicate processing power to the Blockchain. If transaction verification fees become too high, the marketplace may be reluctant to use bitcoin. Decreased demand for bitcoin may adversely affect its price, which may adversely affect an investment in the Fund. |
13
| ● | Bitcoin Network development contributors could propose amendments to the Bitcoin Network's protocols and software that, if accepted and authorized by large groups of Bitcoin Network users, could adversely affect an investment in the Fund. The Bitcoin Network is an open-source project meaning that any developer or computer scientist may review, propose changes to and develop software clients for the Bitcoin Network protocols. Although a small group of individuals referred to as the Core Developers previously exercised significant influence over the direction of Bitcoin Network development, no single party or group controls what refinements or improvements to the Bitcoin Network's source code are proposed, approved or produced as upgrades or new software clients for Bitcoin Network users. A software update or new software client may alter the protocols and software that govern the Bitcoin Network and the properties of bitcoin, including the irreversibility of transactions and limitations on the mining of new bitcoin. When a modification is introduced and a substantial majority of users and miners consent to the modification, the change is implemented, and the Bitcoin Network remains uninterrupted. However, if less than a substantial majority of users and miners consent to the proposed modification, and the modification is not compatible with the software prior to its modification, the consequence would be what is known as a "fork" (i.e., "split") of the Bitcoin Network (and the Blockchain), with one prong running the pre-modified software and the other running the modified software. The effect of such a fork would be the existence of two versions of the Bitcoin Network running in parallel, but with each version's underlying asset and blockchain lacking interchangeability. Additionally, a fork could be introduced by an unintentional, unanticipated software flaw in the multiple versions of otherwise compatible software users run. Although several chain forks have been addressed by community-led efforts to merge the two chains, such a fork could adversely affect Bitcoin's viability. It is possible, however, that a substantial number of Bitcoin users and miners could adopt an incompatible version of Bitcoin while resisting community-led efforts to merge the two chains. This would result in a permanent fork. On August 1, 2017, after 7 extended debates among developers as to how to improve the Bitcoin network's transaction capacity, the Bitcoin network was forked by a group of developers and miners resulting in the creation of a new blockchain, which underlies the new digital asset "Bitcoin Cash" alongside the original Bitcoin Blockchain. Bitcoin and Bitcoin Cash now operate on separate, independent blockchains. Although the Bitcoin Network remained unchanged after the fork, it is unclear how such actions will affect the long-term viability of bitcoin and, accordingly, may adversely affect an investment in the Fund. |
| ● | The decentralized structure of Bitcoin Network software development may prevent the formation of a consensus on how to improve and modify the Bitcoin Network, which could prevent needed or desirable updates and thereby adversely impact an investment in the Fund. The lack of a formal or informal centralized structure in the development of Bitcoin Network means that parties with potentially competing motives and incentives must generate a consensus on how best to improve key elements of the Bitcoin Network protocols, such as how best to increase the transaction capacity of the Bitcoin Network. If developer proposals to improve the Bitcoin Network's protocols are incapable of obtaining an overwhelming consensus for adoption, a proposal may either be abandoned or indefinitely delayed pending the formation of consensus or the proposal may result in a fork. If a desirable or necessary improvement to the Bitcoin Network protocols is not implemented, it may have a negative impact on the functioning of the Bitcoin Network or the growth of user adoption. Any such delay may, therefore, have a negative impact on the secondary market price of bitcoin and the instruments providing exposure to the price of bitcoin in which the Fund invests. |
14
| ● | The open-source structure of the Bitcoin Network protocol means that the contributors to the protocol are generally not directly compensated for their contributions in maintaining and developing the protocol. A failure to properly monitor and upgrade the protocol could damage the Bitcoin Network and, therefore, an investment in the instruments providing exposure to the price of bitcoin in which the Fund invests. As the Bitcoin Network protocol is not sold and its use does not generate revenues for contributors, contributors are generally not compensated for maintaining and updating the Bitcoin Network protocol. Although some bitcoin industry participants have funded core developers, this type of financial incentive is not typical. The lack of guaranteed financial incentive for contributors to maintain or develop the Bitcoin Network and the lack of guaranteed resources to adequately address emerging issues with the Bitcoin Network may reduce incentives to address the issues adequately or in a timely manner. This may have a negative impact on the secondary market price of bitcoin and an investment in the Fund. |
| ● | Intellectual property rights claims may adversely affect the operation of the Bitcoin Network. Third parties may assert intellectual property claims relating to the holding and transfer of digital assets and their source code. Regardless of the merit of any intellectual property or other legal action, any threatened action that reduces confidence in the Bitcoin network's long-term viability or the ability of end-users to hold and transfer bitcoin may adversely affect an investment in the Fund. Additionally, a meritorious intellectual property claim could prevent end-users from accessing the Bitcoin Network or holding or transferring their bitcoin. As a result, an intellectual property claim could adversely affect an investment in the instruments providing exposure to the price of bitcoin in which the Fund invests. |
| ● | A malicious actor may attack the Bitcoin Network in an effort to prevent its function, which may adversely impact an investment in the Fund. A malicious actor may attack the Bitcoin Network in a number of ways, including a "50 Percent Attack" or a spam attack. If a malicious actor obtains a majority of the processing power (referred to herein as "aggregate hashrate") dedicated to mining on the Bitcoin Network, it will be able to exert unilateral control over the addition of blocks to the Blockchain. As long as the malicious actor enjoys this majority it may be able to "double-spend" its own bitcoin (i.e., spend the same bitcoin in two or more conflicting transactions) as well as prevent the confirmation of other Bitcoin transactions. If such a scenario were to materialize, it could adversely affect an investment in the Fund. More simply, a malicious actor could attempt to flood the pool of unconfirmed transactions (known as the "mempool") with tens of thousands of transactions in an effort to significantly slow the confirmation of legitimate transactions across the Bitcoin Network. Such a delay, if sustained for extended periods of time, could negatively impact the secondary market price of Bitcoin. These or any other form of attack on the Bitcoin Network could adversely affect an investment the instruments providing exposure to the price of bitcoin in which the Fund invests. Moreover, in the past, flaws in the source code for digital assets have been exposed and exploited, including flaws that disabled some functionality for users, exposed users' personal information and/or resulted in the theft of users' digital assets. The cryptography underlying bitcoin could prove to be flawed or ineffective, or developments in mathematics and/or technology, including advances in digital computing, algebraic geometry and quantum computing, could result in such cryptography becoming ineffective. In any of these circumstances, a malicious actor may be able to compromise the security of the Bitcoin Network, which would adversely affect the value of the Fund. Moreover, functionality of the Bitcoin Network may be negatively affected such that it is no longer attractive to users, thereby dampening demand for bitcoin. Even if another digital asset other than bitcoin were affected by similar circumstances, any reduction in confidence in the source code or cryptography underlying digital assets generally could negatively affect the demand for digital assets and therefore adversely affect the value of the Fund. |
15
| ● | In the event of widespread disruption to the Internet, the market for bitcoins may become dangerously illiquid. The Bitcoin Network's functionality relies on the Internet. A significant disruption of Internet connectivity affecting large numbers of users or geographic areas could impede the functionality of the Bitcoin Network and adversely affect the instruments providing exposure to the price of bitcoin in which the Fund invests. In addition, certain features of the Bitcoin Network, such as decentralization, open source protocol, and reliance on peer-to-peer connectivity, may increase the risk of fraud or cyber-attack by potentially reducing the likelihood of a coordinated response. |
FLEX Options Risk. The use of option contracts involves investment strategies and risks different from those associated with ordinary portfolio securities transactions. The Fund will utilize FLEX Options for its Bitcoin ETP Options, which are issued and guaranteed for settlement by the OCC. The Fund bears the risk that the OCC will be unable or unwilling to perform its obligations under the FLEX Options contracts. In the unlikely event that the OCC becomes insolvent or is otherwise unable to meet its settlement obligations, the Fund could suffer significant losses. Additionally, FLEX Options may be less liquid than certain other securities, such as standardized options. In less liquid markets for the FLEX Options, the Fund may have difficulty closing out certain FLEX Options positions at desired times and prices. In connection with the creation and redemption of Shares, to the extent market participants are not willing or able to enter into FLEX Option transactions with the Fund at prices that reflect the market price of the Shares, the Fund's NAV and, in turn the share price of the Fund, could be negatively impacted. The Fund may experience substantial downside from specific FLEX Option positions and certain FLEX Option positions may expire worthless.
The prices of option contracts are volatile and are influenced by, among other things, actual and anticipated changes in the value of the underlying instrument, or in interest rates, including the implied volatility, which in turn are affected by fiscal and monetary policies and by national and international political and economic events. The effective use of option contracts also depends on the Fund's ability to terminate its option contracts at times deemed desirable to do so. There is no assurance that the Fund will be able to effect closing transactions at any particular time or at an advantageous price. The Fund enters into FLEX Options in accordance with Rule 18f-4. Accordingly, the Fund is required to, among other things, adopt and implement a written derivatives risk management program and comply with limitations on risks relating to its derivatives transactions. To the extent the Fund is noncompliant with Rule 18f-4, the Fund may be required to adjust its investment portfolio which may, in turn, negatively impact the Fund's ability to provide its sought-after investment returns.
16
Swap Agreements Risk. The Fund may enter into cash-settled swaps and other derivatives to gain exposure to an underlying asset without actually purchasing such asset. Swaps are two-party contracts entered into primarily by institutional investors for periods ranging from a day to more than one year. In a standard "swap" transaction, two parties agree to exchange the returns (or differentials in rates of return) earned or realized on a particular pre-determined interest rate, commodity, security, indexes, or other assets or measurable indicators. The primary risks associated with the use of swaps are mispricing or improper valuation, imperfect correlation between movements in the notional amount and the price of the underlying investments, and the failure of a counterparty to perform. If a counterparty's creditworthiness for an over-the-counter swap declines, the value of the swap would likely decline. Moreover, there is no guarantee that the Fund could eliminate its exposure under an outstanding swap by entering into an offsetting swap with the same or another party. In addition, the Fund may use a combination of swaps on an underlying index and swaps that reference Bitcoin ETPs that is designed to track the performance of that index. The performance of a Bitcoin ETP may deviate from the performance of its underlying index due to embedded costs and other factors. Thus, the Fund's swaps may be subject to greater correlation risk to the extent such agreements reference a Bitcoin ETP as the reference asset, and as a result may not achieve as high of a degree of correlation with the Bitcoin Price as it otherwise would.
Clearing Member Default Risk. Transactions in some types of derivatives, including FLEX Options, are required to be centrally cleared ("cleared derivatives"). In a transaction involving cleared derivatives, the Fund's counterparty is a clearing house, such as the OCC, rather than a bank or broker. Since the Fund is not a member of clearing houses and only members of a clearing house ("clearing members") can participate directly in the clearing house, the Fund will hold cleared derivatives through accounts at clearing members. In cleared derivatives positions, the Fund will make payments (including margin payments) to, and receive payments from, a clearing house through their accounts at clearing members. Customer funds held at a clearing organization in connection with any option contracts are held in a commingled omnibus account and are not identified to the name of the clearing member's individual customers. As a result, assets deposited by the Fund with any clearing member as margin for its Bitcoin ETP Options may, in certain circumstances, be used to satisfy losses of other clients of the Fund's clearing member. In addition, although clearing members guarantee performance of their clients' obligations to the clearing house, there is a risk that the assets of the Fund might not be fully protected in the event of the clearing member's bankruptcy. The Fund is also subject to the risk that a limited number of clearing members are willing to transact on the Fund's behalf, which heightens the risks associated with a clearing member's default. If a clearing member defaults the Fund could lose some or all of the benefits of a transaction entered into by the Fund with the clearing member. The loss of a clearing member for the Fund to transact with could result in increased transaction costs and other operational issues that could impede the Fund's ability to implement its investment strategy. If the Fund cannot find a clearing member to transact with on the Fund's behalf, the Fund may be unable to effectively implement its investment strategy.
Counterparty Risk. The Fund is subject to counterparty risk by virtue of its investments in the Bitcoin Instruments. Counterparty risk is the risk an issuer, guarantor or counterparty of a security in the Fund is unable or unwilling to meet its obligation on the security. Counterparty risk may arise because of the counterparty's financial condition, market activities, or for other reasons. The Fund may be unable to recover its investment from the counterparty or may obtain a limited and/or delayed recovery. The OCC acts as guarantor and central counterparty with respect to the FLEX Options. As a result, the ability of the Fund to meet its objective depends on the OCC being able to meet its obligations. In the event an OCC clearing member that is a counterparty of the Fund were to become insolvent, the Fund may have some or all of its FLEX Options closed without its consent or may experience delays or other difficulties in attempting to close or exercise its affected FLEX Options positions, both of which would impair the Fund's ability to deliver on its investment strategy. The OCC's rules and procedures are designed to facilitate the prompt settlement of options transactions and exercises, including for clearing member insolvencies. However, there is the risk that the OCC and its backup system will fail if clearing member insolvencies are substantial or widespread. In the unlikely event that the OCC becomes insolvent or is otherwise unable to meet its settlement obligations, the Fund could suffer significant losses.
17
Bitcoin ETPs Risk. The Fund uses one or more Bitcoin ETPs as the reference asset for its Bitcoin Instruments, and may invest in shares of Bitcoin ETPs. Bitcoin ETPs are exchange-traded investment products not registered under the 1940 Act that seek to match the daily changes in the price of bitcoin, and trade intra-day on a national securities exchange. Shares of Bitcoin ETPs are not traded at net asset value, but may trade at prices above or below the value of their underlying portfolios. The level of risk involved in the purchase or sale of a Bitcoin ETPs is similar to the risk involved in the purchase or sale of an exchange traded fund, and generally reflect the risks of owning the underlying bitcoin and cash that the Bitcoin ETP holds.
Bitcoin ETPs are subject to management fees and other fees that may increase their costs versus the costs of owning bitcoin directly. To the extent the Fund invests directly in Bitcoin ETPs, the Fund will indirectly bear its proportionate share of management fees and other expenses that are charged by Bitcoin ETPs in addition to the management fees and other expenses paid by the Fund. The Fund will pay brokerage commissions in connection with the purchase and sale of shares of Bitcoin ETPs.
Bitcoin ETPs generally determine the price of bitcoin by reference to a benchmark rate or index. Since the Fund uses Bitcoin ETPs to get its exposure to the price of bitcoin, the risk exists that the Bitcoin Price will not track the global price of bitcoin, or the price of bitcoin on any one digital asset trading platform. In the event the Bitcoin Price deviates from the global price of bitcoin, the Fund's sought-after two times returns will likely deviate from the returns of the price of bitcoin.
Collateral Investments Risk. The Fund's use of Collateral Investments may include obligations issued or guaranteed by the U.S. Government, its agencies and instrumentalities, including bills, notes and bonds issued by the U.S. Treasury, investment companies registered under the 1940 Act that invest in high-quality securities and corporate debt securities, such as commercial paper.
Some securities issued or guaranteed by federal agencies and U.S. Government-sponsored instrumentalities may not be backed by the full faith and credit of the United States, in which case the investor must look principally to the agency or instrumentality issuing or guaranteeing the security for ultimate repayment, and may not be able to assert a claim against the United States itself in the event that the agency or instrumentality does not meet its commitment. The U.S. Government, its agencies and instrumentalities do not guarantee the market value of their securities, and consequently, the value of such securities may fluctuate. Although the Fund may hold securities that carry U.S. Government guarantees, these guarantees do not extend to shares of the Fund.
Investment companies that invest in high-quality securities are subject to management fees and other expenses. Therefore, investments in these funds will cause the Fund to bear indirectly a proportional share of the fees and costs of the funds in which it invests. At the same time, the Fund will continue to pay its own management fees and expenses with respect to all of its assets, including any portion invested in the shares of such fund. It is possible to lose money by investing in investment companies that invest in high-quality securities.
18
Corporate debt securities such as commercial paper generally are short-term unsecured promissory notes issued by businesses. Corporate debt may carry variable or floating rates of interest. Corporate debt securities carry both credit risk and interest rate risk. Credit risk is the risk that the Fund could lose money if the issuer of a corporate debt security is unable to pay interest or repay principal when it is due.
Tax Risk. The Fund intends to elect and to qualify each year to be treated as a RIC under Subchapter M of the Code. As a RIC, the Fund will not be subject to U.S. federal income tax on the portion of its net investment income and net capital gain that it distributes to Shareholders, provided that it satisfies certain requirements of the Code. If the Fund does not qualify as a RIC for any taxable year and certain relief provisions are not available, the Fund's taxable income will be subject to tax at the Fund level and to a further tax at the shareholder level when such income is distributed. Additionally, buying securities shortly before the record date for a taxable dividend or capital gain distribution is commonly known as "buying the dividend." In the event a shareholder purchases Shares shortly before such a distribution, the entire distribution may be taxable to the shareholder even though a portion of the distribution effectively represents a return of the purchase price. To comply with the asset diversification test applicable to a RIC, the Fund will limit its investments in the Subsidiary to 25% of the Fund's total assets at the end of each tax quarter. The investment strategy of the Fund will cause the Fund to hold substantially more than 25% of the Fund's total assets in investments in the Subsidiary the majority of the time. The Fund intends to manage the exposure to the Subsidiary so that the Fund's investments in the Subsidiary do not exceed 25% of the total assets at the end of any tax quarter. If the Fund's investments in the Subsidiary were to exceed 25% of the Fund's total assets at the end of a tax quarter, the Fund, generally, has a grace period to cure such lack of compliance. If the Fund fails to timely cure, it may no longer be eligible to be treated as a RIC.
Because the Fund's Bitcoin Instruments produce non-qualifying income for purposes of qualifying as a RIC, the Fund makes its investments in such instruments through the Subsidiary. The Fund intends to treat any income it may derive from the Bitcoin Instruments received by the Subsidiary as "qualifying income" under the provisions of the Code applicable to RICs. The Internal Revenue Service (the "IRS") has issued numerous Private Letter Rulings ("PLRs") provided to third parties not associated with the Fund or its affiliates (which only those parties may rely on as precedent) concluding that similar arrangements resulted in qualifying income. Many of such PLRs have now been revoked by the IRS. In March of 2019, the Internal Revenue Service published Regulations that concluded that income from a corporation similar to the Subsidiary would be qualifying income, if the income is related to the Fund's business of investing in stocks or securities. Although the Regulations do not require distributions from the Subsidiary, the Fund intends to cause the Subsidiary to make distributions that would allow the Fund to make timely distributions to its shareholders. The Fund generally will be required to include in its own taxable income the income of the Subsidiary for a tax year, regardless of whether the Fund receives a distribution of the Subsidiary's income in that tax year, and this income would nevertheless be subject to the distribution requirement for qualification as a regulated investment company and would be taken into account for purposes of the 4% excise tax.
19
If, in any year, the Fund were to fail to qualify for the special tax treatment accorded a RIC and its shareholders, and were ineligible to or were not to cure such failure, the Fund would be taxed in the same manner as an ordinary corporation subject to U.S. federal income tax on all its income at the fund level. The resulting taxes could substantially reduce the Fund's net assets and the amount of income available for distribution. In addition, in order to requalify for taxation as a RIC, the Fund could be required to recognize unrealized gains, pay substantial taxes and interest, and make certain distributions.
Authorized Participant Concentration Risk. Only an authorized participant may engage in creation or redemption transactions directly with the Fund. The Fund has a limited number of institutions that may act as authorized participants on an agency basis (i.e., on behalf of other market participants). To the extent that authorized participants exit the business or are unable to proceed with orders for the issuance or redemption of Creation Units and no other authorized participant is able to step forward to fulfill the order, Shares may be more likely to trade at a premium or discount to NAV and possibly face trading halts and/or delisting, and the bid/ask spread (the difference between the price that someone is willing to pay for Shares at a specific point in time versus the price at which someone is willing to sell) on Shares may widen.
Cash Transactions Risk. The Fund may effectuate all or a portion of its creations and redemptions for cash, rather than in-kind securities. As a result, an investment in the Fund may be less tax-efficient than an investment in an ETF that effects its creations and redemptions only in-kind. ETFs are able to make in-kind redemptions to avoid being taxed on gains on the distributed portfolio securities at the fund level. A Fund that effects redemptions for cash may be required to sell portfolio securities in order to obtain the cash needed to distribute redemption proceeds. Any recognized gain on these sales by the Fund will generally cause the Fund to recognize a gain it might not otherwise have recognized, or to recognize such gain sooner than would otherwise be required if it were to distribute portfolio securities only in-kind. The Fund intends to distribute these gains to shareholders to avoid being taxed on this gain at the fund level and otherwise comply with special tax rules that apply to it. This strategy may cause shareholders to be subject to tax on gains they would not otherwise be subject to, or at an earlier date than if they had made an investment in another ETF. Moreover, cash transactions may have to be carried out over several days if the securities market is relatively illiquid and may involve considerable brokerage fees and taxes. These brokerage fees and taxes, which will be higher than if the Fund sold and redeemed its shares principally in-kind, will be passed on to those purchasing and redeeming Creation Units in the form of creation and redemption transaction fees. In addition, these factors may result in wider spreads between the bid and the offered prices of Fund Shares than for ETFs that distribute portfolio securities in-kind. The Fund's use of cash for creations and redemptions could also result in dilution to the Fund and increases transaction costs, which could negatively impact the Fund's ability to achieve its investment objective.
Cyber Security Risk. As the use of Internet technology has become more prevalent in the course of business, the investment industry has become more susceptible to potential operational risks through breaches in cyber security. A breach in cyber security refers to both intentional and unintentional events that may cause the Fund to lose proprietary information, suffer data corruption or lose operational capacity. Such events could cause the Fund to incur regulatory penalties, reputational damage, additional compliance costs associated with corrective measures and/or financial loss. Cyber security breaches may involve unauthorized access to the Fund's digital information systems through "hacking" or malicious software coding, but may also result from outside attacks such as denial-of-service attacks through efforts to make network services unavailable to intended users. In addition, cyber security breaches of the Fund's third-party service providers, such as its administrator, transfer agent, custodian, or issuers in which the Fund invests, can also subject the Fund to many of the same risks associated with direct cyber security breaches. The Fund has established risk management systems designed to reduce the risks associated with cyber security. However, there is no guarantee that such efforts will succeed, especially because the Fund does not directly control the cyber security systems of issuers or third-party service providers.
20
Debt Securities Risk. Investments in debt securities subject the holder to the credit risk of the issuer. Credit risk refers to the possibility that the issuer or other obligor of a security will not be able or willing to make payments of interest and principal when due. Generally, the value of debt securities will change inversely with changes in interest rates. To the extent that interest rates rise, certain underlying obligations may be paid off substantially slower than originally anticipated and the value of those securities may fall sharply. During periods of falling interest rates, the income received by the Fund may decline. If the principal on a debt security is prepaid before expected, the prepayments of principal may have to be reinvested in obligations paying interest at lower rates. Debt securities generally do not trade on a securities exchange making them generally less liquid and more difficult to value than common stock.
Frequent Trading Risk. The Fund regularly purchases and subsequently sells (i.e., "rolls") individual Bitcoin ETP Options throughout the year so as to maintain a fully invested position. As the contracts near their expiration dates, the Fund rolls them over into new contracts. This frequent trading of contracts may increase the amount of commissions or mark-ups to broker-dealers that the Fund pays when it buys and sells contracts, which may detract from the Fund's performance. High portfolio turnover may result in the Fund paying higher levels of transaction costs and may generate greater tax liabilities for shareholders. Frequent trading risk may cause the Fund's performance to be less than expected.
Interest Rate Risk. Interest rate risk is the risk that the value of the debt securities in the Fund's portfolio will decline because of rising market interest rates. Interest rate risk is generally lower for shorter term debt securities and higher for longer-term debt securities. Duration is a reasonably accurate measure of a debt security's price sensitivity to changes in interest rates and a common measure of interest rate risk. Duration measures a debt security's expected life on a present value basis, taking into account the debt security's yield, interest payments and final maturity. In general, duration represents the expected percentage change in the value of a security for an immediate 1% change in interest rates. For example, the price of a debt security with a three-year duration would be expected to drop by approximately 3% in response to a 1% increase in interest rates. Therefore, prices of debt securities with shorter durations tend to be less sensitive to interest rate changes than debt securities with longer durations. As the value of a debt security changes over time, so will its duration.
Leverage Risk. The Fund seeks to achieve and maintain the exposure to the Bitcoin Price by using leverage inherent in option contracts and/or swap agreements. Therefore, the Fund is subject to leverage risk. When the Fund purchases or sells an instrument or enters into a transaction without investing an amount equal to the full economic exposure of the instrument or transaction, it creates leverage, which can result in the Fund losing more than it originally invested. As a result, these investments may magnify losses to the Fund, and even a small market movement may result in significant losses to the Fund. Leverage may also cause the Fund to be more volatile because it may exaggerate the effect of any increase or decrease in the value of the Fund's portfolio securities. Futures trading involves a degree of leverage and as a result, a relatively small price movement in futures instruments may result in immediate and substantial losses to the Fund. The Fund may at times be required to liquidate portfolio positions, including when it is not advantageous to do so, in order to comply with guidance from the SEC regarding asset segregation requirements to cover certain leveraged positions.
21
If the Fund is unable to obtain sufficient leveraged exposure to the Bitcoin Price due to the limited availability of necessary investments or financial instruments or trading halts, the Fund could, among other things, limit or suspend the purchase of creation units until the Adviser determines that the requisite exposure to the Bitcoin Price is obtainable. During the period that the purchase of creation units is suspended, the Fund could trade at a significant premium or discount to its NAV and could experience substantial redemptions.
Liquidity Risk. The Fund's investments are subject to liquidity risk, which exists when an investment is or becomes difficult or impossible to purchase or sell at an advantageous time and price. Liquidity risk may be the result of, among other things, market turmoil, the reduced number and capacity of traditional market participants, or the lack of an active trading market. Markets for securities or financial instruments could be disrupted by a number of events, including, but not limited to, an economic crisis, natural disasters, new legislation or regulatory changes inside or outside the U.S. Liquid investments may become less liquid after being purchased by the Fund, particularly during periods of market stress. In addition, if a transaction is particularly large or if the relevant market is or becomes illiquid, it may not be possible to initiate a transaction or liquidate a position, which may cause the Fund to suffer significant losses and difficulties in meeting redemptions. If a number of securities held by the Fund stop trading, it may have a cascading effect and cause the Fund to halt trading. Volatility in market prices will increase the risk of the Fund being subject to a trading halt. In the event that trading in the underlying Bitcoin ETP Options is limited or absent, the value of the Fund's Bitcoin ETP Options may decrease. There is no guarantee that a liquid secondary trading market will exist for the Bitcoin ETP Options. The trading in FLEX Options, such as the Bitcoin ETP Options, may be less deep and liquid than the market for certain other securities, including certain non-customized option contracts. In a less liquid market for the Bitcoin ETP Options, terminating the Bitcoin ETP Options may require the payment of a premium or acceptance of a discounted price and may take longer to complete. Additionally, the liquidation of a large number of Bitcoin ETP Options may more significantly impact the price in a less liquid market. Further, the Fund requires a sufficient number of participants to facilitate the purchase and sale of options on an exchange to provide liquidity to the Fund for its FLEX Option positions. A less liquid trading market may adversely impact the value of the Bitcoin ETP Options and the value of your investment.
Market Maker Risk. If the Fund has lower average daily trading volumes, it may rely on a small number of third-party market makers to provide a market for the purchase and sale of Shares. Any trading halt or other problem relating to the trading activity of these market makers could result in a dramatic change in the spread between the Fund's NAV and the price at which the Shares are trading on the Exchange, which could result in a decrease in value of the Shares. In addition, decisions by market makers or authorized participants to reduce their role or step away from these activities in times of market stress could inhibit the effectiveness of the arbitrage process in maintaining the relationship between the underlying values of the Fund's portfolio securities and the Fund's market price. This reduced effectiveness could result in Shares trading at a discount to NAV and also in greater than normal intra-day bid-ask spreads for Shares.
22
Market Risk. The Fund could lose money over short periods due to short-term market movements and over longer periods during more prolonged market downturns. Assets may decline in value due to factors affecting financial markets generally or particular asset classes or industries represented in the markets. The value of option contracts or other assets may also decline due to general market conditions, economic trends or events that are not specifically related to the issuer of the security or other asset, or due to factors that affect a particular issuer or issuers, country, group of countries, region, market, industry, group of industries, sector or asset class. During a general market downturn, multiple asset classes may be negatively affected. Changes in market conditions and interest rates will not have the same impact on all types of securities. The value of Shares may also decline as a result of market conditions. Factors such as inflation, changes in interest rates, changes in regulatory requirements, bank failures, political climate deterioration or developments, armed conflicts, natural disasters or future health crises, may negatively impact market conditions, and cause a decrease in the value of Shares. Other unexpected political, regulatory and diplomatic events within the U.S. and abroad may affect investor and consumer confidence and may adversely impact financial markets and the broader economy. These events, and any other future events, may adversely affect the prices and liquidity of the Fund's portfolio investments and could result in disruptions in the trading markets.
New Fund Risk. The Fund is new and currently has fewer assets than larger funds, and like other new funds, large inflows and outflows may impact the Fund's market exposure for limited periods of time. This impact may be positive or negative, depending on the direction of market movement during the period affected. Additionally, because the Fund has fewer assets than larger funds over which to spread its fixed costs, its expense levels on a percentage basis will be higher than that of a larger fund.
Non-Diversification Risk. The Fund is classified as a "non-diversified company" under the 1940 Act. As a result, the Fund is only limited as to the percentage of its assets which may be invested in the securities of any one issuer by the diversification requirements imposed by the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended (the "Code"). The Fund may invest a relatively high percentage of its assets in a limited number of issuers. As a result, the Fund may be more susceptible to a single adverse economic or regulatory occurrence affecting one or more of these issuers, experience increased volatility and be highly invested in certain issuers.
Operational Risk. The Fund is exposed to operational risks arising from a number of factors, including, but not limited to, human error in the implementation of the Fund's investment strategy, processing and communication errors, errors of the Fund's service providers, counterparties or other third-parties, failed or inadequate processes and technology or systems failures. The Fund and the Adviser and Sub-Adviser seek to reduce these operational risks through controls and procedures. However, these measures do not address every possible risk and may be inadequate to address these risks.
Portfolio Turnover Risk. High portfolio turnover may result in increased transaction costs to the Fund, including brokerage commissions, dealer markups and other transaction costs on the sale of the securities and on reinvestment in other securities.
23
Premium/Discount Risk. Shares trade on the Exchange at market prices rather than their NAV. The market price of Shares generally corresponds to movements in the Fund's NAV as well as the relative supply and demand for Shares on the Exchange. The market price may be at, above (a premium) or below (a discount) the Fund's NAV. Differences in market prices of Shares and the NAV per Share may be due, in large part, to the fact that supply and demand forces at work in the secondary trading market for Shares will be closely related to, but not identical to, the same forces influencing the prices of the Fund's holdings trading individually or in the aggregate at any point in time. These differences can be especially pronounced during times of market volatility or stress. During these periods, the demand for Shares may decrease considerably and cause the market price of Shares to deviate, and in some cases deviate significantly, from the Fund's NAV and the bid/ask spread on Shares may widen.
Reverse Repurchase Agreements Risk. The Fund may invest in reverse repurchase agreements. Reverse repurchase agreements are transactions in which the Fund sells portfolio securities to financial institutions such as banks and broker-dealers, and agrees to repurchase them at a mutually agreed-upon date and price which is higher than the original sale price. Reverse repurchase agreements are a form of leverage and the use of reverse repurchase agreements by the Fund may increase the Fund's volatility. The Fund incurs costs, including interest expenses, in connection with the opening and closing of reverse repurchase agreements that will be borne by the shareholders.
Reverse repurchase agreements are also subject to the risk that the other party to the reverse repurchase agreement will be unable or unwilling to complete the transaction as scheduled, which may result in losses to the Fund. In situations where the Fund is required to post collateral with a counterparty, the counterparty may fail to segregate the collateral or may commingle the collateral with the counterparty's own assets. As a result, in the event of the counterparty's bankruptcy or insolvency, the Fund's collateral may be subject to the conflicting claims of the counterparty's creditors, and the Fund may be exposed to the risk of a court treating the Fund as a general unsecured creditor of the counterparty, rather than as the owner of the collateral. There can be no assurance that a counterparty will not default and that the Fund will not sustain a loss on a transaction as a result.
Reverse repurchase agreements also involve the risk that the market value of the securities sold by the Fund may decline below the price at which it is obligated to repurchase the securities. In addition, when the Fund invests the proceeds it receives in a reverse repurchase transaction, there is a risk that those investments may decline in value. In this circumstance, the Fund could be required to sell other investments in order to meet its obligations to repurchase the securities.
Subsidiary Investment Risk. Changes in the laws of the United States and/or the Cayman Islands, under which the Fund and the Subsidiary are organized, respectively, could result in the inability of the Fund to operate as intended and could negatively affect the Fund and its shareholders. The Subsidiary is not registered under the 1940 Act and is not subject to all the investor protections of the 1940 Act. However, as the Subsidiary is wholly-owned by the Fund, and the investors of the Fund will have the investor protections of the 1940 Act, the Fund as a whole-including the Subsidiary-will provide investors with 1940 Act protections.
24
Trading Issues Risk. Although the Shares are listed for trading on the Exchange, there can be no assurance that an active trading market for such Shares will develop or be maintained. Shares trade on the Exchange at market prices that may be below, at or above the Fund's NAV. Securities, including the Shares, are subject to market fluctuations and liquidity constraints that may be caused by such factors as economic, political, or regulatory developments, changes in interest rates, and/or perceived trends in securities prices. Shares of the Fund could decline in value or underperform other investments. Trading in Shares on the Exchange may be halted due to market conditions or for reasons that, in the view of the Exchange, make trading in Shares inadvisable. In addition, trading in Shares on the Exchange is subject to trading halts caused by extraordinary market volatility pursuant to the Exchange "circuit breaker" rules. Market makers are under no obligation to make a market in the Shares, and authorized participants are not obligated to submit purchase or redemption orders for Creation Units. There can be no assurance that the requirements of the Exchange necessary to maintain the listing of the Fund will continue to be met or will remain unchanged. Initially, due to the small asset size of the Fund, it may have difficulty maintaining its listings on the Exchange.
Valuation Risk. During periods of reduced market liquidity or in the absence of readily available market quotations for the holdings of the Fund, the ability of the Fund to value its holdings becomes more difficult and the judgment of the Fund's investment adviser (employing the fair value procedures adopted by the Board of Trustees of the Trust) may play a greater role in the valuation of the Fund's holdings due to reduced availability of reliable objective pricing data. Consequently, while such determinations may be made in good faith, it may nevertheless be more difficult for the Fund to accurately assign a daily value. In the event an investment may need to be fair valued, the valuation involves subjectivity and there is a risk that the Fund may not be able to sell an investment at the price assigned to it in accordance with the Trust's procedures in accordance with Rule 2a-5 of the 1940 Act ("Rule 2a-5").
The Shares will change in value, and you could lose money by investing in the Fund. The Fund may not achieve its investment objective.
Performance
As of the date of this prospectus, the Fund has not yet commenced operations and therefore does not have a performance history. Once available, the Fund's performance information will be accessible on the Fund's website at www.innovatoretfs.com and will provide some indication of the risks of investing in the Fund.
Management
Investment Adviser
Innovator Capital Management, LLC
Investment Sub-Adviser
Milliman Financial Risk Management LLC ("Milliman" or the "Sub-Adviser")
Portfolio Managers
The following persons serve as portfolio managers of the Fund.
| • | Robert T. Cummings, Principal, Senior Director, Head of Portfolio Management at Milliman |
| • | Jordan B. Rosenfeld, Senior Director and Portfolio Manager at Milliman |
The portfolio managers are primarily and jointly responsible for the day-to-day management of the Fund and have served in such capacity since the Fund's inception in [_____] 2025.
25
Purchase and Sale of Fund Shares
The Fund will issue and redeem Shares at NAV only with authorized participants that have entered into agreements with the Fund's distributor and only in Creation Units or multiples thereof ("Creation Unit Aggregations"), in exchange for the deposit or delivery of a basket of securities in which the Fund invests. The Fund may also issue and redeem Shares in exchange for cash. Except when aggregated in Creation Units, the Shares are not redeemable securities of the Fund.
Individual Shares may only be bought and sold in the secondary market (i.e., on a national securities exchange) through a broker or dealer at a market price. Because the Shares trade at market prices rather than NAV, Shares may trade at a price greater than NAV (at a premium), at NAV, or less than NAV (at a discount). An investor may incur costs attributable to the difference between the highest price a buyer is willing to pay to purchase Shares (bid) and the lowest price a seller is willing to accept for Shares (ask) when buying or selling shares in the secondary market (the "bid-ask spread").
Recent information, including information on the Fund's NAV, market price, premiums and discounts, and bid-ask spreads, is available online at www.innovatoretfs.com.
Tax Information
The Fund's distributions will generally be taxable as ordinary income, returns of capital or capital gains. A sale of Shares may result in capital gain or loss.
Payments to Broker-Dealers and Other Financial Intermediaries
If you purchase Shares through a broker-dealer or other financial intermediary (such as a bank), Innovator and Foreside Fund Services, LLC, the Fund's distributor (the "Distributor"), may pay the intermediary for the sale of Shares and related services. These payments may create a conflict of interest by influencing the broker-dealer or other intermediary and your salesperson to recommend the Fund over another investment. Ask your salesperson or visit your financial intermediary's website for more information.
26
Additional Information About the Fund's Principal Investment Strategies
The Fund is a series of the Innovator ETFs® Trust (the "Trust") and is regulated as an "investment company" under the 1940 Act. The Fund's investment objective is considered non-fundamental and may be changed by the Board without shareholder approval. Additionally, the Fund may liquidate and terminate at any time without shareholder approval. Unless an investment policy is identified as being fundamental, all investment policies included in this prospectus and the Fund's Statement of Additional Information ("SAI") are considered non-fundamental, and may be changed by the Board of Trustees of the Trust (the "Board") without shareholder approval. There is no guarantee that the Fund will achieve its investment objective.
Additional Information Regarding the Fund's Investment Objective
The Fund seeks daily investment results, before fees and expenses, that correspond to two times (200%) the daily price performance of the Bitcoin Price for a single day, not for any other period. The Fund does not seek to achieve its stated investment objectives over a period of time greater than a single day. A "single day" is measured from the time the Fund calculates its NAV to the time of the Fund's next NAV calculation.
The return of the Fund for periods longer than a single day will be the result of its return for each day compounded over the period. The Fund's returns for periods longer than a single day will very likely differ in amount, and possibly even direction, from the Fund's stated multiple (200%) times the return of bitcthe Bitcoin Priceoin for the same period. For periods longer than a single day, the Fund will lose money if the Bitcoin Price's performance is flat, and it is possible that the Fund will lose money even if the level of the Bitcoin Price falls. Longer holding periods, higher bitcoin volatility, and greater leveraged exposure each exacerbate the impact of compounding on an investor's returns. During periods of higher bitcoin volatility, the volatility of bitcoin may affect the Fund's return as much as or more than the return of bitcoin.
Bitcoin is a relatively new asset class and is subject to unique and substantial risks, including the risk that the value of the Fund's investments could decline rapidly, including to zero. Bitcoin has historically been more volatile than traditional asset classes. You should be prepared to lose your entire investment.
The Fund's investment objective is non-fundamental, meaning it may be changed by the Board without the approval of Fund shareholders. The Fund does not take temporary defensive positions. The Fund will generally seek to achieve its investment objective, irrespective as to whether the value of bitcoin is flat, rising, or declining.
The Fund expects to gain two times exposure to the Bitcoin Price by investing a portion of its assets in a wholly-owned subsidiary of the Fund organized under the laws of the Cayman Islands . In order to qualify as a RIC for purposes of federal income tax treatment under the Code, the Fund's exposure to its Subsidiary on or around the end of each of the Fund's fiscal quarter ends may be no more than 25% of the Fund's assets The Fund may not be able to achieve its investment objective during these times, and may return substantially less than two times (200%) the daily performance of the Bitcoin Price.
27
Additional Information Regarding the Fund's Principal Investment Strategy
Investment in the Subsidiary
The Fund expects to gain exposure to the Bitcoin Instruments by investing a portion of its assets in a wholly-owned subsidiary of the Fund organized under the laws of the Cayman Islands, the [__________]. Innovator serves as investment adviser and Milliman serves as investment sub-adviser to the Subsidiary, subject to the oversight of the Subsidiary's board of directors. The Fund complies with the provisions of the 1940 Act governing investment policies, capital structure, custody, and leverage on an aggregate basis with the Subsidiary. Except as noted herein, for purposes of this Prospectus, references to the Fund's investment strategies and risks include those of the Subsidiary.
Collateral Investments
In addition to the investment in Bitcoin Instruments, the Fund (and the Subsidiary, as applicable) will invest its remaining assets directly in cash, cash-like instruments or high-quality securities. The Collateral Investments may consist of high quality securities, which include: (1) U.S. Government securities, such as bills, notes and bonds issued by the U.S. Treasury; (2) money market funds; and/or (3) corporate debt securities, such as commercial paper and other short-term unsecured promissory notes issued by businesses that are rated investment grade or determined by the Sub-Adviser to be of comparable quality. For these purposes, "investment grade" is defined as investments with a rating at the time of purchase in one of the four highest categories of at least one nationally recognized statistical rating organizations (e.g., BBB- or higher from S&P Global Ratings or Baa3 or higher from Moody's Investors Service, Inc.). The Collateral Investments are designed to provide liquidity (i.e., provide an asset that can easily be exchanged for cash), and satisfy the "margin" requirements applicable to the Fund's Bitcoin Instruments, which require that the Fund post collateral to secure its obligations under those contracts.
Fund Investments
Principal Investments
FLEX Options
FLEX Options are customized option contracts that trade on an exchange but provide investors with the ability to customize key contract terms like strike price, style and expiration date while achieving price discovery in competitive, transparent auctions markets and avoiding the counterparty exposure of over-the-counter options positions. Like traditional exchange-traded options, FLEX Options are guaranteed for settlement by the OCC, a market clearinghouse that guarantees performance by counterparties to certain derivatives contracts.
The FLEX Options in which the Fund will invest are all European style option contracts (option contracts that are exercisable only on the expiration date). The FLEX Options are listed on the Chicago Board Options Exchange.
28
The Fund will purchase and sell call a combination of FLEX Options. In general, put options give the holder (i.e., the buyer) the right to sell an asset (or deliver the cash value of the asset, in case of certain put options) and the seller (i.e., the writer) of the put has the obligation to buy the asset (or receive cash value of the asset, in case of certain put options) at a certain defined price. Call options give the holder (i.e., the buyer) the right to buy an asset (or receive cash value of the asset, in case of certain call options) and the seller (i.e., the writer) the obligation to sell the asset (or deliver cash value of the asset, in case of certain call options) at a certain defined price. The FLEX Options held by the Fund will be cash settled (options that give the Fund the right to receive, or require the Fund to deliver, a cash payment on the option expiration date based upon the difference between the strike price and the then-current price of the Underlying ETF).
The Fund will use the market value of its derivatives holdings for the purpose of determining compliance with the 1940 Act and the rules promulgated thereunder. Since the FLEX Options held by the Fund are exchange-traded, these will be valued on a mark-to-market basis. In the event market prices are not available, the Fund will use fair value pricing pursuant to the fair value procedures adopted by Innovator as the "Valuation Designee" pursuant to Rule 2a-5 of the 1940 Act ("Rule 2a-5") and approved by, and subject to the oversight of, the Board. The Fund will enter into FLEX Options contracts in accordance with Rule 18f-4 under the 1940 Act, which requires the Fund to implement certain policies and procedures designed to manage its derivatives risks, dependent upon the Fund's level of exposure to derivative instruments.
Swap Agreements
The Fund will enter into an OTC swap agreement(s) with major global financial institutions to pursue its investment objective. Swap agreements are contracts entered into primarily with major financial institutions for a specified period ranging from a day to more than one year. In a standard "swap" transaction, two parties agree to exchange the return (or differentials in rates of return) earned or realized on particular predetermined investments or instruments. The gross return to be exchanged or "swapped" between the parties is calculated with respect to a "notional amount," e.g., the return on or change in value of a particular dollar amount invested in a "basket" of securities or an ETF representing a particular index. If the reference asset has a dramatic intraday move that causes a material decline in net assets, the terms of the Fund's swap agreements may permit the counterparties to immediately close out the transaction with the Fund. In that event, the Fund may be unable to enter into another swap agreement or invest in other derivatives to achieve the desired exposure consistent with its investment objective. Any costs associated with using swap agreements may also have the effect of lowering the Fund's returns. The Fund will use fair value pricing pursuant to the fair value procedures adopted by Innovator as the "Valuation Designee" pursuant to Rule 2a-5 and approved by, and subject to the oversight of, the Board. The Fund will enter into swap agreements pursuant to Rule 18f-4 under the 1940 Act, which requires the Fund to implement certain policies and procedures designed to manage its derivatives risks, dependent upon the Fund's level of exposure to derivative instruments.
U.S. Treasury Securities
U.S. Treasury securities are government debt instruments issued by the United States Department of the Treasury that are backed by the full faith and credit of the United States Government.
29
Disclosure of Portfolio Holdings
A description of the Trust's policies and procedures with respect to the disclosure of the Fund's portfolio holdings is available in the Fund's SAI, which is available at www.innovatoretfs.com.
Additional Risks of Investing in the Fund
Risk is inherent in all investing. Investing in the Fund involves risk, including the risk that you may lose all or part of your investment. There can be no assurance that the Fund will meet its stated objective. Before you invest, you should consider the following supplemental disclosure pertaining to the Principal Risks set forth above in this prospectus. The significance of each risk factor below may change over time and you should review each risk factor carefully.
Principal Risks
Aggressive Investment Risk. Bitcoin is subject to unique and substantial risks. The value of an investment in the Fund could decline significantly and without warning, including to zero. You may lose the full value of your investment within a single day. If you are not prepared to accept significant and unexpected changes in the value of the Fund and the possibility that you could lose your entire investment in the Fund you should not invest in the Fund. The value of an investment in the Fund could decline significantly and without warning, including to zero. You should be prepared to lose your entire investment. Shares will change in value, and you could lose money by investing in the Fund. The Fund may not achieve its investment objective.
Compounding Risk. The Fund has a single day investment objective, and the Fund's performance for any other period is the result of its return for each day compounded over the period. The performance of the Fund for periods longer than a single day will very likely differ in amount, and possibly even direction, from twice (200%) of the daily return of the Bitcoin Price for the same period, before accounting for fees and expenses. Compounding affects all investments, but has a more significant impact on a leveraged fund and a fund that rebalances daily. This effect becomes more pronounced as bitcoin volatility and holding periods increase.
This effect becomes more pronounced as bitcoin volatility and holding periods increase. Fund performance for a period longer than a single day can be estimated given any set of assumptions for the following factors: (a) bitcoin volatility; (b) bitcoin performance; (c) period of time; (d) financing rates associated with leveraged exposure; and (e) other Fund expenses. The chart below illustrates the impact of two principal factors - bitcoin volatility and bitcoin performance - on Fund performance. The chart shows estimated Fund returns for a number of combinations of bitcoin volatility and bitcoin performance over a one-year period. Actual volatility, bitcoin, and Fund performance may differ significantly from the chart below. Performance shown in the chart assumes: (a) no dividends paid; (b) no Fund expenses; and (c) borrowing/lending rates (to obtain leveraged exposure) of zero percent. If Fund expenses and/or actual borrowing/lending rates were reflected, the Fund's performance would be different than shown.
30
Estimated Fund Returns
| Performance | One Year Volatility Rate | |||||
| One Year Bitcoin |
Two Times (200%) the One Year Bitcoin |
10% | 25% | 50% | 75% | 100% |
| -60% | -120% | -84.2% | -85.0% | -87.5% | -90.9% | -94.1% |
| -50% | -100% | -75.2% | -76.5% | -80.5% | -85.8% | -90.8% |
| -40% | -80% | -64.4% | -66.2% | -72.0% | -79.5% | -86.8% |
| -30% | -60% | -51.5% | -54.0% | -61.8% | -72.1% | -82.0% |
| -20% | -40% | -36.6% | -39.9% | -50.2% | -63.5% | -76.5% |
| -10% | -20% | -19.8% | -23.9% | -36.9% | -53.8% | -70.2% |
| 0% | 0% | -1.0% | -6.1% | -22.1% | -43.0% | -63.2% |
| 10% | 20% | 19.8% | 13.7% | -5.8% | -31.1% | -55.5% |
| 20% | 40% | 42.6% | 35.3% | 12.1% | -18.0% | -47.0% |
| 30% | 60% | 67.3% | 58.8% | 31.6% | -3.7% | -37.8% |
| 40% | 80% | 94.0% | 84.1% | 52.6% | 11.7% | -27.9% |
| 50% | 100% | 122.8% | 111.4% | 75.2% | 28.2% | -17.2% |
| 60% | 120% | 153.5% | 140.5% | 99.4% | 45.9% | -5.8% |
Bitcoin's annualized historical volatility rate for the five-year year period ended _____ was ____%. Bitcoin's highest __ to __ volatility rate during the five-year period was ___% (____). Bitcoin's annualized total return performance for the five-year period ended ____ was ____%. Historical bitcoin volatility and performance do not predict future bitcoin volatility and performance.
Leveraged Correlation Risk. A number of factors may affect the Fund's ability to achieve a high degree of leveraged (200%) correlation with the Bitcoin Price, and there is no guarantee that the Fund will achieve a high degree of correlation. Failure to achieve a high degree of correlation may prevent the Fund from achieving its daily investment objective, and the percentage change of the Fund's NAV each day may differ, perhaps significantly in amount, and possibly even direction, from twice the daily changes in the Bitcoin Price on a given day.
A number of other factors may adversely affect the Fund's sought-after two times correlation, including fees, expenses, transaction costs, financing costs associated with the use of derivatives, income items, valuation methodology, accounting standards and disruptions or illiquidity in the Bitcoin Instruments. The Fund may take or refrain from taking positions in order to improve tax efficiency, comply with regulatory restrictions, or for other reasons, each of which may negatively affect the Fund's correlation with daily changes in the Bitcoin Price. The Fund may also be subject to large movements of assets into and out of the Fund, potentially resulting in the Fund being under- or over-exposed to bitcoin. Any of these factors could decrease correlation between the performance of the Fund and daily changes in the Bitcoin Price and may hinder the Fund's ability to meet its daily investment objective.
Target Exposure and Rebalancing Risks. The Fund normally will seek to maintain notional exposure to the Bitcoin Price at 200%. However, in order to comply with certain tax qualification tests at the end of each tax quarter, the Fund may reduce its exposure to its Bitcoin Instruments on or about such date. If the value of bitcoin rises during such periods when the Fund has reduced its futures exposure to bitcoin, without gaining a similar increased exposure through Other Investments, the performance of the Fund may be less than it would have been had the Fund maintained its exposure through such period.
31
In addition, significant and unpredictable increases in margin rates with respect to the Bitcoin Instruments relative to prevailing futures prices could result in the Fund not achieving its target two times exposure and as such would cause the Fund to experience greater risk of failing to meet its target exposure of two times (200%) the daily performance of the Bitcoin Price, before fees and expenses.
Rebalancing Risk. If for any reason the Fund is unable to rebalance all or a portion of its portfolio, or if all or a portion of the portfolio is rebalanced incorrectly, the Fund's investment exposure may not be consistent with the Fund's daily investment objective. In these instances, the Fund may not successfully track the performance of daily changes in the Bitcoin Price and may not achieve its investment objective. Additionally, the rebalancing of Bitcoin Instruments may impact the trading in such FLEC Options and may adversely affect the value of the Fund. The trading activity associated with such transactions will contribute to the existing trading volume on the underlying Bitcoin ETP Options and may adversely affect the market price of such options.
Position Limits Risk. The options exchanges have established limits on the maximum number of puts and calls covering the same underlying security that may be held or written by a single investor or group of investors acting in concert or under common control (regardless of whether the options are purchased or written on the same or different exchanges or are held or written in one or more accounts or through one or more brokers). These are referred to as "position limits." The position limit applicable to a particular option class is determined by the options exchange based on the number of shares outstanding and trading volume of the security underlying the option. The rules of the options markets generally limit the maximum number of options on the same side of the market (i.e., calls held plus puts written, or puts held plus calls written) with respect to a single underlying interest that may be carried in the accounts of a single investor or group of investors acting in concert. An options market may require that positions in certain Bitcoin ETP Options be aggregated with positions in certain other options for purposes of calculating position limits.
The clearing members that clear the Fund's listed option positions are required to monitor and report the Fund's positions to the options exchanges and may be required to liquidate positions in excess of these limits. Failure to comply with position limits may result in the imposition of fines and other sanctions by the options exchanges.
To the extent the Fund needs to modify its holdings in Bitcoin ETP Options, such modification may adversely affect the profitability of the Fund and prevent the Fund from achieving its investment objective. A violation of position limits could also lead to regulatory action materially adverse to a Fund's investment strategy.
Management Risk. The Fund is subject to management risk because it is an actively managed portfolio. The Sub-Adviser, subject to the oversight of the Adviser, will apply investment techniques and risk analyses in making investment decisions for the Fund, but there can be no guarantee that the Fund will meet its investment objective.
32
Bitcoin Investing Risk. The Fund is indirectly exposed to the risks of investing in bitcoin through its investments in Bitcoin Instruments. Bitcoin is a new and highly speculative investment. The risks associated with bitcoin include the following:
| ● | Bitcoin is a new technological innovation with a limited history. There is no assurance that usage of bitcoin will continue to grow. A contraction in use of bitcoin may result in increased volatility or a reduction in the price of bitcoin, which could adversely impact the value of the Fund. The Bitcoin Network was launched in January 2009, platform trading in bitcoin began in 2010, and Bitcoin Futures trading began in 2017, each of which limits a potential shareholder's ability to evaluate an investment in the Fund. |
| ● | The Fund's investments are exposed to risks associated with the price of bitcoin, which is subject to numerous factors and risks. The price of bitcoin is impacted by numerous factors, including: |
| ○ | The total and available supply of bitcoin, including the possibility that a small group of early bitcoin adopters hold a significant proportion of the bitcoin that has thus far been created and that sales of bitcoin by such large holders may impact the price of bitcoin; |
| ○ | Global bitcoin demand, which is influenced by the growth of retail merchants' and commercial businesses' acceptance of bitcoin as payment for goods and services, the security of online digital asset trading platforms and public bitcoin addresses that hold bitcoin, the perception that the use and holding of bitcoin is safe and secure, the lack of regulatory restrictions on their use, and the reputation regarding the use of bitcoin for illicit purposes; |
| ○ | The fact that bitcoin is not presently widely accepted as a medium of exchange, which may be due to a number of common impediments and/or disadvantages to adopting the Bitcoin Network as a payment network, including the slowness of transaction processing and finality, variability of transaction fees, and volatility of the price of bitcoin; |
| ○ | Global bitcoin supply, which is influenced by similar factors as global bitcoin demand, in addition to fiat currency (i.e., government currency not backed by an asset such as gold) needs by miners and taxpayers who may liquidate bitcoin holdings to meet tax obligations; |
| ○ | Investors' expectations with respect to the rate of inflation of fiat currencies and deflation of bitcoin; |
| ○ | Foreign exchange rates between fiat currencies and digital assets such as bitcoin; |
| ○ | Interest rates; |
| ○ | The continued operation of digital asset trading platforms in the United States and foreign jurisdictions, including their regulatory status, trading and custody policies, and cyber security; |
| ○ | Investment and trading activities of large investors, including private and registered funds, that may directly or indirectly invest in bitcoin; ○ Regulatory measures, if any, that restrict the use of bitcoin as a form of payment or the purchase or sale of bitcoin, including measures that restrict the direct or indirect participation in the bitcoin market by financial institutions or the introduction of bitcoin instruments; |
| ○ | The maintenance and development of the open-source software protocol of the Bitcoin Network; |
| ○ | Increased competition from other digital assets, including forks of the Bitcoin Network; |
| ○ | Developments in the information technology sector; |
| ○ | Global or regional political, economic or financial events and situations; |
| ○ | Investor or Bitcoin Network participant sentiments on the value or utility of bitcoin; and |
| ○ | The dedication of mining power to the Bitcoin Network and the willingness of bitcoin miners to clear bitcoin transactions for relatively low fees. |
33
Negative developments in any of these factors could adversely impact an investment in the Fund.
| ● | A decline in the adoption of bitcoin could negatively impact the performance of the Fund. As a new asset and technological innovation, the bitcoin industry is subject to a high degree of uncertainty. The adoption of bitcoin will require growth in its usage for various applications that include retail and commercial payments, cross-border and remittance transactions, speculative investment and technical applications. Adoption of bitcoin will also require an accommodating regulatory environment. A lack of expansion in usage of bitcoin could adversely affect the instruments providing exposure to the price of bitcoin in which the Fund invests. In addition, there is no assurance that bitcoin will maintain its value over the long-term. The value of bitcoin is subject to risks related to its usage. Even if growth in bitcoin adoption occurs in the near or medium-term, there is no assurance that bitcoin usage will continue to grow over the long-term. A contraction in use of bitcoin may result in increased volatility or a reduction in the price of bitcoin, which would adversely impact the value of the Fund's shares. Recently, bitcoin has come under scrutiny for its environmental impact, specifically the amount of energy consumed by bitcoin miners. Some companies have indicated they will cease accepting bitcoin for certain kinds of purchases due to such environmental concerns. To the extent such concerns persist, the demand for bitcoin and the speed of its adoption could be suppressed. |
| ● | Bitcoin trading prices are volatile, and shareholders could lose all or substantially all of their investment in the Fund. Speculators and investors who seek to profit from trading and holding bitcoin generate a significant portion of bitcoin demand. Bitcoin speculation regarding future appreciation in the value of bitcoin may inflate and make more volatile the price of a bitcoin. As a result, bitcoin may be more likely to fluctuate in value due to changing investor confidence in future appreciation in the price of bitcoin. Notably, bitcoin has been prone to rapid price declines, including significant declines occurring in a single day, throughout its history. For example, on March 12, 2020, bitcoin spot prices dropped by more than -37% on March 12, 2020, due to rapidly growing concerns about the COVID-19 outbreak. |
The price of bitcoin may be impacted by events in other parts of the blockchain and digital asset ecosystem, even if such events are not directly related to the security or utility of bitcoin or the Bitcoin Network. Such events may precipitate a significant decline in the price of bitcoin and the instruments the Fund uses to obtain exposure to the price of bitcoin.
For example, in May 2022, the TerraUSD stablecoin experienced a loss of confidence, resulting in a 98% drop by the end of the month from its intended $1.00 USD peg. The collapse in the price of TerraUSD had wide consequences for the entire blockchain and digital asset ecosystem. The drop in TerraUSD contributed to the collapse of crypto lending platforms Celsius and Voyager, as well as prominent crypto hedge fund Three Arrows Capital. Many digital assets were dragged down by the news, including bitcoin, which dropped from its then-recent high $47,062 in March 30, 2022, to $19,785 by June 30, 2022, a drop of more than 58%.
In November 2022, FTX Trading Ltd. ("FTX"), a major digital asset trading platform, filed for bankruptcy following a halt in customer withdrawals and allegations of mismanagement of customer assets. The announcement precipitated steep price drops across various digital assets, including Bitcoin, which lost more than 25% of its value in the immediate wake of the revelations.
34
On June 5, 2023, The SEC charged Binance Holdings Ltd. ("Binance"), which operates the largest crypto asset trading platform in the world, Binance.com; BAM Trading Services Inc., which, together with Binance, operates the crypto asset trading platform, Binance.US; and their founder, Changpeng Zhao, with a variety of securities law violations.
Future announcements and events related to bitcoin, the Bitcoin Network, other digital assets, NFTs, and digital asset firms, including digital asset trading platforms, lending platforms, hedge funds, market makers, and custodians, may significantly impact the prices of bitcoin and expose the Fund to significant risks.
| ● | Regulation of participants in the bitcoin ecosystem continues to evolve in both the U.S. and foreign jurisdictions, which may restrict the use of bitcoin or otherwise impact the demand for bitcoin. As a technology, the Bitcoin Network is governed by its internal protocols and source code; however, the use by individuals or businesses of the Bitcoin Network and bitcoin may be subject to government regulation. Both domestic and foreign regulators and governments have increased focus on the use of the Bitcoin Network and bitcoin since 2013. Many digital asset platforms are unlicensed, unregulated, operate without extensive supervision by governmental authorities, and do not provide the public with significant information regarding their ownership structure, management team, corporate practices, cybersecurity, and regulatory compliance. In particular, those located outside the United States may be subject to significantly less stringent regulatory and compliance requirements in their local jurisdictions, and may take the position that they are not subject to laws and regulations that would apply to a national securities exchange or designated contract market in the United States, or may, as a practical matter, be beyond the ambit of U.S. regulators. As a result, trading activity on or reported by these digital asset platforms is generally significantly less regulated than trading in regulated U.S. securities and commodities markets, and may reflect behavior that would be prohibited in regulated U.S. trading venues. In the U.S., federal and certain state authorities have exercised jurisdiction over specific uses of the Bitcoin Network and bitcoin, typically in the context of money service business regulation. Some foreign regulators and governments have exercised similar regulatory oversight; however, other jurisdictions have determined that regulatory action was premature or that the use of the Bitcoin Network should be prohibited or limited for reasons such as incompatibility with capital controls or financial system risks. Bitcoin market disruptions and resulting governmental interventions are unpredictable, and may make bitcoin illegal altogether. Future foreign regulations and directives may conflict with those in the U.S., and such regulatory actions may restrict or make bitcoin illegal in foreign jurisdictions. Future regulations and directives may impact the demand for bitcoin, and may also affect the ability of digital asset trading platforms to operate and for other market participants to enter into bitcoin transactions. Currently, there is either a fragmentation of regulatory efforts or a general lack of regulation in U.S. and foreign markets. As a result of fragmented regulatory efforts or lack of regulation, individuals or groups may engage in fraud of market manipulation. Further, the bitcoin market globally and in the United States is not subject to comparable regulatory guardrails as exist in regulated securities markets. Many bitcoin trading venues lack certain safeguards put in place by exchanges for more traditional assets to enhance the stability of trading on the exchanges and prevent "flash crashes," such as limit-down circuit breakers. As a result, the prices of bitcoin on trading venues may be subject to larger and/or more frequent sudden declines than assets traded on more traditional exchanges. Tools to detect and deter fraudulent or manipulative trading activities such as market manipulation, front-running of trades, and wash-trading may not be available to or employed by digital asset platforms, or may not exist at all. Over the past several years, some digital asset platforms have been closed due to fraud and manipulative activity, business failure or security breaches. In many of these instances, the customers of such digital asset platforms were not compensated or made whole for the partial or complete losses of their account balances in such digital asset platforms. The closure or temporary shutdown of a digital asset platform used in calculating the value of the bitcoin could adversely affect the value of the Fund. |
35
To the extent that future regulatory actions or policies limit or restrict bitcoin usage, bitcoin trading or the ability to convert bitcoin to fiat currencies, the demand for bitcoin may be reduced, which may adversely affect investment in the Fund's shares. Regulation of bitcoin continues to evolve, the ultimate impact of which remains unclear and may adversely affect, among other things, the availability, value or performance of bitcoin and, thus, the instruments in which the Fund invests. Moreover, in addition to exposing the Fund to potential new costs and expenses, additional regulation or changes to existing regulation may also require changes to the Fund's investment strategies. Although there continues to be uncertainty about the full impact of these and other regulatory changes, it is the case that the Fund may be subject to a more complex regulatory framework, and incur additional costs to comply with new requirements as well as to monitor for compliance with any new requirements going forward.
| ● | Sales of newly mined bitcoin may cause the price of bitcoin to decline, which could negatively affect an investment in the Fund. Approximately 900 newly mined bitcoin are created each day. If the parties engaged in bitcoin mining choose not to hold the newly mined bitcoin, and, instead, make them available for sale, there can be downward pressure on the price of bitcoin. A bitcoin mining operation may be more likely to sell a higher percentage of its newly created bitcoin, and more rapidly so, if it is operating at a low profit margin, thus reducing the price of bitcoin. Lower bitcoin prices may result in further tightening of profit margins for miners and worsening profitability, thereby potentially causing even further selling pressure. Decreasing profit margins and increasing sales of newly mined bitcoin could result in a reduction in the price of bitcoin, which could adversely impact an investment in the Fund. |
| ● | Disruptions at digital asset trading platforms and potential consequences of a digital asset trading platform's failure could adversely affect an investment in the Fund. Digital asset trading platforms operate websites on which users can trade bitcoin for U.S. dollars, other government currencies or other digital assets. Trades on digital asset trading platforms are unrelated to transfers of bitcoin between users via the Bitcoin Network. Bitcoin trades on digital asset trading platforms are recorded on the digital asset trading platform's internal ledger only, and each internal ledger entry for a trade will correspond to an entry for an offsetting trade in U.S. dollars, other government currency or other digital asset. Digital asset trading platforms have a limited history, and during this limited history, bitcoin prices on the digital asset markets generally, and on digital asset platforms individually, have been volatile and subject to influence by many factors, including operational interruptions. Unlike exchanges for more traditional assets, such as equity securities and futures contracts, bitcoin and digital asset trading venues are largely unregulated, may be operating out of compliance with regulation and are highly fragmented. As a result, individuals or groups may engage in fraud or market manipulation. Since 2009, several digital asset trading platforms have been closed or experienced disruptions due to fraud, failure, security breaches or distributed denial of service attacks a/k/a "DDoS Attacks." A DDoS attack is a malicious attempt to disrupt the normal traffic of network by overwhelming the target or its infrastructure with a flood of internet traffic. In many of these instances, the customers of such exchanges were not compensated or made whole for the partial or complete losses of their funds held at the exchanges. In 2014, the largest digital asset trading platform at the time, Mt. Gox, filed for bankruptcy in Japan amid reports the exchange lost up to 850,000 bitcoin, then valued then at over $450 million. Digital asset trading platforms are also appealing targets for hackers and malware. In August 2016, Bitfinex, a digital asset trading platform located in Hong Kong, reported a security breach that resulted in the theft of approximately 120,000 bitcoin valued at the time at approximately $65 million, a loss which was socialized and allocated to all Bitfinex account holders, regardless of whether the account holder held bitcoin or cash in their account. In November 2022, FTX Trading Ltd. ("FTX"), a major digital asset trading platform, filed for bankruptcy following a halt in customer withdrawals. The potential for instability of digital asset trading platforms and the closure or temporary shutdown of exchanges due to fraud, business failure, hackers, DDoS or malware, or government-mandated regulation may reduce confidence in bitcoin, which may result in greater volatility in bitcoin. |
36
| ● | Demand for bitcoin is driven, in part, by its status as the most prominent and secure digital asset. It is possible that a digital assets other than bitcoin (often referred to as "Altcoins") could have features that make it more desirable to a material portion of the digital asset user base, resulting in a reduction in demand for bitcoin, which could have a negative impact on the price of bitcoin and adversely affect the instruments in which the Fund invests. The Bitcoin Network and bitcoin, as an asset, hold a "first-to-market" advantage over other digital assets. This first-to-market advantage is driven in large part by having the largest user base and, more importantly, the largest combined mining power in use to secure the Blockchain and transaction verification system. Having a large mining network results in greater user confidence regarding the security and long-term stability of a digital asset's network and its blockchain; as a result, the advantage of more users and miners makes a digital asset more secure, which makes it more attractive to new users and miners, resulting in a network effect that strengthens the first-to-market advantage. Bitcoin also enjoys significantly greater acceptance and usage than other digital asset networks in the retail and commercial marketplace, due in large part to the relatively well-funded efforts of payment processing companies. However, it is possible that other blockchains will emerge that are similarly designed to serve as an alternative payment system, such as those focused on privacy through the use of zero-knowledge cryptography. These alternative blockchains have in the past and may in the future seek to compete with the Bitcoin Network by offering networks that improve the speed of transaction processing, address issues in the finality and variability of transaction fees in the Bitcoin Networks, and with lesser volatility in the digital asset's price than bitcoin. In addition, it is also possible that other digital assets and trading systems could become more widely accepted and used than bitcoin. The market demand for these alternative blockchains may reduce the market demand for bitcoin which would adversely impact the price of bitcoin. Despite the marked first-mover advantage of the Bitcoin Network over other digital assets, it is possible that an Altcoin could become materially popular due to either a perceived or exposed shortcoming of the Bitcoin Network protocol that is not immediately addressed by the bitcoin developers or a perceived advantage of an altcoin that includes features not incorporated into bitcoin. For example, the development of digital self-executing contracts (also known as "smart contracts" or "DeFi") on the Ethereum network has permitted the value of its native unit (ether) to rival bitcoin for periods of time. If an Altcoin obtains significant market share (either in market capitalization, mining power or use as a payment technology), this could reduce bitcoin's market share and have a negative impact on the demand for, and price of, bitcoin. Finally, the continued adoption of bitcoin may require growth in its usage as a means of payment. The slowness of transaction processing and the variability of transaction fees are significant impediments to the widespread adoption of bitcoin. To address these issues, participants have created secondary networks that layer on top of the blockchain to facilitate small, low-cost transactions (e.g., Lightning Network). These secondary networks may be more vulnerable to fraud and malicious attacks and may experience greater price volatility. In addition, participants have been slow to adopt these secondary networks. If the adoption and use of bitcoin slows or contracts, bitcoin may become less liquid, and the price of bitcoin may experience greater volatility. |
| ● | Miners may cease expanding processing power to create blocks and verify transactions if they are not adequately compensated. Miners generate revenue from both newly created bitcoin (known as the "block reward") and from fees taken upon verification of transactions. If the aggregate revenue from transaction fees and the block reward is below a miner's cost, the miner may cease operations. An acute cessation of mining operations would reduce the collective processing power on the Blockchain, which would adversely affect the transaction verification process by temporarily decreasing the speed at which blocks are added to the Blockchain and make the Blockchain more vulnerable to a malicious actor obtaining control in excess of 50 percent of the processing power on the Blockchain. Reductions in processing power could result in material, though temporary, delays in transaction confirmation time. Any reduction in confidence in the transaction verification process or mining processing power may adversely impact the price of bitcoin. Furthermore, the block reward will decrease over time. In the summer of 2020, the block reward was reduced from 12.5 to 6.25 bitcoin, and it will further reduce to 3.125 bitcoin in 2024. As the block reward continues to decrease over time, the mining incentive structure will transition to a higher reliance on transaction verification fees in order to incentivize miners to continue to dedicate processing power to the Blockchain. If transaction verification fees become too high, the marketplace may be reluctant to use bitcoin. Decreased demand for bitcoin may adversely affect its price, which may adversely affect an investment in the Fund. |
37
| ● | Bitcoin Network development contributors could propose amendments to the Bitcoin Network's protocols and software that, if accepted and authorized by large groups of Bitcoin Network users, could adversely affect an investment in the Fund. The Bitcoin Network is an open-source project meaning that any developer or computer scientist may review, propose changes to and develop software clients for the Bitcoin Network protocols. Although a small group of individuals referred to as the Core Developers previously exercised significant influence over the direction of Bitcoin Network development, no single party or group controls what refinements or improvements to the Bitcoin Network's source code are proposed, approved or produced as upgrades or new software clients for Bitcoin Network users. A software update or new software client may alter the protocols and software that govern the Bitcoin Network and the properties of bitcoin, including the irreversibility of transactions and limitations on the mining of new bitcoin. When a modification is introduced and a substantial majority of users and miners consent to the modification, the change is implemented, and the Bitcoin Network remains uninterrupted. However, if less than a substantial majority of users and miners consent to the proposed modification, and the modification is not compatible with the software prior to its modification, the consequence would be what is known as a "fork" (i.e., "split") of the Bitcoin Network (and the Blockchain), with one prong running the pre-modified software and the other running the modified software. The effect of such a fork would be the existence of two versions of the Bitcoin Network running in parallel, but with each version's underlying asset and blockchain lacking interchangeability. Additionally, a fork could be introduced by an unintentional, unanticipated software flaw in the multiple versions of otherwise compatible software users run. Although several chain forks have been addressed by community-led efforts to merge the two chains, such a fork could adversely affect Bitcoin's viability. It is possible, however, that a substantial number of Bitcoin users and miners could adopt an incompatible version of Bitcoin while resisting community-led efforts to merge the two chains. This would result in a permanent fork. On August 1, 2017, after 7 extended debates among developers as to how to improve the Bitcoin network's transaction capacity, the Bitcoin network was forked by a group of developers and miners resulting in the creation of a new blockchain, which underlies the new digital asset "Bitcoin Cash" alongside the original Bitcoin Blockchain. Bitcoin and Bitcoin Cash now operate on separate, independent blockchains. Although the Bitcoin Network remained unchanged after the fork, it is unclear how such actions will affect the long-term viability of bitcoin and, accordingly, may adversely affect an investment in the Fund. |
| ● | The decentralized structure of Bitcoin Network software development may prevent the formation of a consensus on how to improve and modify the Bitcoin Network, which could prevent needed or desirable updates and thereby adversely impact an investment in the Fund. The lack of a formal or informal centralized structure in the development of Bitcoin Network means that parties with potentially competing motives and incentives must generate a consensus on how best to improve key elements of the Bitcoin Network protocols, such as how best to increase the transaction capacity of the Bitcoin Network. If developer proposals to improve the Bitcoin Network's protocols are incapable of obtaining an overwhelming consensus for adoption, a proposal may either be abandoned or indefinitely delayed pending the formation of consensus or the proposal may result in a fork. If a desirable or necessary improvement to the Bitcoin Network protocols is not implemented, it may have a negative impact on the functioning of the Bitcoin Network or the growth of user adoption. Any such delay may, therefore, have a negative impact on the secondary market price of bitcoin and the instruments providing exposure to the price of bitcoin in which the Fund invests. |
38
| ● | The open-source structure of the Bitcoin Network protocol means that the contributors to the protocol are generally not directly compensated for their contributions in maintaining and developing the protocol. A failure to properly monitor and upgrade the protocol could damage the Bitcoin Network and, therefore, an investment in the instruments providing exposure to the price of bitcoin in which the Fund invests. As the Bitcoin Network protocol is not sold and its use does not generate revenues for contributors, contributors are generally not compensated for maintaining and updating the Bitcoin Network protocol. Although some bitcoin industry participants have funded core developers, this type of financial incentive is not typical. The lack of guaranteed financial incentive for contributors to maintain or develop the Bitcoin Network and the lack of guaranteed resources to adequately address emerging issues with the Bitcoin Network may reduce incentives to address the issues adequately or in a timely manner. This may have a negative impact on the secondary market price of bitcoin and an investment in the Fund. |
| ● | Intellectual property rights claims may adversely affect the operation of the Bitcoin Network. Third parties may assert intellectual property claims relating to the holding and transfer of digital assets and their source code. Regardless of the merit of any intellectual property or other legal action, any threatened action that reduces confidence in the Bitcoin network's long-term viability or the ability of end-users to hold and transfer bitcoin may adversely affect an investment in the Fund. Additionally, a meritorious intellectual property claim could prevent end-users from accessing the Bitcoin Network or holding or transferring their bitcoin. As a result, an intellectual property claim could adversely affect an investment in the instruments providing exposure to the price of bitcoin in which the Fund invests. |
| ● | A malicious actor may attack the Bitcoin Network in an effort to prevent its function, which may adversely impact an investment in the Fund. A malicious actor may attack the Bitcoin Network in a number of ways, including a "50 Percent Attack" or a spam attack. If a malicious actor obtains a majority of the processing power (referred to herein as "aggregate hashrate") dedicated to mining on the Bitcoin Network, it will be able to exert unilateral control over the addition of blocks to the Blockchain. As long as the malicious actor enjoys this majority it may be able to "double-spend" its own bitcoin (i.e., spend the same bitcoin in two or more conflicting transactions) as well as prevent the confirmation of other Bitcoin transactions. If such a scenario were to materialize, it could adversely affect an investment in the Fund. More simply, a malicious actor could attempt to flood the pool of unconfirmed transactions (known as the "mempool") with tens of thousands of transactions in an effort to significantly slow the confirmation of legitimate transactions across the Bitcoin Network. Such a delay, if sustained for extended periods of time, could negatively impact the secondary market price of Bitcoin. These or any other form of attack on the Bitcoin Network could adversely affect an investment the instruments providing exposure to the price of bitcoin in which the Fund invests. Moreover, in the past, flaws in the source code for digital assets have been exposed and exploited, including flaws that disabled some functionality for users, exposed users' personal information and/or resulted in the theft of users' digital assets. The cryptography underlying bitcoin could prove to be flawed or ineffective, or developments in mathematics and/or technology, including advances in digital computing, algebraic geometry and quantum computing, could result in such cryptography becoming ineffective. In any of these circumstances, a malicious actor may be able to compromise the security of the Bitcoin Network, which would adversely affect the value of the Fund. Moreover, functionality of the Bitcoin Network may be negatively affected such that it is no longer attractive to users, thereby dampening demand for bitcoin. Even if another digital asset other than bitcoin were affected by similar circumstances, any reduction in confidence in the source code or cryptography underlying digital assets generally could negatively affect the demand for digital assets and therefore adversely affect the value of the Fund. |
39
| ● | In the event of widespread disruption to the Internet, the market for bitcoins may become dangerously illiquid. The Bitcoin Network's functionality relies on the Internet. A significant disruption of Internet connectivity affecting large numbers of users or geographic areas could impede the functionality of the Bitcoin Network and adversely affect the instruments providing exposure to the price of bitcoin in which the Fund invests. In addition, certain features of the Bitcoin Network, such as decentralization, open source protocol, and reliance on peer-to-peer connectivity, may increase the risk of fraud or cyber-attack by potentially reducing the likelihood of a coordinated response. |
FLEX Options Risk. The use of option contracts involves investment strategies and risks different from those associated with ordinary portfolio securities transactions. The Fund will utilize FLEX Options for its Bitcoin ETP Options, which are issued and guaranteed for settlement by the OCC. The Fund bears the risk that the OCC will be unable or unwilling to perform its obligations under the FLEX Options contracts. In the unlikely event that the OCC becomes insolvent or is otherwise unable to meet its settlement obligations, the Fund could suffer significant losses. Additionally, FLEX Options may be less liquid than certain other securities, such as standardized options. In less liquid markets for the FLEX Options, the Fund may have difficulty closing out certain FLEX Options positions at desired times and prices. In connection with the creation and redemption of Shares, to the extent market participants are not willing or able to enter into FLEX Option transactions with the Fund at prices that reflect the market price of the Shares, the Fund's NAV and, in turn the share price of the Fund, could be negatively impacted. The Fund may experience substantial downside from specific FLEX Option positions and certain FLEX Option positions may expire worthless.
The prices of option contracts are volatile and are influenced by, among other things, actual and anticipated changes in the value of the underlying instrument, or in interest rates, including the implied volatility, which in turn are affected by fiscal and monetary policies and by national and international political and economic events. The effective use of option contracts also depends on the Fund's ability to terminate its option contracts at times deemed desirable to do so. There is no assurance that the Fund will be able to effect closing transactions at any particular time or at an advantageous price. The Fund enters into FLEX Options in accordance with Rule 18f-4. Accordingly, the Fund is required to, among other things, adopt and implement a written derivatives risk management program and comply with limitations on risks relating to its derivatives transactions. To the extent the Fund is noncompliant with Rule 18f-4, the Fund may be required to adjust its investment portfolio which may, in turn, negatively impact the Fund's ability to provide its sought-after investment returns.
40
Swap Agreements Risk. The Fund may enter into cash-settled swaps and other derivatives to gain exposure to an underlying asset without actually purchasing such asset. Swaps are two-party contracts entered into primarily by institutional investors for periods ranging from a day to more than one year. In a standard "swap" transaction, two parties agree to exchange the returns (or differentials in rates of return) earned or realized on a particular pre-determined interest rate, commodity, security, indexes, or other assets or measurable indicators. The primary risks associated with the use of swaps are mispricing or improper valuation, imperfect correlation between movements in the notional amount and the price of the underlying investments, and the failure of a counterparty to perform. If a counterparty's creditworthiness for an over-the-counter swap declines, the value of the swap would likely decline. Moreover, there is no guarantee that the Fund could eliminate its exposure under an outstanding swap by entering into an offsetting swap with the same or another party. In addition, the Fund may use a combination of swaps on an underlying index and swaps that reference Bitcoin ETPs that is designed to track the performance of that index. The performance of a Bitcoin ETP may deviate from the performance of its underlying index due to embedded costs and other factors. Thus, the Fund's swaps may be subject to greater correlation risk to the extent such agreements reference a Bitcoin ETP as the reference asset, and as a result may not achieve as high of a degree of correlation with the Bitcoin Price as it otherwise would.
Clearing Member Default Risk. Transactions in some types of derivatives, including FLEX Options, are required to be centrally cleared ("cleared derivatives"). In a transaction involving cleared derivatives, the Fund's counterparty is a clearing house, such as the OCC, rather than a bank or broker. Since the Fund is not a member of clearing houses and only members of a clearing house ("clearing members") can participate directly in the clearing house, the Fund will hold cleared derivatives through accounts at clearing members. In cleared derivatives positions, the Fund will make payments (including margin payments) to, and receive payments from, a clearing house through their accounts at clearing members. Customer funds held at a clearing organization in connection with any option contracts are held in a commingled omnibus account and are not identified to the name of the clearing member's individual customers. As a result, assets deposited by the Fund with any clearing member as margin for its Bitcoin ETP Options may, in certain circumstances, be used to satisfy losses of other clients of the Fund's clearing member. In addition, although clearing members guarantee performance of their clients' obligations to the clearing house, there is a risk that the assets of the Fund might not be fully protected in the event of the clearing member's bankruptcy. The Fund is also subject to the risk that a limited number of clearing members are willing to transact on the Fund's behalf, which heightens the risks associated with a clearing member's default. If a clearing member defaults the Fund could lose some or all of the benefits of a transaction entered into by the Fund with the clearing member. The loss of a clearing member for the Fund to transact with could result in increased transaction costs and other operational issues that could impede the Fund's ability to implement its investment strategy. If the Fund cannot find a clearing member to transact with on the Fund's behalf, the Fund may be unable to effectively implement its investment strategy.
41
Counterparty Risk. The Fund is subject to counterparty risk by virtue of its investments in the Bitcoin Instruments. Counterparty risk is the risk an issuer, guarantor or counterparty of a security in the Fund is unable or unwilling to meet its obligation on the security. Counterparty risk may arise because of the counterparty's financial condition, market activities, or for other reasons. The Fund may be unable to recover its investment from the counterparty or may obtain a limited and/or delayed recovery. The OCC acts as guarantor and central counterparty with respect to the FLEX Options. As a result, the ability of the Fund to meet its objective depends on the OCC being able to meet its obligations. In the event an OCC clearing member that is a counterparty of the Fund were to become insolvent, the Fund may have some or all of its FLEX Options closed without its consent or may experience delays or other difficulties in attempting to close or exercise its affected FLEX Options positions, both of which would impair the Fund's ability to deliver on its investment strategy. The OCC's rules and procedures are designed to facilitate the prompt settlement of options transactions and exercises, including for clearing member insolvencies. However, there is the risk that the OCC and its backup system will fail if clearing member insolvencies are substantial or widespread. In the unlikely event that the OCC becomes insolvent or is otherwise unable to meet its settlement obligations, the Fund could suffer significant losses.
Bitcoin ETPs Risk. The Fund uses one or more Bitcoin ETPs as the reference asset for its Bitcoin Instruments, and may invest in shares of Bitcoin ETPs. Bitcoin ETPs are exchange-traded investment products not registered under the 1940 Act that seek generally match the performance of the price of bitcoin, and trade intra-day on a national securities exchange. Shares of Bitcoin ETPs are not traded at net asset value, but may trade at prices above or below the value of their underlying portfolios. The level of risk involved in the purchase or sale of a Bitcoin ETPs is similar to the risk involved in the purchase or sale of an exchange traded fund, and generally reflect the risks of owning the underlying bitcoin and cash that the Bitcoin ETP holds.
Bitcoin ETPs are subject to management fees and other fees that may increase their costs versus the costs of owning bitcoin directly. To the extent the Fund invests directly in Bitcoin ETPs, the Fund will indirectly bear its proportionate share of management fees and other expenses that are charged by Bitcoin ETPs in addition to the management fees and other expenses paid by the Fund. The Fund will pay brokerage commissions in connection with the purchase and sale of shares of Bitcoin ETPs.
Bitcoin ETPs generally determine the price of bitcoin by reference to a benchmark rate or index. Since the Fund uses Bitcoin ETPs to get its exposure to the price of bitcoin, the risk exists that the Bitcoin Price will not track the global price of bitcoin, or the price of bitcoin on any one digital asset trading platform. In the event the Bitcoin Price deviates from the global price of bitcoin, the Fund's sought-after two times returns will likely deviate from the returns of the price of bitcoin.
Collateral Investments Risk. The Fund's use of Collateral Investments may include obligations issued or guaranteed by the U.S. Government, its agencies and instrumentalities, including bills, notes and bonds issued by the U.S. Treasury, investment companies registered under the 1940 Act that invest in high-quality securities and corporate debt securities, such as commercial paper.
Some securities issued or guaranteed by federal agencies and U.S. Government-sponsored instrumentalities may not be backed by the full faith and credit of the United States, in which case the investor must look principally to the agency or instrumentality issuing or guaranteeing the security for ultimate repayment, and may not be able to assert a claim against the United States itself in the event that the agency or instrumentality does not meet its commitment. The U.S. Government, its agencies and instrumentalities do not guarantee the market value of their securities, and consequently, the value of such securities may fluctuate. Although the Fund may hold securities that carry U.S. Government guarantees, these guarantees do not extend to shares of the Fund.
Investment companies that invest in high-quality securities are subject to management fees and other expenses. Therefore, investments in these funds will cause the Fund to bear indirectly a proportional share of the fees and costs of the funds in which it invests. At the same time, the Fund will continue to pay its own management fees and expenses with respect to all of its assets, including any portion invested in the shares of such fund. It is possible to lose money by investing in investment companies that invest in high-quality securities.
42
Corporate debt securities such as commercial paper generally are short-term unsecured promissory notes issued by businesses. Corporate debt may carry variable or floating rates of interest. Corporate debt securities carry both credit risk and interest rate risk. Credit risk is the risk that the Fund could lose money if the issuer of a corporate debt security is unable to pay interest or repay principal when it is due.
Tax Risk. The Fund intends to elect and to qualify each year to be treated as a RIC under Subchapter M of the Code. As a RIC, the Fund will not be subject to U.S. federal income tax on the portion of its net investment income and net capital gain that it distributes to Shareholders, provided that it satisfies certain requirements of the Code. If the Fund does not qualify as a RIC for any taxable year and certain relief provisions are not available, the Fund's taxable income will be subject to tax at the Fund level and to a further tax at the shareholder level when such income is distributed. Additionally, buying securities shortly before the record date for a taxable dividend or capital gain distribution is commonly known as "buying the dividend." In the event a shareholder purchases Shares shortly before such a distribution, the entire distribution may be taxable to the shareholder even though a portion of the distribution effectively represents a return of the purchase price. To comply with the asset diversification test applicable to a RIC, the Fund will limit its investments in the Subsidiary to 25% of the Fund's total assets at the end of each tax quarter. The investment strategy of the Fund will cause the Fund to hold substantially more than 25% of the Fund's total assets in investments in the Subsidiary the majority of the time. The Fund intends to manage the exposure to the Subsidiary so that the Fund's investments in the Subsidiary do not exceed 25% of the total assets at the end of any tax quarter. If the Fund's investments in the Subsidiary were to exceed 25% of the Fund's total assets at the end of a tax quarter, the Fund, generally, has a grace period to cure such lack of compliance. If the Fund fails to timely cure, it may no longer be eligible to be treated as a RIC.
Because the Fund's Bitcoin Instruments produce non-qualifying income for purposes of qualifying as a RIC, the Fund makes its investments in such instruments through the Subsidiary. The Fund intends to treat any income it may derive from the Bitcoin Instruments received by the Subsidiary as "qualifying income" under the provisions of the Code applicable to RICs. The Internal Revenue Service (the "IRS") has issued numerous Private Letter Rulings ("PLRs") provided to third parties not associated with the Fund or its affiliates (which only those parties may rely on as precedent) concluding that similar arrangements resulted in qualifying income. Many of such PLRs have now been revoked by the IRS. In March of 2019, the Internal Revenue Service published Regulations that concluded that income from a corporation similar to the Subsidiary would be qualifying income, if the income is related to the Fund's business of investing in stocks or securities. Although the Regulations do not require distributions from the Subsidiary, the Fund intends to cause the Subsidiary to make distributions that would allow the Fund to make timely distributions to its shareholders. The Fund generally will be required to include in its own taxable income the income of the Subsidiary for a tax year, regardless of whether the Fund receives a distribution of the Subsidiary's income in that tax year, and this income would nevertheless be subject to the distribution requirement for qualification as a regulated investment company and would be taken into account for purposes of the 4% excise tax.
If, in any year, the Fund were to fail to qualify for the special tax treatment accorded a RIC and its shareholders, and were ineligible to or were not to cure such failure, the Fund would be taxed in the same manner as an ordinary corporation subject to U.S. federal income tax on all its income at the fund level. The resulting taxes could substantially reduce the Fund's net assets and the amount of income available for distribution. In addition, in order to requalify for taxation as a RIC, the Fund could be required to recognize unrealized gains, pay substantial taxes and interest, and make certain distributions.
43
Authorized Participant Concentration Risk. Only an authorized participant may engage in creation or redemption transactions directly with the Fund. The Fund has a limited number of institutions that may act as authorized participants on an agency basis (i.e., on behalf of other market participants). To the extent that authorized participants exit the business or are unable to proceed with orders for the issuance or redemption of Creation Units and no other authorized participant is able to step forward to fulfill the order, Shares may be more likely to trade at a premium or discount to NAV and possibly face trading halts and/or delisting, and the bid/ask spread (the difference between the price that someone is willing to pay for Shares at a specific point in time versus the price at which someone is willing to sell) on Shares may widen.
Cash Transactions Risk. The Fund may effectuate all or a portion of its creations and redemptions for cash, rather than in-kind securities. As a result, an investment in the Fund may be less tax-efficient than an investment in an ETF that effects its creations and redemptions only in-kind. ETFs are able to make in-kind redemptions to avoid being taxed on gains on the distributed portfolio securities at the fund level. A Fund that effects redemptions for cash may be required to sell portfolio securities in order to obtain the cash needed to distribute redemption proceeds. Any recognized gain on these sales by the Fund will generally cause the Fund to recognize a gain it might not otherwise have recognized, or to recognize such gain sooner than would otherwise be required if it were to distribute portfolio securities only in-kind. The Fund intends to distribute these gains to shareholders to avoid being taxed on this gain at the fund level and otherwise comply with special tax rules that apply to it. This strategy may cause shareholders to be subject to tax on gains they would not otherwise be subject to, or at an earlier date than if they had made an investment in another ETF. Moreover, cash transactions may have to be carried out over several days if the securities market is relatively illiquid and may involve considerable brokerage fees and taxes. These brokerage fees and taxes, which will be higher than if the Fund sold and redeemed its shares principally in-kind, will be passed on to those purchasing and redeeming Creation Units in the form of creation and redemption transaction fees. In addition, these factors may result in wider spreads between the bid and the offered prices of Fund Shares than for ETFs that distribute portfolio securities in-kind. The Fund's use of cash for creations and redemptions could also result in dilution to the Fund and increases transaction costs, which could negatively impact the Fund's ability to achieve its investment objective.
Cyber Security Risk. As the use of Internet technology has become more prevalent in the course of business, the investment industry has become more susceptible to potential operational risks through breaches in cyber security. A breach in cyber security refers to both intentional and unintentional events that may cause the Fund to lose proprietary information, suffer data corruption or lose operational capacity. Such events could cause the Fund to incur regulatory penalties, reputational damage, additional compliance costs associated with corrective measures and/or financial loss. Cyber security breaches may involve unauthorized access to the Fund's digital information systems through "hacking" or malicious software coding, but may also result from outside attacks such as denial-of-service attacks through efforts to make network services unavailable to intended users. In addition, cyber security breaches of the Fund's third-party service providers, such as its administrator, transfer agent, custodian, or issuers in which the Fund invests, can also subject the Fund to many of the same risks associated with direct cyber security breaches. The Fund has established risk management systems designed to reduce the risks associated with cyber security. However, there is no guarantee that such efforts will succeed, especially because the Fund does not directly control the cyber security systems of issuers or third-party service providers.
44
Debt Securities Risk. Investments in debt securities subject the holder to the credit risk of the issuer. Credit risk refers to the possibility that the issuer or other obligor of a security will not be able or willing to make payments of interest and principal when due. Generally, the value of debt securities will change inversely with changes in interest rates. To the extent that interest rates rise, certain underlying obligations may be paid off substantially slower than originally anticipated and the value of those securities may fall sharply. During periods of falling interest rates, the income received by the Fund may decline. If the principal on a debt security is prepaid before expected, the prepayments of principal may have to be reinvested in obligations paying interest at lower rates. Debt securities generally do not trade on a securities exchange making them generally less liquid and more difficult to value than common stock.
Frequent Trading Risk. The Fund regularly purchases and subsequently sells (i.e., "rolls") individual Bitcoin ETP Options throughout the year so as to maintain a fully invested position. As the contracts near their expiration dates, the Fund rolls them over into new contracts. This frequent trading of contracts may increase the amount of commissions or mark-ups to broker-dealers that the Fund pays when it buys and sells contracts, which may detract from the Fund's performance. High portfolio turnover may result in the Fund paying higher levels of transaction costs and may generate greater tax liabilities for shareholders. Frequent trading risk may cause the Fund's performance to be less than expected.
Interest Rate Risk. Interest rate risk is the risk that the value of the debt securities in the Fund's portfolio will decline because of rising market interest rates. Interest rate risk is generally lower for shorter term debt securities and higher for longer-term debt securities. Duration is a reasonably accurate measure of a debt security's price sensitivity to changes in interest rates and a common measure of interest rate risk. Duration measures a debt security's expected life on a present value basis, taking into account the debt security's yield, interest payments and final maturity. In general, duration represents the expected percentage change in the value of a security for an immediate 1% change in interest rates. For example, the price of a debt security with a three-year duration would be expected to drop by approximately 3% in response to a 1% increase in interest rates. Therefore, prices of debt securities with shorter durations tend to be less sensitive to interest rate changes than debt securities with longer durations. As the value of a debt security changes over time, so will its duration.
Leverage Risk. The Fund seeks to achieve and maintain the exposure to the Bitcoin Price by using leverage inherent in option contracts and/or swap agreements. Therefore, the Fund is subject to leverage risk. When the Fund purchases or sells an instrument or enters into a transaction without investing an amount equal to the full economic exposure of the instrument or transaction, it creates leverage, which can result in the Fund losing more than it originally invested. As a result, these investments may magnify losses to the Fund, and even a small market movement may result in significant losses to the Fund. Leverage may also cause the Fund to be more volatile because it may exaggerate the effect of any increase or decrease in the value of the Fund's portfolio securities. Futures trading involves a degree of leverage and as a result, a relatively small price movement in futures instruments may result in immediate and substantial losses to the Fund. The Fund may at times be required to liquidate portfolio positions, including when it is not advantageous to do so, in order to comply with guidance from the SEC regarding asset segregation requirements to cover certain leveraged positions.
45
If the Fund is unable to obtain sufficient leveraged exposure to the Bitcoin Price due to the limited availability of necessary investments or financial instruments or trading halts, the Fund could, among other things, limit or suspend the purchase of creation units until the Adviser determines that the requisite exposure to the Bitcoin Price is obtainable. During the period that the purchase of creation units is suspended, the Fund could trade at a significant premium or discount to its NAV and could experience substantial redemptions.
Liquidity Risk. The Fund's investments are subject to liquidity risk, which exists when an investment is or becomes difficult or impossible to purchase or sell at an advantageous time and price. Liquidity risk may be the result of, among other things, market turmoil, the reduced number and capacity of traditional market participants, or the lack of an active trading market. Markets for securities or financial instruments could be disrupted by a number of events, including, but not limited to, an economic crisis, natural disasters, new legislation or regulatory changes inside or outside the U.S. Liquid investments may become less liquid after being purchased by the Fund, particularly during periods of market stress. In addition, if a transaction is particularly large or if the relevant market is or becomes illiquid, it may not be possible to initiate a transaction or liquidate a position, which may cause the Fund to suffer significant losses and difficulties in meeting redemptions. If a number of securities held by the Fund stop trading, it may have a cascading effect and cause the Fund to halt trading. Volatility in market prices will increase the risk of the Fund being subject to a trading halt. In the event that trading in the underlying Bitcoin ETP Options is limited or absent, the value of the Fund's Bitcoin ETP Options may decrease. There is no guarantee that a liquid secondary trading market will exist for the Bitcoin ETP Options. The trading in FLEX Options, such as the Bitcoin ETP Options, may be less deep and liquid than the market for certain other securities, including certain non-customized option contracts. In a less liquid market for the Bitcoin ETP Options, terminating the Bitcoin ETP Options may require the payment of a premium or acceptance of a discounted price and may take longer to complete. Additionally, the liquidation of a large number of Bitcoin ETP Options may more significantly impact the price in a less liquid market. Further, the Fund requires a sufficient number of participants to facilitate the purchase and sale of options on an exchange to provide liquidity to the Fund for its FLEX Option positions. A less liquid trading market may adversely impact the value of the Bitcoin ETP Options and the value of your investment.
Market Maker Risk. If the Fund has lower average daily trading volumes, it may rely on a small number of third-party market makers to provide a market for the purchase and sale of Shares. Any trading halt or other problem relating to the trading activity of these market makers could result in a dramatic change in the spread between the Fund's NAV and the price at which the Shares are trading on the Exchange, which could result in a decrease in value of the Shares. In addition, decisions by market makers or authorized participants to reduce their role or step away from these activities in times of market stress could inhibit the effectiveness of the arbitrage process in maintaining the relationship between the underlying values of the Fund's portfolio securities and the Fund's market price. This reduced effectiveness could result in Shares trading at a discount to NAV and also in greater than normal intra-day bid-ask spreads for Shares.
46
Market Risk. The Fund could lose money over short periods due to short-term market movements and over longer periods during more prolonged market downturns. Assets may decline in value due to factors affecting financial markets generally or particular asset classes or industries represented in the markets. The value of option contracts or other assets may also decline due to general market conditions, economic trends or events that are not specifically related to the issuer of the security or other asset, or due to factors that affect a particular issuer or issuers, country, group of countries, region, market, industry, group of industries, sector or asset class. During a general market downturn, multiple asset classes may be negatively affected. Changes in market conditions and interest rates will not have the same impact on all types of securities. The value of Shares may also decline as a result of market conditions. Factors such as inflation, changes in interest rates, changes in regulatory requirements, bank failures, political climate deterioration or developments, armed conflicts, natural disasters or future health crises, may negatively impact market conditions, and cause a decrease in the value of Shares. Other unexpected political, regulatory and diplomatic events within the U.S. and abroad may affect investor and consumer confidence and may adversely impact financial markets and the broader economy. These events, and any other future events, may adversely affect the prices and liquidity of the Fund's portfolio investments and could result in disruptions in the trading markets.
New Fund Risk. The Fund is new and currently has fewer assets than larger funds, and like other new funds, large inflows and outflows may impact the Fund's market exposure for limited periods of time. This impact may be positive or negative, depending on the direction of market movement during the period affected. Additionally, because the Fund has fewer assets than larger funds over which to spread its fixed costs, its expense levels on a percentage basis will be higher than that of a larger fund.
Non-Diversification Risk. The Fund is classified as a "non-diversified company" under the 1940 Act. As a result, the Fund is only limited as to the percentage of its assets which may be invested in the securities of any one issuer by the diversification requirements imposed by the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended (the "Code"). The Fund may invest a relatively high percentage of its assets in a limited number of issuers. As a result, the Fund may be more susceptible to a single adverse economic or regulatory occurrence affecting one or more of these issuers, experience increased volatility and be highly invested in certain issuers.
Operational Risk. The Fund is exposed to operational risks arising from a number of factors, including, but not limited to, human error in the implementation of the Fund's investment strategy, processing and communication errors, errors of the Fund's service providers, counterparties or other third-parties, failed or inadequate processes and technology or systems failures. The Fund and the Adviser and Sub-Adviser seek to reduce these operational risks through controls and procedures. However, these measures do not address every possible risk and may be inadequate to address these risks.
Portfolio Turnover Risk. High portfolio turnover may result in increased transaction costs to the Fund, including brokerage commissions, dealer markups and other transaction costs on the sale of the securities and on reinvestment in other securities.
Premium/Discount Risk. Shares trade on the Exchange at market prices rather than their NAV. The market price of Shares generally corresponds to movements in the Fund's NAV as well as the relative supply and demand for Shares on the Exchange. The market price may be at, above (a premium) or below (a discount) the Fund's NAV. Differences in market prices of Shares and the NAV per Share may be due, in large part, to the fact that supply and demand forces at work in the secondary trading market for Shares will be closely related to, but not identical to, the same forces influencing the prices of the Fund's holdings trading individually or in the aggregate at any point in time. These differences can be especially pronounced during times of market volatility or stress. During these periods, the demand for Shares may decrease considerably and cause the market price of Shares to deviate, and in some cases deviate significantly, from the Fund's NAV and the bid/ask spread on Shares may widen.
47
Reverse Repurchase Agreements Risk. The Fund may invest in reverse repurchase agreements. Reverse repurchase agreements are transactions in which the Fund sells portfolio securities to financial institutions such as banks and broker-dealers, and agrees to repurchase them at a mutually agreed-upon date and price which is higher than the original sale price. Reverse repurchase agreements are a form of leverage and the use of reverse repurchase agreements by the Fund may increase the Fund's volatility. The Fund incurs costs, including interest expenses, in connection with the opening and closing of reverse repurchase agreements that will be borne by the shareholders.
Reverse repurchase agreements are also subject to the risk that the other party to the reverse repurchase agreement will be unable or unwilling to complete the transaction as scheduled, which may result in losses to the Fund. In situations where the Fund is required to post collateral with a counterparty, the counterparty may fail to segregate the collateral or may commingle the collateral with the counterparty's own assets. As a result, in the event of the counterparty's bankruptcy or insolvency, the Fund's collateral may be subject to the conflicting claims of the counterparty's creditors, and the Fund may be exposed to the risk of a court treating the Fund as a general unsecured creditor of the counterparty, rather than as the owner of the collateral. There can be no assurance that a counterparty will not default and that the Fund will not sustain a loss on a transaction as a result.
Reverse repurchase agreements also involve the risk that the market value of the securities sold by the Fund may decline below the price at which it is obligated to repurchase the securities. In addition, when the Fund invests the proceeds it receives in a reverse repurchase transaction, there is a risk that those investments may decline in value. In this circumstance, the Fund could be required to sell other investments in order to meet its obligations to repurchase the securities.
Subsidiary Investment Risk. Changes in the laws of the United States and/or the Cayman Islands, under which the Fund and the Subsidiary are organized, respectively, could result in the inability of the Fund to operate as intended and could negatively affect the Fund and its shareholders. The Subsidiary is not registered under the 1940 Act and is not subject to all the investor protections of the 1940 Act. However, as the Subsidiary is wholly-owned by the Fund, and the investors of the Fund will have the investor protections of the 1940 Act, the Fund as a whole-including the Subsidiary-will provide investors with 1940 Act protections.
Trading Issues Risk. Although the Shares are listed for trading on the Exchange, there can be no assurance that an active trading market for such Shares will develop or be maintained. Shares trade on the Exchange at market prices that may be below, at or above the Fund's NAV. Securities, including the Shares, are subject to market fluctuations and liquidity constraints that may be caused by such factors as economic, political, or regulatory developments, changes in interest rates, and/or perceived trends in securities prices. Shares of the Fund could decline in value or underperform other investments. Trading in Shares on the Exchange may be halted due to market conditions or for reasons that, in the view of the Exchange, make trading in Shares inadvisable. In addition, trading in Shares on the Exchange is subject to trading halts caused by extraordinary market volatility pursuant to the Exchange "circuit breaker" rules. Market makers are under no obligation to make a market in the Shares, and authorized participants are not obligated to submit purchase or redemption orders for Creation Units. There can be no assurance that the requirements of the Exchange necessary to maintain the listing of the Fund will continue to be met or will remain unchanged. Initially, due to the small asset size of the Fund, it may have difficulty maintaining its listings on the Exchange.
48
Valuation Risk. During periods of reduced market liquidity or in the absence of readily available market quotations for the holdings of the Fund, the ability of the Fund to value its holdings becomes more difficult and the judgment of the Fund's investment adviser (employing the fair value procedures adopted by the Board of Trustees of the Trust) may play a greater role in the valuation of the Fund's holdings due to reduced availability of reliable objective pricing data. Consequently, while such determinations may be made in good faith, it may nevertheless be more difficult for the Fund to accurately assign a daily value. In the event an investment may need to be fair valued, the valuation involves subjectivity and there is a risk that the Fund may not be able to sell an investment at the price assigned to it in accordance with the Trust's procedures in accordance with Rule 2a-5 of the 1940 Act ("Rule 2a-5").
Management of the Fund
The Fund is a series of Innovator ETFsÒ Trust, an investment company registered under the 1940 Act. The Fund is treated as a separate fund with its own investment objectives and policies. The Trust is organized as a Delaware statutory trust. The Board is responsible for the overall management and direction of the Trust. The Board elects the Trust's officers and approves all significant agreements, including those with the Adviser, Sub-Adviser, custodian and fund administrative and accounting agent.
Investment Adviser
Innovator Capital Management, LLC, 200 W. Front Street, Wheaton, Illinois 60187, serves as the Fund's investment adviser. In its capacity as Adviser, Innovator has overall responsibility for selecting and monitoring the Fund's investments and managing the Fund's business affairs. Innovator serves as investment adviser to 148 exchange-traded funds, each of which is organized as a separate series of the Trust, a registered management investment company.
Investment Sub-Adviser
Milliman Financial Risk Management LLC, 71 South Wacker Drive, 31st Floor, Chicago, Illinois 60606, serves as the Fund's investment sub-adviser. Milliman has responsibility for managing the Fund's investment program in pursuit of its investment objective.
Portfolio Managers
Robert T. Cummings and Jordan B. Rosenfeld serve as the Fund's portfolio managers. The portfolio managers are primarily and jointly responsible for the day-to-day management of the Fund.
| · | Robert T. Cummings - Principal, Senior Director, Head of Portfolio Management at Milliman. Mr. Cummings has served in this role since 2007. Mr. Cummings has more than 13 years of experience as a trader with a primary focus on options. Prior to joining Milliman, he was involved in various proprietary trading strategies and was a portfolio manager of associated derivatives funds. These strategies included volatility arbitrage, global macro, and high-frequency trading. Entities at which Mr. Cummings has previously worked include Citadel Investment Group, TradeNet (as a primary market maker on the Chicago Board Options Exchange), KCM Group and Spyglass Capital Management. |
49
| · | Jordan B. Rosenfeld - Senior Director and Portfolio Manager at Milliman. Mr. Rosenfeld joined Milliman in 2018 as a trader and in 2021 was promoted to ETF Portfolio Manager. Mr. Rosenfeld is responsible for implementing derivatives strategies in exchange-traded funds, mutual funds, and unit investment trusts. He has more than nine years of experience in capital markets with a focus on derivatives portfolio management and multi-asset strategy. Prior to joining the firm, Mr. Rosenfeld was a global macro portfolio manager at Gelber Group. |
For additional information concerning Innovator and Milliman, including a description of the services provided to the Fund, please see the Fund's SAI. Additional information regarding the portfolio managers' compensation, other accounts managed by the portfolio managers and the portfolio managers' ownership of Shares may also be found in the SAI.
Management Fee
Pursuant to an investment advisory agreement between Innovator and the Trust, on behalf of the Fund (the "Investment Management Agreement"), the Fund has agreed to pay an annual unitary management fee to Innovator in an amount equal to [___]% of its average daily net assets. This unitary management fee is designed to pay the Fund's expenses and to compensate Innovator for the services it provides to the Fund. Out of the unitary management fee, Innovator pays substantially all expenses of the Fund, including the cost of transfer agency, custody, fund administration, legal, audit and other service and license fees. However, Innovator is not responsible for distribution and service fees payable pursuant to a Rule 12b-1 plan, if any, brokerage commissions and other expenses connected with the execution of portfolio transactions, taxes, interest, and extraordinary expenses.
Pursuant to an investment sub-advisory agreement between Innovator, Milliman and the Trust, on behalf of the Fund (the "Investment Sub-Advisory Agreement"), Innovator has agreed to pay an annual sub-advisory fee to Milliman in an amount based on the Fund's average daily net assets. Innovator is responsible for paying the entirety of Milliman's sub-advisory fee. The Fund does not directly pay Milliman.
A discussion regarding the basis for the Board's approval of the Investment Management Agreement and Investment Sub-Advisory Agreement on behalf of the Fund will be available in the Fund's Semi-Annual Report to shareholders for the fiscal period ended April 30, 2025.
Manager of Managers Structure. The Fund and Innovator have received an exemptive order from the SEC to operate under a manager of managers structure that permits Innovator, with the approval of the Board, to appoint and replace sub-advisers, enter into sub-advisory agreements, and materially amend and terminate sub-advisory agreements on behalf of the Fund without shareholder approval ("Manager of Managers Structure"). Under the Manager of Managers Structure, Innovator has ultimate responsibility, subject to oversight by the Board, for overseeing the Fund's sub-advisers and recommending to the Board their hiring, termination, or replacement. The SEC order does not apply to any sub-adviser that is affiliated with the Fund or Innovator.
50
The Manager of Managers Structure enables the Fund to operate with greater efficiency and without incurring the expense and delays associated with obtaining shareholder approvals for matters relating to any sub-adviser or the sub-advisory agreement. The Manager of Managers Structure does not permit an increase in the advisory fees payable by the Fund without shareholder approval. Shareholders will be notified of any changes made to any sub-adviser or a sub-advisory agreement within 90 days of the change.
Additional Information Relating to the Declaration of Trust
The Trust's Agreement and Declaration of Trust (the "Declaration of Trust") provides that by virtue of becoming a shareholder of the Trust, each shareholder is bound by the provisions of the Declaration of Trust. Subject to the provisions of the Declaration of Trust, the Board may, subject to the requisite vote, engage in and prosecute, defend, compromise, abandon, or adjust, by arbitration, or otherwise, any actions, suits, proceedings, disputes, claims, and demands relating to the Trust. The Board may, in the exercise of their or its good faith business judgment, dismiss any action, suit, proceeding, dispute, claim or demand, derivative or otherwise, brought by a shareholder in its own name or in the name of the Trust. The Declaration of Trust further provides a detailed process for the bringing of derivative actions by shareholders. Prior to bringing a derivative action, a written demand by the complaining shareholder must first be made on the Board to bring the subject action unless an effort to cause the Board to bring such action is excused. A demand on the Board shall only be excused if a majority of the Board a material personal financial interest in the subject action.
There may be questions regarding the enforceability of these provisions based on certain interpretations of the Securities Act of 1933 Act, as amended, the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended and the 1940 Act. However, the Declaration of Trust provides if any provision shall be held invalid or unenforceable in any jurisdiction, such invalidity or unenforceability shall attach only to that provision in such jurisdiction and shall not in any manner affect such provision in any other jurisdiction or any other provision of the Declaration of Trust. The provisions of the Declaration of Trust are not intended to restrict any shareholder rights under the federal securities laws and do not mandate the adjudication of federal securities laws claims through arbitration.
How to Buy and Sell Shares
The Fund will issue or redeem its Shares at NAV per Share only in Creation Units. Most Fund shareholders will buy and sell Shares in secondary market transactions through brokers. Shares will be listed for trading on the secondary market on the Exchange. Shares can be bought and sold throughout the trading day like other publicly traded shares. Share prices are reported in dollars and cents per Share. There is no minimum investment. When buying or selling Shares through a broker, you will incur customary brokerage commissions and charges, and you may pay some or all of the spread between the bid and the offered price in the secondary market on each leg of a round trip (purchase and sale) transaction. Because Shares trade at market price rather than NAV, a Fund shareholder may pay more than NAV when purchasing Shares and receive less than NAV when selling Shares.
Authorized participants may acquire Shares directly from the Fund, and authorized participants may tender their Shares for redemption directly to the Fund, at NAV per Share only in Creation Units, and in accordance with the procedures described in the SAI.
51
Book Entry
Shares are held in book-entry form, which means that no stock certificates are issued. The Depository Trust Company ("DTC") or its nominee is the record owner of all outstanding Shares and is recognized as the owner of all Shares for all purposes.
Investors owning Shares are beneficial owners as shown on the records of DTC or its participants. DTC serves as the securities depository for all Shares. Participants in DTC include securities brokers and dealers, banks, trust companies, clearing corporations and other institutions that directly or indirectly maintain a custodial relationship with DTC. As a beneficial owner of Shares, you are not entitled to receive physical delivery of stock certificates or to have Shares registered in your name, and you are not considered a registered owner of Shares. Therefore, to exercise any right as an owner of Shares, you must rely upon the procedures of DTC and its participants. These procedures are the same as those that apply to any other stocks that you hold in book entry or "street name" form.
Share Trading Prices
The trading prices of Shares on the Exchange is based on market price and may differ from the Fund's daily NAV. Market forces of supply and demand, economic conditions and other factors may affect the trading prices of Shares.
Frequent Purchases and Redemptions of Shares
The Fund does not impose restrictions on the frequency of purchases and redemptions ("market timing"), and has adopted no policies and procedures with respect to market timing activities. In making this determination, the Board considered the risks associated with market timing activities by the Fund's shareholders, including, dilution, disruption of portfolio management, increases in the Fund's trading costs and the potential for the realization of capital gains.
Shares may be purchased and redeemed directly from the Fund only when aggregated into one or more Creation Units by authorized participants that have entered into agreements with the Fund's distributor. The vast majority of trading in Shares occurs on the secondary market and does not involve the Fund directly. Cash trades on the secondary market are unlikely to cause many of the harmful effects of frequent purchases and/or redemptions of Shares detailed above. To the extent the Fund may effect the issuance or redemption of Creation Units in exchange wholly or partially for cash, such trades could result in disruption of portfolio management, dilution to the Fund and increased transaction costs, which could negatively impact the Fund's ability to achieve its investment objectives, and may lead to the realization of capital gains. These consequences may increase as the frequency of cash purchases and redemptions of Creation Units by authorized participants increases. However, direct trading by authorized participants is critical to ensuring that Shares trade at or close to NAV.
To minimize these potential consequences of frequent purchases and redemptions of Shares, the Fund imposes transaction fees on purchases and redemptions of Creation Units to cover the custodial and other costs the Fund incurs in effecting trades. In addition, the Fund reserves the right to not accept orders from authorized participants that Innovator has determined may be disruptive to the management of the Fund or otherwise are not in the best interests of the Fund. For these reasons, the Board has not adopted policies and procedures with respect to frequent purchases and redemptions of Shares.
52
Dividends, Distributions and Taxes
Ordinarily, dividends from net investment income, if any, are declared and paid at least annually by the Fund. The Fund distributes its net realized capital gains, if any, to shareholders annually.
Distributions in cash may be reinvested automatically in additional whole Shares only if the broker through whom you purchased Shares makes such option available.
Taxes
This section summarizes some of the main U.S. federal income tax consequences of owning Shares of the Fund. This section is current as of the date of this prospectus. Tax laws and interpretations change frequently, and this summary does not describe all of the tax consequences to all taxpayers. For example, this summary generally does not describe your situation if you are a corporation, a non-U.S. person, a broker-dealer, or other investor with special circumstances. In addition, this section does not describe your state, local or non-U.S. tax consequences.
This federal income tax summary is based in part on the advice of counsel to the Fund. The Internal Revenue Service could disagree with any conclusions set forth in this section. In addition, counsel to the Fund was not asked to review, and has not reached a conclusion with respect to, the federal income tax treatment of the assets to be included in the Fund. This may not be sufficient for you to use as the purpose of avoiding penalties under federal tax law.
As with any investment, you should seek advice based on your individual circumstances from your own tax advisor.
The Fund intends to qualify as a "regulated investment company" under the federal tax laws. If the Fund qualifies as a regulated investment company and distributes its income as required by the tax law, the Fund generally will not pay federal income taxes.
As with any investment, you should consider how your investment in Shares will be taxed. The tax information in this prospectus is provided as general information. You should consult your own tax advisor about the tax consequences of an investment in Shares.
Unless your investment in Shares is made through a tax-exempt entity or tax-deferred retirement account, such as an IRA plan, you need to be aware of the possible tax consequences when:
| • | The Fund makes distributions, |
| • | You sell your Shares listed on the Exchange, and |
| • | You purchase or redeem Creation Units. |
53
To maintain its status as a RIC, the Fund must meet certain income, diversification and distributions tests. The Fund intends to treat any income that it may derive from the FLEX Options as "qualifying income" under the provisions of the Code applicable to RICs. If the income is not qualifying income or the issuer of the FLEX Options is not appropriately the referenced asset, the Fund could lose its own status as a RIC. The Fund may enter into option agreements with the same counterparty but have taken the position that the option agreements are separate agreements. Under general tax principles, the Fund would not accrue income on separate option agreements during the term of the agreements. However, if the agreements are treated as one agreement, the Fund might be required to accrue income and make annual distributions of income. If the Fund is required to accrue income, but does not distribute the income to shareholders, the Fund may fail to qualify as a RIC. In addition, if the agreements are treated as one agreement, the Fund may fail either or both of the RIC income and diversification tests. For purposes of the diversification tests, the identification of the issuer (or, in some cases, issuers) of a particular investment can depend on the terms and conditions of such investment. In particular, there is no published Internal Revenue Service guidance or case law on how to determine the "issuer" of various derivatives that the Funds may enter into. Therefore, there is a risk that the Funds will not meet the Code's diversification requirements and will not qualify, or will be disqualified, as a RIC. Based upon language in the legislative history, the Fund intends to treat the issuer of the FLEX Options as the referenced asset, which, assuming the referenced asset qualifies as a RIC, would allow the Fund to qualify for special rules in the RIC diversification requirements.
Taxes on Distributions
The Fund's distributions are generally taxable. After the end of each year, you will receive a tax statement that separates the distributions of the Fund into two categories, ordinary income distributions and capital gain dividends. Ordinary income distributions are generally taxed at your ordinary tax rate; however, certain ordinary income distributions received from the Fund may be taxed at the capital gains tax rates. Generally, you will treat all capital gain dividends as long-term capital gains regardless of how long you have owned your Shares. To determine your actual tax liability for your capital gain dividends, you must calculate your total net capital gain or loss for the tax year after considering all of your other taxable transactions, as described below. In addition, the Fund may make distributions that represent a return of capital for tax purposes and thus will generally not be taxable to you; however, such distributions may reduce your tax basis in your Shares, which could result in you having to pay higher taxes in the future when Shares are sold, even if you sell the Shares at a loss from your original investment. The tax status of your distributions from the Fund is not affected by whether you reinvest your distributions in additional Shares or receive them in cash. The income from the Fund that you must take into account for federal income tax purposes is not reduced by amounts used to pay a deferred sales fee, if any. The tax laws may require you to treat distributions made to you in January as if you had received them on December 31 of the previous year.
Income from the Fund may also be subject to a 3.8% "Medicare tax." This tax generally applies to your net investment income if your adjusted gross income exceeds certain threshold amounts, which are $250,000 in the case of married couples filing joint returns and $200,000 in the case of single individuals.
A corporation that owns Shares generally will not be entitled to the dividends received deduction with respect to many dividends received from the Fund because the dividends received deduction is generally not available for distributions from regulated investment companies.
If you are an individual, the maximum marginal stated federal tax rate for net capital gain is generally 20% (15% or 0% for taxpayers with taxable incomes below certain thresholds). Capital gains may also be subject to the Medicare tax described above.
54
Net capital gain equals net long-term capital gain minus net short-term capital loss for the taxable year. Capital gain or loss is long-term if the holding period for the asset is more than one year and is short-term if the holding period for the asset is one year or less. You must exclude the date you purchase your Shares to determine your holding period. However, if you receive a capital gain dividend from the Fund and sell your Shares at a loss after holding it for six months or less, the loss will be recharacterized as long-term capital loss to the extent of the capital gain dividend received. The tax rates for capital gains realized from assets held for one year or less are generally the same as for ordinary income. The Code treats certain capital gains as ordinary income in special situations.
An election may be available to shareholders to defer recognition of the gain attributable to a capital gain dividend if they make certain qualifying investments within a limited time. Shareholders should talk to their tax advisor about the availability of this deferral election and its requirements.
Taxes on Exchange Listed Shares
If you sell or redeem your Shares, you will generally recognize a taxable gain or loss. To determine the amount of this gain or loss, you must subtract your tax basis in your Shares from the amount you receive in the transaction. Your tax basis in your Shares is generally equal to the cost of your Shares, generally including sales charges. In some cases, however, you may have to adjust your tax basis after you purchase your Shares.
Taxes and Purchases and Redemptions of Creation Units
If you exchange securities for Creation Units you will generally recognize a gain or a loss. The gain or loss will be equal to the difference between the market value of the Creation Units at the time and your aggregate basis in the securities surrendered and the cash component paid. If you exchange Creation Units for securities, you will generally recognize a gain or loss equal to the difference between your basis in the Creation Units and the aggregate market value of the securities received and any cash redemption amount. The Internal Revenue Service, however, may assert that a loss realized upon an exchange of securities for Creation Units or Creation Units for securities cannot be deducted currently under the rules governing "wash sales," or on the basis that there has been no significant change in economic position.
Treatment of the FLEX Options
The FLEX Options included in the portfolio are exchange-traded options. Under Section 1256 of the Code, certain types of exchange-traded options are treated as if they were sold (i.e., "marked to market") at the end of each year. The Fund does not believe that the positions held by the Fund will be subject to Section 1256, which means that the positions will not be marked to market.
However, the Fund's investments in offsetting positions with respect to the Underlying ETF may be "straddles" for U.S. federal income tax purposes. The straddle rules may affect the character of gains (or losses) realized by the Fund, and losses realized by the Fund on positions that are part of a straddle may be deferred under the straddle rules, rather than being taken into account in calculating taxable income for the taxable year in which the losses are realized. In addition, certain carrying charges (including interest expense) associated with positions in a straddle may be required to be capitalized rather than deducted currently. Certain elections that the Fund may make with respect to its straddle positions may also affect the amount, character and timing of the recognition of gains or losses from the affected positions.
55
The tax consequences of straddle transactions to the Fund are not entirely clear in all situations under currently available authority. The straddle rules may increase the amount of short-term capital gain realized by the Fund, which is taxed as ordinary income when distributed to U.S. shareholders in a non-liquidating distribution. Because application of the straddle rules may affect the character of gains or losses, defer losses and/or accelerate the recognition of gains or losses from the affected straddle positions, if the Fund makes a non-liquidating distribution of its short-term capital gain, the amount which must be distributed to U.S. shareholders as ordinary income may be increased or decreased substantially as compared to a fund that did not engage in such transactions.
Treatment of Fund Expenses
Expenses incurred and deducted by the Fund will generally not be treated as income taxable to you. In some cases, however, you may be required to treat your portion of these Fund expenses as income. You may not be able to take a deduction for some or all of these expenses, even if the cash you receive is reduced by such expenses.
Backup Withholding
The Fund may be required to withhold U.S. federal income tax ("backup withholding") from dividends and capital gains distributions paid to shareholders. Federal tax will be withheld if (1) the shareholder fails to furnish the Fund with the shareholder's correct taxpayer identification number or social security number, (2) the IRS notifies the shareholder or the Fund that the shareholder has failed to report properly certain interest and dividend income to the IRS and to respond to notices to that effect, or (3) when required to do so, the shareholder fails to certify to the Fund that he or she is not subject to backup withholding. The current backup withholding rate is 24%. Any amounts withheld under the backup withholding rules may be credited against the shareholder's U.S. federal income tax liability.
Non-U.S. Investors
If you are a non-U.S. investor (i.e., an investor other than a U.S. citizen or resident or a U.S. corporation, partnership, estate or trust), you should be aware that, generally, subject to applicable tax treaties, distributions from the Fund will generally be characterized as dividends for U.S. federal income tax purposes (other than dividends which the Fund properly reports as capital gain dividends) and will be subject to U.S. federal income taxes, including withholding taxes, subject to certain exceptions described below.
However, distributions received by a non-U.S. investor from the Fund that are properly reported by the Fund as capital gain dividends may not be subject to U.S. federal income taxes, including withholding taxes, provided that the Fund makes certain elections and certain other conditions are met. Distributions from the Fund that are properly reported by the Fund as an interest-related dividend attributable to certain interest income received by the Fund or as a short-term capital gain dividend attributable to certain net short-term capital gain income received by the Fund may not be subject to U.S. federal income taxes, including withholding taxes when received by certain non-U.S. investors, provided that the Fund makes certain elections and certain other conditions are met.
56
Distributions to, and gross proceeds from dispositions of Shares by, (i) certain non-U.S. financial institutions that have not entered into an agreement with the U.S. Treasury to collect and disclose certain information and are not resident in a jurisdiction that has entered into such an agreement with the U.S. Treasury and (ii) certain other non-U.S. entities that do not provide certain certifications and information about the entity's U.S. owners may be subject to a U.S. withholding tax of 30%. However, proposed regulations may eliminate the requirement to withhold on payments of gross proceeds from dispositions.
The foregoing discussion summarizes some of the possible consequences under current federal tax law of an investment in the Fund. It is not a substitute for personal tax advice. You also may be subject to state and local taxes on Fund distributions and sales of Shares.
Consult your personal tax advisor about the potential tax consequences of an investment in Shares under all applicable tax laws. See "Distributions and Taxes" in the SAI for more information.
Investments in the Subsidiary
One of the requirements for qualification as a RIC is that the Fund must derive at least 90% of its gross income for each taxable year from "qualifying income." Qualifying income includes dividends, interest, payments with respect to certain securities loans, and gains from the sale or other disposition of stock, securities or foreign currencies or other income derived with respect to its business of investing in such stock, securities or currencies.
The Fund intends to treat any income it may derive from the Bitcoin Instruments received by the Subsidiary as "qualifying income" under the provisions of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended, applicable to RICs. The IRS had issued numerous PLRs provided to third parties not associated with the Fund or its affiliates (which only those parties may rely on as precedent) concluding that similar arrangements resulted in qualifying income. Many of such PLRs have now been revoked by the Internal Revenue Service. In March of 2019, the Internal Revenue Service published Regulations that concluded that income from a corporation similar to the Subsidiary would be qualifying income, if the income is related to the Fund's business of investing in stocks or securities. Although the Regulations do not require distributions from the Subsidiary, the Fund intends to cause the Subsidiary to make distributions that would allow the Fund to make timely distributions to its shareholders.
If the Fund did not qualify as a RIC for any taxable year and certain relief provisions were not available, the Fund's taxable income would be subject to tax at the Fund level and to a further tax at the shareholder level when such income is distributed. In such event, in order to re-qualify for taxation as a RIC, the Fund might be required to recognize unrealized gains, pay substantial taxes and interest and make certain distributions. This would cause investors to incur higher tax liabilities than they otherwise would have incurred and would have a negative impact on Fund returns. In such event, the Fund's Board of Trustees may determine to reorganize or close the Fund or materially change the Fund's investment objective and strategies.
The Subsidiary intends to conduct its affairs in a manner such that it will not be subject to U.S. federal income tax. It will, however, be considered a controlled foreign corporation, and the Fund will be required to include as income annually amounts earned by the Subsidiary during that year, whether or not distributed by the Subsidiary. Furthermore, the Fund will be subject to the RIC qualification distribution requirements with respect to the Subsidiary's income, whether or not the Subsidiary makes a distribution to the Fund during the taxable year and thus the Fund may not have sufficient cash on hand to make such distribution.
57
Changes in the laws of the United States and/or the Cayman Islands, under which the Fund and the Subsidiary is organized, respectively, could result in the inability of the Fund and/or the Subsidiary to operate as described in this prospectus and could negatively affect the Fund and its shareholders. For example, Cayman Islands law does not currently impose any income, corporate or capital gains tax, estate duty, inheritance tax, gift tax or withholding tax on the Subsidiary. If Cayman Islands law changes such that the Subsidiary must pay Cayman Islands governmental authority taxes, the Fund's shareholders would likely suffer decreased investment returns. There remains a risk that the tax treatment the Bitcoin Instruments may be affected by future regulatory or legislative changes that could affect the character, timing and/or amount of the Fund's taxable income or gains and distributions.
Distributor
Foreside Fund Services, LLC serves as the distributor of Creation Units for the Fund on an agency basis. The Distributor does not maintain a secondary market in Shares.
Net Asset Value
US Bancorp Fund Services LLC ("USBFS"), the Fund's administrator and fund accounting agent, calculates the Fund's NAV at the close of regular trading (ordinarily 4:00 p.m. E.S.T.) every day the New York Stock Exchange is open. The NAV for one Share is the value of that Share's portion of the net assets of the Fund, which is calculated by taking the market price of the Fund's total assets, including any interest or dividends accrued but not yet collected, less all liabilities, and dividing such amount by the total number of Shares outstanding. The result, rounded to the nearest cent is the NAV per Share.
Section 2(a)(41) of the 1940 Act provides that when a market quotation is readily available for a fund's portfolio investments, such investment must be valued at the market value. Rule 2a-5 under the 1940 Act defines a readily available market quotation as "a quoted price (unadjusted) in active markets for identical investments that the fund can access at a measurement date, provided that a quotation will not be readily available if it is not reliable." If a market quotation is not "readily available" the portfolio investment must be fair valued as determined in good faith by a fund's board of trustees. Rule 2a-5 allows a fund's board of trustees to designate the fund's investment adviser as the "valuation designee" to perform fair value determinations subject to certain conditions. In accordance with Rule 2a-5, the Board has appointed Innovator as the "Valuation Designee" for the Fund's portfolio investments. Investments will be fair valued as determined in good faith in accordance with the policies and procedures established by Innovator as the Valuation Designee pursuant to Rule 2a-5 and approved by, and subject to the oversight of, the Board of Trustees. As a general principle, "fair value" represents a good faith approximation of the value of a portfolio investment and is the amount the Fund might reasonably expect to receive from the current sale of that investment in an arm's-length transaction. The use of fair value prices may result in prices used by the Fund that may differ from current market quotations or official closing prices on the applicable exchange. A variety of factors may be considered in determining the fair value of such securities. While the Valuation Procedures (defined below) are intended to result in the Fund's NAV calculation that fairly reflects the values as of the time of pricing, the fair value determined for a portfolio instrument may be materially different from the value that could be realized upon the sale of that instrument.
58
FLEX Options listed on an exchange (e.g., Cboe) will typically be valued at a model-based price provided by the exchange at the official close of that exchange's trading day. However, when the Fund's option has a same-day market trading price, this same-day market trading price will be used for FLEX Option values instead of the exchange's model-based price. If the exchange on which the option is traded is unable to provide a model price, model-based FLEX Options prices will additionally be provided by a backup third-party pricing provider. In selecting the model prices, the Sub-Adviser may provide a review of the calculation of model prices provided by each vendor, and may note to such vendors of any data errors observed, or where an underlying component value of the model pricing package may be missing or incorrect, prior to publication by the vendor of the model pricing to the Fund Accounting Agent for purposes of that day's NAV. If either pricing vendor is not available to provide a model price for that day, the value of a FLEX option will be determined by Innovator as Valuation Designee in accordance with the Valuation Procedures. In instances where in the same trading day, a particular FLEX Option is represented in an all-cash basket (either a creation unit or redemption unit), as well as in an in-kind basket (either a creation unit or a redemption unit), for valuation purposes that trading day the Fund will default to use the trade price for both instances, rather than the model price otherwise available for the in-kind transaction.
Common stocks, preferred stocks and other equity securities listed on any national or foreign exchange (excluding the NASDAQ National Market ("NASDAQ") and the London Stock Exchange Alternative Investment Market ("AIM")) will be valued at the last sale price on the exchange on which they are principally traded or, for NASDAQ and AIM securities, the official closing price. Securities traded on more than one securities exchange are valued at the last sale price or official closing price, as applicable, at the close of the exchange representing the principal market for such securities. Securities traded in the over-the-counter market are valued at the mean of the bid and the asked price, if available, and otherwise at their closing bid price.
Exchange-traded options (other than FLEX Options) and futures contracts will be valued at the closing price in the market where such contracts are principally traded. If no closing price is available, they will be valued at fair value. Any fair value determination will be made in accordance with the policies and procedures established by Innovator as Valuation Designee in accordance with Rule 2a-5.
USBFS may obtain all market quotations used in valuing securities from a third-party pricing service vendor (a "Pricing Service"). If no quotation can be obtained from a Pricing Service, then USBFS will contact Innovator. Innovator is responsible for establishing the valuation of portfolio securities and other instruments held by the Fund in accordance with the pricing and valuation procedures adopted by the Board (the "Valuation Procedures"). Innovator will then attempt to obtain one or more broker quotes for the security daily and will value the security accordingly.
If no quotation is available from either a Pricing Service, or one or more brokers, or if Innovator has reason to question the reliability or accuracy of a quotation supplied or the use of amortized cost, the value of any portfolio security held by the Fund for which reliable market quotations are not readily available will be determined by Innovator in a manner that most appropriately reflects fair market value of the security on the valuation date. The use of a fair valuation method may be appropriate if, for example: (i) market quotations do not accurately reflect fair value of an investment; (ii) an investment's value has been materially affected by events occurring after the close of the exchange or market on which the investment is principally traded (for example, a foreign exchange or market); (iii) a trading halt closes an exchange or market early; or (iv) other events result in an exchange or market delaying its normal close.
59
Fair valuation of an equity security will be based on the consideration of all available information, including, but not limited to, the following: (a) the type of security; (b) the size of the holding; (c) the initial cost of the security; (d) transactions in comparable securities; (e) price quotes from dealers and/or pricing services; (f) relationships among various securities; (g) information obtained by contacting the issuer, analysts, or the appropriate stock exchange; (h) an analysis of the issuer's financial statements; and (i) the existence of merger proposals or tender offers that might affect the value of the security.
With respect to any non-U.S. securities held by the Fund, the Fund may take factors influencing specific markets or issuers into consideration in determining the fair value of a non-U.S. security. International securities markets may be open on days when the U.S. markets are closed. In such cases, the value of any international securities owned by the Fund may be significantly affected on days when investors cannot buy or sell Shares. In addition, due to the difference in times between the close of the international markets and the time the Fund prices its Shares, the value the Fund assigns to securities generally will not be the same as the quoted or published prices of those securities on their primary markets or exchanges. In determining fair value prices, the Fund may consider the performance of securities on their primary exchanges, foreign currency appreciation/depreciation, securities market movements in the U.S., or other relevant information as related to the securities.
For more information about how the Fund's NAV is determined, please see the section in the SAI entitled "Determining Offering Price and Net Asset Value."
Fund Service Providers
US Bancorp Fund Services LLC is the administrator and transfer agent for the Trust. U.S. Bank, N.A. serves as the custodian for the Trust.
Chapman and Cutler LLP, 320 South Canal Street, Chicago, Illinois 60606, serves as legal counsel to the Trust.
Cohen & Company, Ltd., 342 North Water Street, Suite 830, Milwaukee, Wisconsin 53202, serves as the Fund's independent registered public accounting firm and is responsible for auditing the annual financial statements of the Fund.
Premium/Discount Information
Information showing the number of days the market price of the Fund's Shares was greater (at a premium) and less (at a discount) than the Fund's NAV for the most recently completed calendar year, and the most recently completed calendar quarters since that year (or the life of the Fund, if shorter), is available at www.innovatoretfs.com.
60
Other Investment Companies
Section 12(d)(1) of the 1940 Act restricts investments by investment companies in the securities of other investment companies. The SEC adopted Rule 12d1-4 under the 1940 Act, which outlines the requirements under which an investment company may invest in securities of another investment company beyond the limits prescribed in Section 12(d)(1) of the 1940 Act. Any investment by another investment company in the Fund, or by the Fund in another investment company, must comply with Rule 12d1-4 in order to exceed the limits contained in Section 12(d)(1).
Financial Highlights
The Fund is new and has no performance history as of the date of this prospectus. Financial information therefore is not available.
61
Innovator 2x Bitcoin Daily ETF
For more detailed information on the Fund, several additional sources of information are available to you. The SAI, incorporated by reference into this Prospectus, contains detailed information on the Fund's policies and operation. Additional information about the Fund's investments is available in the Fund's annual and semi-annual reports to shareholders and in Form N-CSR. In the Fund's annual report, you will find a discussion of the market conditions and investment strategies that significantly impacted the Fund's performance during its last fiscal year. In Form N-CSR, you will find the Fund's annual and semi-annual financial statements. The Fund's most recent SAI, annual or semi-annual reports and certain other information such as Fund financial statements are available free of charge by calling the Fund at (800) 208-5212, on the Fund's website at www.innovatoretfs.com or through your financial advisor. Shareholders may call the toll-free number above with any inquiries.
You may obtain this and other information regarding the Fund, including the SAI and Codes of Ethics adopted by the Adviser, Sub-Adviser, Distributor and the Trust, directly from the SEC. Information on the SEC's website is free of charge. Visit the SEC's on-line EDGAR database at http://www.sec.gov. You may also request information regarding the Fund by sending a request (along with a duplication fee) to the SEC by sending an electronic request to [email protected].
|
Innovator Capital Management, LLC 200 W. Front Street Wheaton, Illinois 60187 (800) 208-5212 www.innovatoretfs.com |
SEC File #: 333-146827 811-22135 |
The information in this Statement of Additional Information is not complete and may be changed. We may not sell these securities until the registration statement filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission is effective. This Statement of Additional Information is not an offer to sell these securities and it is not soliciting an offer to buy these securities in any state where the offer of sale is not permitted.
Preliminary Statement of Additional Information
Dated November 22, 2024
Subject to Completion
Statement of Additional Information
Innovator 2x Bitcoin Daily ETF (_____)
________________
200 W. Front Street
Wheaton, Illinois 60187
www.innovatoretfs.com
This Statement of Additional Information ("SAI") describes shares of the Innovator 2x Bitcoin Daily ETF (the "Fund") which is a series of Innovator ETFsÒ Trust (the "Trust"). The Fund's investment adviser is Innovator Capital Management, LLC ("Innovator" or the "Adviser") and investment sub-adviser is Milliman Financial Risk Management LLC ("Milliman" or the "Sub-Adviser"). The Fund's distributor is Foreside Fund Services, LLC (the "Distributor"). The Fund's shares are principally listed for trading on [____].
This SAI supplements the information contained in the Fund's Prospectus, dated [____], as they may be amended and supplemented from time to time. This SAI should be read in conjunction with the Prospectus. This SAI is not itself a prospectus but is, in its entirety, incorporated by reference into the Prospectus. A copy of the Fund's most recent annual report, semi-annual report or the Prospectus for the Fund may be obtained, without charge, by writing the Adviser at the address listed above or by calling (800) 208-5212.
Table of Contents
| General Information | 3 | |
| Exchange Listing and Trading | 4 | |
| Investment Restrictions and Policies | 5 | |
| Investment Strategies and Risks | 8 | |
| Disclosure of Portfolio Holdings Information | 27 | |
| Management of the Trust | 29 | |
| Investment Adviser and Other Service Providers | 36 | |
| Additional Payments to Financial Intermediaries | 40 | |
| Trading and Brokerage | 42 | |
| Capital Structure | 42 | |
| Creation and Redemption of Creation Units | 44 | |
| Determining Offering Price and Net Asset Value | 51 | |
| Distributions and Taxes | 55 | |
| Performance Information | 61 | |
| Financial Statements | 61 | |
| Control Persons and Principal Holders of Shares | 61 | |
| Exhibit A - Proxy Voting Guidelines | A-1 |
-2-
General Information
The Trust is a Delaware statutory trust organized on October 17, 2007. On August 11, 2017, the Trust changed its name from Academy Funds Trust to Innovator ETFsÒ Trust. The Trust is an open-end management investment company, registered under the Investment Company Act of 1940, as amended (the "1940 Act"). The Trust currently offers shares of [___] separate series, representing separate portfolios of investments. This SAI relates solely to the Fund, which is classified as a "non-diversified company" as such term is defined in the 1940 Act.
The Fund offers, issues and redeems shares ("Shares") at net asset value ("NAV") only in aggregations of a specified number of Shares (each a "Creation Unit"). The Fund may issue or redeem Creation Units in exchange for the securities comprising the Fund ("Deposit Securities") and/or cash, or some combination thereof. Shares of the Fund are listed and traded on [_____] ("_____" or the "Exchange"), a national securities exchange. Fund Shares are traded in the secondary market and elsewhere at market prices that may be at, above, or below the Fund's NAV. Shares are redeemable only in Creation Units by Authorized Participants (as defined in the section entitled "Disclosure of Portfolio Holdings Information"), and, generally, in exchange for a cash amount. In the event of the liquidation of the Fund, the Trust may lower the number of Shares in a Creation Unit.
The Fund is a separate mutual fund, and each Share represents an equal proportionate interest in the Fund. All consideration received by the Trust for Shares and all assets of the Fund belong solely to the Fund and would be subject to liabilities related thereto.
The Trust reserves the right to permit or require that creations and redemptions of Shares are effected fully or partially in-kind and reserves the right to permit or require the substitution of Deposit Securities in lieu of cash. Shares may be issued in advance of receipt of Deposit Securities, subject to various conditions, including a requirement that the Authorized Participant maintain with the Trust a cash deposit marked to the market value of any omitted Deposit Securities. The Trust may use such cash deposit at any time to purchase Deposit Securities. For more information, please see the section entitled "Creation and Redemption of Creation Units." Transaction fees and other costs associated with creations or redemptions that include cash may be higher than the transaction fees and other costs associated with in-kind creations or redemptions. In all cases, conditions with respect to creations and redemptions of shares and fees will be limited in accordance with the requirements of Securities and Exchange Commission ("SEC") rules and regulations applicable to management investment companies offering redeemable securities.
The Trust's Agreement and Declaration of Trust (the "Declaration of Trust") provides that by virtue of becoming a shareholder of the Trust, each shareholder is bound by the provisions of the Declaration of Trust. Subject to the provisions of the Declaration of Trust, the Board of Trustees of the Trust may, subject to the requisite vote, engage in and prosecute, defend, compromise, abandon, or adjust, by arbitration, or otherwise, any actions, suits, proceedings, disputes, claims, and demands relating to the Trust. The Board of Trustees may, in the exercise of their or its good faith business judgment, dismiss any action, suit, proceeding, dispute, claim or demand, derivative or otherwise, brought by a shareholder in its own name or in the name of the Trust. The Declaration of Trust further provides a detailed process for the bringing of derivative actions by shareholders.
-3-
Prior to bringing a derivative action, a written demand by the complaining shareholder must first be made on the Board of Trustees to bring the subject action unless an effort to cause the Board of Trustees to bring such action is excused. A demand on the Board of Trustees shall only be excused if a majority of the Board of Trustees has a material personal financial interest in the subject action. There may be questions regarding the enforceability of these provisions based on certain interpretations of the Securities Act of 1933 Act, as amended (the "1933 Act"), the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the "1934 Act") and the 1940 Act. However, the Declaration of Trust provides if any provision shall be held invalid or unenforceable in any jurisdiction, such invalidity or unenforceability shall attach only to that provision in such jurisdiction and shall not in any manner affect such provision in any other jurisdiction or any other provision of the Declaration of Trust.
Capitalized terms used in this SAI, but not otherwise defined, have the meanings ascribed to them in the Fund's Prospectus.
Exchange Listing and Trading
There can be no assurance that the requirements of the Exchange necessary to maintain the listing of Shares of the Fund will continue to be met. The Exchange may, but is not required to, remove the Shares of the Fund from listing if (i) following the initial 12-month period beginning upon the commencement of trading of the Fund, there are fewer than 50 beneficial holders of the Shares for 30 or more consecutive trading days, (ii) the "approximate value" of the Fund, as described in the section of the Prospectus entitled "Net Asset Value," is no longer calculated or available, or (iii) any other event shall occur or condition shall exist that, in the opinion of the Exchange, makes further dealings on the Exchange inadvisable. The Exchange will remove the Shares of the Fund from listing and trading upon termination of the Fund.
As in the case of other stocks traded on the Exchange, brokers' commissions on transactions will be based on negotiated commission rates at customary levels. Negotiated commission rates only apply to investors who will buy and sell Shares of the Fund in secondary market transactions through brokers on the Exchange and does not apply to investors such as market makers, large investors and institutions who wish to deal in Creation Units directly with the Fund.
The Trust reserves the right to adjust the price levels of the Shares in the future to help maintain convenient trading ranges for investors. Any adjustments would be accomplished through stock splits or reverse stock splits, which would have no effect on the net assets of the Fund.
Continuous Offering
The method by which Creation Units are created and traded may raise certain issues under applicable securities laws. Because new Creation Units are issued and sold by the Fund on an ongoing basis, at any point a "distribution," as such term is used in the 1933 Act, may occur. Broker-dealers and other persons are cautioned that some activities on their part may, depending on the circumstances, result in their being deemed participants in a distribution in a manner that could render them statutory underwriters and subject them to the prospectus delivery requirement and liability provisions of the 1933 Act.
-4-
For example, a broker-dealer firm or its client may be deemed a statutory underwriter if it takes Creation Units after placing an order with the Distributor, breaks them down into constituent Shares and sells such Shares directly to customers or if it chooses to couple the creation of new Shares with an active selling effort involving solicitation of secondary market demand for Shares. A determination of whether one is an underwriter for purposes of the 1933 Act must take into account all of the facts and circumstances pertaining to the activities of the broker-dealer or its client in the particular case and the examples mentioned above should not be considered a complete description of all the activities that could lead to a categorization as an underwriter.
Broker-dealer firms should also note that dealers who are not "underwriters" but are effecting transactions in Shares, whether or not participating in the distribution of Shares, generally are required to deliver a prospectus. This is because the prospectus delivery exemption in Section 4(a)(3) of the 1933 Act is not available in respect of such transactions as a result of Section 24(d) of the 1940 Act. As a result, broker-dealer firms should note that dealers who are not underwriters but are participating in a distribution (as contrasted with ordinary secondary market transactions) and thus dealing with the shares that are part of an overallotment within the meaning of Section 4(a)(3)(C) of the 1933 Act would be unable to take advantage of the prospectus delivery exemption provided by Section 4(a)(3) of the 1933 Act. Firms that incur a prospectus delivery obligation with respect to Shares of the Fund are reminded that, pursuant to Rule 153 under the 1933 Act, a prospectus delivery obligation under Section 5(b)(2) of the 1933 Act owed to an exchange member in connection with a sale on the Exchange generally is satisfied by the fact that the prospectus is available at the Exchange upon request. The prospectus delivery mechanism provided in Rule 153 is available only with respect to transactions on a national securities exchange, a trading facility, or an alternative trading system.
Innovator or its affiliates, or a fund for which Innovator or an affiliate serves as investment adviser, (each, as applicable, a "Selling Shareholder") may purchase Creation Units through a broker-dealer to "seed" (in whole or in part) the Fund as it launched or thereafter, or may purchase Shares of the Fund through a broker-dealer or other investors, including in secondary market transactions. Because the Selling Shareholder may be deemed to be affiliates of the Fund, the Shares are being registered to permit the resale of these shares from time to time after any such purchase. The Fund will not receive any of the proceeds from the resale of such Shares.
Investment Restrictions and Policies
Investment Objective
There can be no assurance that the Fund will achieve its objective. The Fund's investment objective and policies, and its associated risks, are discussed below and in the Fund's Prospectus, which should be read carefully before an investment is made. All investment objectives and investment policies not specifically designated as fundamental may be changed without shareholder approval. Additional information about the Fund and its policies is provided below.
-5-
Fundamental Investment Restrictions
The investment restrictions set forth below have been adopted by the Trust as fundamental policies that cannot be changed without the affirmative vote of the holders of a majority of the outstanding voting securities of the Fund (as defined in the 1940 Act). All other investment policies or practices of the Fund are considered by the Trust to be non-fundamental and, accordingly, may be changed without shareholder approval. For purposes of the 1940 Act, a "majority of the outstanding voting securities" means the lesser of the vote of: (i) 67% or more of the shares of the Fund present at a meeting, if the holders of more than 50% of the outstanding shares of the Fund are present or represented by proxy, or (ii) more than 50% of the shares of the Fund.
The Fund shall not:
| (1) | Borrow money, except to the extent permitted by the 1940 Act, or any rules, exemptions or interpretations thereunder that may be adopted, granted or issued by the SEC. |
| (2) | Act as an underwriter, except to the extent the Fund may be deemed to be an underwriter when disposing of securities it owns or when selling its own shares. |
| (3) | Make loans if, as a result, more than 33 1/3% of its total assets would be lent to other persons, including other investment companies to the extent permitted by the 1940 Act or any rules, exemptions or interpretations thereunder which may be adopted, granted or issued by the SEC. |
| (4) | Purchase or sell real estate unless acquired as a result of ownership of securities or other instruments and provided that this restriction does not prevent the Fund from (i) purchasing or selling securities or instruments secured by real estate or interests therein, securities or instruments representing interests in real estate or securities or instruments of issuers that invest, deal or otherwise engage in transactions in real estate or interests therein and (ii) making, purchasing or selling real estate mortgage loans. |
| (5) | Purchase or sell commodities except to the extent permitted by applicable law. |
| (6) | Issue senior securities, except to the extent permitted by the 1940 Act or any rules, exemptions or interpretations thereunder that may be adopted, granted or issued by the SEC. |
| (7) | Invest 25% or more of the Fund's net assets in securities of issuers in any one industry or group of industries (other than securities issued or guaranteed by the U.S. government or any of its agencies or instrumentalities or securities of other investment companies), except that the Fund may invest more than 25% of its total assets in investments that provide exposure to the Bitcoin Price (as defined below). To the extent the Fund invests in the securities of other investment companies, it will consider the concentrations of those underlying investment companies in determining compliance with its own concentration restrictions. |
-6-
Notations Regarding the Fund's Fundamental Investment Restrictions
With respect to the fundamental policy relating to borrowing money set forth in (1) above, the 1940 Act permits the Fund to borrow money in amounts of up to one-third of the Fund's total assets from banks for any purpose, and to borrow up to 5% of the Fund's total assets from banks or other lenders for temporary purposes. (The Fund's total assets include the amounts being borrowed.) To limit the risks attendant to borrowing, the 1940 Act requires the Fund to maintain at all times an "asset coverage" of at least 300% of the amount of its borrowings. Asset coverage means the ratio that the value of the Fund's total assets (including amounts borrowed), minus liabilities other than borrowings, bears to the aggregate amount of all borrowings. Borrowing money to increase portfolio holdings is known as "leveraging."
Except for restriction (1) above, if a percentage restriction is adhered to at the time of investment, a later increase in percentage resulting from a change in market value of the investment or the total assets of the Fund will not constitute a violation of that restriction. With respect to restriction (1), if the limitations are exceeded as a result of a change in market value then the Fund will reduce the amount of borrowings within three days thereafter to the extent necessary to comply with the limitations (not including Sundays and holidays).
With respect to the fundamental policy relating to concentrations set forth in (7) above, the 1940 Act does not define what constitutes "concentration" in an industry. Rather, the SEC staff has taken the position that investment of 25% or more of a fund's total assets in one or more issuers conducting their principal activities in the same industry or group of industries constitutes a concentration. It is possible that interpretations of concentration could change in the future.
With respect to the submission of a change in an investment policy to the holders of outstanding voting securities of the Fund, such matter shall be deemed to have been effectively acted upon with respect to the Fund if a majority of the outstanding voting securities of the Fund vote for the approval of such matter, notwithstanding that such matter has not been approved by the holders of a majority of the outstanding voting securities of any other series of the Trust affected by such matter.
Non-Fundamental Investment Restrictions
In addition to the fundamental policies and investment restrictions described above, and the various general investment policies described in the Prospectus, the Fund will be subject to the following investment restrictions, which are considered non-fundamental and may be changed by the Trust's Board of Trustees (the "Board") without shareholder approval.
| (1) | The Fund may not invest more than 15% of its net assets in securities that it cannot sell or dispose of in the ordinary course of business within seven days at approximately the value at which the Fund has valued the investment. |
| (2) | The Fund is permitted to invest in other investment companies, including open-end, closed-end or unregistered investment companies, either within the percentage limits set forth in the 1940 Act, any rule or order thereunder, or SEC staff interpretation thereof, or without regard to percentage limits in connection with a merger, reorganization, consolidation or other similar transaction. |
* * *
-7-
Unless otherwise indicated, all limitations under the Fund's fundamental or non-fundamental investment restrictions apply only at the time that a transaction is undertaken. Any change in the percentage of the Fund's assets invested in certain securities or other instruments resulting from market fluctuations or other changes in the Fund's total assets will not require the Fund to dispose of an investment until the Adviser/Sub-Adviser determines that it is practicable to sell or close out the investment without undue market or tax consequences.
Investment Strategies and Risks
The following information relates to and supplements the description of the Fund's investment strategies and risks that are contained in the Prospectus and includes descriptions of permitted investments and investment practices as well as associated risk factors.
The Fund seeks to achieve its investment objective primarily through instruments that reference one or more exchange-traded products that hold bitcoin directly ("Bitcoin ETPs"). Such instruments are expected to consist of FLexible EXchange® Options ("FLEX Options") that reference the one or more Bitcoin ETPs (the "Bitcoin ETP Options") and/or swap agreements that reference one or more Bitcoin ETPs ("Bitcoin ETP Swaps" and collectively with Bitcoin ETP Options, the "Bitcoin Instruments").
The Fund will also invest in cash, cash-like instruments or other high-quality securities that serve as collateral to the Bitcoin Instruments ("Collateral Investments"). In this manner, the Fund seeks to provide investment results that correspond to twice the price performance of bitcoin (i.e., "spot" bitcoin prices), as represented by the price of one or more Bitcoin ETPs referenced by the Bitcoin Instruments (the "Bitcoin Price") for a single day.
The Fund expects to gain two times exposure to the Bitcoin Price by investing a portion of its assets in a wholly-owned subsidiary of the Fund organized under the laws of the Cayman Islands (the "Subsidiary"). The Subsidiary and the Fund will have the same investment adviser, investment sub-adviser and investment objective. The Subsidiary will also follow the same general investment policies and restrictions as the Fund. Except as noted herein, for purposes of this SAI, references to the Fund's investment strategies and risks include those of the Subsidiary. The Fund complies with the provisions of the 1940 Act governing investment policies and capital structure and leverage on an aggregate basis with the Subsidiary. Furthermore, the Adviser, as the investment adviser to the Subsidiary, complies with the provisions of the 1940 Act relating to investment advisory contracts as it relates to its advisory agreement with the Subsidiary. The Subsidiary also complies with the provisions of the 1940 Act relating to affiliated transactions and custody. Because the Fund intends to qualify for treatment as a regulated investment company ("RIC") under Subchapter M of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 (the "Internal Revenue Code"), the size of the Fund's investment in the Subsidiary will not exceed 25% of the Fund's total assets at each quarter end of the Fund's fiscal year. The Subsidiary is not registered under the 1940 Act and is not directly subject to its investor protections, except as noted in the Prospectus or this SAI. However, the Subsidiary is wholly owned and controlled by the Fund and is advised by Innovator and sub-advised by Milliman. The Trust's Board of Trustees has oversight responsibility for the investment activities of the Fund, including its investment in the Subsidiary, and the Fund's role as the sole shareholder of the Subsidiary. Innovator receives no additional compensation for managing the assets of the Subsidiary. The Subsidiary will also enter into separate contracts for the provision of custody, transfer agency, and accounting agent services with the same service providers or with affiliates of the same service providers that provide those services to the Fund. Changes in the laws of the United States (where the Fund is organized) and/or the Cayman Islands (where the Subsidiary is incorporated) could prevent the Fund and/or the Subsidiary from operating as described in the Prospectus and this SAI and could negatively affect the Fund and its shareholders. For example, the Cayman Islands currently does not impose certain taxes on the Subsidiary, including income and capital gains tax, among others. If Cayman Islands laws were changed to require the Subsidiary to pay Cayman Islands taxes, the investment returns of the Fund would likely decrease. The financial statements of the Subsidiary will be consolidated with the Fund's financial statements in the Fund's Annual and Semi-Annual Reports, when available.
-8-
The Subsidiary's transactions in Bitcoin Instruments will be subject to special provisions of the Internal Revenue Code that, among other things, may affect the character of gains and losses realized by the Subsidiary (i.e., may affect whether gains or losses are ordinary or capital, or short-term or long-term), may accelerate recognition of income to the Subsidiary and may defer Subsidiary losses. Because the Subsidiary is a controlled foreign corporation for U.S. federal income tax purposes, this treatment of the Subsidiary's income will affect the income the Fund must recognize. These rules could, therefore, affect the character, amount and timing of distributions to shareholders. These provisions also (a) will require the Subsidiary to mark-to-market certain types of the positions in its portfolio (i.e., treat them as if they were closed out), and (b) may cause the Subsidiary and the Fund to recognize income without the Fund receiving cash with which to make distributions in amounts necessary to satisfy the 90% distribution requirement for qualifying to be taxed as a RIC and the distribution requirement for avoiding excise taxes.
The Fund intends to treat any income it may derive from Bitcoin Instruments received by the Subsidiary as "qualifying income" under the provisions of the Internal Revenue Code applicable to RICs. The IRS had issued numerous private letter rulings ("PLRs") provided to third parties not associated with the Fund or its affiliates (which only those parties may rely on as precedent) concluding that similar arrangements resulted in qualifying income. Many of such PLRs have now been revoked by the IRS. In March of 2019, the IRS published Regulations that concluded that income from a corporation similar to the Subsidiary would be qualifying income, if the income is related to the Fund's business of investing in stocks or securities. Although the Regulations do not require distributions from the Subsidiary, the Fund intends to cause the Subsidiary to make distributions that would allow the Fund to make timely distributions to its shareholders. The Fund generally will be required to include in its own taxable income the income of the Subsidiary for a tax year, regardless of whether the Fund receives a distribution of the Subsidiary's income in that tax year, and this income would nevertheless be subject to the distribution requirement for qualification as a regulated investment company and would be taken into account for purposes of the 4% excise tax.
-9-
Bitcoin Investing Risk. The Fund is indirectly exposed to the risks of investing in bitcoin through its investments in Bitcoin Instruments. Bitcoin is a new and highly speculative investment. The risks associated with bitcoin include the following:
| ● | Bitcoin is a new technological innovation with a limited history. There is no assurance that usage of bitcoin will continue to grow. A contraction in use of bitcoin may result in increased volatility or a reduction in the price of bitcoin, which could adversely impact the value of the Fund. The Bitcoin Network was launched in January 2009, platform trading in bitcoin began in 2010, and trading in options on Bitcoin ETPs began in 2024, each of which limits a potential shareholder's ability to evaluate an investment in the Fund. |
| ● | The Fund's investments are exposed to risks associated with the price of bitcoin, which is subject to numerous factors and risks. The price of bitcoin is impacted by numerous factors, including: |
| ○ | The total and available supply of bitcoin, including the possibility that a small group of early bitcoin adopters hold a significant proportion of the bitcoin that has thus far been created and that sales of bitcoin by such large holders may impact the price of bitcoin; |
| ○ | Global bitcoin demand, which is influenced by the growth of retail merchants' and commercial businesses' acceptance of bitcoin as payment for goods and services, the security of online digital asset trading platforms and public bitcoin addresses that hold bitcoin, the perception that the use and holding of bitcoin is safe and secure, the lack of regulatory restrictions on their use, and the reputation regarding the use of bitcoin for illicit purposes; |
| ○ | Global bitcoin supply, which is influenced by similar factors as global bitcoin demand, in addition to fiat currency (i.e., government currency not backed by an asset such as gold) needs by miners and taxpayers who may liquidate bitcoin holdings to meet tax obligations; |
| ○ | Investors' expectations with respect to the rate of inflation of fiat currencies and deflation of bitcoin; |
| ○ | Foreign exchange rates between fiat currencies and digital assets such as bitcoin; |
| ○ | Interest rates; |
| ○ | The continued operation of digital asset trading platforms in the United States and foreign jurisdictions, including their regulatory status, trading and custody policies, and cyber security; |
| ○ | Investment and trading activities of large investors, including private and registered funds, that may directly or indirectly invest in bitcoin; |
| ○ | Regulatory measures, if any, that restrict the use of bitcoin as a form of payment or the purchase or sale of bitcoin, including measures that restrict the direct or indirect participation in the bitcoin market by financial institutions or the introduction of bitcoin instruments; |
| ○ | The maintenance and development of the open-source software protocol of the Bitcoin Network; |
| ○ | Increased competition from other digital assets, including forks of the Bitcoin Network; |
| ○ | Developments in the information technology sector; |
| ○ | Global or regional political, economic or financial events and situations; |
-10-
| ○ | Investor or Bitcoin Network participant sentiments on the value or utility of bitcoin; and |
| ○ | The dedication of mining power to the Bitcoin Network and the willingness of bitcoin miners to clear bitcoin transactions for relatively low fees. |
Negative developments in any of these factors could adversely impact an investment in the Fund.
| ● | A decline in the adoption of bitcoin could negatively impact the performance of the Fund. As a new asset and technological innovation, the bitcoin industry is subject to a high degree of uncertainty. The adoption of bitcoin will require growth in its usage for various applications that include retail and commercial payments, cross-border and remittance transactions, speculative investment and technical applications. Adoption of bitcoin will also require an accommodating regulatory environment. A lack of expansion in usage of bitcoin could adversely affect the instruments providing exposure to the price of bitcoin in which the Fund invests. In addition, there is no assurance that bitcoin will maintain its value over the long-term. The value of bitcoin is subject to risks related to its usage. Even if growth in bitcoin adoption occurs in the near or medium-term, there is no assurance that bitcoin usage will continue to grow over the long-term. A contraction in use of bitcoin may result in increased volatility or a reduction in the price of bitcoin, which would adversely impact the value of the Fund's shares. Recently, bitcoin has come under scrutiny for its environmental impact, specifically the amount of energy consumed by bitcoin miners. Some companies have indicated they will cease accepting bitcoin for certain kinds of purchases due to such environmental concerns. To the extent such concerns persist, the demand for bitcoin and the speed of its adoption could be suppressed. |
| ● | Bitcoin trading prices are volatile, and shareholders could lose all or substantially all of their investment in the Fund. Speculators and investors who seek to profit from trading and holding bitcoin generate a significant portion of bitcoin demand. Bitcoin speculation regarding future appreciation in the value of bitcoin may inflate and make more volatile the price of a bitcoin. As a result, bitcoin may be more likely to fluctuate in value due to changing investor confidence in future appreciation in the price of bitcoin. |
| ● | Regulation of participants in the bitcoin ecosystem continues to evolve in both the U.S. and foreign jurisdictions, which may restrict the use of bitcoin or otherwise impact the demand for bitcoin. As a technology, the Bitcoin Network is governed by its internal protocols and source code; however, the use by individuals or businesses of the Bitcoin Network and bitcoin may be subject to government regulation. Both domestic and foreign regulators and governments have increased focus on the use of the Bitcoin Network and bitcoin since 2013. In the U.S., federal and certain state authorities have exercised jurisdiction over specific uses of the Bitcoin Network and bitcoin, typically in the context of money service business regulation. Some foreign regulators and governments have exercised similar regulatory oversight; however, other jurisdictions have determined that regulatory action was premature or that the use of the Bitcoin Network should be prohibited or limited for reasons such as incompatibility with capital controls or financial system risks. Bitcoin market disruptions and resulting governmental interventions are unpredictable, and may make bitcoin illegal altogether. Future foreign regulations and directives may conflict with those in the U.S., and such regulatory actions may restrict or make bitcoin illegal in foreign jurisdictions. Future regulations and directives may impact the demand for bitcoin, and may also affect the ability of digital asset trading platforms to operate and for other market participants to enter into bitcoin transactions. |
-11-
To the extent that future regulatory actions or policies limit or restrict bitcoin usage, bitcoin trading or the ability to convert bitcoin to fiat currencies, the demand for bitcoin may be reduced, which may adversely affect investment in the Fund's shares. Regulation of bitcoin continues to evolve, the ultimate impact of which remains unclear and may adversely affect, among other things, the availability, value or performance of bitcoin and, thus, the instruments in which the Fund invests. Moreover, in addition to exposing the Fund to potential new costs and expenses, additional regulation or changes to existing regulation may also require changes to the Fund's investment strategies. Although there continues to be uncertainty about the full impact of these and other regulatory changes, it is the case that the Fund may be subject to a more complex regulatory framework, and incur additional costs to comply with new requirements as well as to monitor for compliance with any new requirements going forward.
| ● | Sales of newly mined bitcoin may cause the price of bitcoin to decline, which could negatively affect an investment in the Fund. Approximately 900 newly mined bitcoin are created each day. If the parties engaged in bitcoin mining choose not to hold the newly mined bitcoin, and, instead, make them available for sale, there can be downward pressure on the price of bitcoin. A bitcoin mining operation may be more likely to sell a higher percentage of its newly created bitcoin, and more rapidly so, if it is operating at a low profit margin, thus reducing the price of bitcoin. Lower bitcoin prices may result in further tightening of profit margins for miners and worsening profitability, thereby potentially causing even further selling pressure. Decreasing profit margins and increasing sales of newly mined bitcoin could result in a reduction in the price of bitcoin, which could adversely impact an investment in the Fund. |
| ● | Disruptions at digital asset trading platforms and potential consequences of a digital asset trading platform's failure could adversely affect an investment in the Fund. Digital asset trading platforms operate websites on which users can trade bitcoin for U.S. dollars, other government currencies or other digital assets. Trades on digital asset trading platforms are unrelated to transfers of bitcoin between users via the Bitcoin Network. Bitcoin trades on digital asset trading platforms are recorded on the digital asset trading platform's internal ledger only, and each internal ledger entry for a trade will correspond to an entry for an offsetting trade in U.S. dollars, other government currency or other digital asset. Digital asset trading platforms have a limited history. Since 2009, several digital asset trading platforms have been closed or experienced disruptions due to fraud, failure, security breaches or distributed denial of service attacks a/k/a "DDoS Attacks." A DDoS attack is a malicious attempt to disrupt the normal traffic of network by overwhelming the target or its infrastructure with a flood of internet traffic. In many of these instances, the customers of such exchanges were not compensated or made whole for the partial or complete losses of their funds held at the exchanges. In 2014, the largest digital asset trading platform at the time, Mt. Gox, filed for bankruptcy in Japan amid reports the exchange lost up to 850,000 bitcoin, then valued then at over $450 million. Digital asset trading platforms are also appealing targets for hackers and malware. In August 2016, Bitfinex, a digital asset trading platform located in Hong Kong, reported a security breach that resulted in the theft of approximately 120,000 bitcoin valued at the time at approximately $65 million, a loss which was socialized and allocated to all Bitfinex account holders, regardless of whether the account holder held bitcoin or cash in their account. In November 2022, FTX Trading Ltd. ("FTX"), a major digital asset trading platform, filed for bankruptcy following a halt in customer withdrawals. The potential for instability of digital asset trading platforms and the closure or temporary shutdown of exchanges due to fraud, business failure, hackers, DDoS or malware, or government-mandated regulation may reduce confidence in bitcoin, which may result in greater volatility in bitcoin. |
-12-
| ● | Demand for bitcoin is driven, in part, by its status as the most prominent and secure digital asset. It is possible that a digital assets other than bitcoin (often referred to as "Altcoins") could have features that make it more desirable to a material portion of the digital asset user base, resulting in a reduction in demand for bitcoin, which could have a negative impact on the price of bitcoin and adversely affect the instruments in which the Fund invests. The Bitcoin Network and bitcoin, as an asset, hold a "first-to-market" advantage over other digital assets. This first-to-market advantage is driven in large part by having the largest user base and, more importantly, the largest combined mining power in use to secure the Blockchain and transaction verification system. Having a large mining network results in greater user confidence regarding the security and long-term stability of a digital asset's network and its blockchain; as a result, the advantage of more users and miners makes a digital asset more secure, which makes it more attractive to new users and miners, resulting in a network effect that strengthens the first-to-market advantage. Bitcoin also enjoys significantly greater acceptance and usage than other digital asset networks in the retail and commercial marketplace, due in large part to the relatively well-funded efforts of payment processing companies. Despite the marked first-mover advantage of the Bitcoin Network over other digital assets, it is possible that an Altcoin could become materially popular due to either a perceived or exposed shortcoming of the Bitcoin Network protocol that is not immediately addressed by the bitcoin developers or a perceived advantage of an altcoin that includes features not incorporated into bitcoin. For example, the development of digital self-executing contracts (also known as "smart contracts" or "DeFi") on the Ethereum network has permitted the value of its native unit (ether) to rival bitcoin for periods of time. If an Altcoin obtains significant market share (either in market capitalization, mining power or use as a payment technology), this could reduce bitcoin's market share and have a negative impact on the demand for, and price of, bitcoin. |
| ● | Miners may cease expanding processing power to create blocks and verify transactions if they are not adequately compensated. Miners generate revenue from both newly created bitcoin (known as the "block reward") and from fees taken upon verification of transactions. If the aggregate revenue from transaction fees and the block reward is below a miner's cost, the miner may cease operations. An acute cessation of mining operations would reduce the collective processing power on the Blockchain, which would adversely affect the transaction verification process by temporarily decreasing the speed at which blocks are added to the Blockchain and make the Blockchain more vulnerable to a malicious actor obtaining control in excess of 50 percent of the processing power on the Blockchain. Reductions in processing power could result in material, though temporary, delays in transaction confirmation time. Any reduction in confidence in the transaction verification process or mining processing power may adversely impact the price of bitcoin. Furthermore, the block reward will decrease over time. In the summer of 2020, the block reward was reduced from 12.5 to 6.25 bitcoin, and it will further reduce to 3.125 bitcoin in 2024. As the block reward continues to decrease over time, the mining incentive structure will transition to a higher reliance on transaction verification fees in order to incentivize miners to continue to dedicate processing power to the Blockchain. If transaction verification fees become too high, the marketplace may be reluctant to use bitcoin. Decreased demand for bitcoin may adversely affect its price, which may adversely affect an investment in the Fund. |
-13-
| ● | Bitcoin Network development contributors could propose amendments to the Bitcoin Network's protocols and software that, if accepted and authorized by large groups of Bitcoin Network users, could adversely affect an investment in the Fund. The Bitcoin Network is an open-source project meaning that any developer or computer scientist may review, propose changes to and develop software clients for the Bitcoin Network protocols. Although a small group of individuals referred to as the Core Developers previously exercised significant influence over the direction of Bitcoin Network development, no single party or group controls what refinements or improvements to the Bitcoin Network's source code are proposed, approved or produced as upgrades or new software clients for Bitcoin Network users. A software update or new software client may alter the protocols and software that govern the Bitcoin Network and the properties of bitcoin, including the irreversibility of transactions and limitations on the mining of new bitcoin. When a modification is introduced and a substantial majority of users and miners consent to the modification, the change is implemented, and the Bitcoin Network remains uninterrupted. However, if less than a substantial majority of users and miners consent to the proposed modification, and the modification is not compatible with the software prior to its modification, the consequence would be what is known as a "fork" (i.e., "split") of the Bitcoin Network (and the Blockchain), with one prong running the pre-modified software and the other running the modified software. The effect of such a fork would be the existence of two versions of the Bitcoin Network running in parallel, but with each version's underlying asset and blockchain lacking interchangeability. Additionally, a fork could be introduced by an unintentional, unanticipated software flaw in the multiple versions of otherwise compatible software users run. Although several chain forks have been addressed by community-led efforts to merge the two chains, such a fork could adversely affect Bitcoin's viability. It is possible, however, that a substantial number of Bitcoin users and miners could adopt an incompatible version of Bitcoin while resisting community-led efforts to merge the two chains. This would result in a permanent fork. On August 1, 2017, after 7 extended debates among developers as to how to improve the Bitcoin network's transaction capacity, the Bitcoin network was forked by a group of developers and miners resulting in the creation of a new blockchain, which underlies the new digital asset "Bitcoin Cash" alongside the original Bitcoin Blockchain. Bitcoin and Bitcoin Cash now operate on separate, independent blockchains. Although the Bitcoin Network remained unchanged after the fork, it is unclear how such actions will affect the long-term viability of bitcoin and, accordingly, may adversely affect an investment in the Fund. |
-14-
| ● | The decentralized structure of Bitcoin Network software development may prevent the formation of a consensus on how to improve and modify the Bitcoin Network, which could prevent needed or desirable updates and thereby adversely impact an investment in the Fund. The lack of a formal or informal centralized structure in the development of Bitcoin Network means that parties with potentially competing motives and incentives must generate a consensus on how best to improve key elements of the Bitcoin Network protocols, such as how best to increase the transaction capacity of the Bitcoin Network. If developer proposals to improve the Bitcoin Network's protocols are incapable of obtaining an overwhelming consensus for adoption, a proposal may either be abandoned or indefinitely delayed pending the formation of consensus or the proposal may result in a fork. If a desirable or necessary improvement to the Bitcoin Network protocols is not implemented, it may have a negative impact on the functioning of the Bitcoin Network or the growth of user adoption. Any such delay may, therefore, have a negative impact on the secondary market price of bitcoin and the instruments providing exposure to the price of bitcoin in which the Fund invests. |
| ● | The open-source structure of the Bitcoin Network protocol means that the contributors to the protocol are generally not directly compensated for their contributions in maintaining and developing the protocol. A failure to properly monitor and upgrade the protocol could damage the Bitcoin Network and, therefore, an investment in the instruments providing exposure to the price of bitcoin in which the Fund invests. As the Bitcoin Network protocol is not sold and its use does not generate revenues for contributors, contributors are generally not compensated for maintaining and updating the Bitcoin Network protocol. Although some bitcoin industry participants have funded core developers, this type of financial incentive is not typical. The lack of guaranteed financial incentive for contributors to maintain or develop the Bitcoin Network and the lack of guaranteed resources to adequately address emerging issues with the Bitcoin Network may reduce incentives to address the issues adequately or in a timely manner. This may have a negative impact on the secondary market price of bitcoin and an investment in the Fund. |
| ● | Intellectual property rights claims may adversely affect the operation of the Bitcoin Network. Third parties may assert intellectual property claims relating to the holding and transfer of digital assets and their source code. Regardless of the merit of any intellectual property or other legal action, any threatened action that reduces confidence in the Bitcoin network's long-term viability or the ability of end-users to hold and transfer bitcoin may adversely affect an investment in the Fund. Additionally, a meritorious intellectual property claim could prevent end-users from accessing the Bitcoin Network or holding or transferring their bitcoin. As a result, an intellectual property claim could adversely affect an investment in the instruments providing exposure to the price of bitcoin in which the Fund invests. |
-15-
| ● | A malicious actor may attack the Bitcoin Network in an effort to prevent its function, which may adversely impact an investment in the Fund. A malicious actor may attack the Bitcoin Network in a number of ways, including a "50 Percent Attack" or a spam attack. If a malicious actor obtains a majority of the processing power (referred to herein as "aggregate hashrate") dedicated to mining on the Bitcoin Network, it will be able to exert unilateral control over the addition of blocks to the Blockchain. As long as the malicious actor enjoys this majority it may be able to "double-spend" its own bitcoin (i.e., spend the same bitcoin in two or more conflicting transactions) as well as prevent the confirmation of other Bitcoin transactions. If such a scenario were to materialize, it could adversely affect an investment in the Fund. More simply, a malicious actor could attempt to flood the pool of unconfirmed transactions (known as the "mempool") with tens of thousands of transactions in an effort to significantly slow the confirmation of legitimate transactions across the Bitcoin Network. Such a delay, if sustained for extended periods of time, could negatively impact the secondary market price of Bitcoin. These or any other form of attack on the Bitcoin Network could adversely affect an investment the instruments providing exposure to the price of bitcoin in which the Fund invests. |
| ● | In the event of widespread disruption to the Internet, the market for bitcoins may become dangerously illiquid. The Bitcoin Network's functionality relies on the Internet. A significant disruption of Internet connectivity affecting large numbers of users or geographic areas could impede the functionality of the Bitcoin Network and adversely affect the instruments providing exposure to the price of bitcoin in which the Fund invests. In addition, certain features of the Bitcoin Network, such as decentralization, open source protocol, and reliance on peer-to-peer connectivity, may increase the risk of fraud or cyber-attack by potentially reducing the likelihood of a coordinated response. |
Bitcoin ETPs. The Fund uses one or more Bitcoin ETPs as the reference asset for its Bitcoin Instruments, and may invest in shares of Bitcoin ETPs. Bitcoin ETPs are exchange-traded investment products not registered under the 1940 Act that seek to match the daily changes in the price of bitcoin, and trade intra-day on a national securities exchange. Bitcoin ETPs are passively managed and do not pursue active management investment strategies, and their sponsors do not actively manage the exposure to bitcoin held by the Bitcoin ETP. This means that the sponsor of the Bitcoin ETP does not sell bitcoin at times when its price is high or acquire bitcoin at low prices in the expectation of future price increases. Bitcoin ETPs seek to track the price of bitcoin as determined by a specific index which typically examine multiple digital trading platforms to determine a prevailing bitcoin price, however, such index may not accurately track the global price of bitcoin.
Borrowing and Leverage. The Fund may borrow money to the extent permitted by the 1940 Act. If the Fund borrows money, it must pay interest and other fees, which will reduce the Fund's returns if such costs exceed the returns on the portfolio securities purchased or retained with such borrowings. Any such borrowings are intended to be temporary. However, under certain market conditions, including periods of low demand or decreased liquidity, such borrowings might be outstanding for longer periods of time. As prescribed by the 1940 Act, the Fund will be required to maintain specified asset coverage of at least 300% with respect to any bank borrowing immediately following such borrowing. In the event that such asset coverage shall at any time fall below 300%, the Fund shall, within three days thereafter (not including Sundays and holidays), reduce the amount of its borrowings to an extent that the asset coverage of such borrowings shall be at least 300%. The Fund may be required to dispose of assets on unfavorable terms if market fluctuations or other factors reduce the Fund's asset coverage to less than the prescribed amount.
-16-
A number of other factors may adversely affect the Fund's correlation with the Bitcoin Price, including fees, expenses, transaction costs, financing costs associated with the use of derivatives, income items, valuation methodology, accounting standards and disruptions or illiquidity in the markets for the securities or Bitcoin Instruments in which the Fund invests. The Fund may take or refrain from taking positions in order to improve tax efficiency, comply with regulatory restrictions, or for other reasons, each of which may negatively affect the Fund's correlation with the Bitcoin Price. The Fund may also be subject to large movements of assets into and out of the Fund, potentially resulting in the Fund being under- or over-exposed to the Bitcoin Price. Any of these factors could decrease correlation between the performance of the Fund and the Bitcoin Price and may hinder the Fund's ability to meet its daily investment objective.
Collateral Investments. In seeking to achieve its investment objective, and for serving as margin for the Fund's investments in Bitcoin Instruments, the Fund may invest all or part of its assets in cash or cash equivalents, which include, but are not limited to, the following:
| (1) | U.S. government securities, including bills, notes and bonds differing as to maturity and rates of interest, which are either issued or guaranteed by the U.S. Treasury or by U.S. government agencies or instrumentalities. U.S. government securities include securities that are issued or guaranteed by the United States Treasury, by various agencies of the U.S. government, or by various instrumentalities that have been established or sponsored by the U.S. government. U.S. Treasury securities are backed by the "full faith and credit" of the United States. Securities issued or guaranteed by federal agencies and U.S. government-sponsored instrumentalities may or may not be backed by the full faith and credit of the United States. Some of the U.S. government agencies that issue or guarantee securities include the Export-Import Bank of the United States, the Farmers Home Administration, the Federal Housing Administration, the Maritime Administration, the Small Business Administration and the Tennessee Valley Authority. An instrumentality of the U.S. government is a government agency organized under federal charter with government supervision. Instrumentalities issuing or guaranteeing securities include, among others, the Federal Home Loan Banks, the Federal Land Banks, the Central Bank for Cooperatives, Federal Intermediate Credit Banks and Federal National Mortgage Association. In the case of those U.S. government securities not backed by the full faith and credit of the United States, the investor must look principally to the agency or instrumentality issuing or guaranteeing the security for ultimate repayment and may not be able to assert a claim against the United States itself in the event that the agency or instrumentality does not meet its commitment. The U.S. government, its agencies and instrumentalities do not guarantee the market value of their securities, and consequently, the value of such securities may fluctuate. |
| (2) | The Fund may invest in certificates of deposit issued against funds deposited in a bank or savings and loan association. Such certificates are for a definite period of time, earn a specified rate of return, and are normally negotiable. If such certificates of deposit are non-negotiable, they will be considered illiquid securities and be subject to the Fund's 15% restriction on investments in illiquid securities. Pursuant to the certificate of deposit, the issuer agrees to pay the amount deposited plus interest to the bearer of the certificate on the date specified thereon. Under current FDIC regulations, the maximum insurance payable as to any one certificate of deposit is $250,000; therefore, certificates of deposit purchased by the Fund may not be fully insured. The Fund may only invest in certificates of deposit issued by U.S. banks with at least $1 billion in assets. |
-17-
| (3) | The Fund may invest in bankers' acceptances, which are short-term credit instruments used to finance commercial transactions. Generally, an acceptance is a time draft drawn on a bank by an exporter or an importer to obtain a stated amount of funds to pay for specific merchandise. The draft is then "accepted" by a bank that, in effect, unconditionally guarantees to pay the face value of the instrument on its maturity date. The acceptance may then be held by the accepting bank as an asset, or it may be sold in the secondary market at the going rate of interest for a specific maturity. |
| (4) | The Fund may invest in bank time deposits, which are monies kept on deposit with banks or savings and loan associations for a stated period of time at a fixed rate of interest. There may be penalties for the early withdrawal of such time deposits, in which case the yields of these investments will be reduced. |
| (5) | The Fund may invest in commercial paper, which are short-term unsecured promissory notes, including variable rate master demand notes issued by corporations to finance their current operations. Master demand notes are direct lending arrangements between the Fund and a corporation. There is no secondary market for the notes. However, they are redeemable by the Fund at any time. The Fund's portfolio managers will consider the financial condition of the corporation (e.g., earning power, cash flow and other liquidity ratios) and will continuously monitor the corporation's ability to meet all of its financial obligations, because the Fund's liquidity might be impaired if the corporation were unable to pay principal and interest on demand. The Fund may invest in commercial paper only if it has received the highest rating from at least one nationally recognized statistical rating organization or, if unrated, judged by the Fund's sub-adviser to be of comparable quality. |
| (6) | The Fund may invest in shares of money market funds, as consistent with its investment objective and policies. Shares of money market funds are subject to management fees and other expenses of those funds. Therefore, investments in money market funds will cause the Fund to bear proportionately the costs incurred by the money market funds' operations. At the same time, the Fund will continue to pay its own management fees and expenses with respect to all of its assets, including any portion invested in the shares of other investment companies. It is possible for the Fund to lose money by investing in money market funds. |
| (7) | The Fund may invest in corporate debt securities, as consistent with its investment objective and policies. Corporate debt may be rated investment-grade or below investment-grade and may carry variable or floating rates of interest. Some corporate debt securities that are rated below investment-grade generally are considered speculative because they present a greater risk of loss, including default, than higher quality debt securities. The Fund could lose money if the issuer of a corporate debt security is unable to pay interest or repay principal when it is due. |
-18-
Cyber Security Risk. The Fund may be more susceptible to operational risks through breaches in cyber security. A cyber security incident may refer to either intentional or unintentional events that allow an unauthorized party to gain access to fund assets, customer data, or proprietary information, or cause the Fund or a service provider to suffer data corruption or lose operational functionality. A cyber security incident could, among other things, result in the loss or theft of customer data or funds, customers or employees being unable to access electronic systems ("denial of services"), loss or theft of proprietary information or corporate data, physical damage to a computer or network system, remediation costs associated with system repairs, data corruption or loss of operational capacity. Any of these results could have a substantial adverse impact on the Fund. For example, if a cyber security incident results in a denial of service, Fund shareholders could lose access to their electronic accounts for an unknown period of time, and employees could be unable to access electronic systems to perform critical duties for the Fund, such as trading, NAV calculation, shareholder accounting or fulfillment of Share purchases and redemptions. Cyber security incidents could cause the Fund, Adviser, Sub-Adviser or Distributor to incur regulatory penalties, reputational damage, additional compliance costs associated with corrective measures, or financial loss of a significant magnitude. Such incidents may also cause the Fund to violate applicable privacy and other laws. The Fund's service providers have established risk management systems that seek to reduce the risks associated with cyber security, and business continuity plans in the event there is a cybersecurity breach. However, there is no guarantee that such efforts will succeed, especially since the Fund does not directly control the cyber security systems of the issuers of securities in which the Fund invests or the Fund's third-party service providers (including the Fund's transfer agent and custodian) and the Fund and its Shareholders may be negatively impacted as a result.
FLEX Options. FLexible EXchange® Options ("FLEX Options") are customized option contracts available through national securities exchanges that are guaranteed for settlement by the Options Clearing Corporation ("OCC"). FLEX Options are listed on a U.S. national securities exchange. FLEX Options provide investors with the ability to customize assets referenced by the options, exercise prices, exercise styles (i.e., American-style, exercisable any time prior to the expiration date, or European-style, exercisable only on the option expiration date) and expiration dates, while achieving price discovery in competitive, transparent auctions markets and avoiding the counterparty exposure of over-the-counter ("OTC") options positions. Each option contract entitles the holder thereof to purchase (for the call options) or sell (for the put options) shares of the reference asset at the strike price.
The OCC guarantees performance by each of the counterparties to the FLEX Options, becoming the "buyer for every seller and the seller for every buyer", with the goal of protecting clearing members and options traders from counterparty risk.
Certain Considerations Regarding Options. The FLEX Options in which the Fund invests will be options on one or more Bitcoin ETPs. As such, the value of the Fund's FLEX Options will fluctuate with changes in the value of the assets included in, or held by, such Bitcoin ETP(s), and thus the Bitcoin Price. In addition to the value of the Bitcoin ETPs, the value of an option contract, in general, will reflect, among other things, the time remaining until its expiration date, the relationship of the exercise price to the market price of the underlying investment, and general market conditions. Option contracts that expire unexercised have no value. The Fund invests in Bitcoin ETP Options indirectly via the Subsidiary.
-19-
Each of the options exchanges has established limitations governing the maximum number of call or put options on the same asset that may be bought or written by a single investor, whether acting alone or in concert with others (regardless of whether such options are written on the same or different exchanges or are held or written on one or more accounts or through one or more brokers). Under these limitations, option positions of all investment companies advised by Innovator are combined for purposes of these limits. Pursuant to these limitations, an exchange may order the liquidation of positions and may impose other sanctions or restrictions. These positions limits may restrict the number of listed options that the Fund may buy or sell, which could impact the Fund's ability to achieve its investment objective.
Puts and calls on a reference asset entitle the purchaser of the option the right to purchase (for a call option) or sell (for a put option) the reference asset at a predetermined specified price (the "strike price"). When the Fund writes a call on a Bitcoin ETP, it receives a premium and agrees that the purchaser of the call, upon exercise of the call, will receive from the Fund the delivery of an amount of cash or a specified number of shares of such Bitcoin ETP in exchange for the strike price. When the Fund buys a call on a Bitcoin ETP, it pays a premium and has the same rights to such call as indicated above. When the Fund buys a put on a Bitcoin ETP, it pays a premium and has the right to require the seller of the put, upon the Fund's exercise of the put, to deliver an amount of cash or a specified number of shares of such Bitcoin ETP in exchange for the strike price. When the Fund writes a put on a Bitcoin ETP, it receives a premium and the purchaser of the put has the right to require the Fund to deliver an amount of cash or a specified number of shares of such Bitcoin ETP in exchange for the strike price. Notwithstanding the above, the Fund utilizes FLEX Options that are cash-settled. Cash-settled option contracts give the holder the right to receive an amount (or owe an amount) of cash upon the exercise of the option contract. Gain or loss depends on changes in the value of the reference asset's price return relative to the strike price for a given option contract. The amount of cash is equal to the difference between the closing price of the reference asset's price return and the exercise price of the option contract times a specified multiple ("multiplier"), which determines the total value for each point of such difference.
Risks of Options on Bitcoin ETPs. If the Fund has purchased an option and exercises it before the closing value for that day is available, it runs the risk that the Bitcoin ETP's price return may subsequently change. If such a change causes the exercised option to fall out of the money, the Fund will be required to pay the difference between the closing value of the Bitcoin ETP's value and the exercise price of the option (times the applicable multiplier) to the assigned writer.
-20-
Rule 18f-4. Funds that enter into derivatives transactions and certain other transactions notwithstanding the restrictions on the issuance of "senior securities" under Section 18 of the 1940 Act are permitted to do so in accordance with Rule 18f-4 under the 1940 Act ("Rule 18f-4" or the "Derivatives Rule"). The Derivatives Rule defines the term "derivatives" to include short sales and forward contracts, such as TBA transactions, in addition to instruments traditionally classified as derivatives, such as swaps, futures, and option contracts. Rule 18f-4 also regulates other types of leveraged transactions, such as reverse repurchase transactions and transactions deemed to be "similar to" reverse repurchase transactions, such as certain securities lending transactions in connection with which a fund obtains leverage. Among other things, Rule 18f-4 prohibits a fund from entering into these derivatives transactions except in accordance with the provisions of the Derivatives Rule. The Derivatives Rule requires, among other things, a fund to adopt and implement a written "derivatives risk management program" and comply with limitations on risks relating to its derivatives transactions. The Derivatives Rule establishes limits on the derivatives transactions that a fund may enter into based on the value-at-risk ("VaR") of the fund inclusive of derivatives. A fund generally satisfies the limits under the Derivatives Rule if the VaR of its portfolio (inclusive of derivatives transactions) does not exceed 200% of the VaR of its "designated reference portfolio." The "designated reference portfolio" is a representative unleveraged index or the fund's own portfolio absent derivatives holdings, as determined by such fund's derivatives risk manager (the person or persons appointed by the fund's board of directors/trustees responsible for administering the derivatives risk management program). This limits test is referred to as the "Relative VaR Test". In addition, among other requirements, Rule 18f-4 also requires a fund carry out enhanced reporting to the board of directors/trustees, the SEC and the public regarding a fund's derivatives activities. These requirements apply unless a fund qualifies as a "limited derivatives user," which the Derivatives Rule defines as a fund that limits its derivatives exposure to 10% of its net assets. The Fund complies with the requirements of Rule 18f-4 in its usage of option contracts. It is possible that the limits and compliance costs imposed by the Derivatives Rule may adversely affect the Fund's performance, efficiency in implementing its strategy, liquidity and/or ability to pursue its investment objectives and may increase the costs associated with the operation of the Fund, which could adversely affect investors.
Inflation Risk. Inflation may reduce the intrinsic value of increases in the value of the Fund. Inflation risk is the risk that the value of assets or income from investments will be less in the future as inflation decreases the value of money. As inflation increases, the value of the Fund's assets can decline.
Legislation and Litigation Risk. Legislation or litigation that affects the value of securities held by the Fund and/or that the Fund has exposure to by virtue of its usage of derivatives instruments may reduce the value of the Fund. From time to time, various legislative initiatives are proposed that may have a negative impact on certain securities. In addition, litigation regarding any of the securities owned by the Fund or the Reference Asset may negatively impact the value of Shares. Such legislation or litigation may cause the Fund to lose value.
Listing Standards Risk. The Fund is required to comply with listing requirements adopted by the Exchange. Non-compliance with such requirements may result in the Fund's shares being delisted by the Exchange. Any resulting liquidation of the Fund could cause the Fund to incur elevated transaction costs and could result in negative tax consequences for its shareholders.
-21-
Market Risk. Market risk is the risk that a particular security, or Shares of the Fund in general, may fall in value. Securities are subject to market fluctuations caused by such factors as economic, political, regulatory or market developments, changes in interest rates and perceived trends in securities prices. Shares of the Fund could decline in value or underperform other investments due to short-term market movements or any longer periods during more prolonged market downturns. In addition, local, regional or global events such as war, acts of terrorism, spread of infectious diseases or other public health issues, recessions, or other events could have a significant negative impact on the Fund and its investments. Such events may affect certain geographic regions, countries, sectors and industries more significantly than others. Such events could adversely affect the prices and liquidity of the Fund's portfolio securities or other instruments and could result in disruptions in the trading markets. Any of such circumstances could have a materially negative impact on the value of the Fund's Shares and result in increased market volatility. During any such events, the Fund's Shares may trade at increased premiums or discounts to their NAV.
Shares of the Fund in general, may fall due to current market conditions or adverse changes in market conditions. Values of securities may change due to factors such as, or changes in circumstances in relation to, inflation, interest rates, regulatory requirements, bank failures, political climate deterioration or developments, armed conflicts or wars, natural disasters or future health crises. As a means to fight inflation, the Federal Reserve and certain foreign central banks have historically raised interest rates which may negatively impact the performance of securities held by the Fund. Certain market factors may result in central banks changing their approach in the future. U.S. regulators have proposed, in the past, and may further propose in the future, several changes to market and issuer regulations which could directly impact the Fund and/or its ability to implement its investment strategies or make certain investments. Regulatory changes may also increase operational costs, which could impact overall performance. Bank failures, such as the March 2023 failures of Silicon Valley Bank and Signature Bank (the second- and third-largest bank failures in U.S. history) could result in disruption to the broader banking industry or markets generally and reduce confidence in financial institutions and the economy as a whole, which may also heighten market volatility and reduce liquidity. The political climate in the U.S., as well as political and diplomatic events both domestically and abroad, have and may continue to have an adverse impact on the U.S. regulatory landscape, markets and investor behavior, which could have a negative impact on the Fund's investments and operations. A U.S. federal government shutdown may also significantly impact investor or consumer behavior, which may adversely impact the markets and global economy. Global and domestic authorities and regulators have previously responded to serious economic disruptions with ranging fiscal and monetary policy changes, including, but not limited to, direct capital infusions into companies, new monetary programs and dramatically lower interest rates. Any change in these policies, or the ineffectiveness of these policies, cold increase volatility in securities markets, which may adversely impact the Fund's investments and performance. Any market disruptions could also delay the Fund from making sound investment decisions in a timely manner. If the Fund concentrates its investments in a region enduring geopolitical market disruption, it may face higher risk of loss, although the increasing interconnectivity between global economies and financial markets can lead to events or conditions in one country, region or financial market, adversely impacting a different country, region or financial market.
-22-
Other unexpected political, regulatory and diplomatic events within the U.S. and abroad may affect investor and consumer confidence and may adversely impact financial markets and the broader economy. For example, armed conflicts or wars have and could continue to cause significant market disruptions and volatility within the markets. The hostilities and sanctions resulting from those hostilities could have a significant impact on the Fund's investments, performance and liquidity. The economies of the U.S. and its trading partners, as well as the financial markets generally, may also be adversely impacted by trade disputes and other matters. If any geopolitical conflicts develop or worsen, economies, markets and individual securities may be adversely affected, and the value of the Fund's assets may go down.
Health crises caused by the outbreak of infectious diseases or other public health issues, may exacerbate other pre-existing political, social, economic, market and financial risks. The impact of any such events, could negatively affect the global economy, as well as the economies of individual countries or regions, the financial performance of individual companies, sectors and industries, and the markets in general in significant and unforeseen ways. Any future public health crisis, and the ensuing policies enacted by governments and central banks have caused in the past, and may cause in the future, significant volatility and uncertainty in global financial markets, negatively impacting global growth prospects. As the COVID-19 global pandemic illustrated, such events may affect certain geographic regions, countries, sectors and industries more significantly than others. The Fund's investments and liquidity thereof could be negatively impacted in the event of such health crises.
Advancements in technology may also adversely impact markets and overall performance of the Fund. For instance, the economy may be significantly impacted by the advanced development and increased regulation of artificial intelligence. As the use of technology grows, liquidity and market movements may be affected. As artificial intelligence is used more widely, the profitability and growth of Fund holdings may be impacted, which could significantly impact the overall performance of the Fund.
These events, and any other future events, may adversely affect the prices and liquidity of the Fund's portfolio investments and could result in disruptions in the trading markets.
Reverse Repurchase Agreements. The Fund may invest in reverse repurchase agreements which are a form of borrowing in which the Fund sells portfolio securities to financial institutions and agrees to repurchase them at a mutually agreed-upon date and price that is higher than the original sale price and use the proceeds for investment purchases.
As noted above, because the Fund intends to qualify for treatment as a RIC under the Internal Revenue Code, the size of the Fund's investment in the Subsidiary will not exceed 25% of the Fund's total assets at or around each quarter end of the Fund's fiscal year (the "Asset Diversification Test"). At other times of the year, the Fund's investments in the Subsidiary will significantly exceed 25% of the Fund's total (or gross) assets. When the Fund seeks to reduce its total assets exposure to the Subsidiary, it may use the short-term Treasury Bills it owns (and purchase additional Treasury Bills as needed) to transact in reverse repurchase agreement transactions, which are ostensibly loans to the Fund. Those loans will increase the gross assets of the Fund, which the Sponsor expects will allow the Fund to meet the Asset Diversification Test. When the Fund enters into a reverse repurchase agreement, it will either (i) be consistent with Section 18 of the 1940 Act and maintain asset coverage of at least 300% of the value of the reverse repurchase agreement; or (ii) treat the reverse repurchase agreement transactions as derivative transactions for purposes of Rule 18f-4 under the 1940 Act, including as applicable, the value-at-risk based limit on leverage risk.
-23-
Security Issuer Risk. Issuer-specific attributes may cause a security held by the Reference Asset to be more volatile than the market generally. The value of an individual security or particular type of security may be more volatile than the market as a whole and may perform differently from the value of the market as a whole.
Swap Agreements. The Fund may utilize Bitcoin Swaps in pursuing its investment objective, which may consist of cash-settled swaps that provide exposure to Bitcoin ETPs without actually purchasing such Bitcoin ETP. Swaps are two-party contracts entered into primarily by institutional investors for periods ranging from a day to more than one year. In a standard "swap" transaction, two parties agree to exchange the returns (or differentials in rates of return) earned or realized on a particular pre-determined interest rate, commodity, security, indexes, or other assets or measurable indicators. The gross return to be exchanged or "swapped" between the parties is calculated with respect to a "notional amount," e.g., the return on, or the increase/decrease in, value of a particular dollar amount invested in Bitcoin ETPs. The Fund will enter into swap agreements that reference one or more Bitcoin ETPs indirectly via the Subsidiary.
The Fund may enter into swaps to invest in a market without owning or taking physical custody of securities. For example, in one common type of total return swap, the Fund's counterparty will agree to pay the Fund the rate at which the specified asset or indicator (e.g., Bitcoin-ETPs) increased in value multiplied by the relevant notional amount of the swap. The Fund will agree to pay to the counterparty an interest fee (based on the notional amount) and the rate at which the specified asset or indicator decreased in value multiplied by the notional amount of the swap, plus, in certain instances, commissions or trading spreads on the notional amount. As a result, the swap has a similar economic effect as if the Fund were to invest in the assets underlying the swap in an amount equal to the notional amount of the swap. The return to the Fund on such swap should be the gain or loss on the notional amount plus dividends or interest on the assets less the interest paid by the Fund on the notional amount. However, unlike cash investments in the underlying assets, the Fund will not be an owner of the underlying assets and will not have voting or similar rights in respect of such assets.
The Fund's investment adviser, under the supervision of the Board, is responsible for determining and monitoring the liquidity of the Fund's transactions in swaps. The Fund may enter into any of several types of swaps, including:
Total Return Swaps.
Total return swaps may be used either as economically similar substitutes for owning the reference asset specified in the swap, such as the securities that comprise a given market index, particular securities or commodities, or other assets or indicators. They also may be used as a means of obtaining exposure in markets where the reference asset is unavailable or it may otherwise be impossible or impracticable for the Fund to own that asset. "Total return" refers to the payment (or receipt) of the total return on the underlying reference asset, which is then exchanged for the receipt (or payment) of an interest rate. Total return swaps provide the Fund with the additional flexibility of gaining exposure to a market or sector index in a potentially more economical way.
-24-
Commodity Swaps.
The Fund also may invest in commodity swaps. Commodity swaps may be used either as substitutes for owning specific physical commodities or as a means of obtaining exposure in markets where a reference commodity is unavailable or may otherwise be impossible or impracticable for the Fund to own that asset. Most swaps entered into by the Fund calculate and settle the obligations of the parties to the agreement on a "net basis" with a single payment. Consequently, the Fund's current obligations (or rights) under a swap will generally be equal only to the net amount to be paid or received under the agreement based on the relative values of the positions held by each party to the agreement (the "net amount"). Premium (discount) payments as well as periodic payments (receipts) related to the interest leg of the swap or to the default of the reference entity. The Fund's obligations under most swaps will be accrued daily (offset against any amounts owed to the Fund by the counterparty to the swap). However, typically no payments will be made until the settlement date. Swaps that cannot be terminated in the ordinary course of business within seven days at approximately the amount the Fund has valued the asset may be considered to be illiquid for purposes of the Fund's illiquid investment limitations.
U.S. Government Securities Risk. U.S. government securities are subject to interest rate risk but generally do not involve the credit risks associated with investments in other types of debt securities. As a result, the yields available from U.S. government securities are generally lower than the yields available from other debt securities. U.S. government securities are guaranteed only as to the timely payment of interest and the payment of principal when held to maturity. While securities issued or guaranteed by U.S. federal government agencies are backed by the full faith and credit of the U.S. Department of the Treasury, securities issued by government sponsored entities are solely the obligation of the issuer and generally do not carry any guarantee from the U.S. government.
Leveraged Performance
The Fund seeks daily investment results, before fees and expenses, that correspond to two times (2x) the daily price performance of the Bitcoin Price for a single day, not for any other period. A "single day" is measured from the time the Fund calculates its NAV to the time of the Fund's next NAV calculation. The return of the Fund for periods longer than a single day will be the result of its return for each single day compounded over the period. The Fund's returns for periods longer than a single day will very likely differ in amount, and possibly even direction, from the Fund's stated multiple (200%) times the return of the Bitcoin Price for the same period. Longer holding periods and higher bitcoin volatility each exacerbate the impact of compounding on an investor's returns. During periods of higher bitcoin volatility, the volatility of bitcoin may affect the Fund's return as much as or more than the return of the Bitcoin Price.
The table below shows performance of the how compounding impacts a two times daily rebalanced investment referencing bitcoin over periods longer than one single day. Areas shaded lighter represent those scenarios where a hypothetical fund that seeks daily two times returns of bitcoin will return the same or outperform (i.e., return more than) two times of bitcoin performance over one year; conversely, areas shaded darker represent those scenarios where the hypothetical fund will underperform (i.e., return less than) two times of bitcoin performance over one year. Performance shown in the chart assumes: (a) no fund expenses and (b) borrowing/lending rates (to obtain leveraged exposure) of zero percent. If Fund expenses and/or actual borrowing/lending rates were reflected, the performance would be different than shown.
-25-
|
One Year Bitcoin Performance |
(200%) One Year Bitcoin Performance |
Bitcoin Volatility | ||||||||||||
| 0% | 5% | 10% | 15% | 20% | 25% | 30% | 35% | 40% | 45% | 50% | 55% | 60% | ||
| (60)% | (120)% | (84.0)% | (84.0)% | (84.2)% | (84.4)% | (84.6)% | (85.0)% | (85.4)% | (85.8)% | (86.4)% | (86.9)% | (87.5)% | (88.2)% | (88.8)% |
| (55)% | (110)% | (79.8)% | (79.8)% | (80.0)% | (80.2)% | (80.5)% | (81.0)% | (81.5)% | (82.1)% | (82.7)% | (83.5)% | (84.2)% | (85.0)% | (85.9)% |
| (50)% | (100)% | (75.0)% | (75.1)% | (75.2)% | (75.6)% | (76.0)% | (76.5)% | (77.2)% | (77.9)% | (78.7)% | (79.6)% | (80.5)% | (81.5)% | (82.6)% |
| (45)% | (90)% | (69.8)% | (69.8)% | (70.1)% | (70.4)% | (70.9)% | (71.6)% | (72.4)% | (73.2)% | (74.2)% | (75.3)% | (76.4)% | (77.6)% | (78.9)% |
| (40)% | (80)% | (64.0)% | (64.1)% | (64.4)% | (64.8)% | (65.4)% | (66.2)% | (67.1)% | (68.2)% | (69.3)% | (70.6)% | (72.0)% | (73.4)% | (74.9)% |
| (35)% | (70)% | (57.8)% | (57.9)% | (58.2)% | (58.7)% | (59.4)% | (60.3)% | (61.4)% | (62.6)% | (64.0)% | (65.5)% | (67.1)% | (68.8)% | (70.5)% |
| (30)% | (60)% | (51.0)% | (51.1)% | (51.5)% | (52.1)% | (52.9)% | (54.0)% | (55.2)% | (56.6)% | (58.2)% | (60.0)% | (61.8)% | (63.8)% | (65.8)% |
| (25)% | (50)% | (43.8)% | (43.9)% | (44.3)% | (45.0)% | (46.0)% | (47.2)% | (48.6)% | (50.2)% | (52.1)% | (54.1)% | (56.2)% | (58.4)% | (60.8)% |
| (20)% | (40)% | (36.0)% | (36.2)% | (36.6)% | (37.4)% | (38.5)% | (39.9)% | (41.5)% | (43.4)% | (45.5)% | (47.7)% | (50.2)% | (52.7)% | (55.3)% |
| (15)% | (30)% | (27.8)% | (27.9)% | (28.5)% | (29.4)% | (30.6)% | (32.1)% | (34.0)% | (36.1)% | (38.4)% | (41.0)% | (43.7)% | (46.6)% | (49.6)% |
| (10)% | (20)% | (19.0)% | (19.2)% | (19.8)% | (20.8)% | (22.2)% | (23.9)% | (26.0)% | (28.3)% | (31.0)% | (33.8)% | (36.9)% | (40.1)% | (43.5)% |
| (5)% | (10)% | (9.8)% | (10.0)% | (10.6)% | (11.8)% | (13.3)% | (15.2)% | (17.5)% | (20.2)% | (23.1)% | (26.3)% | (29.7)% | (33.3)% | (37.0)% |
| 0% | 0% | 0.0% | (0.2)% | (1.0)% | (2.2)% | (3.9)% | (6.1)% | (8.6)% | (11.5)% | (14.8)% | (18.3)% | (22.1)% | (26.1)% | (30.2)% |
| 5% | 10% | 10.3% | 10.0% | 9.2% | 7.8% | 5.9% | 3.6% | 0.8% | (2.5)% | (6.1)% | (10.0)% | (14.1)% | (18.5)% | (23.1)% |
| 10% | 20% | 21.0% | 20.7% | 19.8% | 18.3% | 16.3% | 13.7% | 10.6% | 7.0% | 3.1% | (1.2)% | (5.8)% | (10.6)% | (15.6)% |
| 15% | 30% | 32.3% | 31.9% | 30.9% | 29.3% | 27.1% | 24.2% | 20.9% | 17.0% | 12.7% | 8.0% | 3.0% | (2.3)% | (7.7)% |
| 20% | 40% | 44.0% | 43.6% | 42.6% | 40.8% | 38.4% | 35.3% | 31.6% | 27.4% | 22.7% | 17.6% | 12.1% | 6.4% | 0.5% |
| 25% | 50% | 56.3% | 55.9% | 54.7% | 52.8% | 50.1% | 46.8% | 42.8% | 38.2% | 33.1% | 27.6% | 21.7% | 15.5% | 9.0% |
| 30% | 60% | 69.0% | 68.6% | 67.3% | 65.2% | 62.4% | 58.8% | 54.5% | 49.5% | 44.0% | 38.0% | 31.6% | 24.9% | 17.9% |
| 35% | 70% | 82.3% | 81.8% | 80.4% | 78.2% | 75.1% | 71.2% | 66.6% | 61.2% | 55.3% | 48.8% | 41.9% | 34.7% | 27.2% |
| 40% | 80% | 96.0% | 95.5% | 94.0% | 91.6% | 88.3% | 84.1% | 79.1% | 73.4% | 67.0% | 60.1% | 52.6% | 44.8% | 36.7% |
| 45% | 90% | 110.3% | 109.7% | 108.2% | 105.6% | 102.0% | 97.5% | 92.2% | 86.0% | 79.2% | 71.7% | 63.7% | 55.4% | 46.7% |
| 50% | 100% | 125.0% | 124.4% | 122.8% | 120.0% | 116.2% | 111.4% | 105.6% | 99.1% | 91.7% | 83.8% | 75.2% | 66.3% | 57.0% |
| 55% | 110% | 140.3% | 139.7% | 137.9% | 134.9% | 130.8% | 125.7% | 119.6% | 112.6% | 104.7% | 96.2% | 87.1% | 77.5% | 67.6% |
| 60% | 120% | 156.0% | 155.4% | 153.5% | 150.3% | 146.0% | 140.5% | 134.0% | 126.5% | 118.1% | 109.1% | 99.4% | 89.2% | 78.6% |
There can be no assurance that the Fund will achieve its investment objective or avoid substantial losses. The Fund does not seek to achieve its stated investment objective over a period of time greater than a single day because mathematical compounding prevents the Fund from achieving such results. Results for the Fund over periods of time greater than a single day should not be expected to be a simple return of twice the performance of the Bitcoin Price. The Fund's returns will likely differ in amount and possibly even direction from twice the performance of the Bitcoin Price over the same period. These differences can be significant.
The Fund will lose money if the performance of the Bitcoin Price is flat over time, and the Fund can lose money regardless of the performance of the Bitcoin Price, as a result of daily rebalancing, fees, bitcoin's volatility, compounding and other factors. Daily compounding of the Fund's investment returns can dramatically and adversely affect its longer-term performance, especially during periods of high volatility. Volatility has a negative impact on the Fund's performance and may be at least as important to the Fund's return for a period as the return of the Bitcoin Price.
Portfolio Turnover
The Fund may have a portfolio turnover rate in excess of 100%. Portfolio trading will be undertaken principally to accomplish the Fund's investment objective. The Fund is free to dispose of portfolio securities at any time, subject to complying with the Internal Revenue Code and the 1940 Act, when changes in circumstances or conditions make such a move desirable in light of the Fund's investment objective. Therefore, the Fund will not attempt to achieve or be limited to a predetermined rate of portfolio turnover.
-26-
The portfolio turnover rate tells you the amount of trading activity in the Fund's portfolio. A turnover rate of 100% would occur, for example, if all of the Fund's investments held at the beginning of a year were replaced by the end of the year, or if a single investment was frequently traded. The turnover rate also may be affected by cash requirements from purchases and redemptions of Shares. A high rate of portfolio turnover in any year may increase brokerage commissions paid and could generate taxes for shareholders on realized investment gains. Because the Fund has not yet commenced operations, portfolio turnover information is not available at this time.
Disclosure of Portfolio Holdings Information
The Board has approved portfolio holdings disclosure policies (the "Disclosure Policies") that govern the timing and circumstances of disclosure to shareholders and third parties of information regarding the portfolio investments held by the Fund. It is the policy of the Fund and its service providers, including, without limitation, the Fund's investment adviser, investment sub-adviser, distributor, administrator, custodian and transfer agent, to protect the confidentiality of the Fund's holdings and prevent the selective disclosure of nonpublic information about the Fund's portfolio holdings, which includes the Fund's portfolio holdings and pending transactions. The Fund and each of its service providers must adhere to the Disclosure Policies.
The Fund and its service providers may not disclose any information concerning the portfolio holdings of the Fund to any unaffiliated third party, with certain exceptions set forth in the Disclosure Policies. The Fund and its service providers may not receive compensation or any other consideration (which includes any agreement to maintain assets in the Fund or in other investment companies or accounts managed by the Adviser or Sub-Adviser, or any affiliated person of the Adviser or Sub-Adviser) in connection with the disclosure of portfolio holdings information.
The Disclosure Policies are not intended to prevent the disclosure of any and all portfolio information for a legitimate business purpose to the Fund's service providers and others who generally need access to such information in the performance of their contractual duties and responsibilities, such as the Fund's custodian, fund accountant, investment adviser and sub-adviser, administrator, independent public accountant, attorneys, officers and trustees and each of their respective affiliates and advisers, and are subject to duties of confidentiality, including a duty not to trade on nonpublic information, imposed by law and/or contract.
The Fund, or its duly authorized service providers, may disclose the Fund's portfolio holdings in the following circumstances:
| · | Publicly Available Information/Mandatory Disclosure. The Fund, or its duly authorized service providers, will publicly disclose holdings of the Fund in accordance with regulatory requirements, such as periodic portfolio disclosure in filings with the SEC. |
-27-
| · | Confidential Dissemination of Portfolio Holdings. Numerous mutual fund evaluation services regularly analyze the portfolio holdings of mutual funds in order to monitor and report on various attributes including style, capitalization, maturity, yield, and beta. These services then distribute the results of their analysis to the public and/or paid subscribers. In order to facilitate the review of the Fund by these services, the Fund may distribute (or authorize its service providers to distribute) portfolio holdings to such services before their public disclosure is required or authorized provided that: (i) the recipient does not distribute the portfolio holdings or results of the analysis to third parties, other departments, or persons who are likely to use the information for purposes of purchasing or selling shares of the Fund before the portfolio holdings or results of the analysis become public information; and (ii) the recipient signs a written confidentiality agreement. Persons and entities unwilling to execute an acceptable confidentiality agreement may only receive portfolio holdings information that has otherwise been publicly disclosed in accordance with the Disclosure Policies. |
| · | Analytical Information. The Fund or its duly authorized service providers may distribute the following information concerning the Fund's portfolio before disclosure of portfolio holdings is required, provided that the information has been publicly disclosed (via the Fund's website or as otherwise permitted by regulatory interpretation or guidance): the Fund's deposit instruments, redemption instruments and with respect to active, long/short and self-indexing ETFs, complete portfolio holdings will be publicly disseminated each business day and before the commencement of trading of shares on the listing exchanges. The Fund's holdings will be disclosed on the Adviser's website showing the portfolio positions and quantities of the securities held that will form the basis for the Fund's NAV calculation for end of the business day. |
| · | Press Interviews, Broker Discussion, etc. Portfolio managers and other senior officers or spokespersons of the Fund may disclose or confirm the ownership of any individual portfolio position to reporters, brokers, shareholders, consultants, or other interested persons only if such information has been previously publicly disclosed in accordance with the Disclosure Policies. |
| · | Shareholder In-Kind Distributions. The Fund's shareholders may, in some circumstances, elect to redeem their shares of the Fund in exchange for their pro rata share of the securities held by the Fund. In such circumstances, the Fund's shareholders may receive a complete listing of the portfolio holdings of the Fund up to seven (7) calendar days prior to making the redemption request, provided that they agree in writing to maintain the confidentiality of the portfolio holdings information and not to trade on such information. |
| · | Other Circumstances. The Fund or the Adviser may disclose non-public portfolio holdings information to a third party who does not fall within the pre-approved categories, and who are not executing broker-dealers; however, prior to the receipt of any nonpublic portfolio holdings information by such third party, (i) the Chief Executive Officer and Chief Compliance Officer (the "CCO") determine that the Fund has a legitimate business purpose for disclosing such information; and (ii) the recipient enters into a confidentiality agreement. |
-28-
Certain exceptions to the Disclosure Policies permit the non-public disclosure of portfolio holdings to a limited group of third parties so long as the third party has signed a written confidentiality agreement. Such confidentiality agreement should generally provide that: (1) the portfolio information is the confidential property of the Fund (and its service providers, if applicable) and may not be shared or used directly or indirectly for any purpose except as expressly provided in the confidentiality agreement; (2) the recipient of the portfolio information agrees to limit access to the portfolio information to its employees (and agents) who, on a need-to-know basis, are (i) authorized to have access to the portfolio information and (ii) subject to confidentiality obligations, including duties not to trade on nonpublic information, no less restrictive than the confidentiality obligations contained in the confidentiality agreement; (3) upon written request, the recipient agrees to promptly return or destroy, as directed, the portfolio information; and (4) portfolio information may be deemed to no longer be confidential if (i) it is already known to the recipient prior to disclosure by the Fund, (ii) it becomes publicly known without breach of the confidentiality agreement by the recipient, (iii) it is received from a third party and, to the knowledge of the recipient, the disclosure by such third party is not a breach of any agreement to which such third party is subject, or (iv) it is authorized by the Fund or its agents to be disclosed.
The Fund will disclose its complete portfolio holdings schedule for each month in a fiscal quarter in public filings with the SEC within 60 days after the end of the relevant fiscal quarter on Form N-PORT. The Fund's complete schedule of portfolio holdings for the second and fourth quarters of each fiscal year is included in the semi-annual and annual reports to shareholders, respectively, and is filed with the SEC on Form N-CSR. A semi-annual or annual report for the Fund will become available to investors within 60 days after the period to which it relates. The Fund's Forms N-PORT and Forms N-CSR are available on the SEC's website at www.sec.gov.
The Fund's portfolio holdings are publicly disseminated each day the Fund is open for business through financial reporting and news services, including publicly accessible websites. Additionally, a basket composition file, which includes information such as security names and share quantities to deliver in exchange for Fund shares, together with estimates and actual cash components, is publicly disseminated each day the NYSE is open for trading via the National Securities Clearing Corporation.
Pursuant to Rule 6c-11 under the 1940 Act, information regarding the Fund's current portfolio holdings is available on a daily basis at the Fund's website, available at www.innovatoretfs.com. No non-public information concerning the Trust will be disseminated.
Management of the Trust
Trustees and Officers
The business and affairs of the Trust are managed under the direction of its Board. The Trust's Trustees and principal officers are noted in the tables below along with their ages and their business experience for the past five years. The Trustees serve for indefinite terms until their resignation, death or removal. The Fund's officers are elected annually by the Board and serve at the Board's pleasure. Each Trustee serves as a trustee of all the ETFs issued by Innovator ETFsÒ Trust.
-29-
|
Name, Address and Year of Birth |
Position(s) Held with the Trust |
Length of Time Served |
Principal Occupation(s) During Past 5 Years |
Number of Portfolios in Fund Complex Overseen by Trustee or Officer |
Other Directorships Held by Trustee or Officer in the Past Five Years |
|||
| Independent Trustees | ||||||||
|
Mark Berg
200 W. Front Street Year of Birth: 1971 |
Trustee | Since 2017 | Founding Principal (2001-present), Chief Executive Officer (2019-present), President (2001-2019), Timothy Financial Counsel Inc. | [___] | Tortazo, LLC (2018 - present) | |||
|
Joe Stowell
200 W. Front Street Year of Birth: 1968 |
Trustee | Since 2017 | Chief Operating Officer, Woodman Valley Chapel (2015-present). | [___] | Board of Advisors, M4 Europe (2023 - present); Board of Advisors, Westmont College (2016 - 2021) | |||
|
Brian J. Wildman
200 W. Front Street Year of Birth: 1963 |
Trustee | Since 2017 |
President, Timothy Financial Counsel Inc. (2019-present); Executive Vice President, Consumer Banking (2016-2019), Chief Risk Officer (2013-2016), MB Financial Bank. |
[___] | Missionary Furlough Homes (2008 - 2022); MB Financial Bank (2003 - 2019) | |||
| Interested Trustee1 and Officers | ||||||||
|
H. Bruce Bond
200 W. Front Street Year of Birth: 1963 |
Interested Trustee, President and Principal Executive Officer | Since 2017 | Chief Executive Officer, Innovator Capital Management, LLC (2017-present). | [___] | None | |||
|
John W. Southard, Jr.
200 W. Front Street Year of Birth: 1969 |
Vice President, Secretary and Assistant Treasurer | Since 2017 | Chief Investment Officer, Innovator Capital Management, LLC (2017-present); Director and Co-Founder, T2 Capital Management, LLC (2010-present). | [___] | None | |||
|
Kenneth Kalina
|
Chief Compliance Officer and Anti-Money Laundering Officer | Since 2024 | Senior Principal Consultant, ACA Foreside (since 2022); Fund Chief Compliance Officer, Foreside Fund Officer Services, LLC (June 2017 to June 2022). | [___] | None | |||
|
Kathy Meyer
|
Vice President, Treasurer and Principal Financial Accounting Officer | Since 2022 | Chief Financial Officer, Innovator Capital Management, LLC (2018-present). | [___] | None | |||
| 1 | H. Bruce Bond is deemed to be an interested person of the Trust (as defined in the 1940 Act) because of his affiliation with the Adviser. |
-30-
Board Leadership
The Board has overall responsibility for the oversight and management of the Fund. The Board has two standing committees (as described further below): an Audit Committee and a Nominating and Governance Committee. The Chairman of each Board committee is an Independent Trustee.
In order to streamline communication between the Adviser and the Independent Trustees and create certain efficiencies, the Board has a Lead Independent Trustee who is responsible for: (i) coordinating activities of the Independent Trustees; (ii) working with the Adviser, Fund counsel and the independent legal counsel to the Independent Trustees to determine the agenda for Board meetings; (iii) serving as the principal contact for and facilitating communication between the Independent Trustees and the Fund's service providers, particularly the Adviser; and (iv) any other duties that the Independent Trustees may delegate to the Lead Independent Trustee. The Lead Independent Trustee is selected by the Independent Trustees and serves until his or her successor is selected. Mr. Berg serves as the Lead Independent Trustee.
The Chairman of the Board presides at all meetings of the Board, and acts as a liaison with service providers, officers, attorneys, and other Trustees. The Chair of each Board committee performs a similar role with respect to the committee. The Chairman of the Board or the Chair of a Board committee may also perform such other functions as may be delegated by the Board or the committee from time to time. The Independent Trustees meet regularly outside the presence of Trust management, in executive session or with other service providers to the Fund. The Board has regular meetings throughout the year and may hold special meetings if required before its next regular meeting. Each committee meets regularly to conduct the oversight functions delegated to that committee by the Board and reports its findings to the Board. The Board and each standing committee conduct annual assessments of their oversight function and structure. The Board has determined that the Board's leadership structure is appropriate because it allows the Board to exercise independent judgment over management and to allocate areas of responsibility among committees and the full Board to enhance effective oversight. Mr. Stowell serves as the Chairman of the Nominating and Governance Committee and Mr. Wildman serves as the Chairman of the Audit Committee.
-31-
Risk Oversight
Among the Board's general oversight and management functions is to oversee the risks of the Fund. The Fund is subject to various risks, including investment, compliance, operational and valuation risks, among others. The Board addresses its risk oversight function through different Board and committee activities. For instance, the Board has delegated the day-to-day risk management and oversight function to the Adviser, or in certain cases (subject to the Adviser's supervision) and depending on the nature of the risks to other service providers. The Board, or a committee, reviews and evaluates reports from the Adviser or service providers regarding the risks faced by the Fund and regarding the service providers' oversight and management of those risks. In addition to the delegation of the day-to-day risk management and oversight function, the committees of the Board allow the Trustees to quickly and efficiently consider risk matters and facilitate the oversight by the Trustees of Fund activities and the risks related to those activities.
The Board has also appointed a Chief Compliance Officer ("CCO") who oversees the implementation and evaluation of the Fund's compliance program. Kenneth Kalina serves as CCO and Anti-Money Laundering Officer of the Trust.
Not all risks that may affect the Fund can be identified nor can controls be developed to eliminate or mitigate their occurrence or effects. It may not be practical or cost effective to eliminate or mitigate certain risks, the processes and controls employed to address certain risks may be limited in their effectiveness. Further, some risks are simply beyond the reasonable control of the Fund or the Advisor or other service providers. There can be no guarantee that any risk management systems established by the Fund, its service providers, or issuers of the securities in which the Fund invests will succeed, and the Fund cannot control such systems put in place by service providers, issuers or other third parties whose operations may affect the Fund and/or its shareholders. Moreover, it is necessary to bear certain risks (such as investment related risks) to achieve the Fund's goals. As a result of the foregoing and other factors, the Fund's ability to manage risk is subject to substantial limitations.
Trustees' Qualifications.
The Nominating and Governance Committee selects and nominates persons for election or appointment by the Board as Independent Trustees. The Board has adopted the Nominating and Governance Committee Charter and Guidelines, which provides the Nominating and Governance Committee with general criteria to guide the Committee's choice of candidates to nominate to serve on the Board; however, there are no specific qualifications or requirements to serve on the Board. The Board believes that, collectively, the Trustees have balanced and diverse experience, skills, attributes and qualifications, that allow the Board to operate effectively in governing the Trust and protecting the interests of shareholders. Among the attributes common to all Trustees are their ability to review critically, evaluate, question and discuss information provided to them; to interact effectively with the Trust's investment manager, sub-advisers, other service providers, counsel and independent auditors; and to exercise business judgment in the performance of their duties as Trustees. Each Trustee's ability to perform his duties effectively is evidenced by his educational background or professional training; business, consulting or public service positions; experience from service as a Board member of the Trust, other investment funds, public companies or non-profit entities or other organizations; and ongoing commitment and participation in Board and committee meetings throughout the years.
-32-
While there are no specific required qualifications for Board membership, the Board believes the specific background of each Trustee is appropriate to his or her serving on the Board. The foregoing discussion and the Trustees and officers chart above are included in this Statement of Additional Information pursuant to requirements of the SEC, do not constitute holding out the Board or any Trustee as having special expertise or experience and shall not be deemed to impose any greater responsibility or liability on any Trustee by reason thereof.
H. Bruce Bond. Mr. Bond is the Chief Executive Officer of Innovator, responsible for the firm's strategic vision. Mr. Bond began his career in 1986 at Griffin, Kubik, Stephens and Thompson, a small boutique firm specializing in municipal bonds. In 1994 he continued his career at First Trust Portfolios as Vice President responsible for wholesale distribution of financial products across the Midwest and Florida. In 1998 Mr. Bond joined Nuveen Investments as a Managing Director to lead an effort in its Structured Products Group to develop, market and distribute closed-end funds, unit investment trusts and exchange-traded fund products. Mr. Bond became the head of marketing for all Nuveen products before leaving to start PowerShares in early 2003. As Founder and Chief Executive Officer of PowerShares, Mr. Bond pioneered many firsts in the ETF industry. In 2006, PowerShares was acquired by Invesco, a global asset manager. Mr. Bond remained the President and Chief Executive Officer of PowerShares and Chairman of the Board of the PowerShares Funds until September of 2011. During his time at PowerShares, Mr. Bond helped develop, list and distribute over 130 fund products on various exchanges located in the United States and throughout Europe, with assets under management in excess of $80 billion.
Mark Berg. As Chief Executive Officer and Founding Principal of Timothy Financial Counsel Inc., Mr. Berg's primary role is the leadership and management of Timothy Financial Counsel Inc. He is the primary advisor for select clients, but also oversees the financial planning process for all Timothy Financial clients. Mr. Berg has served in the fee-only financial planning industry since 1995. Mr. Berg is also a founding board member of Tortazo LLC since 2018. He holds a BA in Economics from Wheaton College and is a Certified Financial Planner™ practitioner. He is also a NAPFA Registered Financial Advisor where he has served as the Regional President and Chair, as well as on the National Board of Directors. He speaks regularly at conferences on financial planning and practice management. He has been interviewed and/or quoted by a variety of publications, such as Dow Jones Newswire, The Wall Street Journal, Reader's Digest, and Kiplinger's and has been interviewed on NBC television.
Joe Stowell. Mr. Stowell is currently the Chief Operation Officer of Woodmen Valley Chapel in Colorado Springs, Colorado. He oversees the financial, human resources and congregational management of this multi-campus organization. Prior to joining Woodman in September of 2015, Mr. Stowell served for eight years as the Executive Vice President/COO of the English Language Institute/China (ELIC), a global educational non-profit focused primarily in Asia and the Middle East. Before his work in the non-profit business management sector, Joe traded futures, options and swaps for over a decade, focusing on currencies and bonds both in the US and abroad for McNamara Trading and Chicago Research & Trade. He was on trading floors and desks in Chicago, New York and Tokyo.
-33-
Brian J. Wildman. Mr. Wildman is currently the President of Timothy Financial Counsel Inc. From 2016 until 2019, Mr. Wildman served as Executive Vice President, Consumer Banking of MB Financial Bank. During that time, Mr. Wildman also served as a director of MB Financial Bank. From 2013 to 2016, Mr. Wildman was responsible for Risk Management and served as MB Financial Bank's Chief Risk Officer. Prior to 2013, Mr. Wildman was responsible for the MB Financial Bank's Wealth Management and Consumer Services groups. Prior to joining MB Financial Bank in 2003, he was First Vice President of Bank One and served in various management positions with its predecessor organization, American National Bank and Trust Company of Chicago, since 1988. Mr. Wildman was a member of the Board of Trustees of Missionary Furlough Homes from 2008 to 2022. Additionally, Mr. Wildman serves as the "audit committee financial expert" for the Board.
Share Ownership
The following table provides the dollar range of Shares of the Fund beneficially owned by the Trustees as of December 31, 2023.
| Trustee |
Aggregate Dollar Range of Equity Securities of the Fund |
Aggregate Dollar Range of Equity Securities in all Funds Overseen Within Fund Complex |
| H. Bruce Bond | None | Over $100,000 |
| Mark Berg | None | Over $100,000 |
| Joe Stowell | None | Over $100,000 |
| Brian J. Wildman | None | Over $100,000 |
As of December 31, 2024, [the Independent Trustees and immediate family members did not own beneficially or of record any class of securities of an investment adviser or principal underwriter of the Fund or any person directly or indirectly controlling, controlled by, or under common control with an investment adviser or principal underwriter of the Fund.]
As of [___], [___], the officers and Trustees, in the aggregate, owned less than 1% of the Shares of the Fund.
Trustee Compensation
Effective January 1, 2024, each Independent Trustee is paid a fixed annual retainer of $274,000 per year. The fixed annual retainer is allocated pro rata among each Fund in the Trust based upon each Fund's assets under management.
-34-
The following table sets forth the estimated compensation (including reimbursement for travel and out-of-pocket expenses) to be paid by the Fund and by the Trust to the Trustees for their services to the Fund for the fiscal year ending October 31, 2025. Only the Trustees of the Trust (the "Trustees") who are not "interested persons" of the Trust or the Adviser, as defined by the 1940 Act (the "Independent Trustees"), receive compensation from the Fund. The Trust has no retirement or pension plans. The Trust has no employees. Its officers are compensated by Innovator.
| Trustee |
Estimated Compensation from the Fund |
Estimated Compensation from the Trust |
| H. Bruce Bond | None | None |
| Mark Berg | $[___] | $274,000 |
| Joe Stowell | $[___] | $274,000 |
| Brian J. Wildman | $[___] | $274,000 |
Board Committees
Audit Committee: The Trust's Audit Committee consists of each of the Independent Trustees. The Audit Committee monitors accounting and financial reporting policies and practice, and internal controls for the Trust. It also oversees the quality and objectivity of the Trust's financial statements and the independent audit thereof, and acts as a liaison between the Trust's independent registered public accounting firm and the full Board.
Nominating and Governance Committee: The Trust's Nominating and Governance Committee consists of each of the Independent Trustees. The Nominating and Governance Committee recommends Board members, fills vacancies and considers the qualifications of Board members. The committee will consider shareholder recommendations for nomination to the Board only in the event that there is a vacancy on the Board. Shareholders who wish to submit recommendations for nominations to the Board to fill a vacancy must submit their recommendations in writing to the Nominating and Governance Committee, c/o Innovator ETFsÒ Trust, 200 W. Front Street, Wheaton, Illinois 60187. Shareholders should include appropriate information on the background and qualifications of any person recommended (e.g., a resume), as well as the candidate's contact information and a written consent from the candidate to serve if nominated and elected. Shareholder recommendations for nominations to the Board will be accepted on an ongoing basis and such recommendations will be kept on file for consideration when there is a vacancy on the Board.
Proxy Voting Policies
The Trust has adopted a proxy voting policy that seeks to ensure that proxies for securities held by the Fund are voted consistently with the best interests of the Fund.
The Board has delegated to the Adviser the proxy voting responsibilities for the Fund and has directed Innovator to vote proxies consistent with the Fund's best interests. In order to facilitate the proxy voting process, Broadridge Investor Communication Solutions, Inc. ("Broadridge") has been retained to provide access to a selection of third-party providers that are available to provide proxy vote recommendations and research. Votes are cast through the Broadridge ProxyEdge® platform ("ProxyEdge"). With the assistance of Broadridge, Egan-Jones Proxy Services ("Egan-Jones") has been selected to provide vote recommendations based on its own internal guidelines. The services provided to Innovator through Egan Jones include access to Egan-Jones' research analysis and their voting recommendations. Services provided to Innovator through ProxyEdge include receipt of proxy ballots, vote execution based upon the recommendations of Egan-Jones, access to the voting recommendations of Egan-Jones, as well as reporting, auditing, working with custodian banks, and consulting assistance for the handling of proxy voting responsibilities. ProxyEdge also maintains proxy voting records and provides Innovator with reports that reflect the proxy voting activities of client portfolios.
-35-
The fundamental guideline followed by the Adviser in voting proxies is to make every effort to confirm that the manner in which shares are voted is in the best interest of clients and the value of the investment. Absent special circumstances of the types described below, it is the policy of Adviser to exercise its proxy voting discretion in accordance with the Egan-Jones Proxy Voting Principles and Guidelines set forth in Exhibit A.
Information regarding how the Fund voted proxies (if any) relating to portfolio securities during the most recent 12-month period ended June 30 is available upon request and without charge on the Fund's website at https://www.innovatoretfs.com, by calling (800) 208-5212 or by accessing the SEC's website at https://www.sec.gov.
Investment Adviser and Other Service Providers
Investment Adviser
Innovator Capital Management, LLC, located at 200 W. Front Street, Wheaton, Illinois 60187, furnishes investment management services to the Fund, subject to the supervision and direction of the Board. Substantially all of the interests of Innovator are owned by Messrs. H. Bruce Bond, John Wilder Southard, Jr. and Jeffrey Brown. Innovator is controlled by a Board of Managers which currently consists of Mr. Bond, Mr. Southard and Mr. Brown. Mr. Bond controls the Board of Managers by virtue of his majority ownership of Innovator. Mr. Southard owns in excess of twenty-five percent of Innovator and Mr. Brown owns a minority interest in Innovator. Innovator compensates all officers (including the chief compliance officer) and employees of Innovator who are affiliated with both Innovator and the Trust. Innovator is registered with the SEC as an investment adviser under the Investment Advisers Act of 1940, as amended.
Pursuant to an investment management agreement between Innovator and the Trust, on behalf of the Fund (the "Investment Management Agreement"), Innovator oversees the investment of the Fund's assets by Milliman and is responsible for paying all expenses of the Fund, excluding the fee payments under the Investment Management Agreement, interest, taxes, brokerage commissions, acquired fund fees and expenses and other expenses connected with the execution of portfolio transactions, distribution and service fees payable pursuant to a Rule 12b-1 plan, if any, and extraordinary expenses. As compensation for the investment advisory services rendered under the Investment Management Agreement, the Fund has agreed to pay Innovator an annual management fee equal to [__]% of its average daily net assets.
Sub-Adviser
Innovator and the Fund have retained Milliman Financial Risk Management LLC, 71 South Wacker Drive, 31st Floor, Chicago, Illinois 60606, to serve as the Fund's investment sub-adviser. Milliman was established in 1998, and also advises other investment companies, insurance companies, financial institutions, other pooled investment vehicles in addition to the Fund. The Sub-Adviser is a wholly owned subsidiary of Milliman, Inc.
-36-
Pursuant to an investment sub-advisory agreement between Innovator, Milliman and the Trust, on behalf of the Fund (the "Investment Sub-Advisory Agreement"), Milliman manages the investment of the Fund's assets. As compensation for the sub-advisory services rendered under the Investment Sub-Advisory Agreement, Innovator has agreed to pay Milliman an annual sub-advisory fee of [___]. [With respect to the Fund, the Adviser pays the Sub-Adviser for services rendered to the Fund based on its ratable share based on daily assets of the Fund of such total amount.] Innovator is responsible for paying the entire amount of Milliman's sub-advisory fee. The Fund does not directly pay Milliman.
Innovator and the Trust have received an exemptive order from the SEC which exempts Innovator and the Trust from certain of the shareholder approval requirements of Section 15(a) of the 1940 Act and allowed the Board, subject to certain conditions, to appoint a new, unaffiliated sub-advisor and approve a new investment sub-advisory agreement on behalf of the Trust without shareholder approval.
Portfolio Managers. The portfolio managers are primarily responsible for the day-to-day management of the Fund. There are currently two portfolio managers, as follows: Robert T. Cummings and Jordan B. Rosenfeld. As of [___]. [___], none of the portfolio managers beneficially owned any Shares of the Fund.
Compensation. The portfolio managers are paid competitive salaries by Milliman. In addition, they may receive bonuses based on qualitative considerations, such as an individual's contribution to the organization, and performance reviews in relation to job responsibilities.
Conflicts of Interest. The portfolio managers have day-to-day management responsibilities with respect to other investments accounts and, accordingly, may be presented with potential or actual conflicts of interest. The management of other accounts may result in the portfolio manager devoting unequal time and attention to the management of the Fund and/or other accounts. In approving the Investment Management Agreement and Investment Sub-Advisory Agreement, the Board was satisfied that the portfolio managers would be able to devote sufficient attention to the management of the Fund and that Innovator and Milliman seek to manage such competing interests for the time and attention of the portfolio managers.
With respect to securities transactions for the Fund, Milliman determines which broker to use to execute each transaction, consistent with its duty to seek best execution of the transaction. For buy or sell transactions considered simultaneously for the Fund and other accounts, orders are placed at the same time. Milliman uses its best efforts to ensure that no client is treated unfairly in relation to any other client over time in the allocation of securities or the order of the execution of transactions. Milliman generally allocates trades on the basis of assets under management so that the securities positions represent equal exposure as a percentage of total assets of each client. The Fund and client accounts are not generally invested in thinly traded or illiquid securities; therefore, conflicts in fulfilling investment opportunities are to some extent minimized. If an aggregated trade order is not substantially filled, it will generally be allocated pro rata.
-37-
Other Accounts. The portfolio managers manage the investment vehicles with the number of accounts and assets, as of [___], [___], set forth in the table below. None of the accounts managed by the portfolio managers pay an advisory fee that is based upon the performance of the account.
|
Registered Investment |
Other Pooled Investment Vehicles # of Accounts ($ Assets) |
Other Accounts # of Accounts ($ Assets) |
|
| Robert T. Cummings | [__] ($[__]) | [__] ($[__]) | [__] ($[__]) |
| Jordan B. Rosenfeld | [__] ($[__]) | [__] ($[__]) | [__] ($[__]) |
Distributor
Foreside Fund Services, LLC, located at Three Canal Plaza, Suite 100, Portland, ME 04101, serves as the principal underwriter of the Shares pursuant to a distribution agreement (the "Distribution Agreement"). The Distributor continually distributes Shares on a best effort basis. The Distributor has no obligation to sell any specific quantity of Shares. The Distribution Agreement is renewable annually. Shares are continuously offered for sale by the Fund through the Distributor only in Creation Units, as described in the Fund's Prospectus and this SAI. Shares amounting to less than a Creation Unit are not distributed by the Distributor. The Distributor is a broker-dealer registered under the 1934 Act and a member of the Financial Industry Regulatory Authority, Inc. ("FINRA"). The Distributor, its affiliates and officers have no role in determining the investment policies or which securities are to be purchased or sold by the Fund. The Distributor is not affiliated with the Trust, the Adviser, the Sub-Adviser, or any stock exchange.
The Distribution Agreement for the Fund provides that it may be terminated at any time, without the payment of any penalty, on at least 60 days' prior written notice to the other party (i) by vote of a majority of the Independent Trustees or (ii) by vote of a majority of the outstanding voting securities (as defined in the 1940 Act) of the Fund. The Distribution Agreement will terminate automatically in the event of its "assignment," as that term is defined in the 1940 Act.
Codes of Ethics
In order to mitigate the possibility that the Fund will be adversely affected by personal trading, the Trust, Innovator and Milliman have adopted Codes of Ethics under Rule 17j-1 of the 1940 Act. These Codes of Ethics contain policies restricting securities trading in personal accounts access persons, Trustees and others who normally come into possession of information on portfolio transactions. Personnel subject to the Codes of Ethics may invest in securities that may be purchased or held by the Fund; however, the Codes of Ethics require that each transaction in such securities be reviewed by the Compliance Department. These Codes of Ethics are on public file with, and are available from, the SEC.
The Distributor relies on the principal underwriter's exception under Rule 17j-1(c)(3). Foreside Financial Group, LLC, on behalf of Foreside Fund Officer Services, LLC, has adopted a code of ethics pursuant to Rule 17j-1 of the 1940 Act. These codes of ethics permit, subject to certain conditions, personnel of each of those entities to invest in securities that may be purchased or held by the Fund.
-38-
Fund Administrator
General Information. The Administrator and Fund Accountant for the Fund is U.S. Bancorp Fund Services, LLC ("USBFS" or the "Administrator"), which has its principal office at 615 East Michigan Street, Milwaukee, Wisconsin 53202 and is primarily in the business of providing administrative, fund accounting and stock transfer services to retail and institutional mutual funds. The Administrator performs these services pursuant to two separate agreements, the Fund Administration Servicing Agreement and the Fund Accounting Servicing Agreement.
Administration Agreement. Pursuant to the Fund Administration Servicing Agreement (the "Administration Agreement") with the Fund, the Administrator provides all administrative services necessary for the Fund, other than those provided by Innovator, subject to the supervision of the Board. Employees of the Administrator generally will not be officers of the Fund for which they provide services.
The Administration Agreement is terminable by the Board or the Administrator on ninety (90) days' written notice and may be assigned provided the non-assigning party provides prior written consent. The Administration Agreement shall remain in effect for three years from the date of its initial approval, unless amended, and its renewal is subject to approval of the Board for periods thereafter. The Administration Agreement provides that in the absence of the Administrator's refusal or willful failure to comply with the Agreement or bad faith, negligence or willful misconduct on the part of the Administrator, the Administrator shall not be liable for any action or failure to act in accordance with its duties thereunder.
Under the Administration Agreement, the Administrator provides all administrative services, including, without limitation: (i) providing services of persons competent to perform such administrative and clerical functions as are necessary to provide effective administration of the Fund; (ii) overseeing the performance of administrative and professional services to the Fund by others, including the Custodian (as defined below); (iii) preparing, but not paying for, the periodic updating of the Fund's Registration Statement, Prospectus and Statement of Additional Information in conjunction with Fund counsel, including the printing of such documents for the purpose of filings with the SEC and state securities administrators, preparing the Fund's tax returns, and preparing reports to the Fund's shareholders and the SEC; (iv) calculation of yield and total return for the Fund; (v) monitoring and evaluating daily income and expense accruals, and sales and redemptions of Shares of the Fund; (vi) preparing in conjunction with Fund counsel, but not paying for, all filings under the securities or "Blue Sky" laws of such states or countries as are designated by the Distributor, which may be required to register or qualify, or continue the registration or qualification, of the Fund and/or its Shares under such laws; (vii) preparing notices and agendas for meetings of the Board and minutes of such meetings in all matters required by the 1940 Act to be acted upon by the Board; and (viii) monitoring periodic compliance with respect to all requirements and restrictions of the 1940 Act, the Internal Revenue Code and the Prospectus.
-39-
Accounting Agreement. The Administrator, pursuant to the Fund Accounting Servicing Agreement (the "Accounting Agreement"), also provides the Fund with accounting services, including, without limitation: (i) daily computation of NAV; (ii) maintenance of security ledgers and books and records as required by the 1940 Act; (iii) production of the Fund's listing of portfolio securities and general ledger reports; (iv) reconciliation of accounting records; and (v) maintaining certain books and records described in Rule 31a-1 under the 1940 Act, and reconciling account information and balances among the Custodian and Adviser.
For the administrative and fund accounting services rendered to the Fund by the Administrator, the Administrator is paid an asset-based fee plus certain out-of-pocket expenses. Pursuant to the terms of the Investment Management Agreement, Innovator is responsible for paying for the services provided by the Administrator. The Fund does not directly pay the Administrator.
Custodian, Transfer Agent and Dividend Agent
U.S. Bank, N.A., Custody Operations, 1555 N. River Center Drive, Suite 302, Milwaukee, Wisconsin 53212 (the "Custodian"), serves as custodian for the Fund's cash and securities. Pursuant to a Custodian Servicing Agreement with the Fund, it is responsible for maintaining the books and records of the Fund's portfolio securities and cash. The Custodian receives a minimum annual fee of $1,000. The Custodian is also entitled to certain out-of-pocket expenses and portfolio transaction fees. The Custodian does not assist in, and is not responsible for, investment decisions involving assets of the Fund. USBFS, the Administrator, also acts as the Fund's transfer and dividend agent.
Legal Counsel
Chapman and Cutler LLP, 320 South Canal Street, Chicago, Illinois 60606 serves as the Trust's legal counsel.
Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm
Cohen & Company, Ltd., located at 342 North Water Street, Suite 830, Milwaukee, Wisconsin 53202, has been selected as the independent registered public accounting firm for the Trust. As such, they are responsible for auditing the Trust's annual financial statements.
Additional Payments to Financial Intermediaries
Innovator from time to time makes payments, out of its own resources, to certain financial intermediaries that sell shares of Innovator ETFs ("Innovator Funds") to promote the sales and retention of Fund shares by those firms and their customers. The amounts of these payments vary by intermediary. The level of payments that Innovator is willing to provide to a particular intermediary may be affected by, among other factors: (i) the firm's total assets or Fund shares held in and recent net investments into Innovator Funds; (ii) the value of the assets invested in the Innovator Funds by the intermediary's customers; (iii) its ability to attract and retain assets; (iv) the intermediary's reputation in the industry; (v ) the level and/or type of marketing assistance and educational activities provided by the intermediary; (vi) the firm's level of participation in Innovator Funds' sales and marketing programs; (vii) the firm's compensation program for its registered representatives who sell Fund shares and provide services to Fund shareholders; and (viii) the asset class of the Innovator Funds for which these payments are provided. Such payments are generally asset-based but may also include the payment of a lump sum. Innovator makes payments, out of its own assets, to those firms as compensation and/or reimbursement for marketing support, services and access for technology platforms, and/or program servicing.
-40-
The amounts of payments referenced above made by Innovator could be significant by comparison and could create an incentive for an intermediary or its representatives to recommend or offer shares of the Innovator Funds to its customers. The intermediary may elevate the prominence or profile of the Innovator Funds within the intermediary's organization by, for example, placing the Innovator Funds on a list of preferred or recommended funds and/or granting Innovator preferential or enhanced opportunities to promote the Innovator Funds in various ways within the intermediary's organization. These payments are made pursuant to negotiated agreements with intermediaries. The payments do not change the price paid by investors for the purchase of a share or the amount the Fund will receive as proceeds from such sales. Furthermore, many of these payments are not reflected in the fees and expenses listed in the fee table section of the Fund's Prospectus because they are not paid by the Fund. The types of payments described herein are not mutually exclusive, and a single intermediary may receive some or all types of payments as described.
Other compensation may be offered to the extent not prohibited by state laws or any self-regulatory agency, such as FINRA. Investors can ask their intermediaries for information about any payments they receive from Innovator and the services it provides for those payments. Investors may wish to take intermediary payment arrangements into account when considering and evaluating any recommendations relating to Fund shares.
Payments to intermediaries, in certain circumstances, may also be made in connection with the distribution of model portfolios developed by Innovator, such as the inclusion of such model portfolios on an intermediary's platform, as well as in connection with the marketing and sale of, and/or product training regarding such model portfolios, or servicing of accounts tracking such model portfolios. Such payments may be variable or fixed fee payments for platform support, or other payments in the form of a variable or fixed fee or a per position fee, or may relate to the amount of assets an intermediary's clients have invested in Innovator Funds in such models developed by Innovator, the management fee, the total expense ratio, or sales of the Innovator Funds in such models developed by Innovator. Some intermediaries also provide related data regarding transactions in specific model portfolios, Innovator Funds and investment strategies to Innovator in exchange for a fee.
Innovator and/or its affiliates may enter into arrangements with third parties, such as a software provider, whereby Innovator may license certain technology or other services from such entity in exchange for licensing or other fees which may be, in whole or in part, dependent on the value of Innovator ETFs held through such software or other service. Such third party may also offer price concessions to broker dealers, investment advisers or other financial intermediaries that license technology or other services that may be dependent, in whole or in part, on the value of Innovator ETFs held through such software or other service.
-41-
Trading and Brokerage
An investment adviser has a fiduciary duty to engage in brokerage practices that are in the best interests of its clients and to place the interests of its clients above all other interests in the broker selection process. Innovator is responsible for the management of the Fund and has delegated trade execution responsibilities to Milliman.
Accordingly, Milliman has an obligation to seek to obtain the "best execution" for the Fund's transactions. "Best execution" is defined as the most favorable execution possible, considering such factors as the broker's services, research provided, commissions charged, volume discounts offered, execution capability, reliability and responsiveness of the broker-dealer. Milliman may test the execution quality of the broker-dealer to which Milliman submitted the trade. This may include comparing a sample of executed equity trades and the prices that were in the market at the time of the trade (e.g., by comparing it to a third-party pricing source).
In selecting a broker for each specific transaction, Milliman uses its best judgment to choose the broker most capable of providing the brokerage services necessary to obtain "best execution." The full range and quality of brokerage services available will be considered in making these determinations. Such services may consist of the following: (i) trading capabilities, including execution speed and ability to provide liquidity; (ii) commissions and/or fees both in aggregate and on a per share basis; (iii) capital strength and stability; (iv) settlement processing; (v) use of technology and other special services; (vi) responsiveness, reliability, and integrity; and, if applicable, (vii) the nature and value of research provided.
Milliman will consider total transaction costs when selecting brokers for trade execution. Total transaction costs include: (i) market impact cost; (ii) lost opportunity to trade cost; (iii) time-to-market cost; (iv) commissions on agency trades or the spreads on principle trades; and (v) bid-ask spread.
As a matter of policy, Milliman has indicated to the Board that it does not intend to maintain any soft dollar arrangements. Milliman may receive research on the economy, derivative instruments, flows and conditions from many broker-dealers. This information is commonly distributed by many broker-dealers to many market participants, is not associated with particular transactions, and does not obligate Milliman to trade with any particular broker-dealer. As these items are made readily available by many broker-dealers to many market participants and they do not affect Milliman's selection of a particular broker-dealer for a specific transaction, Milliman does not believe that it has conflicts of interest related to soft dollars in the case of OTC or exchange-traded futures transactions.
Capital Structure
The Fund has been established as a series of the Trust. The Trust currently has authorized and allocated to the Fund an unlimited number of Shares of beneficial interest with no par value. The Trustees may, at any time and from time to time, by resolution, authorize the establishment and division of additional shares of the Trust into an unlimited number of series and the division of any series (including the Fund) into two or more classes. When issued in accordance with the Trust's registration statement, governing instruments and applicable law (all as may be amended from time to time), all of the Trust's shares are fully paid and non-assessable. Shares do not have preemptive rights.
-42-
All Shares of the Fund represent an undivided proportionate interest in the assets of the Fund. Shareholders of the Trust are entitled to one vote for each full Share and to a proportionate fractional vote for each fractional Share standing in the shareholder's name on the books of the Trust. However, matters affecting only one particular fund or class can be voted on only by shareholders in such fund or class. The shares of the Trust are not entitled to cumulative voting, meaning that holders of more than 50% of the Trust's shares may elect the entire Board. All shareholders are entitled to receive dividend and/or capital gains when and as declared by the Trustees from time to time and as discussed in the Prospectus.
Book Entry Only System
The following information supplements and should be read in conjunction with the section of the Prospectus entitled "Book Entry."
DTC Acts as Securities Depository for Fund Shares
Shares of the Fund are represented by securities registered in the name of The Depository Trust Company ("DTC") or its nominee and deposited with, or on behalf of, DTC. DTC, a limited-purpose trust company, was created in 1973 to enable electronic movement of securities between its participants ("DTC Participants"), and National Securities Clearing Corporation ("NSCC") was established in 1976 to provide a single settlement system for securities clearing and to serve as central counterparty for securities trades among DTC Participants. In 1999, DTC and NSCC were consolidated within The Depository Trust & Clearing Corporation ("DTCC") and became wholly-owned subsidiaries of DTCC. The common stock of DTCC is owned by the DTC Participants, but the New York Stock Exchange ("NYSE") and FINRA, through subsidiaries, hold preferred shares in DTCC that provide them with the right to elect one member each to the DTCC board of directors. Access to the DTC system is available to entities, such as banks, brokers, dealers and trust companies, that clear through or maintain a custodial relationship with a DTC Participant, either directly or indirectly ("Indirect Participants").
Beneficial ownership of Shares is limited to DTC Participants, Indirect Participants and persons holding interests through DTC Participants and Indirect Participants. Ownership of beneficial interests in Shares (owners of such beneficial interests are referred to herein as "Beneficial Owners") is shown on, and the transfer of ownership is effected only through, records maintained by DTC (with respect to DTC Participants) and on the records of DTC Participants (with respect to Indirect Participants and Beneficial Owners that are not DTC Participants). Beneficial Owners will receive from or through the DTC Participant a written confirmation relating to their purchase and sale of Shares.
-43-
Conveyance of all notices, statements and other communications to Beneficial Owners is effected as follows. Pursuant to an agreement between the Trust and DTC, DTC is required to make available to the Trust upon request and for a fee to be charged to the Trust a listing of the Shares of the Fund held by each DTC Participant. The Trust shall inquire of each such DTC Participant as to the number of Beneficial Owners holding Shares, directly or indirectly, through such DTC Participant. The Trust shall provide each such DTC Participant with copies of such notice, statement or other communication, in such form, number and at such place as such DTC Participant may reasonably request, in order that such notice, statement or communication may be transmitted by such DTC Participant, directly or indirectly, to such Beneficial Owners. In addition, the Trust shall pay to each such DTC Participant a fair and reasonable amount as reimbursement for the expenses attendant to such transmittal, all subject to applicable statutory and regulatory requirements.
Fund distributions shall be made to DTC or its nominee, Cede & Co., as the registered holder of all Shares of the Trust. DTC or its nominee, upon receipt of any such distributions, shall credit immediately DTC Participants' accounts with payments in amounts proportionate to their respective beneficial interests in Shares of the Fund as shown on the records of DTC or its nominee. Payments by DTC Participants to Indirect Participants and Beneficial Owners of Shares held through such DTC Participants will be governed by standing instructions and customary practices, as is now the case with securities held for the accounts of customers in bearer form or registered in a "street name," and will be the responsibility of such DTC Participants.
The Trust has no responsibility or liability for any aspect of the records relating to or notices to Beneficial Owners, or payments made on account of beneficial ownership interests in such Shares, or for maintaining, supervising or reviewing any records relating to such beneficial ownership interests, or for any other aspect of the relationship between DTC and the DTC Participants or the relationship between such DTC Participants and the Indirect Participants and Beneficial Owners owning through such DTC Participants. DTC may decide to discontinue providing its service with respect to Shares of the Trust at any time by giving reasonable notice to the Trust and discharging its responsibilities with respect thereto under applicable law. Under such circumstances, the Trust shall take action to find a replacement for DTC to perform its functions at a comparable cost.
Creation and Redemption of Creation Units
General. ETFs, such as the Fund, do not sell or redeem individual shares, but rather generally issue and redeem their shares in primary market transactions through a creation and redemption mechanism. Financial entities known as "Authorized Participants" (as defined below) have contractual arrangements with an ETF or one of the ETF's service providers purchase and redeem an ETF's shares directly with the ETF in large blocks of shares known as "Creation Units." Prior to start of trading on every business day, an ETF publishes through the National Securities Clearing Corporation ("NSCC") the "basket" of securities, cash or other assets that it will accept in exchange for a Creation Unit of the ETF's shares. An authorized participant that wishes to effectuate a creation of an ETF's shares deposits with the ETF a "basket" of securities, cash or other assets identified by the ETF that day, and then receives the Creation Unit of the ETF's shares in return for those assets. After purchasing a Creation Unit, the authorized participant may continue to hold an ETF's shares or sell them in the secondary market. The redemption process is the reverse of the purchase process: the authorized participant redeems a Creation Unit of an ETF's shares for a basket of securities and other assets. The combination of the creation and redemption process with secondary market trading in Fund shares and underlying securities provides arbitrage opportunities that are designed to help keep the market price of the ETF's shares at or close to the NAV per share of such ETF.
-44-
Authorized Participants. An "Authorized Participant" is a member or participant of a clearing agency registered with the SEC that has a written agreement with the Fund or one of the Fund's service providers that allows the Authorized Participant to place orders for the purchase or redemption of Creation Units (a "Participant Agreement"). Orders to purchase Creation Units must be delivered through an Authorized Participant that has executed a Participant Agreement and must comply with the applicable provisions of such Participant Agreement. Investors wishing to purchase or sell shares generally do so on an exchange. Institutional investors other than Authorized Participants are responsible for making arrangements for a redemption request to be made through an Authorized Participant.
Business Day. A "Business Day" is generally any day on which the New York Stock Exchange ("NYSE"), the Exchange and the Trust are open for business. As of the date of this SAI, the NYSE observes the following holidays: New Year's Day, Martin Luther King, Jr. Day, Presidents' Day, Good Friday, Memorial Day, Juneteenth, Independence Day, Labor Day, Thanksgiving Day and Christmas Day. The "Transmittal Date" is any Business Day on which an order to purchase or redeem Creation Units is received in proper form.
Basket Composition and Custom Baskets. Rule 6c-11(c)(3) under of the 1940 Act requires an ETF relying on the exemptions offered by Rule 6c-11 to adopt and implement written policies and procedures governing the construction of baskets and the process that the ETF will use for the acceptance of baskets. In general, in connection with the construction and acceptance of baskets, the Adviser may consider various factors, including, but not limited to: (1) whether the securities, assets and other positions comprising a basket are consistent with the ETF's investment objective(s), policies and disclosure; (2) whether the securities, assets and other positions can legally and readily be acquired, transferred and held by the ETF and/or Authorized Participant(s), as applicable; (3) whether to utilize cash, either in lieu of securities or other instruments or as a cash balancing amount; and (4) in the case of an ETF that tracks an index, whether the securities, assets and other positions aid index tracking. The Fund currently intends to effect creations and redemptions only to and from broker-dealers and large institutional investors that have entered into participation agreements, as described further below. The Fund may effect creations and redemptions for in-kind securities or for cash, rather than in-kind securities. Creation Units are sold at their NAV plus a transaction fee.
The Fund may utilize a "pro-rata basket" or a "custom basket" in reliance on Rule 6c-11. A pro-rata basket is a basket that is a pro rata representation of the ETF's portfolio holdings. When utilizing a pro-rata basket, minor deviations may occur when it is not operationally feasible to include a particular instrument within the basket, except to the extent that the Fund utilized different baskets in transactions on the same Business Day. Rule 6c-11 defines "custom baskets" to include two categories of baskets. First, a basket containing a non-representative selection of the ETF's portfolio holdings would constitute a custom basket. These types of custom baskets include, but are not limited to, baskets that do not reflect: (i) a pro rata representation of the ETF's portfolio holdings; (ii) a representative sampling of an ETF's portfolio holdings; or (iii) changes due to a rebalancing or reconstitution of an ETF's securities market index, if applicable. Second, if different baskets are used in transactions on the same Business Day, each basket after the initial basket would constitute a custom basket. For example, if an ETF exchanges a basket with either the same or another Authorized Participant that reflects a representative sampling that differs from the initial basket, that basket (and any such subsequent baskets) would be a custom basket. Similarly, if an ETF substitutes cash in lieu of a portion of basket assets for a single Authorized Participant, that basket would be a custom basket. The Adviser's Rule 6c-11 Committee defines any deviation from a pro-rata basket to be a "custom basket."
-45-
An ETF and its shareholders may benefit from the flexibility afforded by custom baskets under a variety of circumstances. Generally, the usage of custom baskets may reduce costs, improve trading and increase efficiency. ETFs may be able to avoid transaction costs and adverse tax consequences when utilizing custom baskets because it provides a way for the ETF to add, remove, and re-weight portfolio securities without transacting in the market. Rule 6c-11 provides an ETF with flexibility to use "custom baskets" if the ETF has adopted written policies and procedures that: (1) set forth detailed parameters for the construction and acceptance of custom baskets that are in the best interests of the ETF and its shareholders, including the process for any revisions to, or deviations from, those parameters; and (2) specify the titles or roles of employees of the ETF's investment advisor who are required to review each custom basket for compliance with those parameters.
Historically, the use of baskets that do not correspond pro-rata to an ETF's portfolio holdings created concern that the Authorized Participant could take advantage of its relationship with an ETF and pressure an ETF to construct a basket that favors the Authorized Participant to the detriment of such ETF's shareholders. For example, because ETFs rely on Authorized Participants to maintain the secondary market by promoting an effective arbitrage mechanism, an Authorized Participant holding less liquid or less desirable securities potentially could pressure an ETF into accepting those securities in its basket in exchange for liquid ETF shares (i.e., dumping). An Authorized Participant also could pressure the ETF into including in its basket certain desirable securities in exchange for ETF shares tendered for redemption (i.e., cherry-picking). In either case, the ETF's other investors would be disadvantaged and would be left holding shares of an ETF with a less liquid or less desirable portfolio of securities. In accordance with Rule 6c-11, the Adviser has adopted policies and procedures designed to mitigate concerns that an Authorized Participant could unduly influence the Fund to construct a basket that favors an Authorized Participant to the detriment of the Fund's shareholders, but there is no guarantee that these policies and procedures will be effective.
Basket Dissemination. Basket files are published for consumption through the NSCC, a subsidiary of Depository Trust & Clearing Corporation, and can be utilized for pricing, creations, redemptions, rebalancing and custom scenarios. In most instances, pro-rata baskets are calculated and supplied by the ETF's custodial bank based on ETF holdings, whereas non-pro rata, custom and forward-looking pro-rata baskets are calculated by the fund's investment adviser and disseminated by the ETF's custodial bank through the NSCC process.
-46-
Placement of Creation or Redemption Orders. All orders to purchase or redeem Creation Units are to be governed according to the applicable Participant Agreement that each Authorized Participant has executed. Except as set forth below, all orders to purchase or redeem Creation Units must be received by the transfer agent in the proper form required by the Participant Agreement no later than the closing time of the regular trading session of the NYSE (ordinarily 4:00 p.m. Eastern Time) on each day the NYSE is open for business (the "Closing Time") in order for the purchase or redemption of Creation Units to be effected based on the NAV of shares of the Fund as next determined on such date after receipt of the order in proper form. In the case of a redemption order, such order must also be accompanied or followed by the requisite number of shares of the Fund specified in such order, which delivery must be made through DTC to the transfer agent. All shares of the Funds, however created, will be entered on the records of DTC in the name of Cede & Co. for the account of a DTC Participant.
At its discretion, the Fund may require an Authorized Participant to submit orders to purchase or redeem Creation Units earlier in the day. The Fund, or the Distributor on behalf of the Fund, will provide Authorized Participants with prior notice of any such deadline. Purchase or redemption orders of Creation Units received by the transfer agent after the applicable deadline will not be accepted by the Fund.
The delivery of Creation Units properly created will occur no later than the second Business Day following the day on which the purchase order is deemed received ("T+2"). The requisite Cash Redemption Amount (as defined below) for an order properly submitted to redeem Creation Units will ordinarily be transferred no later than T+2.
Purchase and Issuance of Creation Units. The consideration for the purchase of a Creation Unit of shares of the Fund may consist of the in-kind deposit of a designated portfolio of securities and other instruments (the "Deposit Instruments") and an amount of cash computed as described below (the "Cash Component"). Together, the Deposit Instruments (and/or any cash with respect to cash purchases and cash-in-lieu amounts) and the Cash Component constitute the "Fund Deposit," which represents the minimum initial and subsequent investment amount for a Creation Unit of the Fund.
The Cash Component is sometimes also referred to as the Balancing Amount. The Cash Component serves the function of compensating for any differences between the NAV per Creation Unit and the "Deposit Amount" (an amount equal to the aggregate market value of the Deposit Instruments and/or cash in lieu of all or a portion of the Deposit Instruments). The Cash Component is an amount equal to the difference between the NAV of the Fund's shares (per Creation Unit) and the Deposit Amount. If the Cash Component is a positive number (i.e., the NAV per Creation Unit exceeds the Deposit Amount), the creator will deliver the Cash Component. If the Cash Component is a negative number (i.e., the NAV per Creation Unit is less than the Deposit Amount), the creator will receive the Cash Component.
A Creation Unit will generally not be issued until the transfer of good title to the Fund of the Deposit Instruments and the payment of the Cash Component, the "Creation Transaction Fee" (as defined below) and any other required cash amounts have been completed. To the extent contemplated by the applicable Participant Agreement, Creation Units of the Fund will be issued to such Authorized Participant notwithstanding the fact that the corresponding Fund Deposits have not been received in part or in whole, in reliance on the undertaking of the Authorized Participant to deliver the missing Deposit Instruments as soon as possible, which undertaking shall be secured by such Authorized Participant's delivery and maintenance of collateral consisting of cash in the form of U.S. dollars in immediately available funds having a value (marked to market daily) at least equal to 105% which Innovator may change from time to time of the value of the missing Deposit Instruments. Such cash collateral must be delivered no later than 2:00 p.m., Eastern Time, on the contractual settlement date. The Participant Agreement will permit the Fund to use such collateral to buy the missing Deposit Instruments at any time and will subject the Authorized Participant to liability for any shortfall between the cost to the Fund of purchasing such securities and the value of the collateral.
-47-
Redemption of Fund Shares in Creation Units. Beneficial Owners of shares of the Fund may sell their shares in the secondary market, but must accumulate enough shares to constitute a Creation Unit to redeem through the Fund. The Fund will not redeem shares in amounts less than Creation Units and there can be no assurance that there will be sufficient liquidity in the public trading market at any time to permit assembly of a Creation Unit. Investors should expect to incur customary brokerage and other costs in connection with assembling a sufficient number of the Fund's shares to constitute a redeemable Creation Unit. Redemption requests must be placed by or through an Authorized Participant. Creation Units will be redeemable at their NAV per Creation Unit next determined after receipt of a request for redemption by the Fund. To the extent contemplated by a Participant Agreement, in the event the Authorized Participant has submitted a redemption request in proper form but is unable to transfer all or part of the Creation Unit to be redeemed to the Fund's transfer agent, the transfer agent will nonetheless accept the redemption request in reliance on the undertaking by the Authorized Participant to deliver the missing shares as soon as possible. Such undertaking shall be secured by the Authorized Participant's delivery and maintenance of collateral consisting of cash having a value (marked to market daily) at least equal to 105%, which Innovator may change from time to time, of the value of the missing shares.
Delivery of Redemption Proceeds. Deliveries of securities to Authorized Participants in connection with redemption orders are generally expected to be made within two Business Days. Due to the schedule of holidays in certain countries, however, the delivery of in-kind redemption proceeds for the Fund may take longer than two Business Days after the day on which the redemption request is received in proper form. Section 22(e) of the 1940 Act generally prohibits a registered open-end management investment company from postponing the date of satisfaction of redemption requests for more than seven days after the tender of a security for redemption. This prohibition can cause operational difficulties for ETFs that hold foreign investments and exchange in-kind baskets for Creation Units. For example, local market delivery cycles for transferring foreign investments to redeeming investors, together with local market holiday schedules, can sometimes require a delivery process in excess of seven days. Rule 6c-11 grants relief from Section 22(e) to permit an ETF to delay satisfaction of a redemption request for more than seven days if a local market holiday, or series of consecutive holidays, or the extended delivery cycles for transferring foreign investments to redeeming Authorized Participants, or the combination thereof prevents timely delivery of the foreign investment included in the ETF's basket. Under this exemption, an ETF must deliver foreign investments as soon as practicable, but in no event later than 15 days after the tender to the ETF. The exemption therefore will permit a delay only to the extent that additional time for settlement is actually required, when a local market holiday, or series of consecutive holidays, or the extended delivery cycles for transferring foreign investments to redeeming authorized participants prevents timely delivery of the foreign investment included in the ETF's basket. If a foreign investment settles in less than 15 days, Rule 6c-11 requires an ETF to deliver it pursuant to the standard settlement time of the local market where the investment trades. Rule 6c-11 defines "foreign investment" as any security, asset or other position of the ETF issued by a foreign issuer (as defined by Rule 3b-4 under the 1934 Act), and that is traded on a trading market outside of the United States. This definition is not limited to "foreign securities," but also includes other investments that may not be considered securities. Although these other investments may not be securities, they may present the same challenges for timely settlement as foreign securities if they are transferred in kind.
-48-
The redemption proceeds for a Creation Unit generally consist of the Deposit Instruments-as announced on the Business Day of the request for redemption received in proper form-plus or minus cash in an amount equal to the difference between the net asset value of the Fund's shares (per Creation Unit) being redeemed, as next determined after a receipt of a request in proper form, and the aggregate market value of the Deposit Instruments (the "Cash Redemption Amount"), less the applicable Redemption Transaction Fee as described below and, if applicable, any operational processing and brokerage costs, transfer fees or stamp taxes. In the event that the Deposit Instruments have an aggregate market value greater than the net asset value of the Fund's shares (per Creation Unit), a compensating cash payment equal to the difference plus the applicable Redemption Transaction Fee and, if applicable, any operational processing and brokerage costs, transfer fees or stamp taxes, is required to be made by or through an Authorized Participant by the redeeming shareholder.
Creation Transaction Fees. The Fund imposes fees in connection with the purchase of Creation Units. The Fund, or the Distributor on behalf of the Fund, will provide Authorized Participants with prior notice of such Fees. The Fund may adjust the fee from time to time based upon actual experience. The price for each Creation Unit will equal the daily NAV per share of the Fund times the number of shares in a Creation Unit, plus the fees described above and, if applicable, any operational processing and brokerage costs, transfer fees, stamp taxes and part or all of the spread between the expected bid and offer side of the market related to the securities comprising the creation basket. Shares of the Fund may be issued in advance of receipt of all Deposit Instruments subject to various conditions including a requirement to maintain on deposit with the Fund cash at least equal to a percentage specified by the Fund multiplied by the market value of the missing Deposit Instruments.
Redemption Transaction Fees. The Fund imposes fees in connection with the redemption of Creation Units. The Fund, or the Distributor on behalf of the Fund, will provide the Authorized Participants with prior notice of any such fees. The Fund may adjust the fee from time to time based upon actual experience. The price received for each Creation Unit will equal the daily NAV per share of the Fund times the number of shares in a Creation Unit, minus the fees described above and, if applicable, any operational processing and brokerage costs, transfer fees, stamp taxes and part or all of the spread between the expected bid and offer side of the market related to the securities comprising the redemption basket. Investors who use the services of a broker or other such intermediary in addition to an Authorized Participant to effect a redemption of a Creation Unit may also be assessed an amount to cover the cost of such services. The redemption fee charged by the Fund will comply with Rule 22c-2 of the 1940 Act which limits redemption fees to no more than 2% of the value of the shares redeemed.
-49-
Suspension of Creations. The SEC has stated its position that an ETF generally may suspend the issuance of Creation Units only for a limited time and only due to extraordinary circumstances, such as when the markets on which the ETF's portfolio holdings are traded are closed for a limited period of time. The SEC has also stated that an ETF cannot set transaction fees so high as to effectively suspend the issuance of Creation Units. The Fund reserves the right, for any legally permissible reason, to reject a creation order transmitted to it if: (i) the order is not in proper form; (ii) the purchaser or group of related purchasers, upon obtaining the Creation Units of Fund shares ordered, would own 80% or more of the currently outstanding shares of the Fund; (iii) the required consideration is not delivered; (iv) the acceptance of the Fund Deposit would, in the opinion of the Fund, be unlawful; or (v) there exist circumstances outside the control of the Fund that make it impossible to process purchases of Creation Units for all practical purposes. Examples of such circumstances include: acts of God or public service or utility problems such as fires, floods, extreme weather conditions and power outages resulting in telephone, telecopy and computer failures; market conditions or activities causing trading halts; systems failures involving computer or other information systems affecting the Fund, Innovator, the Distributor, DTC, NSCC, the transfer agent, the custodian, any sub-custodian or any other participant in the purchase process; and similar extraordinary events. The transfer agent shall notify a prospective creator of a Creation Unit and/or the Authorized Participant acting on behalf of such prospective creator of the rejection of the order of such person. The Trust, the Fund, the transfer agent, the custodian, any sub-custodian and the Distributor are under no duty, however, to give notification of any defects or irregularities in the delivery of Fund Deposits, nor shall any of them incur any liability for the failure to give any such notification.
Suspension of Redemptions. An ETF may suspend the redemption of Creation Units only in accordance with Section 22(e) of the 1940 Act. Section 22(e) stipulates that no registered investment company shall suspend the right of redemption, or postpone the date of payment or satisfaction upon redemption of any redeemable security in accordance with its terms for more than seven days after the tender of such security to the company or its agent designated for that purpose for redemption, except (1) for any period (A) during which the NYSE is closed other than customary week-end and holiday closings or (B) during which trading on the NYSE is restricted; (2) for any period during which an emergency exists as a result of which (A) disposal by the investment company of securities owned by it is not reasonably practicable or (B) it is not reasonably practicable for such company fairly to determine the value of its net assets; or (3) for such other periods as the SEC may by order permit for the protection of security holders of the investment company.
Exceptions to Use of Creation Units. Pursuant to Rule 6c-11, ETFs are permitted to sell or redeem individual shares on the day of consummation of a reorganization, merger, conversion or liquidation. Under these limited circumstances, an ETF may need to issue or redeem individual shares and may need to transact without utilizing Authorized Participants.
-50-
Determining Offering Price and Net Asset Value
The NAV of the Fund will be determined as of the close of regular trading on the NYSE (normally 4:00 p.m. E.T.) on the days specified in the Fund's prospectus or as otherwise determined by resolution adopted by the Board (each, a "valuation day"). If the NYSE closes early on a valuation day, the Fund shall determine its NAV as of that time. Portfolio securities generally shall be valued utilizing prices provided by independent pricing services. The Board has authorized the Fund and USBFS, the Fund's accounting agent (the "Fund Accounting Agent"), to use prices provided by certain pricing service vendors (each, a "Pricing Service"). The securities held by the Fund are valued in accordance with the policies and procedures established by Innovator as the "Valuation Designee" pursuant to Rule 2a-5 under the 1940 Act and approved by, and subject to the oversight of, the Board (the "Valuation Procedures"). If market quotations are not readily available or are not reliable, the securities or other assets of the Fund will be valued at their fair value as determined in good faith by the Valuation Designee in accordance with the Valuation Procedures.
Equity and Other Non-Fixed Income Securities and Other Assets
The following securities and other assets, for which accurate and reliable market quotations are readily available, will be valued by the Fund Accounting Agent as described:
| A. | Common stocks, preferred stocks and other equity securities listed on any national or foreign exchange (excluding the NASDAQ National Market ("NASDAQ") and the London Stock Exchange Alternative Investment Market ("AIM")) will be valued at the last sale price on the exchange on which they are principally traded or, for NASDAQ and AIM securities, the official closing price. Securities traded on more than one securities exchange are valued at the last sale price or official closing price, as applicable, at the close of the exchange representing the principal market for such securities. |
| B. | Securities traded in the over-the-counter market are valued at the mean of the bid and the asked price, if available, and otherwise at their closing bid price. |
| C. | Exchange-traded options (other than FLEX Options) and futures contracts will be valued at the closing price in the market where such contracts are principally traded. If no closing price is available, they will be valued at their fair value as determined by the Valuation Designee in accordance with the Valuation Procedures. |
| D. | Forward foreign currency contracts are valued at the current day's interpolated foreign exchange rate, as calculated using the current day's spot rate, and the thirty, sixty, ninety, and one-hundred eighty day forward rates provided by a Pricing Service or by certain independent dealers in such contracts. |
| E. | Redeemable securities issued by open-end investment companies shall be valued at the investment company's applicable net asset value, with the exception of exchange-traded open-end investment companies which are priced as equity securities in accordance with the methods outlined in subsection A above. |
-51-
| F. | FLEX Options listed on an exchange (e.g., Cboe) will typically be valued at a model-based price provided by the exchange at the official close of that exchange's trading day. However, when the Fund's option has a same-day market trade price, this same-day market trade price will be used for FLEX Option values instead of the exchange's model-based price. If the exchange on which the option is traded is unable to provide a model price, model-based FLEX Options prices will additionally be provided by a backup third-party pricing provider. In selecting the model prices, the Sub-Adviser may provide a review of the calculation of model prices provided by each vendor, and may note to such vendors of any data errors observed, or where an underlying component value of the model pricing package may be missing or incorrect, prior to publication by the vendor of the model pricing to the Fund Accounting Agent for purposes of that day's NAV. If either pricing vendor is not available to provide a model price for that day, the value of a FLEX Option will be determined by Innovator as Valuation Designee in accordance with the Valuation Procedures. In instances where in the same trading day a particular FLEX Option is both represented in an all-cash basket (either a creation unit or redemption unit), as well as in an in-kind basket (either a creation unit or redemption unit), for valuation purposes that trading day the Fund will default to use the trade price for both instances, rather than using the model price otherwise available for the in-kind transaction. |
The Fund Accounting Agent will obtain all market quotations used in valuing securities in accordance with subsection A and E above from a Pricing Service. If no quotation can be obtained from a Pricing Service, then the Fund Accounting Agent will contact Innovator. Innovator is responsible for establishing valuation of portfolio securities and other instruments held by the Fund in accordance with the Valuation Procedures. Innovator will then attempt to obtain one or more broker quotes for the security daily and will value the security accordingly.
If no quotation is available from either a Pricing Service, or one or more brokers, or if Innovator has reason to question the reliability or accuracy of a quotation supplied, Innovator must determine if a "fair value" of such portfolio security must be provided by Innovator pursuant to the Valuation Procedures.
Fixed Income Securities, Swaps and Other Instruments
Subject to the special pricing situations set forth below, the following securities will be valued by the Fund Accounting Agent as follows:
| A. | Fixed income securities, swaps, currency-, credit- and commodity-linked notes, and other similar instruments will be valued using a Pricing Service. |
| B. | Fixed income securities having a remaining maturity of 60 days or less when purchased will be valued at cost adjusted for amortization of premiums and accretion of discounts, provided Innovator has determined that the use of amortized cost is an appropriate reflection of fair value given market and issuer specific conditions existing at the time of the determination. Factors that may be considered in determining the appropriateness of the use of amortized cost include, but are not limited to, the following: |
| a. | the credit conditions in the relevant market and changes thereto; |
| b. | the liquidity conditions in the relevant market and changes thereto; |
-52-
| c. | the interest rate conditions in the relevant market and changes thereto (such as significant changes in interest rates); |
| d. | issuer-specific conditions (such as significant credit deterioration); and |
| e. | any other market-based data Innovator considers relevant. In this regard, Innovator may use last-obtained market-based data to assist it when valuing portfolio securities using amortized cost. |
| C. | Repurchase agreements will be valued as follows: Overnight repurchase agreements will be valued at cost. Term repurchase agreements (i.e., those whose maturity exceeds seven days) will be valued by Innovator at the average of the bid quotations obtained daily from at least two recognized dealers. |
The Fund Accounting Agent will obtain all pricing data for use in valuing securities in accordance with subsections G through I, as applicable, above from a Pricing Service or, if no price is available from a Pricing Service, then the Fund Accounting Agent will contact Innovator, which will attempt to obtain one or more broker quotes from the selling dealer or financial institution for the security daily and will value the security accordingly. If Innovator has reason to question the accuracy or reliability of a price supplied or the use of the amortized cost methodology, Innovator must determine if a "fair value" of such portfolio security must be provided by Innovator pursuant to the Valuation Procedures. From time to time, Innovator will request that the Fund Accounting Agent submit price challenges to a Pricing Service, usually in response to any updated broker prices received.
Special Pricing Situations
If no quotation is available from either a Pricing Service or one or more brokers or if Innovator, as Valuation Designee, has reason to question the reliability or accuracy of a quotation supplied or the use of amortized cost, the value of any portfolio security held by the Fund for which reliable market quotations are not readily available will be determined by Innovator in accordance with the Valuation Procedures in a manner that most appropriately reflects fair market value of the security on the valuation date. The use of a fair valuation method may be appropriate if, for example: (i) market quotations do not accurately reflect fair value of an investment; (ii) an investment's value has been materially affected by events occurring after the close of the exchange or market on which the investment is principally traded (for example, a foreign exchange or market); (iii) a trading halt closes an exchange or market early; or (iv) other events result in an exchange or market delaying its normal close.
-53-
Fair valuation of a fixed-income security will be based on the consideration of all available information, including, but not limited to, the following: (a) the fundamental business data relating to the issuer, or economic data relating to the country of issue; (b) an evaluation of the forces which influence the market in which these securities are purchased and sold; (c) the type, size and cost of the security; (d) the financial statements of the issuer, or the financial condition of the country of issue; (e) the credit quality and cash flow of the issuer, or country of issue, based on the portfolio manager's or external analysis; (f) the information as to any transactions in or offers for the security; (g) the price and extent of public trading in similar securities (or equity securities) of the issuer/borrower, or comparable companies; (h) the coupon payments, yield data/cash flow data; (i) the quality, value and salability of collateral, if any, securing the security; (j) the business prospects of the issuer, including any ability to obtain money or resources from a parent or affiliate and an assessment of the issuer's management (for corporate debt only); (k) the economic, political and social prospects/developments of the country of issue and the assessment of the country's governmental leaders/officials (for sovereign debt only); (l) the prospects for the issuer's industry, and multiples (of earnings and/or cash flows) being paid for similar businesses in that industry (for corporate debt only); and (m) other relevant factors.
Fair valuation of an equity security will be based on the consideration of all available information, including, but not limited to, the following: (a) the type of security; (b) the size of the holding; (c) the initial cost of the security; (d) transactions in comparable securities; (e) price quotes from dealers and/or pricing services; (f) relationships among various securities; (g) information obtained by contacting the issuer, analysts, or the appropriate stock exchange; (h) an analysis of the issuer's financial statements; and (i) the existence of merger proposals or tender offers that might affect the value of the security.
If the equity security in question is a foreign security, the following additional information may be considered: (j) the country's or geographic region's political and economic environment; (k) the value of similar foreign securities traded on other foreign markets; (l) ADR and GDR trading of similar securities; (m) closed-end fund trading of similar securities; (n) foreign currency exchange activity; (o) the trading prices of financial products that are tied to baskets of foreign securities; (p) factors relating to the event that precipitated the pricing problem; (q) whether the event is likely to recur; and (r) whether the effects of the event are isolated or whether they affect entire markets, countries or regions.
In addition, if a "material market movement" occurs between the time a market on which a foreign security is traded closes and the time that the NAV of the Fund is determined, then the foreign security will be valued in accordance with Section VIII of the Valuation Procedures.
Restricted securities (with the exception of Rule 144A Securities for which market quotations are available) will normally be valued at fair value as determined by Innovator in accordance with the Valuation Procedures. The portfolio manager(s) will notify Innovator of the existence of a restricted security in the Fund's portfolio and will present to Innovator a recommendation as to the initial and continuing valuation of such security. Innovator will then determine the fair value of such restricted security.
Foreign Market Closures
On a day on which a foreign market is closed, but the U.S. markets are open, securities principally trading in those closed markets shall be fair valued. Innovator and the Fund Accounting Agent shall use ICE Data Services, or such other third-party fair valuation pricing vendor as Innovator and the Board may approve from time-to- time, to price the securities principally trading in those closed foreign markets.
-54-
Distributions and Taxes
This section summarizes some of the main U.S. federal income tax consequences of owning Shares of the Fund. This section is current as of the date of the SAI. Tax laws and interpretations change frequently, and this summary does not describe all of the tax consequences to all taxpayers. For example, this summary generally does not describe your situation if you are a corporation, a non-U.S. person, a broker-dealer, or other investor with special circumstances. In addition, this section does not describe your state, local or foreign tax consequences.
This federal income tax summary is based in part on the advice of counsel to the Fund. The Internal Revenue Service could disagree with any conclusions set forth in this section. In addition, our counsel was not asked to review, and has not reached a conclusion with respect to the federal income tax treatment of the assets to be deposited in the Fund. This summary may not be sufficient for prospective investors to use for the purpose of avoiding penalties under federal tax law.
As with any investment, prospective investors should seek advice based on their individual circumstances from their own tax advisor.
The Fund intends to qualify annually and to elect to be treated as a regulated investment company under the Internal Revenue Code (the "Code").
To qualify for the favorable U.S. federal income tax treatment generally accorded to regulated investment companies, the Fund must, among other things, (a) derive in each taxable year at least 90% of its gross income from dividends, interest, payments with respect to securities loans and gains from the sale or other disposition of stock, securities or foreign currencies or other income derived with respect to its business of investing in such stock, securities or currencies, or net income derived from interests in certain publicly traded partnerships; (b) diversify its holdings so that, at the end of each quarter of the taxable year, (i) at least 50% of the market value of the Fund's assets is represented by cash and cash items (including receivables), U.S. government securities, the securities of other regulated investment companies and other securities, with such other securities of any one issuer generally limited for the purposes of this calculation to an amount not greater than 5% of the value of the Fund's total assets and not greater than 10% of the outstanding voting securities of such issuer, and (ii) not more than 25% of the value of its total assets is invested in the securities (other than U.S. government securities or the securities of other regulated investment companies) of any one issuer, or two or more issuers which the Fund controls which are engaged in the same, similar or related trades or businesses, or the securities of one or more of certain publicly traded partnerships; and (c) distribute at least 90% of its investment company taxable income (which includes, among other items, dividends, interest and net short-term capital gains in excess of net long-term capital losses) and at least 90% of its net tax-exempt interest income each taxable year. There are certain exceptions for failure to qualify if the failure is for reasonable cause or is de minimis, and certain corrective action is taken and certain tax payments are made by the Fund.
-55-
As a regulated investment company, the Fund generally will not be subject to U.S. federal income tax on its investment company taxable income (as that term is defined in the Code, but without regard to the deduction for dividends paid) and net capital gain (the excess of net long-term capital gain over net short-term capital loss), if any, that it distributes to shareholders. The Fund intends to distribute to its shareholders, at least annually, substantially all of its investment company taxable income and net capital gain. If the Fund retains any net capital gain or investment company taxable income, it will generally be subject to federal income tax at regular corporate rates on the amount retained. In addition, amounts not distributed on a timely basis in accordance with a calendar year distribution requirement are subject to a nondeductible 4% excise tax unless, generally, the Fund distributes during each calendar year an amount equal to the sum of (1) at least 98% of its ordinary income (not taking into account any capital gains or losses) for the calendar year, (2) at least 98.2% of its capital gains in excess of its capital losses (adjusted for certain ordinary losses) for the one-year period ending October 31 of the calendar year, and (3) any ordinary income and capital gains for previous years that were not distributed during those years. In order to prevent application of the excise tax, the Fund intends to make its distributions in accordance with the calendar year distribution requirement. A distribution will be treated as paid on December 31 of the current calendar year if it is declared by the Fund in October, November or December with a record date in such a month and paid by the Fund during January of the following calendar year. Such distributions will be taxable to shareholders in the calendar year in which the distributions are declared, rather than the calendar year in which the distributions are received.
Subject to certain reasonable cause and de minimis exceptions, if the Fund fails to qualify as a regulated investment company or fails to satisfy the 90% distribution requirement in any taxable year, the Fund would be taxed as an ordinary corporation on its taxable income (even if such income were distributed to its shareholders) and all distributions out of earnings and profits would be taxed to shareholders as ordinary income.
Distributions
Dividends paid out of the Fund's investment company taxable income are generally taxable to a shareholder as ordinary income to the extent of the Fund's earnings and profits, whether paid in cash or reinvested in additional Shares.
Income from the Fund may also be subject to a 3.8% "Medicare tax." This tax generally applies to net investment income if the taxpayer's adjusted gross income exceeds certain threshold amounts, which are $250,000 in the case of married couples filing joint returns and $200,000 in the case of single individuals.
A corporation that owns Shares generally will not be entitled to the dividends received deduction with respect to many dividends received from the Fund because the dividends received deduction is generally not available for distributions from regulated investment companies. However, certain ordinary income dividends on Shares that are attributable to qualifying dividends received by the Fund from certain domestic corporations may be reported by the Fund as being eligible for the dividends received deduction.
-56-
Distributions of net capital gain (the excess of net long-term capital gain over net short-term capital loss), if any, properly reported as capital gain dividends are taxable to a shareholder as long-term capital gains, regardless of how long the shareholder has held Fund Shares. An election may be available to shareholders to defer recognition of the gain attributable to a capital gain dividend if they make certain qualifying investments within a limited time. Shareholders should talk to their tax advisor about the availability of this deferral election and its requirements. Shareholders receiving distributions in the form of additional Shares, rather than cash, generally will have a tax basis in each such Share equal to the value of a Share of the Fund on the reinvestment date. A distribution of an amount in excess of the Fund's current and accumulated earnings and profits will be treated by a shareholder as a return of capital which is applied against and reduces the shareholder's basis in his or her Shares. To the extent that the amount of any such distribution exceeds the shareholder's basis in his or her Shares, the excess will be treated by the shareholder as gain from a sale or exchange of the Shares.
Shareholders will be notified annually as to the U.S. federal income tax status of distributions, and shareholders receiving distributions in the form of additional Shares will receive a report as to the value of those Shares.
Sale or Exchange of Fund Shares
Upon the sale or other disposition of Shares of the Fund, which a shareholder holds as a capital asset, such a shareholder may realize a capital gain or loss which will be long-term or short-term, depending upon the shareholder's holding period for the Shares. Generally, a shareholder's gain or loss will be a long-term gain or loss if the Shares have been held for more than one year. An election may be available to shareholders to defer recognition of capital gain if they make certain qualifying investments within a limited time. Shareholders should talk to their tax advisor about the availability of this deferral election and its requirements.
Any loss realized on a sale or exchange will be disallowed to the extent that Shares disposed of are replaced (including through reinvestment of dividends) within a period of 61 days beginning 30 days before and ending 30 days after disposition of Shares or to the extent that the shareholder, during such period, acquires or enters into an option or contract to acquire, substantially identical stock or securities. In such a case, the basis of the Shares acquired will be adjusted to reflect the disallowed loss. Any loss realized by a shareholder on a disposition of Fund Shares held by the shareholder for six months or less will be treated as a long-term capital loss to the extent of any distributions of long-term capital gain received by the shareholder with respect to such Shares.
Taxes on Purchase and Redemption of Creation Units
If a shareholder exchanges securities for Creation Units the shareholder will generally recognize a gain or a loss. The gain or loss will be equal to the difference between the market value of the Creation Units at the time and the shareholder's aggregate basis in the securities surrendered and the Cash Component paid. If a shareholder exchanges Creation Units for securities, then the shareholder will generally recognize a gain or loss equal to the difference between the shareholder's basis in the Creation Units and the aggregate market value of the securities received and the Cash Redemption Amount. The Internal Revenue Service, however, may assert that a loss realized upon an exchange of securities for Creation Units or Creation Units for securities cannot be deducted currently under the rules governing "wash sales," or on the basis that there has been no significant change in economic position.
-57-
Treatment of the FLEX Options
The Fund's investments in offsetting positions with respect to the Reference Asset may be "straddles" for U.S. federal income tax purposes. The straddle rules may affect the character of gains (or losses) realized by the Fund, and losses realized by the Fund on positions that are part of a straddle may be deferred under the straddle rules, rather than being taken into account in calculating taxable income for the taxable year in which the losses are realized. In addition, certain carrying charges (including interest expense) associated with positions in a straddle may be required to be capitalized rather than deducted currently. Certain elections that the Fund may make with respect to its straddle positions may also affect the amount, character and timing of the recognition of gains or losses from the affected positions.
The tax consequences of straddle transactions to the Fund are not entirely clear in all situations under currently available authority. The straddle rules may increase the amount of short-term capital gain realized by the Fund, which is taxed as ordinary income when distributed to U.S. shareholders in a non-liquidating distribution. Because application of the straddle rules may affect the character of gains or losses, defer losses and/or accelerate the recognition of gains or losses from the affected straddle positions, if the Fund makes a non-liquidating distribution of its short-term capital gain, the amount which must be distributed to U.S. shareholders as ordinary income may be increased or decreased substantially as compared to the Fund that did not engage in such transactions.
The FLEX Options included in the portfolio are exchange-traded options. Under Section 1256 of the Code, certain types of exchange-traded options are treated as if they were sold (i.e., "marked to market") at the end of each year. The Fund does not believe that the positions held by the Fund will be subject to Section 1256, which means that the positions will not be marked to market, but the positions will be subject to the straddle rules.
Nature of Fund's Investments
Certain of the Fund's investment practices are subject to special and complex federal income tax provisions that may, among other things, (i) disallow, suspend or otherwise limit the allowance of certain losses or deductions, (ii) convert lower taxed long-term capital gain into higher taxed short-term capital gain or ordinary income, (iii) convert an ordinary loss or a deduction into a capital loss (the deductibility of which is more limited), (iv) cause the Fund to recognize income or gain without a corresponding receipt of cash, (v) adversely affect the time as to when a purchase or sale of stock or securities is deemed to occur and (vi) adversely alter the characterization of certain complex financial transactions.
Futures Contracts and Options
The Fund's transactions in futures contracts and options will be subject to special provisions of the Code that, among other things, may affect the character of gains and losses realized by the Fund (i.e., may affect whether gains or losses are ordinary or capital, or short-term or long-term), may accelerate recognition of income to the Fund and may defer Fund losses. These rules could, therefore, affect the character, amount and timing of distributions to shareholders. These provisions also (a) will require the Fund to mark-to-market certain types of the positions in its portfolio (i.e., treat them as if they were closed out), and (b) may cause the Fund to recognize income without receiving cash with which to make distributions in amounts necessary to satisfy the 90% distribution requirement for qualifying to be taxed as a regulated investment company and the distribution requirements for avoiding excise taxes.
-58-
Backup Withholding
The Fund may be required to withhold U.S. federal income tax from all taxable distributions and sale proceeds payable to shareholders who fail to provide the Fund with their correct taxpayer identification number or fail to make required certifications, or who have been notified by the Internal Revenue Service that they are subject to backup withholding. Corporate shareholders and certain other shareholders specified in the Code generally are exempt from such backup withholding. This withholding is not an additional tax. Any amounts withheld may be credited against the shareholder's U.S. federal income tax liability.
Non-U.S. Shareholders
U.S. taxation of a shareholder who, as to the United States, is a nonresident alien individual, a foreign trust or estate, a foreign corporation or foreign partnership ("non-U.S. shareholder") depends on whether the income of the Fund is "effectively connected" with a U.S. trade or business carried on by the shareholder.
In addition to the rules described in this section concerning the potential imposition of withholding on distributions to non-U.S. persons, distributions to non-U.S. persons that are "financial institutions" may be subject to a withholding tax of 30% unless an agreement is in place between the financial institution and the U.S. Treasury to collect and disclose information about accounts, equity investments, or debt interests in the financial institution held by one or more U.S. persons or the institution is resident in a jurisdiction that has entered into such an agreement with the U.S. Treasury. For these purposes, a "financial institution" means any entity that (i) accepts deposits in the ordinary course of a banking or similar business, (ii) holds financial assets for the account of others as a substantial portion of its business, or (iii) is engaged (or holds itself out as being engaged) primarily in the business of investing, reinvesting or trading in securities, partnership interests, commodities or any interest (including a futures contract or option) in such securities, partnership interests or commodities. This withholding tax is also currently scheduled to apply to the gross proceeds from the disposition of securities that produce U.S. source interest or dividends. However, proposed regulations may eliminate the requirement to withhold on payments of gross proceeds from dispositions.
Distributions to non-financial non-U.S. entities (other than publicly traded foreign entities, entities owned by residents of U.S. possessions, foreign governments, international organizations, or foreign central banks) will also be subject to a withholding tax of 30% if the entity does not certify that the entity does not have any substantial U.S. owners or provide the name, address and TIN of each substantial U.S. owner. This withholding tax is also currently scheduled to apply to the gross proceeds from the disposition of securities that produce U.S. source interest or dividends. However, proposed regulations may eliminate the requirement to withhold on payments of gross proceeds from dispositions.
-59-
Income Not Effectively Connected. If the income from the Fund is not "effectively connected" with a U.S. trade or business carried on by the non-U.S. shareholder, distributions of investment company taxable income will generally be subject to a U.S. tax of 30% (or lower treaty rate), which tax is generally withheld from such distributions.
Distributions of capital gain dividends and any amounts retained by the Fund which are properly reported by the Fund as undistributed capital gains will not be subject to U.S. tax at the rate of 30% (or lower treaty rate) unless the non-U.S. shareholder is a nonresident alien individual and is physically present in the United States for more than 182 days during the taxable year and meets certain other requirements. However, this 30% tax on capital gains of nonresident alien individuals who are physically present in the United States for more than the 182 day period only applies in exceptional cases because any individual present in the United States for more than 182 days during the taxable year is generally treated as a resident for U.S. income tax purposes; in that case, he or she would be subject to U.S. income tax on his or her worldwide income at the graduated rates applicable to U.S. citizens, rather than the 30% U.S. tax. In the case of a non-U.S. shareholder who is a nonresident alien individual, the Fund may be required to withhold U.S. income tax from distributions of net capital gain unless the non-U.S. shareholder certifies his or her non-U.S. status under penalties of perjury or otherwise establishes an exemption. If a non-U.S. shareholder is a nonresident alien individual, any gain such shareholder realizes upon the sale or exchange of such shareholder's Shares of the Fund in the United States will ordinarily be exempt from U.S. tax unless the gain is U.S. source income and such shareholder is physically present in the United States for more than 182 days during the taxable year and meets certain other requirements.
In addition, capital gain distributions attributable to gains from U.S. real property interests (including certain U.S. real property holding corporations) will generally be subject to United States withholding tax and will give rise to an obligation on the part of the non-U.S. shareholder to file a United States tax return.
Distributions from the Fund that are properly reported by the Fund as an interest-related dividend attributable to certain interest income received by the Fund or as a short-term capital gain dividend attributable to certain net short-term capital gain income received by the Fund may not be subject to U.S. federal income taxes, including withholding taxes when received by certain non-U.S. shareholders, provided that the Fund makes certain elections and certain other conditions are met.
Income Effectively Connected. If the income from the Fund is "effectively connected" with a U.S. trade or business carried on by a non-U.S. shareholder, then distributions of investment company taxable income and capital gain dividends, any amounts retained by the Fund which are properly reported by the Fund as undistributed capital gains and any gains realized upon the sale or exchange of Shares of the Fund will be subject to U.S. income tax at the graduated rates applicable to U.S. citizens, residents and domestic corporations. Non-U.S. corporate shareholders may also be subject to the branch profits tax imposed by the Code. The tax consequences to a non-U.S. shareholder entitled to claim the benefits of an applicable tax treaty may differ from those described herein. Non-U.S. shareholders are advised to consult their own tax advisors with respect to the particular tax consequences to them of an investment in the Fund.
-60-
Capital Loss Carry-Forward
Net capital losses of the Fund may be carried forward indefinitely, and their character is retained as short-term and/or long-term losses. To the extent that these loss carry-forwards are used to offset future capital gains, it is probable that the capital gains so offset will not be distributed to Fund shareholders. The Fund is subject to certain limitations, under U.S. tax rules, on the use of capital loss carry-forwards and net unrealized built-in losses. These limitations generally apply when there has been a 50% change in ownership.
Other Taxation
Fund shareholders may be subject to state, local and foreign taxes on their Fund distributions. Shareholders are advised to consult their own tax advisors with respect to the particular tax consequences to them of an investment in the Fund.
Performance Information
To obtain the Fund's most current performance information, please call (800) 208-5212 or visit the Fund's website at www.innovatoretfs.com. From time to time, the Fund's performance information, such as yield or total return, may be quoted in advertisements or in communications to present or prospective shareholders. Performance quotations represent the Fund's past performance and should not be considered as representative of future results. The Fund will calculate its performance in accordance with the requirements of the rules and regulations under the 1940 Act, as they may be revised from time to time.
Financial Statements
The Fund has not yet commenced investment operations; therefore, financial information is not available at this time.
Control Persons and Principal Holders of Shares
A principal shareholder is any person who owns (either of record or beneficially) 5% or more of the outstanding shares of the Fund. A control person is one who owns, either directly or indirectly, more than 25% of the voting securities of a company or acknowledges the existence of control.
-61-
Exhibit A - Proxy Voting Guidelines
Egan-Jones Proxy Services
Standard Proxy Voting
Principles and Guidelines
Egan-Jones Proxy Voting Principles
Introduction
Our Proxy Voting Principles serve as the background for our Proxy Voting Guidelines, which, in turn, act as general guidelines for the specific recommendations that we make with respect to proxy voting. It is important to recognize that such principles are not intended to dictate but guide. Certain of the principles may be inappropriate for a given Company, or in a given situation. Additionally, the principles are evolving and should be viewed in that light. Our principles are and will be influenced by current and forthcoming legislation, rules and regulations, and stock exchange rules. Examples include:
| • | the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and implementing rules promulgated by the U.S. Securities & Exchange Commission |
| • | revised corporate governance listing standards of the New York Stock Exchange and resulting SEC rules |
| • | corporate governance reforms and subsequent proposed rule filings made with the SEC by The NASDAQ Stock Market, Inc. and resulting SEC rules |
In general:
| • | Directors should be accountable to shareholders, and management should be accountable to directors. |
| • | Information on the Company supplied to shareholders should be transparent. |
| • | Shareholders should be treated fairly and equitably according to the principle of one share, one vote. |
Principles
| A. | Director independence |
It is our view that:
| • | A two-thirds majority of the board should be comprised of independent directors. |
| • | Independent directors should meet alone at regularly scheduled meetings, no less frequently than semi-annually, without the Chief Executive Officer or other non-independent directors present. |
A-1
| • | When the Chairman of the Board also serves as the Company's Chief Executive Officer, the board should designate one independent director to act as a leader to coordinate the activities of the other independent directors. |
| • | Committees of the board dealing with the following responsibilities should consist only of independent directors: audit, compensation, nomination of directors, corporate governance, and compliance. |
| • | No director should serve as a consultant or service provider to the Company. |
| • | Director compensation should be a combination of cash and stock in the Company, with stock constituting a significant component. |
In our opinion, an independent director, by definition, has no material relationship with the Company other than his or her directorship. This avoids the potential for conflict of interest. Specifically such director:
| • | should not have been employed by the Company or an affiliate within the previous five years. |
| • | should not be an immediate family member of an individual who is, or at any time during the past five years was, employed by the Company as an executive officer. |
| • | should not be the founder of the Company. |
| • | should not be a director of the Company serving in an ex officio capacity. |
| • | should not be a member of the Company's Board of Directors for 10 years or more, however, a director who is a diverse nominee may be exempted from this rule on the case-by-case basis. Furthermore, a nominee whose tenure on the Board hasn't reached 10 years by the date of the meeting or up to 90 days after and provided the Company discloses exact appointment date, will be exempted from this rule. |
| • | should have no services contract regarding such matters as aircraft rental contract, real property lease or similar contract with the Company or affiliate, or with a member of the Company's senior management or provide legal or consulting services to the Company within the previous three years. |
| • | should not be employed by a public company at which an executive officer of the Company serves as a director, and thereby be part of an interlocking relationship. |
| • | should not be a member of the immediate family (spouse, parents, children, siblings, mothers and fathers-in-law, sons and daughters-in-law, brothers and sisters-in-law, and anyone other than domestic employees who share such person's home) of any director described above. |
| • | a director who receives, or whose immediate family member receives, more than $120,000 per year in direct compensation (base salary plus cash bonus) from the Company, other than director and committee fees and pension or other forms of deferred compensation for prior service (provided such compensation is not contingent in any way on continued service), is not independent until three years after he or she ceases to receive more than $120,000 per year in such compensation. |
| • | a director who is an executive officer or an employee, or whose immediate family member is an executive officer, of another company (other than a utility) or non-profit organization that makes payments to, or receives payments from, the Company for property or services in an amount which, in any single fiscal year, exceeds the greater of |
$1 million, or 2% of the recipient company's consolidated gross revenues, is not "independent" until three years after falling below such threshold. However, the existence of a credit agreement between a bank and the Company shall not affect the independence of a director who is an executive of that bank within the previous three years.
A-2
Alternate members of key committees will be subject to the same independence criteria as regular members.
| B. | Board operating procedures |
| • | The board should adopt a written statement of its governance principles, and regularly re-evaluate them. |
| • | Independent directors should establish performance criteria and compensation incentives for the Chief Executive Officer, and regularly review his or her performance against such criteria. Such criteria should align the interests of the CEO with those of shareholders, and evaluate the CEO against peer groups. |
| • | The independent directors should be provided access to professional advisers of their own choice, independent of management. |
| • | The board should have a CEO succession plan, and receive periodic reports from management on the development of other members of senior management. |
| • | Directors should have access to senior management through a designated liaison person. |
| • | The board should periodically review its own size, and determine a set number of directors between 5 and 15, instead of a range. |
| C. | Requirements for individual directors We recommend that: |
| • | The board should provide guidelines for directors serving on several Boards addressing competing commitments. |
| • | The board should establish performance criteria for itself and for individual directors regarding director attendance, preparedness, and participation at meetings of the board and of committees of the board, and directors should perform satisfactorily in accordance with such criteria in order to be re-nominated. |
| D. | Shareholder rights |
| • | A simple majority of shareholders should be able to amend the Company's bylaws, call special meetings, or act by written consent. |
| • | "Greenmail" should be prohibited. |
| • | Shareholder approval should be required to enact or amend a "poison pill" (i.e., "shareholder rights") plan |
| • | Directors should be elected annually. |
| • | The board should ordinarily implement a shareholder proposal that is approved by a majority of proxy votes. |
| • | Shareholders should have effective access to the director nomination process |
A-3
Egan-Jones Proxy Voting Guidelines
Consistent with the above-listed principles, the proxy voting guidelines outlined below are written to guide the specific recommendations that we make to our clients. Ordinarily, we do not recommend that clients ABSTAIN on votes; rather, we recommend that they vote FOR or AGAINST proposals (or, in the case of election of directors, that they vote FOR ALL nominees, AGAINST the nominees, or that they WITHHOLD votes for certain nominees). In the latter instance, the recommendation on our report takes the form ALL, EXCEPT FOR and lists the nominees from whom votes should be withheld.
Whether or not the guideline below indicates "case-by-case basis," every case is examined to ensure that the recommendation is appropriate.
Board Of Directors
Election of Directors in Uncontested Elections
Case-by-case basis, examining composition of board and key board committees, attendance history, corporate governance provisions and takeover activity, long-term company financial performance relative to a market index, directors' investment in the Company, etc..
WITHHOLD votes from nominees who:
| • | are affiliated outside directors and sit on the Audit, Compensation, or Nominating committees. |
| • | are inside directors and sit on the Audit, Compensation, or Nominating committees. |
| • | are inside directors and the Company does not have Audit, Compensation, or Nominating committees. |
| • | are identified as not independent by the Company and sit on the Audit, Compensation, or Nominating committees. |
| • | attend less than 75 percent of the board and committee meetings. Participation by phone is acceptable. |
| • | ignore a shareholder proposal that is approved by a majority of the shares outstanding. |
| • | ignore a shareholder proposal that is approved by a majority of the votes cast for two consecutive years. |
| • | fail to act on takeover offers where the majority of the shareholders have tendered their shares. |
| • | implement or renew a "dead-hand" or modified "dead-hand" poison pill. |
A-4
| • | sit on more than five other public boards. |
| • | serve as both Chairmen of the Board and CEOs and the Company receives a poor Board Score. |
| • | serve as CEOs and hold more than one outside public directorship^. |
| • | serve as Chairmen of the Board and hold more than one outside public directorship^. |
| • | sit on the existing board, which has failed to respond adequately to a say-on-pay vote in which the majority of votes cast voted AGAINST. |
| • | sit on the existing board, which has implemented a less frequent say-on-pay vote than the frequency option which received a majority of votes cast in the previous frequency vote. |
^ CEO/CHAIRMAN over-boarding exemption
If CEO or Chairman of the Company holds more than one other public company directorship, but one of these companies is a SPAC, he/she will be exempted from the Egan-Jones over-boarding rule.
Underperforming Board Policy
WITHHOLD votes from Compensation Committee members in cases when the Company obtains a questionable result on the Egan-Jones Compensation Score.*
*Recommendation is based on available data and subject to the analysts' discretion to override in cases when a nominee has served as a member of the Compensation Committee for less than 6 months.
WITHHOLD votes from Compensation Committee members in cases when the Company's Compensation Plans (Cash Bonus Plan or Stock Option Plan) receive an AGAINST recommendation from Egan-Jones.
WITHHOLD votes from Chairman of the Board in cases when the Company obtains the lowest score of Needs Attention on the Cyber Security Risk Score .**
**Recommendation is based on available data and subject to the analysts' discretion to override in cases when the Chairman has served in this capacity for less than 6 months.
WITHHOLD votes from Compensation Committee members due to insufficient disclosure on executive compensation.***
***Including cases when the Company has no employees or none of the executive officers are compensated by the Company and no management fees have been provided.
A-5
WITHHOLD votes from Chairman of the Nominating Committee when there are no women, ethnically or racially diverse directors on the Board.
WITHHOLD from the Board Chair if the company or its board adopted a classified board structure or supermajority vote requirements to amend the bylaws or charter.
Board Accountability
Case-by-case basis for the following:
| • | Evidence or belief of failure of the board to properly account and prepare for risk (i.e. carbon or cyber issues) |
| • | A low board score, coupled with poor performance |
| • | Legal or ethical problems in the Company or its management |
In cases in which the Company has engaged in the practice commonly referred to as "options backdating," Egan-Jones may recommend that votes be withheld from nominees serving on the Company's compensation committee, the Company's entire board of directors, and/or its chief executive officer. Such recommendations will be made on a case-by-case basis, taking into consideration such matters as intent of the individuals involved, scope and timing of the practice, significance of financial restatement required, and corrective action taken.
Furthermore, we may recommend withholding votes from either members of the Company's compensation committee, its entire board of directors and/or its chief executive officer where the Company has engaged in what we judge to be other unsatisfactory compensation practices. Considerations may include such factors as "pay-for-failure" executive severance provisions, change-in-control payments which are either excessive or which are not tied to loss of job or significant reduction in duties, excessive executive perquisites, unjustified changes in the performance standards applied to performance-based compensation, and executive compensation out of proportion to performance of the Company.
FOR shareholder proposals calling for the Company to name as directors only those who receive a majority of shareholder votes.
Separating Chairman and CEO
FOR shareholder proposals requiring that positions of Chairman and CEO be held separately.
Independent Directors
FOR shareholder proposals asking that a two-thirds majority of directors be independent.
FOR shareholder proposals asking that the board's Audit, Compensation, and/or Nominating committees be composed exclusively of independent directors.
FOR shareholder proposals that the Chairman OR lead director be independent.
A-6
Stock Ownership Requirements
AGAINST shareholder proposals requiring directors to own a minimum amount of the Company stock in order to qualify as a director or to remain on the board.
Term Limits
AGAINST shareholder proposals to limit tenure of outside directors.
Egan-Jones strongly encourages diversity and Board turnover without embracing the controversial and problematic approach of term limits or a retirement age. As long as a director nominee, whose tenure exceeds 10 years, is not a member of a key committee we will not recommend a vote to withhold from the nominee.
Retirement Age Limits
AGAINST shareholder proposals to impose a mandatory retirement age for outside directors.
FOR management proposals requesting the approval to remove the mandatory retirement age for directors and trustees.
AGAINST management and shareholder proposals that request placing age limit for a person to be elected or appointed as a director.
Director and Officer Indemnification and Liability
Case-by-case basis on management proposals regarding director and officer indemnification and liability, using Delaware law as the standard.
AGAINST management proposals to eliminate entirely directors and officers liability for monetary damages for violating the duty of care.
AGAINST management indemnification proposals that would expand coverage beyond legal expenses to acts, such as negligence, that are more serious violations of fiduciary obligation than mere carelessness.
FOR proposals authorizing exculpation of officers only in connection with direct claims brought by stockholders, including class actions, but without eliminating monetary liability of officers for breach of fiduciary duty arising out of claims brought by the corporation itself or for derivative claims brought by stockholders in the name of the corporation.
FOR management proposals providing such expanded coverage in cases when a director's or officer's legal defense was unsuccessful if (1) the director was found to have acted in good faith and in a manner that he or she reasonably believed was in the best interests of the Company, and (2) only if the director's legal expenses would be covered.
A-7
Charitable Contributions
AGAINST shareholder proposals regarding disclosure of charitable contributions.
Political Contributions
AGAINST shareholder proposals regarding disclosure of political contributions. FOR management proposals regarding approval of political contributions.
Lobbying Expenditures
AGAINST shareholder proposals for disclosure of lobbying expenditures.
AGAINST shareholder proposals requesting a report of climate lobbying.
AGAINST shareholder proposal requesting a third party review and report on lobbying activities alignment with position on universal health coverage.
Proxy Contests and Other Contested Elections
Election of Directors in Contested Elections
Case-by-case basis for voting for directors in contested elections, considering long-term financial performance of the target Company relative to its industry, management's track record, background to the proxy contest, qualifications of director nominees on both slates, evaluation of what each side is offering shareholders as well as likelihood that proposed objectives and goals will be met, and stock ownership positions.
FOR plurality voting standard in contested elections.
Universal Proxy Card in a Contested Election
FOR proposals requesting that the Company require the use of a universal proxy card in contested elections.
Reimbursement of Proxy Solicitation Expenses
Case-by-case basis for shareholder proposals for reimbursement of proxy solicitation expenses. FOR reimbursing proxy solicitation expenses where EGAN-JONES recommends in favor of the dissidents.
Auditors
Ratifying Auditors
FOR management proposals to ratify appointment of independent auditor unless:
| • | Auditor obtains a questionable result on the Egan-Jones Auditor Score which takes into account a number of factors including but not limited to: |
| Ø | Auditor rotation every seven years |
| Ø | Non-audit fees exceeding 50% of total fees |
A-8
| Ø | Significant and material disciplinary actions taken against the Company's Auditor |
| • | Auditor has a financial interest in or association with the Company, and is therefore not independent; or there is reason to believe that the independent auditor has rendered an opinion which is neither accurate nor indicative of the Company's financial position. |
Auditor Rotation
FOR shareholders proposals asking for auditor rotation.
FOR Shareholder proposal asking to limit the auditor from providing non-audit services.
Proxy Contest Defenses
Classified Board vs. Annual Election
AGAINST management proposals to classify the board.
FOR shareholder proposals to repeal ("de-stagger") classified boards and to elect all directors annually.
Removal of Directors
AGAINST management proposals that provide that directors may be removed only for cause.
FOR shareholder proposals to restore shareholder ability to remove directors with or without cause.
CASE-BY-CASE basis for shareholder proposal to remove a director, usually AGAINST unless there are compelling reasons to remove a director or a director does not fulfill Egan-Jones criteria examining independence, meetings attendance, other board memberships, then in such cases FOR.
AGAINST management proposals that provide that only continuing directors may elect replacements to fill board vacancies.
FOR shareholder proposals that permit shareholders to elect directors to fill board vacancies.
FOR shareholder proposals requesting multiple candidate elections.
Authorization of the Board to Fill (casual) Vacancies
FOR management proposals requesting that vacancies in the number of directors be designated as casual vacancies and that the Board of Directors be authorized to fill such vacancies as and when it deems fit. On condition that director appointed to fill such a casual vacancy shall hold office until the next annual meeting following his or her election or until his or her election or until his or her successor is elected.
A-9
Cumulative Voting
FOR management proposals to eliminate cumulative voting.
AGAINST shareholder proposals to provide for cumulative voting.
Calling Special Meetings
AGAINST management proposals to restrict or prohibit shareholder ability to call special meetings.
FOR management proposals asking to permit shareholders of record who own at least 10% of the Company's shares, have the ability to call a special meeting.
FOR shareholder proposals to allow shareholders holding at least 10% or more of the Company's shares, to call a special shareholder meeting regardless of length of stock ownership to the fullest extent possible, and proposals asking to give to give street name shares and non-street name shares an equal right to call for a special shareholder meeting.
Acting by Written Consent
Case by case for management proposals to restrict or prohibit shareholder ability to take action by written consent.
FOR shareholder proposals to allow or make easier shareholder action by written consent.
Altering Size of the Board
Management proposals regarding any Board size changes must require shareholder approval.
FOR management proposals to fix the size of the board as long as the number of directors is between 5 and 15.
FOR management proposals to set range of directors as long as there are not less than 5 and more than 15 directors on the board.
AGAINST management proposals that give management the ability to alter size of the board without shareholder approval.
AGAINST management proposals to allow the Board to fix number of directors without shareholder approval.
AGAINST management proposals to allow the Board to set range of directors without shareholder approval.
Case-by-case management proposals to approve unusual board size.
A-10
Virtual-only Meeting
FOR management proposals to conduct virtual-only annual meeting, considering shareholders' rights to participate electronically as they would have during an in-person meeting.
FOR proposals asking to allow the Company to hold a virtual meeting of shareholders along with an in-person meeting at a designated location.
Quorum Requirements
FOR proposals seeking approval of a lower quorum requirement if the reduced quorum is at least one-third of shares entitled to vote, either in person or by proxy.
Tender Offer Defenses
Poison Pills
FOR shareholder proposals that ask the Company to submit its "poison pill" for shareholder ratification.
AGAINST shareholder proposal requesting the Board authorize a self-tender offer.
Case-by-case basis for shareholder proposals to redeem the Company's existing "poison pill".
Case-by-case basis for management proposals to ratify a "poison pill".
Fair Price Provisions
Case-by-case basis for adopting fair price provisions, considering vote required to approve the proposed acquisition, vote required to repeal the fair price provision, and mechanism for determining the fair price.
AGAINST fair price provisions with shareholder vote requirements greater than a majority of disinterested shares.
Greenmail
FOR proposals to adopt anti-"greenmail" charter or bylaw amendments or otherwise restrict the Company's ability to make "greenmail" payments.
Case-by-case basis for anti-"greenmail" proposals which are bundled with other charter or bylaw amendments.
Pale Greenmail
Case-by-case basis for restructuring plans that involve the payment of pale greenmail.
Unequal Voting Rights
AGAINST dual-class exchange offers and dual-class recapitalizations.
A-11
Supermajority Requirement to Amend Certificate of Incorporation or Bylaws
FOR management proposals requesting elimination of supermajority voting provisions for amendments to the certificate of incorporation and bylaws.
AGAINST management proposals to require a supermajority shareholder vote to approve charter and bylaw amendments.
FOR shareholder proposals to lower supermajority shareholder vote requirements for charter and bylaw amendments.
FOR shareholder proposals asking that each bylaw amendment adopted by the board of directors not become effective until approved by shareholders.
Supermajority Requirement to Approve Mergers
AGAINST management proposals to require a supermajority shareholder vote to approve mergers and other significant business combinations.
FOR shareholder proposals to lower supermajority shareholder vote requirements for mergers and other significant business combinations.
Other Governance Proposals
Confidential Voting
FOR shareholder proposals that request that the Company adopt confidential voting, use independent tabulators, and use independent inspectors of election as long as the proposals include clauses for proxy contests as follows: In the case of a contested election, management should be permitted to request that the dissident group honor its confidential voting policy. If the dissidents agree, the policy remains in place. If the dissidents do not agree, the confidential voting policy is waived.
FOR management proposals to adopt confidential voting.
Equal Access
AGAINST shareholder proposals that would allow significant Company shareholders equal access to management's proxy material in order to evaluate and propose voting recommendations on proxy proposals and director nominees, and in order to nominate their own candidates to the board.
Proxy Access
FOR binding shareholder proxy access proposals considering the following criteria:
| • | 0.5% ownership threshold |
A-12
| • | Number of board members that may be elected - cap of 1/3 of board or minimum 2 nominees, if the board size is being lowered the calculation is based upon the original board size, if it is being increased the calculation would be based upon the original board size, with each new slot added to the total, so two plus six if six new board positions are being created |
| • | We prefer no limit or caps on the number of shareowners in the nominations group |
| • | Loaned securities will count towards total |
| • | We prefer that all participants affirm that they intend to be "long term shareholders" of the Company with at least 6 month ownership duration requirement |
| • | Proposals with no re-nominations restrictions are preferred. |
FOR shareholder proposals to improve Catch-22 Proxy Access to remove the shareholder group limit - to enable as many shareholders as may be needed to combine their shares to equal 3% of the stock owned continuously for 3-years in order to enable shareholder proxy access.
Bundled Proposals
Case-by-case basis for bundled or "conditioned" proxy proposals. Where items are conditioned upon each other, examine benefits and costs. AGAINST in instances when the joint effect of the conditioned items is not in shareholders' best interests. FOR if the combined effect is positive.
Shareholder Advisory Committees
Case-by-case basis for shareholder proposals establishing a shareholder advisory committee.
Capital Structure
Common Stock Authorization
AGAINST management proposals increasing the number of authorized shares of the class of stock that has superior voting rights in companies that have dual-class capitalization structures.
AGAINST management proposals to increase the number of authorized shares of common stock, or equivalents, that exceeds 50 percent of share capital, without a specified legitimate purpose.
FOR management proposals to increase the number of authorized shares of common stock more than 50 percent of currently issued common share capital, if tied to a specific transaction or financing proposal or if the share pool was used up due to equity plans.
Case-by-case basis on other such management proposals considering the specified purposes of the proposed increase, any explanation of risks to shareholders of failing to approve the request, potential dilution, and recent track record for using authorized shares, in which case judgment is applied to weigh such factors. Factors which are normally weighed in making such judgments include prior performance of the issuer, changes within the industry, relative performance within the industry, client preferences and overall good corporate governance. In general, we view the authorization of additional common shares to be ordinary and necessary and in the best long-term interests of the issuer and its shareholders.
A-13
Stock Distributions: Splits and Dividends
FOR management proposals to increase common share authorization for a stock split, provided that the increase in authorized shares would not result in an excessive number of shares available for issuance, considering the industry and the Company's returns to shareholders.
Reverse Stock Splits
FOR management proposals to implement a reverse stock split when the number of shares will be proportionately reduced to avoid delisting.
Case-by-case basis on management proposals to implement a reverse stock split that do not proportionately reduce the number of shares authorized for issuance taking into consideration stock price at the record date.
Preferred Stock
AGAINST management proposals authorizing creation of new classes of "blank check preferred stock" (i.e., classes with unspecified voting, conversion, dividend distribution, and other rights
Case-by-case basis on management proposals to increase the number of "blank check preferred shares" after analyzing the number of preferred shares available for issuance considering the industry and Company's returns to shareholders.
Blank Check Preferred Stock
FOR shareholder proposals to have placements of "blank check preferred stock" submitted for shareholder approval, except when those shares are issued for the purpose of raising capital or making acquisitions in the normal course.
Adjustments to Par Value of Common Stock
FOR management proposals to reduce the par value of common stock.
Preemptive Rights
Case-by-case basis on shareholder proposals that seek preemptive rights, considering size of the Company and shareholder characteristics.
Debt Restructurings
Case-by-case basis on management proposals to increase number of common and/or preferred shares and to issue shares as part of a debt restructuring plan, considering dilution, any resulting change in control.
FOR management proposals that facilitate debt restructurings except where signs of self- dealing exist.
A-14
Tracking Stock
Case-by-case basis for management proposals for creation of tracking stock, considering the strategic value of the transaction vs. adverse governance changes, excessive increases in authorized stock, inequitable distribution method, diminution of voting rights, adverse conversion features, negative impact on stock option plans, and other alternatives, such as spin-offs.
Stock buybacks
Case-by-case on management proposals requesting stock buybacks. AGAINST in cases when the Company receives one of the lowest two Compensation scores, FOR otherwise. When the Compensation Score is not available, Egan-Jones will recommendation FOR.
Compensation of Officers and Directors
Compensation of Officers and Directors
FOR compensation plans that result in an amount of dilution (or the equivalent value in cash) that is less than the maximum dilution determined by the Compensation Score.
AGAINST compensation plans that result in an excess amount of dilution (or the equivalent value in cash) that is more than the maximum dilution determined by the Compensation Score.
AGAINST compensation plans involving "pay for failure," such as excessively long contracts, guaranteed compensation, excessive severance packages, or other problematic practice not accounted for in the Egan-Jones compensation Score.
Case-by-case (but generally FOR) plans that are completely "decoupled" from the CEOs compensation and thus have no impact on the CEO's current or future total compensation.
Compensation Plan other than a Qualified ESPP at Special Purpose Acquisition Company
FOR compensation plans of the newly formed Company arising from a business combination with a special purpose acquisition Company (SPAC), unless the authorized share pool exceeds 3% of the newly formed Company's authorized shares.
Advisory Votes on Executive Compensation ("Say-on-Pay")
Case-by-case basis on advisory votes on executive compensation ("Say-on-Pay"), based on the result obtained by the Company in Egan-Jones Compensation Score. AGAINST a non-binding compensation advisory vote when the Company obtains a questionable result on the Egan-Jones Compensation Score, FOR otherwise.*
*In cases when the Company doesn't have a CEO or CEO is not the highest paid executive then Egan- Jones will use the Total Compensation and Salary paid to the highest paid NEO of the Company to calculate a Compensation Score.
AGAINST say-on-pay proposal and compensation committee members when executive employment agreements include tax gross-ups.
A-15
Relative Compensation is based upon a number of quantitative and qualitative metrics which produce a final score that is both forward looking and based upon the prior performance metrics of the Company's wealth creation and market capitalization as compared to the CEO's total compensation package. Higher wealth creation, market capitalization and lower CEO compensation all contribute to a higher compensation score. Additional qualitative measures such as 162m compliance, executive pension plan status and other relevant factors are then used to calculate the final score.
Advisory Votes Regarding Frequency of Advisory Votes on Executive Compensation
FOR management proposals that recommend that advisory votes on executive compensation take place annually.
AGAINST management proposals that recommend that advisory votes on executive compensation take place every two years or triennially.
Management Proposals Seeking Approval to Re-price Options
Case-by-case basis on management proposals seeking approval to re-price options.
Director Compensation
Case-by-case basis on stock-based plans for directors.
AGAINST shareholder proposals regarding advisory vote on directors' compensation.
Employee Stock Purchase Plans
Case-by-case basis on employee stock purchase plans.
Amendments that Place a Maximum Limit on Annual Grants or Amend Administrative Features
FOR plans that amend shareholder-approved plans to include administrative features or place maximum limit on annual grants that any participant may receive to comply with the provisions of Section 162(m) of the Omnibus Budget Reconciliation Act (OBRA).
Amendments to Added Performance-Based Goals
FOR amendments to add performance goals to existing compensation plans to comply with the provisions of Section 162(m) of OBRA.
Amendments to Increase Shares and Retain Tax Deductions under OBRA
Case-by-case basis on amendments to existing plans to increase shares reserved and to qualify the plan for favorable tax treatment under the provisions of Section 162(m).
A-16
Approval of Cash or Cash & Stock Bonus Plans
Case-by-case basis on cash or cash & stock bonus plans to exempt compensation from taxes under the provisions of Section 162(m) of OBRA.
Limits on Director and Officer Compensation
FOR shareholder proposals requiring additional disclosure of officer and director compensation.
Case-by-case basis for all other shareholder proposals seeking limits on officer and director compensation.
Golden Parachutes and Tin Parachutes
FOR shareholder proposals requesting that the Board seek shareholder approval of any senior manager's new or renewed pay package that provides for severance or termination payments with an estimated value exceeding 2.99 times the sum of the executive's base salary plus target short-term bonus.
Case-by-case basis on proposals to ratify or cancel "golden or tin parachutes."
Employee Stock Ownership Plans (ESOPs)
FOR proposals that request shareholder approval in order to implement an ESOP or to increase authorized number of shares for existing ESOPs, except in cases when the number of shares allocated to the ESOP is "excessive" (i.e., greater than five percent of outstanding shares).
401(k) Employee Benefit Plans
FOR proposals to implement a 401(k) savings plan for employees.
State of Incorporation
State Takeover Statutes
Case-by-case basis on proposals to opt in or out of state takeover statutes (including control share acquisition statutes, control share cash-out statutes, freeze-out provisions, fair price provisions, stakeholder laws, poison pill endorsements, severance pay and labor contract provisions, anti-"greenmail" provisions, and disgorgement provisions).
Reincorporation Proposals
Case-by-case basis on proposals to change the Company's state of incorporation.
A-17
Business Combinations and Corporate Restructurings
Charter Modification
Case-by-case basis for changes to the charter, considering degree of change, efficiencies that could result, state of incorporation, and regulatory standards and implications.
FOR approval of the amendments to the Company's bylaws to adopt an exclusive forum for internal corporate claims.
The Federal Forum Selection for the Securities Act Claims Amendment
FOR proposals asking to approve an amendment to the Certificate of Incorporation to add a new provision that, unless the Company selects or consents in writing to the selection of an alternative forum, the sole and exclusive forum for the resolution of any complainant, shall be the federal district courts of the United States of America.
Change of Domicile
Case-by-case basis for changes in state of domicile, considering state regulations of each state, required fundamental policies of each state; and the increased flexibility available.
Mergers and Acquisitions
Case-by-case basis on mergers and acquisitions, considering projected financial and operating benefits, offer price, prospects of the combined companies, negotiation process, and changes in corporate governance.
Corporate Restructuring
Case-by-case basis on corporate restructurings, including minority squeeze-outs, leveraged buyouts, spin-offs, liquidations, and asset sales.
Spin-offs
Case-by-case basis on spin-offs, considering tax and regulatory advantages, planned use of proceeds, market focus, and managerial incentives.
Asset Sales
Case-by-case basis on asset sales, considering impact on the balance sheet and working capital, and value received.
Liquidations
Case-by-case basis on liquidations considering management's efforts to pursue alternatives, appraisal value, and compensation for executives managing the liquidation.
A-18
Appraisal Rights
FOR providing shareholders with appraisal rights.
Mutual Fund Proxies
Election of Directors
Case-by-case basis for election of directors, considering board structure, director independence, director qualifications, compensation of directors within the fund and the family of funds, and attendance at board and committee meetings.
WITHHOLD votes for directors who:
| • | are interested directors and sit on key board committees (Audit or Nominating committees) |
| • | are interested directors and the Company does not have one or more of the following committees: Audit or Nominating. |
| • | attend less than 75 percent of the board and committee meetings. Participation by phone is acceptable. |
| • | ignore a shareholder proposal that is approved by a majority of shares outstanding |
| • | ignore a shareholder proposal that is approved by a majority of the votes cast for two consecutive years |
| • | serve as Chairman but are not independent (e.g. serve as an officer of the fund's advisor) |
Converting Closed-end Fund to Open-end Fund
Case-by-case basis for conversion of closed-end fund to open-end fund, considering past performance as a closed-end fund, market in which the fund invests, measures taken by the board to address the market discount, and past shareholder activism, board activity, and votes on related proposals.
Change from Diversified to Non-Diversified Fund
FOR approval of change from diversified to non-diversified fund.
A-19
Proxy Contests
Case-by-case basis on proxy contests, considering past performance, market in which fund invests, and measures taken by the board to address issues raised, past shareholder activism, board activity, and votes on related proposals.
Investment Advisory Agreements
Case-by-case basis on investment advisory agreements, considering proposed and current fee schedules, fund category and investment objective, performance benchmarks, share price performance relative to that of peers; and magnitude of any fee increase.
New Classes or Series of Shares
FOR creating new classes or series of shares.
Preferred Stock Authorization
Case-by-case basis for authorization for or increase in preferred shares, considering financing purpose and potential dilution for common shares.
1940 Act Policies
Case-by-case basis for 1940 Act policies, considering potential competitiveness, regulatory developments, current and potential returns, and current and potential risk.
Changing Fundamental Restriction to Non-fundamental
AGAINST on changing fundamental restriction to non-fundamental restriction.
Changing Fundamental Investment Objective to Non-fundamental
AGAINST proposals to change the fund's fundamental investment objective to non- fundamental.
Changing Fundamental Investment Policy to Non-Fundamental
AGAINST proposals to change the fund's fundamental investment policy to non-fundamental.
Name Rule Proposals
Case-by-case basis for name rule proposals, considering the following factors: political/economic changes in target market; bundling with quorum requirements or with changes in asset allocation, and consolidation in the fund's target market.
A-20
Disposition of Assets, Termination, Liquidation
Case-by-case basis for disposition of assets, termination or liquidation, considering strategies employed, Company's past performance, and terms of liquidation.
Change in Sub-classification
Case-by-case basis for change in sub-classification, considering potential competitiveness, current and potential returns, risk of concentration, and industry consolidation in the target industry.
Authorizing Board to Appoint and Terminate Sub-advisors without Shareholder Approval - "Manager of Managers" Structure
FOR approval of the use of a "Manager of Managers" structure that would permit the Fund's manager to appoint and replace sub-advisers and enter into, and materially amend, sub-advisory agreements for the Fund without obtaining prior shareholder approval, regardless of the level of sub-adviser's affiliation.
Distribution Agreements
Case-by-case basis for approving distribution agreements, considering fees charged to comparably sized funds with similar objectives, proposed distributor's reputation and past performance, and competitiveness of fund in industry.
Master-Feeder Structure
FOR establishment of a master-feeder structure.
Mergers
Case-by-case basis for proposed merger, considering resulting fee structure, performance of each fund, and continuity of management.
Advisory Vote on Merger Related Compensation
AGAINST "golden parachutes" which are abusive,
| • | such as those that exceed 3x of the cash severance or |
| • | if the cash severance multiple is greater than 2.99x or |
| • | contain tax gross-ups or |
| • | provide for accelerated vesting of equity awards, (however, pro-rata vesting of awards based on past service is acceptable) or |
| • | are triggered prior to completion of the transaction or |
| • | if the payouts are not contingent on the executive's termination. |
A-21
Extension Amendment Proposal for SPAC companies
Proposal asking to give the Company the right to extend the date by which the Company must consummate a merger, capital stock exchange, asset acquisition, stock purchase, reorganization or similar business combination. Case-by-case recommendation, if the pre-existing extension terms have been modified to reduce the amount required to be deposited in trust account, then Egan- Jones will recommend AGAINST.
Miscellaneous Shareholder Proposals
Governance
Independent Directors
FOR shareholder proposals asking that a three-quarters majority of directors be independent.
FOR shareholder proposals asking that board's Audit, Compensation, and/or Nominating committees be composed exclusively of independent directors.
FOR shareholder proposals that the Chairman OR lead director be independent.
Statement of the Purpose of a Corporation Review
AGAINST shareholder proposals requesting a review of the statement of the purpose of a corporation and make recommendations to shareholders on how the purpose of a corporation signed by the Chairman and Chief Executive Officer can be fully implemented.
Majority Voting in the Election of Directors
FOR shareholder proposals regarding majority voting in the election of Directors in uncontested meetings.
Election of Non-executive Directors
AGAINST shareholder proposals requesting election of non-executive directors.
Employee Representation on the Board of Directors
AGAINST shareholder proposals on employee representation on the Board of Directors.
Fair Elections/Advance Notice Bylaw
FOR shareholder proposals requesting that shareholder approval is required for any advance notice bylaw amendments that:
1. require the nomination of candidates more than 90 days before the annual meeting,
2. impose new disclosure requirements for director nominees, including disclosures related to past and future plans, or
3. require nominating shareholders to disclose limited partners or business associates, except to the extent such investors own more than 5% of the Company's shares.
A-22
CEO succession policy
FOR shareholder proposals requesting a CEO succession planning policy.
Report on Key-Person Risk
FOR shareholder proposals requesting a report on the Company's key-person risk, including identification of key persons and actions to ameliorate the impacts of their potential loss.
The Board's Nominee Disclosure Policy/ True Diversity Board Policy
Shareholder proposal requesting a policy to disclose to shareholders the following: a description of the specific minimum qualifications that the Board's nominating committee believes must be met by a nominee to be on the board of directors; and each nominee's skills, ideological perspectives, and experience presented in a chart or matrix form. Based on the overall Governance Score: FOR when the Company receives one of the lowest two scores; AGAINST otherwise
AGAINST shareholder proposals requesting that the Board of Directors review the Human Resources Committee's mandate in order for it to play a role in overseeing key strategies regarding organizational culture, human resources, engagement, health, well-being, equity, diversity and inclusion of employees and that it can ensure that such strategies and organizational culture include environmental, social and governance (ESG) principles.
Risk Oversight Committee / Public Policy Committee
Shareholder proposals requesting a report, at reasonable cost, omitting proprietary or legally privileged information, discussing the merits of establishing a risk oversight board committee to oversee the Company's policies including human rights, environment, domestic governmental regulations, foreign affairs and international relations affecting the Company's business. Based on the overall Governance Score: FOR when the Company receives one of the lowest two scores; AGAINST otherwise.
Creation of a New Technology Committee
Shareholder proposals that request that the Company create a new technology committee. Based on the Cybersecurity Risk Score, FOR in cases when the Company receives one of the lowest two scores; AGAINST otherwise.
AGAINST shareholder proposals requesting the Board review the mandate of the Corporate Governance Committee in order to include an ethical component concerning the use of artificial intelligence.
Decarbonization Committee
AGAINST shareholder proposals that request the board of directors establish a new committee to evaluate the risks and drawbacks of attempting to meet demands for the Company decarbonization.
Reimbursement of Shareholder for Expenses Incurred
CASE-BY-CASE for proposals for reimbursing proxy solicitation expenses in contested meetings.
FOR proposals for reimbursing proxy solicitation expenses in contested meetings in cases where EGAN-JONES recommends in favor of the dissidents.
A-23
Terminate the Investment Advisor
CAS-BY-CASE basis for proposals for terminating the investment advisor, considering fund's performance and history of shareholder relations.
Vote Tabulation
FOR shareholder proposals that request all matters presented to shareholders, other than the election of directors, shall be decided by a simple majority of the shares voted 'For' and 'Against' an item and abstentions from the vote count be excluded.
Proxy Voting Review
Shareholder proposal regarding proxy voting review report. Based on the overall Governance Score: FOR when the Company receives one of the lowest two scores; AGAINST otherwise.
Disclosure of Voting Results
FOR shareholder proposals requesting separate disclosure of voting results by classes of shares.
Right to Convert a Limited Amount of Class B Common Stock into Class A Common Stock
FOR shareholder proposals on annual right to convert a limited amount of class B Common Stock (10 votes per share) into Class A Common Stock (1 vote per share).
Maryland's Unsolicited Takeover Act
FOR shareholder proposals requesting that the Board opt out of MUTA, which allows the board of directors to make changes by board resolution only, without shareholder approval, to the Company's capital structure and charter/bylaws. These include, but are not limited to:
| Ø | the ability to re-classify a board; |
| Ø | the exclusive right to set the number of directors; |
| Ø | limiting shareholders' ability to call special meetings to a threshold of at least a majority of shares. |
Report on Whistleblower Policies and Practices
Based on the overall Governance Score: FOR when the Company receives one of the lowest two scores; AGAINST otherwise.
Mandatory Arbitration Bylaw
AGAINST shareholder proposals requesting that the Company adopt to a mandatory arbitration bylaw.
Shareholder proposal regarding a report on the impact of the use of mandatory arbitration on employees and workplace culture. Based on the overall Governance Score: FOR when the Company receives one of the lowest two scores; AGAINST otherwise.
Concealment Clauses
Shareholder proposal requesting additional reporting on risks associated with the use of certain concealment clauses. Based on the overall Governance Score: FOR when the Company receives one of the lowest two scores; AGAINST otherwise.
A-24
Shareholder proposals requesting that shareholders be allowed the opportunity at shareholder meetings to alert board members that the shareholders seek more information or favor a particular approach to corporate policy and that the Company constitution should include the clause: "The Company in general meeting may by ordinary resolution express an opinion or request information about the way in which a power of the Company partially or exclusively vested in the Directors has been or should be exercised. Such a resolution must relate to a material risk identified by the Directors or the Company and cannot advocate action that would violate any law or relate to any personal claim or grievance. Such a resolution is advisory only and does not bind the Directors or the Company". Based on the overall Governance Score: FOR when the Company receives one of the lowest two scores; AGAINST otherwise.
Executive Compensation
Tax Payments on Restricted Awards
AGAINST shareholder proposals to adopt a policy that the Company will pay the personal taxes owed on restricted stock awards on behalf of named executive officers.
Recovery of Unearned Management Bonuses
Shareholder proposals to adopt an executive compensation recoupment policy. Based on the Compensation Score: FOR when the Company receives one of the lowest two results; AGAINST otherwise.
Senior Executive Stock Retention
FOR shareholder proposals that request adoption of a policy requiring senior executives to retain a significant percentage of shares.
Deferral Period for Certain Compensation of Senior Executives
Shareholder proposals that request that the Compensation committee make the following changes to any annual cash incentive program ("Bonus Program"), as applicable to senior executives, in order to promote a longer-term perspective: an award to a senior executive under a Bonus Program that is based on one or more financial measurements whose performance measurement period is one year or shorter shall not be paid in full for a period following the award; and, the Committee shall develop a methodology for (a) determining the length of the Deferral Period and what proportion of a Bonus should be paid immediately; (b) adjusting the remainder of the Bonus over the Deferral Period in a manner that (i) allows accurate assessment of risks taken during the PMP that could have affected performance on the Financial Metric(s) and (ii) allows the Company to recoup Bonus compensation pursuant to its clawback policy; and (c) paying out the remainder of the Bonus at the end of the Deferral Period. Based on the Compensation Score: FOR when the Company receives one of the lowest two results on the Compensation Score; AGAINST otherwise.
Deduct Impact of Stock Buybacks from Executive Pay
Shareholder proposals that request the board of directors adopt a policy that the board will not utilize "earnings per share" ("EPS") or its variations (e.g., diluted or operating EPS) or financial ratios (return on assets or net assets or equity) in determining a senior executive's incentive compensation or eligibility for such compensation, unless the Board utilizes the number of outstanding shares on the beginning date of the performance period and excludes the effect of stock buybacks that may have occurred between that date and the end of the performance period. Based on the overall Governance Score: FOR when the Company receives one of the lowest two scores; AGAINST otherwise.
A-25
Government Service Golden Parachute
AGAINST shareholder proposals on policy prohibiting the vesting of equity-based awards (including stock options, restricted stock and other stock awards granted under an equity incentive plan), for senior executives due to a voluntary resignation to enter government service.
Nonqualified Savings Plan Earnings
AGAINST shareholder proposals to adopt a policy that prohibits the practice of paying above- market earnings on the non-tax-qualified retirement saving or deferred income account balances of senior executive officers.
GAAP Financial Metrics for Purposes of Determining Executive Compensation.
Shareholder proposals asking to adopt a policy that when using performance metrics to calculate senior executive compensation, the Company shall not adjust performance metrics that are calculated in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles (GAAP). Based on the Compensation Score: FOR when the Company receives one of the lowest two scores; AGAINST otherwise.
Stockholder proposals on non-GAAP measures disclosure, to adopt a policy that when the Company adjusts or modifies any generally accepted accounting principles ("GAAP") financial performance metric for determining senior executive compensation, it should include a specific explanation for each adjustment and a reconciliation of the adjusted metric to GAAP. Based on the Compensation Score: FOR when the Company receives one of the lowest two scores; AGAINST otherwise.
Legal and Compliance Costs in Executive Compensation metrics
Shareholder proposals requesting that financial performance metrics should not be adjusted to exclude legal or compliance costs in evaluating performance for incentive payouts to senior executives. Based on the Compensation Score: FOR when the Company receives one of the lowest two scores; AGAINST otherwise.
Shareholder proposal requesting inclusion of legal and compliance costs in incentive compensation metrics. Based on the Compensation Score: FOR when the Company receives one of the lowest two scores; AGAINST otherwise.
Tax Transparency
Shareholder proposals on tax transparency requesting that the Company issue a tax transparency report to shareholders, at reasonable expense and excluding confidential information, prepared in consideration of the indicators and guidelines set forth in the Global Reporting Initiative's (GRI) Tax Standard. Based on the Compensation Score: FOR when the Company receives one of the lowest two scores on the Governance Rating; AGAINST otherwise
A-26
ESG Metrics and Executive Compensation
Shareholder proposals asking that the Company prepare a report, at reasonable cost and omitting proprietary information, describing if, and how, it plans to integrate ESG metrics into the performance measures of named executive officers under the Company's compensation incentive plans. Based on the overall Compensation Score: FOR when the Company receives one of the lowest two scores; AGAINST otherwise.
Community Impacts and Company's Executive Compensation Program
Shareholder proposals asking that the Board of directors publish a report, at reasonable expense, within a reasonable time, and omitting confidential or propriety information, assessing the feasibility of integrating community stakeholder concerns and impacts into the Company's executive compensation program. Based on the overall Compensation Score: FOR when the Company receives one of the lowest two scores; AGAINST otherwise.
Target Amounts for CEO Compensation - Pay Disparity
Shareholder proposals requesting that the Company take into consideration the pay grades and/or salary ranges of all classifications of Company employees when setting target amounts for CEO compensation. Based on the Compensation Score: FOR when the Company receives one of the lowest two scores; AGAINST otherwise.
Equity Ratio Disclosure in Executive Compensation
Shareholder proposals requesting that the Company disclose equity ratio disclosure used by the compensation committee to set executive compensation. Based on the Compensation Score: FOR when the Company receives one of the lowest two scores; AGAINST otherwise.
AGAINST shareholder proposal on reform of executive compensation policy with social responsibility.
FOR shareholder proposals asking to ensure greater independence of compensation advisors.
FOR shareholder proposals to discontinue professional services allowance for NEOs.
Shareholder proposals on cessation of Stock Option and Bonus Programs. Based on the Compensation Score: FOR when the Company receives one of the lowest two scores on the Governance Rating; AGAINST otherwise
Executive Perquisites
Shareholder proposals requesting that payments and/or reimbursements to current and former Named Executive Officers (NEOs) for personal expenses be discontinued. Based on the overall Governance Score: FOR when the Company receives one of the lowest two scores; AGAINST otherwise.
Incentive Compensation and Risks of Material Losses
Shareholder proposals asking that the Company prepare a report, at reasonable cost, disclosing whether and how the Company has identified employees or positions, individually or as part of a group, who are eligible to receive incentive-based compensation that is tied to metrics that could have the ability to expose the Company to possible material losses, as determined in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles. Based on the Compensation Score: FOR when the Company receives one of the lowest two scores; AGAINST otherwise.
A-27
Advisory Vote on Executive Compensation
Shareholder proposals on adoption of advisory vote on executive compensation. Based on the Compensation Score: FOR when the Company receives one of the lowest two scores; AGAINST otherwise. Change from overall Governance Score.
Shareholder proposals on pay for superior performance. Based on the Compensation Score: FOR when the Company receives one of the lowest two scores; AGAINST otherwise.
Drug Pricing Strategies in Incentive Compensation Plans
AGAINST shareholder proposals requesting report on the extent to which risks related to public concern over drug pricing strategies are integrated into incentive compensation arrangements. The report should include, but need not be limited to, discussion of whether incentive compensation arrangements reward, or not penalize, senior executives for (i) adopting pricing strategies, or making and honoring commitments about pricing, that incorporate public concern regarding the level or rate of increase in prescription drug prices; and (ii) considering risks related to drug pricing when allocating capital.
Executive Pay Confidential Voting
FOR shareholder proposals to adopt a bylaw provision restricting management's access to vote tallies prior to the annual Meeting with respect to certain executive pay matters.
Clawback Provision Amendment of the Company Policy
Shareholder proposals requesting recoupment of awarded incentive pay and to state that conduct (intentional misconduct and not intentional misconduct) may trigger application of that policy. Based on the Compensation Score: FOR when the Company receives one of the lowest two results; AGAINST otherwise.
Quantifiable Performance Metrics
CASE-BY-CASE on shareholder proposals that request the board adopt the policy regarding quantifiable performance metrics. Based on the Compensation Score: FOR when the Company receives one of the lowest two scores; AGAINST otherwise.
Accelerated Vesting
FOR shareholder proposals to implement double triggered with pro-rata vesting of awards.
Dividends
CASE-BY-CASE basis for shareholder proposals to increase dividends, but generally AGAINST in the absence of a compelling reason for.
A-28
Shareholder Proposals on Social and Environmental Issues
Environment
AGAINST shareholder proposals asking the Company to issue a report in support of circular economy.
AGAINST shareholder proposals that request companies to follow the CERES Principles.
Generally AGAINST proposals requesting reports that seek additional information, unless it appears that the Company has not adequately addressed shareholders' relevant environmental concerns but FOR shareholder proposals requesting additional disclosure regarding hydraulic fracturing.
Shareholder proposals requesting that the Company issue an annual report to shareholders, at reasonable cost and omitting proprietary information, on plastic pollution. Based on the overall Governance Score: FOR when the Company receives one of the lowest two scores; AGAINST otherwise.
Shareholder proposals requesting a report on reduction of water pollution. Based on the overall Governance Score: FOR when the Company receives one of the lowest two scores; AGAINST otherwise.
AGAINST shareholder proposals promoting recycling.
AGAINST shareholder proposals requesting a report on recyclable packaging.
AGAINST shareholder proposals requesting a report on electronic waste.
AGAINST shareholder proposals on proper disposal of pharmaceuticals.
AGAINST shareholder proposals requesting a report on nanomaterials.
GHG Emissions
Shareholder proposals requesting that the Company adopt GHG emissions reductions goals and issue a report at reasonable cost and omitting proprietary information, on its plans to achieve these goals. Based on the overall Governance Score: FOR when the Company receives one of the lowest two scores; AGAINST otherwise.
Energy
Shareholder proposals to encourage energy conservation and the development of alternate renewable and clean energy resources and to reduce or eliminate toxic wastes and greenhouse gas emissions. Based on the overall Governance Score: FOR when the Company receives one of the lowest two scores; AGAINST otherwise.
A-29
Shareholder proposals requesting a report on renewable energy adoption. Based on the overall Governance Score: FOR when the Company receives one of the lowest two scores; AGAINST otherwise.
Shareholder proposals requesting a report on distributed - scale clean electricity. Based on the overall Governance Score: FOR when the Company receives one of the lowest two scores; AGAINST otherwise.
Shareholder proposals that request that the Board prepare, at reasonable expense and omitting proprietary information, a sustainability report. Based on the overall Governance Score: FOR when the Company receives one of the lowest two scores; AGAINST otherwise.
Shareholder proposals requesting that the Company nominate environmental expert to the Board of Directors. Based on the overall Governance Score: FOR when the Company receives one of the lowest two scores; AGAINST otherwise.
Climate Change
Shareholder proposals on establishing a climate change committee. Based on the overall Governance Score: FOR when the Company receives one of the lowest two scores; AGAINST otherwise.
Shareholder proposals requesting a report on climate change. Based on the overall Governance Score: FOR when the Company receives one of the lowest two scores; AGAINST otherwise.
Shareholder proposals requesting that the Company establish an annual advisory vote policy with respect to its environmental and climate change action plan and objectives. Based on the overall Governance Score: FOR when the Company receives one of the lowest two scores; AGAINST otherwise.
Shareholder proposals requesting environmental and social due diligence. Based on the overall Governance Score: FOR when the Company receives one of the lowest two scores; AGAINST otherwise.
Shareholder proposals requesting a report a report on 2-degree or 1.5-degree scenarios, IEA or IPCC reports, scenarios or assumptions, or any other climate- or net-zero transition-related models. Based on the overall Governance Score: FOR when the Company receives one of the lowest two scores; AGAINST otherwise.
Fiduciary Carbon-Emission Relevance Report
Shareholder proposals requesting a report evaluating the material factors relevant to decisions about whether a 2050 net-zero carbon goal is appropriate; factors such as economic consequences of adopting a 2050 net-zero carbon goal, technological feasibility for the company, the possibility that the climate models that underlie such goals are incorrect etc. Based on the overall Governance Score: FOR when the Company receives one of the lowest two scores; AGAINST otherwise.
A-30
Shareholder proposals requesting that the Company suspend memberships of industry associations that are involved in lobbying inconsistent with the goals of the Paris agreement. Based on the overall Governance Score: FOR when the Company receives one of the lowest two scores; AGAINST otherwise.
Shareholder proposals requesting a report on deforestation impacts in supply chain. Based on the overall Governance Score: FOR when the Company receives one of the lowest two scores; AGAINST otherwise.
Shareholder proposals requesting a report on limiting supply chain flaring. Based on the overall Governance Score: FOR when the Company receives one of the lowest two scores; AGAINST otherwise.
Shareholder proposals requesting a report on climate change and business model. Based on the overall Governance Score: FOR when the Company receives one of the lowest two scores; AGAINST otherwise.
Shareholder proposal requesting a report on investment of retirement funds in companies contributing to climate change. Based on the overall Governance Score: FOR when the Company receives one of the lowest two scores; AGAINST otherwise.
Shareholder proposals requesting a report on public advocacy on climate change and energy by relevant industry associations. Based on the overall Governance Score: FOR when the Company receives one of the lowest two scores; AGAINST otherwise.
Shareholder proposals requesting a report on stranded assets due to climate change. Based on the overall Governance Score: FOR when the Company receives one of the lowest two scores; AGAINST otherwise.
AGAINST shareholder proposals on privatization of pollution assets.
Shareholder proposals requesting a report on risks of petrochemical investments. Based on the overall Governance Score: FOR when the Company receives one of the lowest two scores; AGAINST otherwise.
AGAINST shareholder proposals on new fossil fuel financing requesting adoption of a policy in which the Company takes available actions to help ensure that its financing does not contribute to new fossil fuel supplies.
AGAINST shareholder proposals requesting that the Company commit to continuing to invest in and finance the oil and gas sector and conduct a review of any and all of its policies to ensure that there are none that have the effect of encouraging divestment from the sector.
Shareholder proposal requesting a report on quantitative metrics identified by the Sustainability Accounting Standards Board (SASB) as providing material information on water resource risks for the meat, poultry and dairy sector at reasonable expense and excluding confidential information. Based on the overall Governance Score: FOR when the Company receives one of the lowest two scores; AGAINST otherwise.
A-31
Shareholder proposals requesting a report on environmental expenditures (voluntary climate- related activities) including incurred costs and associated significant and actual benefits that have accrued to shareholders, the public health and the environment, including the global climate, from the Company's environment-related activities that are voluntary and that exceed U.S. and foreign compliance and regulatory requirements. Based on the overall Governance Score: FOR when the Company receives one of the lowest two scores; AGAINST otherwise.
AGAINST shareholder proposals requesting a report on electrification of the transporation sector.
AGAINST shareholder proposals requesting a report on environmentally sensitive, protected areas.
Health
AGAINST shareholder proposals requesting a report on sugar and public health. AGAINST shareholder proposals regarding cage free egg progress disclosure.
Shareholder proposals requesting a report on antibiotics in livestock. Based on the overall Governance Score: FOR when the Company receives one of the lowest two scores; AGAINST otherwise.
AGAINST shareholder proposals to adopt a policy to phase out the routine use of antibiotics in the meat and poultry supply chain.
AGAINST shareholder proposals on protein diversification.
AGAINST shareholder proposal on disclosure of pesticide management data, requesting that the Company disclose, at reasonable expense and omitting proprietary information, quantitative metrics demonstrating measurable progress toward the reduction of synthetic chemical pesticide use in the Company's supply chain.
Shareholder proposals that request the Company prepare a report disclosing the governance measures the Company has implemented to more effectively monitor and manage financial and reputational risks related to the opioid crisis in the U.S. Based on the overall Governance Score: FOR when the Company receives one of the lowest two scores; AGAINST otherwise.
Shareholder proposals that request the Compensation committee prepare a report on drug pricing. Based on the overall Governance Score: FOR when the Company receives one of the lowest two scores; AGAINST otherwise.
AGAINST shareholders proposals that request fair distribution and access to life- sustaining drugs and vaccines in affordable prices in both the United States and in low- income countries.
A-32
Shareholder proposal requesting a report on transfer of intellectual property to potential COVID- 19 manufacturers. Based on the overall Governance Score: FOR when the Company receives one of the lowest two scores; AGAINST otherwise.
Shareholder proposal requesting report on government financial support and access to COVID- 19 vaccines and therapeutics. Based on the overall Governance Score: FOR when the Company receives one of the lowest two scores; AGAINST otherwise.
Shareholder proposal requesting a report on public health costs of protecting vaccine technology. Based on the overall Governance Score: FOR when the Company receives one of the lowest two scores; AGAINST otherwise.
Shareholder proposals requesting that the Company discontinue global sales of baby powder containing talc. Based on the overall Governance Score: FOR when the Company receives one of the lowest two scores; AGAINST otherwise.
AGAINST shareholder proposals requesting a report on the Company's efforts, to identify and reduce environmental and health hazards associated with past, present and future handling of coal combustion residuals and how those efforts may reduce legal, reputational and financial risks to the Company.
AGAINST shareholder proposals requesting that the Company prepare an independent third- party audit on driver health and safety.
AGAINST shareholder proposals requesting a report on health risks of continued in-store tobacco sales.
AGAINST shareholder proposals seeking support for the descheduling of Cannabis.
Social
AGAINST shareholders proposal requesting that the Company create a committee to prepare a report regarding the impact of plant closure on communities and alternatives to help mitigate the effects.
AGAINST shareholder proposals on transition to a public benefit corporation.
AGAINST shareholder proposals on financial initiatives that promote and strengthen communities, focusing on not only their economic effect but their social impact as well.
Northern Ireland
AGAINST proposals related to the MacBride Principles.
A-33
Military Business
Proposals on defense issues. Based on the overall Governance Score: FOR when the Company receives one of the lowest two scores; AGAINST otherwise.
Proposals requesting reports that seek additional information on military related operations, unless the Company has been unresponsive to shareholder relevant requests. Based on the overall Governance Score: FOR when the Company receives one of the lowest two scores; AGAINST otherwise.
Shareholder proposals requesting a report on policies regarding military and militarized policing agencies. Based on the overall Governance Score: FOR when the Company receives one of the lowest two scores; AGAINST otherwise. Change from AGAINST.
Shareholder proposals requesting a report on development of products for military. Based on the overall Governance Score: FOR when the Company receives one of the lowest two scores; AGAINST otherwise. Change from AGAINST.
Human Rights, Labor Issues
Shareholder proposals on establishing a human rights committee. Based on the overall Governance Score: FOR when the Company receives one of the lowest two scores; AGAINST otherwise.
Shareholder proposals requesting that the Company nominate for election at least one director with human/civil rights expertise. Based on the overall Governance Score: FOR when the Company receives one of the lowest two scores; AGAINST otherwise.
Shareholder proposals seeking a human rights report or human rights due diligence process to assess, identify, prevent and mitigate actual and potential adverse human rights impacts. Based on the overall Governance Score: FOR when the Company receives one of the lowest two scores; AGAINST otherwise.
Shareholder proposals requesting a report evaluating the efficacy of the Company's existing policies and practices to address the human rights impacts of its content management policies to address misinformation and disinformation across its platforms. Based on the overall Governance Score: FOR when the Company receives one of the lowest two scores; AGAINST otherwise.
Shareholder proposals requesting a report on data privacy. Based on the overall Governance Score: FOR when the Company receives one of the lowest two scores; AGAINST otherwise.
Shareholder proposals seeking reports on the Company's activities affecting indigenous peoples. Based on the overall Governance Score: FOR when the Company receives one of the lowest two scores; AGAINST otherwise.
AGAINST shareholder proposal regarding human and indigenous peoples' rights and asking the Company to modify its committee charters, bylaws and/or articles of incorporation, to articulate the fiduciary duties of Board and management to ensure due diligence on human and indigenous peoples' rights.
A-34
AGAINST shareholder proposals requesting the Board institute transparent procedures to avoid holding investments in companies that, in management's judgment, substantially contribute to genocide or crimes against humanity, the most egregious violations of human rights.
Freedom of Expression
Shareholder proposals on policies of freedom of expression - to report annually to shareholders, at reasonable expense and excluding confidential and proprietary information, regarding the Company's policies on freedom of expression and access to information, including whether it has publicly committed to respect freedom of expression as a human right; the oversight mechanisms for formulating and administering policies on freedom of expression and access to information. Based on the overall Governance Score: FOR when the Company receives one of the lowest two scores; AGAINST otherwise.
Non-Partisanship/ Political Speech
AGAINST shareholder proposals requesting that the Board of Directors encourage a senior management commitment to avoid supporting or taking a public position on any controversial social or political issues (collectively "political speech"), without having previously, comprehensively and without bias justified by action on the basis of underlying business strategy, exigencies, and priorities.
Freedom of Association
Shareholder proposal regarding adoption of policy on the Company's commitment to respect the rights to freedom of association and collective bargaining in its operations. Based on the overall Governance Score: FOR when the Company receives one of the lowest two scores; AGAINST otherwise.
AGAINST shareholder proposals requesting a third-party audit on workers' freedom of association and collective bargaining rights.
Shareholder proposals requesting workplace safety reports: Based on the overall Governance Score: FOR when the Company receives one of the lowest two scores; AGAINST otherwise.
Shareholder proposals requesting that the Company issue a report, at reasonable cost and omitting proprietary information, to include key performance indicators on human capital management related to the Company's portfolio, including reporting on the number and types of complaints received from employees, including contractors and temporary workers, the remedies offered under its grievance mechanism and the percentage of complaints resolved. Based on the overall Governance Score: FOR when the Company receives one of the lowest two scores; AGAINST otherwise.
Shareholder proposals to report to shareholders on the Company's minimum requirements and standards related to workforce practices. Based on the overall Governance Score: FOR when the Company receives one of the lowest two scores; AGAINST otherwise.
A-35
Shareholder proposals regarding a slavery and human trafficking report. Based on the overall Governance Score: FOR when the Company receives one of the lowest two scores; AGAINST otherwise.
Shareholder proposals requesting a report assessing the risk of increased sexual exploitation of children as the Company develops and offers additional privacy tools. Based on the overall Governance Score: FOR when the Company receives one of the lowest two scores; AGAINST otherwise.
Shareholder proposals requesting a disclosure whether the Company's business operations involve, rely or depend on child labor. Based on the overall Governance Score: FOR when the Company receives one of the lowest two scores; AGAINST otherwise.
Shareholder proposals requesting that the Company prepare an annual report regarding sexual harassment complaints. Based on the overall Governance Score: FOR when the Company receives one of the lowest two scores; AGAINST otherwise.
Shareholder proposals requesting that the Company issue a report on prison labor in supply chain. Based on the overall Governance Score: FOR when the Company receives one of the lowest two scores; AGAINST otherwise.
AGAINST on proposals relating to the Maquiladora Standards and international operating policies.
AGAINST proposals requesting reports on international operating policy issues, unless it appears the Company has not adequately addressed shareholder relevant concerns.
AGAINST shareholder proposals requesting a report, omitting confidential and privileged information and at reasonable expense, detailing any known or potential risks and costs to the company caused by enacted or proposed state policies severely restricting reproductive rights, and
detailing any strategies beyond litigation and legal compliance that the company may deploy to minimize or mitigate these risks.
AGAINST shareholder proposals relating to reproductive rights and consumer data privacy.
AGAINST shareholder proposals supporting activities that include abortion, euthanasia or assisted suicide.
AGAINST shareholder proposals promoting in vitro fertilization for either assisting conception or for research.
World Debt Crisis
AGAINST proposals dealing with Third World debt.
AGAINST proposals requesting reports on Third World debt issues, unless it appears the Company has not adequately addressed shareholder relevant concerns.
A-36
Diversity, Equity and Inclusion
Shareholder proposals asking the Company to set a diversity target (of min of 40%) for the composition of its Board. Based on the overall Governance Score: FOR when the Company receives one of the lowest two scores; AGAINST otherwise.
Shareholder proposals requesting establishment of equal employment opportunity policy. Based on the overall Governance Score: FOR when the Company receives one of the lowest two scores; AGAINST otherwise.
Report on Diversity and Inclusion
Shareholder proposals requesting a report on the effectiveness of the Company's diversity, equity, and inclusion efforts. The report should be done at reasonable expense, exclude proprietary information, and provide transparency on outcomes, using quantitative metrics for hiring, retention, and promotion of employees, including data by gender, race, and ethnicity. Based on the overall Governance Score: FOR when the Company receives one of the lowest two scores; AGAINST otherwise.
DE&I Policies Third Party - Audit Racial Equity/Civil Rights Audit
AGAINST shareholder proposals that request the Board of Directors commission an audit analyzing the impacts of the Company's Equity, Diversity & Inclusion policies on civil rights, non-discrimination and returns to merit, and the impacts of those issues on the Company's business. The audit may, in the Board's discretion, be conducted by an independent and unbiased third party with input from civil rights organizations, public-interest litigation groups, employees and shareholders of a wide spectrum of viewpoints and perspectives. A report on the audit, prepared at reasonable cost and omitting confidential or proprietary information, should be publicly disclosed on the Company's website.
Report on effects of DE&I /Report on Discrimination Risk Oversight and Impact
Shareholders proposals requesting that the Board of Directors conduct an evaluation and issue a report within the next year, at reasonable cost and excluding proprietary information and disclosure of anything that would constitute an admission of pending litigation, evaluating how it oversees risks related to discrimination against individuals based on their race, color, religion (including religious views), sex, national origin, or political views, and whether such discrimination may impact individuals' exercise of their constitutionally protected civil rights. Based on the overall Governance Score: FOR when the Company receives one of the lowest two scores; AGAINST otherwise.
Report on a cost/benefit analysis of its Diversity, Equity & Inclusion programs
Shareholder proposals requesting a report, omitting proprietary or confidential information and considering all relevant costs and benefits, including the reputational costs arising from discriminating on the basis of race, sex and orientation; the financial costs of selecting employees on bases other than merit; the costs associated with relying on incomplete or biased evidence, and related costs. Based on the overall Governance Score: FOR when the Company receives one of the lowest two scores; AGAINST otherwise.
AGAINST shareholder proposals asking that the Company rescind the Racial Equity Audit.
A-37
Shareholder proposals requesting a racial equity audit or a report on progress toward eliminating racial discrimination at the Company. Based on the overall Governance Score: FOR when the Company receives one of the lowest two scores; AGAINST otherwise.
Shareholder proposals regarding assessing inclusion in the workplace and requesting a report to shareholders on whether written policies or unwritten norms at the Company reinforce racism in the Company culture. Based on the overall Governance Score: FOR when the Company receives one of the lowest two scores; AGAINST otherwise.
Shareholder proposals on gender pay gap. Based on the overall Governance Score: FOR when the Company receives one of the lowest two scores; AGAINST otherwise.
Shareholder proposal requesting paid sick leave for all employees. Based on the overall Governance Score: FOR when the Company receives one of the lowest two scores; AGAINST otherwise.
Shareholder proposals requesting a report on worker misclassification. Based on the overall Governance Score: FOR when the Company receives one of the lowest two scores; AGAINST otherwise.
Inclusive Hiring or Fair Chance Employment
Shareholder proposals requesting a report on hiring practices related to people with arrest or incarceration records. Based on the overall Governance Score: FOR when the Company receives one of the lowest two scores; AGAINST otherwise.
Shareholder proposals requesting that the Company issue a report on ethical recruitment in global supply chains. Based on the overall Governance Score: FOR when the Company receives one of the lowest two scores; AGAINST otherwise.
AGAINST shareholder proposal requesting disclosure of languages in which the directors are fluent in the skills and expertise matrix of the circular.
Animal Rights
AGAINST proposals that deal with animal rights.
AGAINST shareholder proposal supply chain practices report focusing on animal welfare.
Nonhuman primates report
AGAINST shareholder proposals requesting that the Board report to shareholders annually on the species, country of origin (including wild-caught or captive-bred, omitting proprietary information), and numbers of nonhuman primates imported by the company into the U.S.; the species and numbers of nonhuman primates transported within the country; and measures the company is taking to mitigate its impact on dwindling populations in nature.
A-38
Product Integrity and Sales, Marketing and Advertising
AGAINST shareholder proposals requesting a report on the Company's activities related to safety measures and mitigation of harm associated with Company products.
AGAINST shareholder proposals on reducing sales and marketing of socially questionable products, including but not limited to alcohol, drugs, tobacco, weapons.
Shareholder proposals asking for responsible sourcing details of product. Based on the Governance Rating score: FOR when the Company receives one of the lowest two scores on the Governance Rating; AGAINST otherwise.
Shareholder proposals requesting a policy to pause sourcing of cotton and other raw materials from China. Based on the Governance Rating score: FOR when the Company receives one of the lowest two scores on the Governance Rating; AGAINST otherwise.
AGAINST shareholder proposals regarding a report on plant-based milk pricing.
AGAINST shareholder proposals requesting that the Company voluntarily label genetically engineered (GE) ingredients in its products.
AGAINST shareholder proposals that request the Company prepare a report, at reasonable expense and omitting proprietary information, assessing actual and potential material financial risks or operational impacts on the Company related to these genetically modified organisms (GMO issues).
Shareholder proposals that request the Company prepare a report, on the social, health, and environmental effects of genetically modified organisms (GMOs). Based on the overall Governance Score: FOR when the Company receives one of the lowest two scores; AGAINST otherwise.
AGAINST shareholder proposals to eliminate GE ingredients from the Company's products, or proposals asking for reports outlining the steps necessary to eliminate GE ingredients from the Company's products.
AGAINST shareholder proposals requesting that the Company make nicotine level information available to customers and begin reducing nicotine levels in the brands to a less addictive level.
Impact of Extended Patent Exclusivities on Product Access
Shareholder proposals requesting a report on a process by which the impact of extended patent exclusivities on product access would be considered in deciding whether to apply for secondary and tertiary patents. Based on the Governance Rating score: FOR when the Company receives one of the lowest two scores on the Governance Rating; AGAINST otherwise.
A-39
Shareholder proposals requesting a report on external costs of disinformation in digital advertising. Based on the Governance Rating score: FOR when the Company receives one of the lowest two scores on the Governance Rating; AGAINST otherwise.
Assessment of the Company's advertising and marketing practices
Shareholder proposals requesting a report, at reasonable expense and excluding proprietary information, assessing whether the Company's advertising and marketing practices may pose financial and/or reputational risks sufficient to have material impacts on the company's finances and operations due to levels of gun violence. Based on the Governance Rating score: FOR when the Company receives one of the lowest two scores on the Governance Rating; AGAINST otherwise.
Certification of Sound Commercial Practices Related to the Selling of Financial Products and Services Based on the overall Governance Score: FOR when the Company receives one of the lowest two scores; AGAINST otherwise.
Political Advertising and Posts
Shareholder proposals asking that the Board of Directors prepare, at a reasonable cost and excluding proprietary information, a report on the controversy surrounding political advertising and posts. Such report should evaluate the implications of the Company's policies that may exempt politicians' posts and political advertisements from elements of platform rules such as the Company's Community Standards and its fact-checking process. Based on the overall Governance Score: FOR when the Company receives one of the lowest two scores; AGAINST otherwise.
Algorithm Disclosure
Shareholder proposals requesting that the Company provide more quantitative and qualitative information on how algorithm systems are used to target and deliver ads, error rates, and the impact these systems had on user speech and experiences. Based on the overall Governance Score: FOR when the Company receives one of the lowest two scores; AGAINST otherwise.
Anticompetitive Practices
Shareholder proposal regarding a report on board oversight of risks related to anticompetitive practices. Based on the Governance Rating score: FOR when the Company receives one of the lowest two scores on the Governance Rating; AGAINST otherwise.
Report on Takedown Requests
Shareholder proposals regarding a report (within a reasonable time frame, at reasonable cost, and excluding confidential information) assessing the feasibility of public disclosing on an annual basis, by jurisdiction, the list of delisted, censored, downgraded, proactively penalized, or blacklisted terms, queries or sites that the Company implements in response to government requests. Based on the overall Governance Score: FOR when the Company receives one of the lowest two scores; AGAINST otherwise.
A-40
Competitiveness and Protection of Personal Information
AGAINST shareholder proposals requesting that the Board of directors inform the shareholders of the investments the bank/company intends to make to update its computer systems so as to increase its competitiveness while enhancing privacy protection.
Facial Recognition Technology
Shareholder proposals on prohibition on sales of facial recognition technology to all government entities. Based on the overall Governance Score: FOR when the Company receives one of the lowest two scores; AGAINST otherwise. Change from AGAINST.
Business Operations and Ethics, Fair Practice
Provision of Services in Conflict Zones policy
AGAINST shareholder proposals requesting a policy on access to services in conflict zones. i.e. that the people in those regions do not suffer discriminatory exclusion from the Company's financial services, or alternatively, if the Company chooses not to establish this policy, provide an evaluation of the economic impact the policy of exclusion has on the affected populations as well as the company's finances, operations and reputation.
Politicized de-banking
Shareholder proposals requesting a report on politicized de-banking evaluating the Company's policies or practices to make sure there are sufficient safeguards to prevent political or religious discrimination. Based on the Governance Rating score: FOR when the Company receives one of the lowest two scores on the Governance Rating; AGAINST otherwise.
AGAINST shareholder proposals requesting a congruency report on partnerships with globalist organizations that facilitate collaboration between businesses, governments and NGOs for social and political ends against the Company's fiduciary duty to shareholders.
Shareholder proposals seeking disclosure of business operations in high risk countries or conflict complicit governments. Based on the Governance Rating score: FOR when the Company receives one of the lowest two scores on the Governance Rating; AGAINST otherwise.
Content Management Report/Content Enforcement Policies
Shareholder proposals requesting a report reviewing the efficacy of its enforcement of its terms of service related to content policies and assessing the risks posed by content management controversies. Based on the overall Governance Score: FOR when the Company receives one of the lowest two scores; AGAINST otherwise.
Cybersecurity
Shareholder proposals requesting a report on cyber risk. Based on the Cyber Security Risk Score: FOR when the Company receives one of the lowest two scores ; AGAINST otherwise.
In rare cases, Egan-Jones may choose to override the documented guideline recommendation when we believe it to be in the best long-term financial interest of shareholders.
A-41
Innovator ETFs® Trust
Part C - Other Information
| Item 28. | Exhibits |
| Exhibit No. | Description |
| (b) | By-Laws of the Registrant is incorporated by reference to the Registrant's Registration Statement on Form N-1A (File No. 333-146827) filed on October 19, 2007. |
| (c) | Not Applicable |
| (2) | Revised Schedule A to the Investment Management Agreement by and between the Registrant, on behalf of the Fund, and Innovator Capital Management, LLC, to be filed by post-effective amendment. |
| (4) | Revised Schedule A to the Sub-Advisory Agreement by and between the Registrant, Innovator Capital Management, LLC and Milliman Financial Risk Management LLC, to be filed by post-effective amendment. |
C-1
| (2) | Revised Exhibit A to the Distribution Agreement by and between the Registrant and Foreside Fund Services, LLC, to be filed by post-effective amendment. | |
| (f) | Not Applicable | |
| (3) | Revised Exhibit B to the Custody Agreement by and between the Registrant and U.S. Bank National Association, to be filed by post-effective amendment. | |
| (3) | Revised Exhibit A to the Fund Accounting Servicing Agreement by and between the Registrant and U.S. Bancorp Fund Services, LLC, to be filed by post-effective amendment. | |
C-2
| (6) | Revised Exhibit A to the Fund Administration Servicing Agreement by and between the Registrant and U.S. Bancorp Fund Services, LLC, to be filed by post-effective amendment. | |
| (9) | Revised Exhibit A to the Transfer Agent Servicing Agreement by and between the Registrant and U.S. Bancorp Fund Services, LLC, to be filed by post-effective amendment. | |
| (10) | Form of Authorized Participant Agreement is incorporated by reference to the Registrant's Registration Statement on Form N-1A (File No. 333-146827) filed on November 7, 2017. | |
| (i) | Form of Opinion and consent of Chapman and Cutler LLP, is filed herewith | |
| (j) | Not Applicable |
| (k) | Not Applicable |
| (l) | Not Applicable |
| (m) | Not Applicable |
| (n) | Not Applicable |
| (o) | Not Applicable |
| (p)(1) | Code of Ethics of Innovator ETFs Trust is incorporated by reference to the Registrant's Registration Statement on Form N-1A (File No. 333-146827) filed on February 28, 2020. |
| (2) | Code of Ethics of Innovator Capital Management, LLC is incorporated by reference to the Registrant's Registration Statement on Form N-1A (File No. 333-146827) filed on February 28, 2020. |
| (3) | Code of Ethics of Milliman Financial Risk Management LLC is incorporated by reference to the Registrant's Registration Statement on Form N-1A (File No. 333-146827) filed on July 12, 2018. |
| (4) | Code of Ethics of Foreside Fund Services, LLC is incorporated by reference to the Registrant's Registration Statement on Form N-1A (File No. 333-146827) filed on November 7, 2017. |
| (q) | Powers of Attorney is incorporated by reference to the Registrant's Registration Statement on Form N-1A (File No. 333-146827) filed on May 28, 2024. |
C-3
| Item 29. | Persons Controlled By or Under Common Control with Registrant |
Not Applicable
| Item 30. | Indemnification |
Under the terms of the Delaware Statutory Trust Act ("DSTA") and the Registrant's Agreement and Declaration of Trust ("Declaration of Trust"), no officer or trustee of the Registrant shall have any liability to the Registrant, its shareholders, or any other party for damages, except to the extent such limitation of liability is precluded by Delaware law, the Declaration of Trust or the By-Laws of the Registrant.
Subject to the standards and restrictions set forth in the Declaration of Trust, DSTA, Section 3817, permits a statutory trust to indemnify and hold harmless any trustee, beneficial owner or other person from and against any and all claims and demands whatsoever. DSTA, Section 3803 protects trustees, officers, managers and other employees, when acting in such capacity, from liability to any person other than the Registrant or beneficial owner for any act, omission or obligation of the Registrant or any trustee thereof, except as otherwise provided in the Declaration of Trust.
Insofar as indemnification for liability arising under the Securities Act or 1933, as amended (the "Act") may be permitted to trustees, officers and controlling persons of the Registrant pursuant to the forgoing provision, or otherwise, the registrant has been advised that in the opinion of the Securities and Exchange Commission such indemnification is against public policy as expressed in the Act and is, therefore, unenforceable. In the event that a claim for indemnification against such liabilities (other than the payment by the registrant of expenses incurred or paid by a trustee, officer or controlling person of the registrant in the successful defense of any action, suit or proceeding) is asserted by such trustee, officer or controlling in connection with the securities being registered, the registrant will, unless in the opinion of its counsel, the matter has been settled by controlling precedent, submit to a court of appropriate jurisdiction the question whether such indemnification by it is against public policy as expressed in the Act and will be governed by the final adjudication of such issue.
C-4
| Item 31. | Business and Other Connections of the Investment Adviser |
Certain information pertaining to the business and other connections of Innovator Capital Management, LLC, the investment adviser to the Fund, is hereby incorporated by reference from the Prospectus and Statement of Additional Information contained herein. The information required by this Item with respect to any director, officer or partner of Innovator Capital Management, LLC is incorporated by reference to the Form ADV filed by Innovator Capital Management, LLC with the Securities and Exchange Commission pursuant to the Investment Advisers Act of 1940, as amended (File No. 801-110111).
Certain information pertaining to the business and other connections of Milliman Financial Risk Management LLC, the investment sub-adviser to the Fund, is hereby incorporated by reference from the Prospectus and Statement of Additional Information contained herein. The information required by this Item with respect to any director, officer or partner of Milliman Financial Risk Management LLC is incorporated by reference to the Form ADV filed by Milliman Financial Risk Management LLC with the Securities and Exchange Commission pursuant to the Investment Advisers Act of 1940, as amended (File No. 801-73056).
| Item 32. | Principal Underwriter |
| (a) | Foreside Fund Services, LLC (the "Distributor") serves as principal underwriter for the following investment companies registered under the Investment Company Act of 1940, as amended: |
| 1. | ABS Long/Short Strategies Fund | |
| 2. | Absolute Shares Trust | |
| 3. | Adaptive Core ETF, Series of Collaborative Investment Series Trust | |
| 4. | AdvisorShares Trust | |
| 5. | AFA Multi-Manager Credit Fund | |
| 6. | AGF Investments Trust (f/k/a FQF Trust) | |
| 7. | AIM ETF Products Trust | |
| 8. | Alexis Practical Tactical ETF, Series of Listed Funds Trust | |
| 9. | AlphaCentric Prime Meridian Income Fund | |
| 10. | American Century ETF Trust | |
| 11. | American Customer Satisfaction ETF, Series of ETF Series Solutions | |
| 12. | Amplify ETF Trust | |
| 13. | ARK ETF Trust | |
| 14. | ASYMmetric ETFs Trust | |
| 15. | Bluestone Community Development Fund (f/k/a The 504 Fund) | |
| 16. | Braddock Multi-Strategy Income Fund, Series of Investment Managers Series Trust | |
| 17. | Bridgeway Funds, Inc. | |
| 18. | Brinker Capital Destinations Trust | |
| 19. | Brookfield Real Assets Income Fund Inc. | |
| 20. | Cabot Equity Growth ETF, Series of Listed Funds Trust | |
| 21. | Calamos Convertible and High Income Fund | |
| 22. | Calamos Convertible Opportunities and Income Fund |
C-5
| 23. | Calamos Dynamic Convertible and Income Fund | |
| 24. | Calamos Global Dynamic Income Fund | |
| 25. | Calamos Global Total Return Fund | |
| 26. | Calamos Strategic Total Return Fund | |
| 27. | Carlyle Tactical Private Credit Fund | |
| 28. | Center Coast Brookfield MLP & Energy Infrastructure Fund | |
| 29. | Changebridge Capital Long/Short ETF, Series of Listed Funds Trust | |
| 30. | Changebridge Capital Sustainable Equity ETF, Series of Listed Funds Trust | |
| 31. | Cliffwater Corporate Lending Fund | |
| 32. | Cliffwater Enhanced Lending Fund | |
| 33. | Cohen & Steers Infrastructure Fund, Inc. | |
| 34. | CornerCap Group of Funds | |
| 35. | CrossingBridge Pre-Merger SPAC ETF, Series of Trust for Professional Managers | |
| 36. | Davis Fundamental ETF Trust | |
| 37. | Defiance Hotel, Airline, and Cruise ETF, Series of ETF Series Solutions | |
| 38. | Defiance Nasdaq Junior Biotechnology ETF, Series of ETF Series Solutions | |
| 39. | Defiance Next Gen Altered Experience ETF, Series of ETF Series Solutions | |
| 40. | Defiance Next Gen Big Data ETF, Series of ETF Series Solutions | |
| 41. | Defiance Next Gen Connectivity ETF, Series of ETF Series Solutions | |
| 42. | Defiance Next Gen H2 ETF, Series of ETF Series Solutions | |
| 43. | Defiance Next Gen SPAC Derived ETF, Series of ETF Series Solutions | |
| 44. | Defiance Quantum ETF, Series of ETF Series Solutions | |
| 45. | Direxion Shares ETF Trust | |
| 46. | DoubleLine Opportunistic Credit Fund | |
| 47. | Eaton Vance NextShares Trust | |
| 48. | Eaton Vance NextShares Trust II | |
| 49. | EIP Investment Trust | |
| 50. | Ellington Income Opportunities Fund | |
| 51. | EntrepreneurShares Series Trust | |
| 52. | Esoterica Thematic ETF Trust | |
| 53. | ETF Opportunities Trust | |
| 54. | Evanston Alternative Opportunities Fund | |
| 55. | Exchange Listed Funds Trust (f/k/a Exchange Traded Concepts Trust II) | |
| 56. | Fat Tail Risk ETF, Series of Collaborative Investment Series Trust | |
| 57. | Fiera Capital Series Trust | |
| 58. | FlexShares Trust | |
| 59. | FOMO ETF, Series of Collaborative Investment Series Trust | |
| 60. | Forum Funds | |
| 61. | Forum Funds II | |
| 62. | Friess Brandywine Blue Fund, Series of Managed Portfolio Series | |
| 63. | Friess Brandywine Fund, Series of Managed Portfolio Series | |
| 64. | Friess Small Cap Growth Fund, Series of Managed Portfolio Series | |
| 65. | Goose Hollow Tactical Allocation ETF, Series of Collaborative Investment Series Trust | |
| 66. | Guinness Atkinson Funds | |
| 67. | Harbor ETF Trust |
C-6
| 68. | Horizon Kinetics Inflation Beneficiaries ETF, Series of Listed Funds Trust | |
| 69. | Infusive US Trust | |
| 70. | Innovator ETFs® Trust | |
| 71. | Ironwood Institutional Multi-Strategy Fund LLC | |
| 72. | Ironwood Multi-Strategy Fund LLC | |
| 73. | John Hancock Exchange-Traded Fund Trust | |
| 74. | Mairs & Power Funds Trust | |
| 75. | Mairs & Power Minnesota Municipal Bond ETF, Series of Trust for Professional Managers | |
| 76. | Manor Investment Funds | |
| 77. | Mindful Conservative ETF, Series of Collaborative Investment Series Trust | |
| 78. | Moerus Worldwide Value Fund, Series of Northern Lights Fund Trust IV | |
| 79. | Mohr Growth ETF, Series of Collaborative Investment Series Trust | |
| 80. | Morgan Creek - Exos SPAC Originated ETF, Series of Listed Funds Trust | |
| 81. | Morningstar Funds Trust | |
| 82. | OSI ETF Trust | |
| 83. | Overlay Shares Core Bond ETF, Series of Listed Funds Trust | |
| 84. | Overlay Shares Foreign Equity ETF, Series of Listed Funds Trust | |
| 85. | Overlay Shares Hedged Large Cap Equity ETF, Series of Listed Funds Trust | |
| 86. | Overlay Shares Large Cap Equity ETF, Series of Listed Funds Trust | |
| 87. | Overlay Shares Municipal Bond ETF, Series of Listed Funds Trust | |
| 88. | Overlay Shares Short Term Bond ETF, Series of Listed Funds Trust | |
| 89. | Overlay Shares Small Cap Equity ETF, Series of Listed Funds Trust | |
| 90. | Palmer Square Opportunistic Income Fund | |
| 91. | Partners Group Private Income Opportunities, LLC | |
| 92. | PENN Capital Funds Trust | |
| 93. | Performance Trust Mutual Funds, Series of Trust for Professional Managers | |
| 94. | Philotimo Focused Growth and Income Fund, Series of World Funds Trust | |
| 95. | Plan Investment Fund, Inc. | |
| 96. | PMC Funds, Series of Trust for Professional Managers | |
| 97. | Point Bridge GOP Stock Tracker ETF, Series of ETF Series Solutions | |
| 98. | Putnam ETF Trust | |
| 99. | Quaker Investment Trust | |
| 100. | Rareview Dynamic Fixed Income ETF, Series of Collaborative Investment Series Trust | |
| 101. | Rareview Tax Advantaged Income ETF, Series of Collaborative Investment Series Trust | |
| 102. | Renaissance Capital Greenwich Funds | |
| 103. | Revere Sector Opportunity ETF, Series of Collaborative Investment Series Trust | |
| 104. | Reverse Cap Weighted U.S. Large Cap ETF, Series of ETF Series Solutions | |
| 105. | RMB Investors Trust (f/k/a Burnham Investors Trust) | |
| 106. | Robinson Opportunistic Income Fund, Series of Investment Managers Series Trust | |
| 107. | Robinson Tax Advantaged Income Fund, Series of Investment Managers Series Trust | |
| 108. | Roundhill BITKRAFT Esports & Digital Entertainment ETF, Series of Listed Funds Trust |
C-7
| 109. | Roundhill IO Digital Infrastructure ETF, Series of Listed Funds Trust | |
| 110. | Roundhill MVP ETF, Series of Listed Funds Trust | |
| 111. | Roundhill Sports Betting & iGaming ETF, Series of Listed Funds Trust | |
| 112. | Roundhill Streaming Services & Technology ETF, Series of Listed Funds Trust | |
| 113. | Salient MF Trust | |
| 114. | Securian AM Balanced Stabilization Fund, Series of Investment Managers Series Trust | |
| 115. | Securian AM Equity Stabilization Fund, Series of Investment Managers Series Trust | |
| 116. | Securian AM Real Asset Income Fund, Series of Investment Managers Series Trust | |
| 117. | SHP ETF Trust | |
| 118. | Six Circles Trust | |
| 119. | Sound Shore Fund, Inc. | |
| 120. | Spear Alpha ETF, Series of Listed Funds Trust | |
| 121. | Strategy Shares | |
| 122. | Swan Hedged Equity US Large Cap ETF, Series of Listed Funds Trust | |
| 123. | Syntax ETF Trust | |
| 124. | The Active Dividend Stock ETF, Series of Collaborative Investment Series Trust | |
| 125. | The Chartwell Funds | |
| 126. | The Community Development Fund | |
| 127. | The De-SPAC ETF, Series of Collaborative Investment Series Trust | |
| 128. | The Private Shares Fund (f/k/a SharesPost 100 Fund) | |
| 129. | The Short De-SPAC ETF, Series of Collaborative Investment Series Trust | |
| 130. | The SPAC and New Issue ETF, Series of Collaborative Investment Series Trust | |
| 131. | Third Avenue Trust | |
| 132. | Third Avenue Variable Series Trust | |
| 133. | Tidal ETF Trust | |
| 134. | TIFF Investment Program | |
| 135. | Timothy Plan High Dividend Stock Enhanced ETF, Series of The Timothy Plan | |
| 136. | Timothy Plan High Dividend Stock ETF, Series of The Timothy Plan | |
| 137. | Timothy Plan International ETF, Series of The Timothy Plan | |
| 138. | Timothy Plan US Large/Mid Core Enhanced ETF, Series of The Timothy Plan | |
| 139. | Timothy Plan US Large/Mid Cap Core ETF, Series of The Timothy Plan | |
| 140. | Timothy Plan US Small Cap Core ETF, Series of The Timothy Plan | |
| 141. | Transamerica ETF Trust | |
| 142. | Trend Aggregation ESG ETF, Series of Collaborative Investment Series Trust | |
| 143. | TrueShares AI & Deep Learning ETF, Series of Listed Funds Trust | |
| 144. | TrueShares ESG Active Opportunities ETF, Series of Listed Funds Trust | |
| 145. | TrueShares Low Volatility Equity Income ETF, Series of Listed Funds Trust | |
| 146. | TrueShares Structured Outcome (April) ETF, Series of Listed Funds Trust | |
| 147. | TrueShares Structured Outcome (August) ETF, Series of Listed Funds Trust | |
| 148. | TrueShares Structured Outcome (December) ETF, Series of Listed Funds Trust | |
| 149. | TrueShares Structured Outcome (February) ETF, Series of Listed Funds Trust | |
| 150. | TrueShares Structured Outcome (January) ETF, Series of Listed Funds Trust | |
| 151. | TrueShares Structured Outcome (July) ETF, Series of Listed Funds Trust | |
| 152. | TrueShares Structured Outcome (June) ETF, Series of Listed Funds Trust |
C-8
| 153. | TrueShares Structured Outcome (March) ETF, Series of Listed Funds Trust | |
| 154. | TrueShares Structured Outcome (May) ETF, Listed Funds Trust | |
| 155. | TrueShares Structured Outcome (November) ETF, Series of Listed Funds Trust | |
| 156. | TrueShares Structured Outcome (October) ETF, Series of Listed Funds Trust | |
| 157. | TrueShares Structured Outcome (September) ETF, Series of Listed Funds Trust | |
| 158. | Tuttle Capital Short Innovation ETF, Series of Collaborative Investment Series Trust | |
| 159. | U.S. Global Investors Funds | |
| 160. | Variant Alternative Income Fund | |
| 161. | VictoryShares Developed Enhanced Volatility Wtd ETF, Series of Victory Portfolios II | |
| 162. | VictoryShares Dividend Accelerator ETF, Series of Victory Portfolios II | |
| 163. | VictoryShares Emerging Market High Div Volatility Wtd ETF, Series of Victory Portfolios II | |
| 164. | VictoryShares International High Div Volatility Wtd ETF, Series of Victory Portfolios II | |
| 165. | VictoryShares International Volatility Wtd ETF, Series of Victory Portfolios II | |
| 166. | VictoryShares NASDAQ Next 50 ETF, Series of Victory Portfolios II | |
| 167. | VictoryShares Protect America ETF, Series of Victory Portfolios II | |
| 168. | VictoryShares Top Veteran Employers ETF, Series of Victory Portfolios II | |
| 169. | VictoryShares US 500 Enhanced Volatility Wtd ETF, Series of Victory Portfolios II | |
| 170. | VictoryShares US 500 Volatility Wtd ETF, Series of Victory Portfolios II | |
| 171. | VictoryShares US Discovery Enhanced Volatility Wtd ETF, Series of Victory Portfolios II | |
| 172. | VictoryShares US EQ Income Enhanced Volatility Wtd ETF, Series of Victory Portfolios II | |
| 173. | VictoryShares US Large Cap High Div Volatility Wtd ETF, Series of Victory Portfolios II | |
| 174. | VictoryShares US Multi-Factor Minimum Volatility ETF, Series of Victory Portfolios II | |
| 175. | VictoryShares US Small Cap High Div Volatility Wtd ETF, Series of Victory Portfolios II | |
| 176. | VictoryShares US Small Cap Volatility Wtd ETF, Series of Victory Portfolios II | |
| 177. | VictoryShares USAA Core Intermediate-Term Bond ETF, Series of Victory Portfolios II | |
| 178. | VictoryShares USAA Core Short-Term Bond ETF, Series of Victory Portfolios II | |
| 179. | VictoryShares USAA MSCI Emerging Markets Value Momentum ETF, Series of Victory Portfolios II | |
| 180. | VictoryShares USAA MSCI International Value Momentum ETF, Series of Victory Portfolios II | |
| 181. | VictoryShares USAA MSCI USA Small Cap Value Momentum ETF, Series of Victory Portfolios II | |
| 182. | VictoryShares USAA MSCI USA Value Momentum ETF, Series of Victory Portfolios II | |
| 183. | West Loop Realty Fund, Series of Investment Managers Series Trust (f/k/a Chilton Realty Income & Growth Fund) | |
| 184. | WisdomTree Trust | |
| 185. | WST Investment Trust | |
| 186. | XAI Octagon Floating Rate & Alternative Income Term Trust |
C-9
(b) The following are the Officers and Manager of the Distributor, the Registrant's underwriter. The Distributor's main business address is Three Canal Plaza, Suite 100, Portland, Maine 04101.
| Name | Address | Position with Underwriter | Position with Registrant |
| Richard J. Berthy | Three Canal Plaza, Suite 100, Portland, ME 04101 |
President, Treasurer and Manager |
None |
| Mark A. Fairbanks |
Three Canal Plaza, Suite 100, Portland, ME 04101 |
Vice President | None |
| Teresa Cowan |
111 E. Kilbourn Ave, Suite 2200, Milwaukee, WI 53202 |
Vice President | None |
| Jennifer K. DiValerio |
899 Cassatt Road, 400 Berwyn Park, Suite 110, Berwyn, PA 19312 |
Vice President | None |
| Nanette K. Chern | Three Canal Plaza, Suite 100, Portland, ME 04101 |
Vice President and Chief Compliance Officer |
None |
| Kelly Whetstone | Three Canal Plaza, Suite 100, Portland, ME 04101 | Secretary | None |
(c) Not Applicable
| Item 33. | Location of Accounts and Records |
All accounts, books and other documents required to be maintained by Section 31(a) of 15 U.S.C. 80a-3-(a) and rules under that section, are maintained by U.S. Bank Fund Services, LLC and U.S. Bank, N.A., with the exception of those maintained by the Registrant's investment adviser, Innovator Capital Management, LLC, 200 W. Front Street, Wheaton, Illinois 60187.
U.S. Bank Fund Services, LLC and U.S. Bank, N.A. provide general administrative, accounting, portfolio valuation, and custodian services, respectively, to the Registrant, including the coordination and monitoring of any third-party service providers and maintain all such records relating to these services.
| Item 34. | Management Services |
Not Applicable
| Item 35. | Undertakings |
Not Applicable
C-10
Signatures
Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Act of 1933, as amended and the Investment Company Act of 1940, as amended, the Registrant has duly caused this Registration Statement to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned, duly authorized, in the City of Wheaton, and State of Illinois, on November 22, 2024.
| Innovator ETFs®Trust | ||
| By: | /s/ H. Bruce Bond | |
| H. Bruce Bond | ||
| President |
Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Act, this Registration Statement has been signed below by the following persons in the capacities and on the date indicated:
| Signature | Title | Date | |||
| /s/ H. Bruce Bond | Chief Executive Officer, | November 22, 2024 | |||
| H. Bruce Bond | President and Trustee | ||||
| /s/ Kathy Meyer | Vice President, Treasurer and | November 22, 2024 | |||
| Kathy Meyer | Principal Financial Accounting Officer | ||||
| Mark Berg* |
) Trustee) |
||||
| ) | |||||
| By: | /s/ H. Bruce Bond | ||||
| Joe Stowell* |
) Trustee) |
H. Bruce Bond Attorney-In-Fact |
|||
| ) | November 22, 2024 | ||||
| Brian J. Wildman* |
) Trustee) |
||||
| ) |
| * | An original power of attorney authorizing H. Bruce Bond to execute this Registration Statement, and amendments thereto, for each of the trustees of the Registrant on whose behalf this Registration Statement is filed, were previously executed, filed as an exhibit and are incorporated by reference herein. |
C-11
Index to Exhibits
| (i) | Form of opinion and consent of Chapman and Cutler LLP |
C-12